Skip to content

· Private foundation

R O W Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$3.9M
Granted FY2024still arriving
36
Grants FY2024still arriving
12
States reached
$2.4M
Largest
01What it funds
0199% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Health$20MInternational$5.2MHuman Services$7kEducation$1kOther$0
02FY2024 · 36 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k26 grants · $82k
  • $10k–50k7 grants · $165k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $57k
  • $250k+2 grants · $3.6M
$4,008
Median grant
12
States reached
$27k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
DIRECT RELIEF$2,381,400
Individual grant recipient$1,173,112
HOSPITAL PROVINCIAL GENERAL DE REFERENCE DE BUKAVU$57,180
UNIVERSITY TEACHING HOSPITAL$36,904
HEALEY INTERNATIONAL RELIEF FOUNDATION$29,960
WEST ATLANTIC BRAIN & STROKE FOUNDATION$28,152
RWANDA PEDIATRIC ASSOCIATION$25,000
MAP INTERNATIONAL$16,704
PRETOLA GLOBAL HEALTH AND CONSULTING$15,000
QUEEN ELIZABETH HOSPITAL$13,020
RACHAEL K FOUNDATION$9,708
CARE EPILEPSY ETHIOPIA$7,632
MASSACHUSETTS GENERAL HOSPITAL$6,950
ARABKIR UNITED CHILDREN'S CHARITY FOUNDATION$6,684
SAVE HAVEN COMMUNITY SERVICES$5,700
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–22, $7k) land where the poverty rate runs at 17%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 84% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%AFYA FOUNDATION: $1k → 9%Children's Hope: $6k → 18%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

IL
MI
NY
MA
IA
PA
NJ
CT
CA
CO
MD
TN
NC
AL
GA
TX
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

31%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$8.2M · 42 repeat orgs$18M to everyone else

42 repeat relationships: 30 still active in FY2024, 12 since wound down; 6 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

42
31

Total granted

$8.2M
$18M

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+28%
+44%

Still filing today

19%
13%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 99% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $27k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’19’20’21’22’23’24
InternationalHealthHuman ServicesPhilanthropyEducationOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • DIRECT RELIEF
    2× · 2023–2024 · $2.4M · revenue +6%
  • AMERICARES FOUNDATION INC
    3× · 2020–2023 · $878k · revenue +28%
  • HI
    HEALEY INTERNATIONAL RELIEF FOUNDATION INC
    4× · 2021–2024 · $81k · revenue +30%

Funded once

  • CP
    Cuatro por Venezuela
    one grant, 2020 · $16M
  • G
    Grants
    one grant, 2019 · $616k
  • DR
    Direct Relief
    one grant, 2020 · $569k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Adventist Health International

Enable, empower, and strengthen the multi-faceted health ministry and mission of the Seventh-day Adventist Church throughout the world.

International
2
Hope International

Provide free medical assistance to poor people in 3rd world countries

International
3
Medical Aid to Haiti Inc

We help haitians heal haitians with a commitment to serving the poor and creating a reliable, consistent and sustainable healthcare system in haiti.

Health
4
Doctors for You International Co Vistex

To provide sustainable, equitable and effecient health care services to the most vulnerable individuals and communities around the world.

Health
5
Comprehensive Disaster Relief

To permanently improve the health status of communities around the world by providing sustainable and affordable quality healthcare and disaster relief services and social welfare projects

Public Safety & Disaster
6
Project Hope - the People-to-People Health Foundation Inc

To conduct and support programs and activities aimed at solving some of the world's greatest public health challenges, with a specific focus on enabling health workers to have the greatest possible impact on the health of the people they…

International
7
Health Missions International Inc

To provide free healthcare services

International
8
MedGlobal Inc

MedGlobal is a humanitarian non-governmental organization working to serve vulnerable communities around the world by providing innovative, free, and sustainable healthcare. Our health services support refugees, displaced persons, and…

Health
9
International Health Services Foundation
Health
10
Innovating Health International Inc

Innovating health international (ihi) is a non-profit dedicated to treating chronic diseases and addressing women's health issues in haiti and malawi. what we do- working with local partners, we aim to increase access to treatment and…

—
11
International Relief Teams

International relief teams is a non-profit international relief and development organization dedicated to allieviating human suffering by providing critical assistance to victims of disaster, profound poverty and neglect worldwide

International
12
Hospital De La Familia Foundation

Delivering life changing care in rural Guatemala through a regional eye center, general medical and surgical care, maternal health and child nutrition programs.

