· Private foundation
Rabinowitz Charitable Foundation
Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2024.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2024
- Under $10k20 grants · $55k
- $10k–50k5 grants · $54k
- $250k+1 grant · $550k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| ALZHEIMER'S FOUNDATION OF AMERICA | $550,000 |
| PINK AID | $12,500 |
| SUNRISE ASSOCIATION | $11,400 |
| ALI FORNEY CENTER | $10,000 |
| STAMFORD HOSPITAL | $10,000 |
| GUITARS OVER GUNS | $10,000 |
| THE CHILDRENS HOSPITAL AT MONTEFIORE | $8,536 |
| CHRIST CHURCH SCHOOL | $5,000 |
| FILLING IN THE BLANKS | $5,000 |
| BROTHERS FOR LIFE | $5,000 |
| STANDWITHUS | $5,000 |
| ABILIS | $4,000 |
| WESTPORT UNIFORMED FIREFIGHTERS CHARITABLE FOUNDATION | $3,220 |
| THE SOUTHPORT SCHOOL | $2,500 |
| JEWISH INSTITUTE FOR NATIONAL SECURITY OF AMERICA | $2,500 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY17–24, $580k) land where the poverty rate runs at 6%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 1% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Your grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +29% since the first grant, against +2% for the ones you funded once.
41 repeat relationships — 14 still active in FY2024, 27 since wound down; 12 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 91% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $56k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- AFALZHEIMER'S FOUNDATION OF AMERICA INC2× · 2022–2024 · $700k · revenue +12%
- SDSUNRISE DAY CAMPS ASSOCIATION INC8× · 2017–2024 · $507k · revenue +38%
- TBTHE BROOKLYN COLLEGE FOUNDATION INC5× · 2018–2023 · $225k · revenue +69%
Funded once
- UOUniversity of Miamigraduatedone grant, 2017 · $100k · revenue +96%
FRIENDS OF THE ISRAEL DEFENSE FORCESone grant, 2023 · $60k · revenue -33%- MHMJR HOLDINGS TRUSTone grant, 2018 · $50k
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
The samuel waxman cancer research foundation (the "foundation") funds innovative research to bring faster cures to patients. in addition to supporting ongoing collaborative research in specific cancers, our scientists are investigating the…
The mission of the institute is to translate basic genetic and molecular mechanisms of schizophrenia and related developmental brain disorders into clinical advances that change the lives of affected individuals. it is catalyzing a new…
The american friends of beit issie shapiro (afobis) is a national not for profit fundraising organization with regional offices in new york city, north miami beach, fl and los angeles, ca. afobis is dedicated to supporting beit issie…
To support cancer research in israel, for the benefit of israel and all mankind.
Brief description of the organization's mission the purpose of the fund is to provide assistance to the families of new york city police officers and firefighters who have been killed in the line of duty. after the events of september 11,…
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Wounded Warrior Project Inc and the most unlike its peers is The Maxim Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.
Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.
Your grantees are a median of 24 years old; the field is 18. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 19% startups (under 5 years old) — 6% of your grantees by number, and just 2% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 3% lost their exemption, against 10% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
68 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 68 of the 113 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds ALZHEIMER'S FOUNDATION OF AMERICA INC ↗
- Who funds SUNRISE DAY CAMPS ASSOCIATION INC ↗
- Who funds THE BROOKLYN COLLEGE FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds THE MIAMI FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds University of Miami ↗
- Who funds Central Fund of Israel ↗
- Who funds FRIENDS OF THE ISRAEL DEFENSE FORCES ↗
- Who funds MIKEY'S WAY FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds FISHER ISLAND DAY SCHOOL INC ↗
- Who funds 4 PAWS FOR ABILITY INC ↗
- Who funds MONTEFIORE MEDICAL CENTER ↗
- Who funds Soundview Empowerment Alliance Inc ↗
- Who funds MARCUM FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds AMERICAN FRIENDS OF LIBI INC ↗
- Who funds FISHER ISLAND PHILANTHROPIC FUND INC ↗
- Who funds KESHET ↗
- Who funds SUNFLOWER NETWORK CORPORATION ↗
- Who funds ALI FORNEY CENTER INC ↗
- Who funds FILLING IN THE BLANKS INC ↗
- Who funds PEF ISRAEL ENDOWMENT FUNDS INC ↗
- Who funds PINE HOLLOW CHARITY FUND ↗
- Who funds PINK AID INC ↗
- Who funds WESTPORT UNIFORMED FIREFIGHTERS CHARITABLE FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds SUMMER SEARCH ↗
- Who funds AMERICAN CHARITY SUPPORT FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds GUITARS OVER GUNS ORGANIZATION INC ↗
- Who funds ONE FAMILY FUND ↗
- Who funds The Stamford Hospital ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Fairfield County's Community Foundation Inc · Jewish Communal Fund · United Way Miami Inc · The Goldman Sachs Charitable Gift Fund · The Chicago Community Trust · Verizon Foundation · The Pfizer Foundation Inc · National Philanthropic Trust · Jpmorgan Chase Foundation · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · The Blackbaud Giving Fund
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Rabinowitz Charitable Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal, a single department, or state — and drag the year to watch it move.
- Abilis Inc — 74% of income from government
- Boys & Girls Club of Stamford Inc — 17% of income from government
- Domestic Violence Crisis Center — 10% of income from government
- University of Miami — 5% of income from government
- Guitars Over Guns Organization Inc — 1% of income from government
- The Stamford Hospital — 0% of income from government
- Wounded Warrior Project Inc — 0% of income from government
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus
How do I get to Rabinowitz Charitable Foundation?
Find your warmest path to Rabinowitz Charitable Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.
Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.