International
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Map International Inc; the most unlike its peers is Cuatro Por Venezuela. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

17 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 17 of the 80 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
16/17
Grantees still filing
15/17
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

Cuatro por Venezuela: $16,078,564 · OtherCuatro por VenezuelaCUATRO POR VENEZUELA: $1,701,300 · OtherCUATRO POR VENEZUELAIndividual grant recipient: $1,447,888 · OtherIndividual grant recipient+62 more: $3,442,792 · Other+62 moreDIRECT RELIEF: $2,390,040 · InternationalDIRECT RELIEFAMERICARES FOUNDATION INC: $877,795 · InternationalAMERICARES FOU…+6 more: $128,132 · InternationalHEALEY INTERNATIONAL RELIEF FOUNDATION INC: $81,253 · PhilanthropyDANNY DID FOUNDATION: $6,935 · HealthSOLIDARITY BRIDGE INC: $2,471 · HealthEPILEPSY ALLIANCE NORTH CAROLINA: $432 · HealthCHILDREN'S HOPE: $5,616 · Human ServicesTHE AFYA FOUNDATION OF AMERICA INC: $1,049 · Human ServicesCTC INTERNATIONAL INC: $1,056 · Education
Other$22,670,544International$3,395,967Philanthropy$81,253Health$9,838Human Services$6,665Education$1,056

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetDIRECT RELIEF: $2,390,040 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetCUATRO POR VENEZUELA: $1,701,300 over 2y, 96% of budgetAMERICARES FOUNDATION INC: $877,795 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetHEALEY INTERNATIONAL RELIEF FOUNDATION INC: $81,253 over 4y, 0.2% of budgetBROTHER'S BROTHER FOUNDATION: $50,400 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetTHE ROTARY FOUNDATION OF ROTARY INTERNATIONAL: $30,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCURE INTERNATIONAL INC: $21,144 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetMAP International Inc: $16,704 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetDANNY DID FOUNDATION: $6,935 over 3y, 0.4% of budgetGUIDING LIGHT ORPHANS INC: $6,500 over 3y, 5.6% of budgetCHILDREN'S HOPE: $5,616 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetSALVADORAN AMERICAN HUMANITARIAN FOUNDATION INC: $3,384 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSOLIDARITY BRIDGE INC: $2,471 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetLOMA LINDA UNIVERSITY HEALTH: $2,160 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCTC INTERNATIONAL INC: $1,056 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetTHE AFYA FOUNDATION OF AMERICA INC: $1,049 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetEPILEPSY ALLIANCE NORTH CAROLINA: $432 over 1y, 0.3% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds DIRECT RELIEF ↗
  • Who funds CUATRO POR VENEZUELA ↗
  • Who funds AMERICARES FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds HEALEY INTERNATIONAL RELIEF FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds BROTHER'S BROTHER FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds THE ROTARY FOUNDATION OF ROTARY INTERNATIONAL ↗
  • Who funds CURE INTERNATIONAL INC ↗
  • Who funds MAP International Inc ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Bank of America Charitable Foundation IncNC8.2× affinity6 shared granteesties to 6 of 6Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · Paypal Charitable Giving Fund · Network for Good · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization R O W Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from R O W Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%6%25%56%100%funder's share of their income ↑0%5%10%15%20%share of the org’s income from government →median 0%
  • Salvadoran American Humanitarian Foundation Inc: 0% of income from government
  • Americares Foundation Inc: 0% of income from government
  • Healey International Relief Foundation Inc: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
0get no government money at all
2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–20%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to R O W Foundation?

Find your warmest path to R O W Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 80 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on R O W’s filings →

More from the funding graph