Skip to content
Quint Family Foundation Inc at a glance

· Private foundation

Quint Family Foundation Inc

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$585k
Granted FY2025still arriving
19
Grants FY2025still arriving
6
States reached
$50k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
05Through PlinthRead
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2020 to 2025.

Animals$960kEducation$241kHealth$209kPhilanthropy$105kArts & Culture$100kFood & Nutrition$70kYouth Development$70kEnvironment$50kOther$0
02FY2025 · 19 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • $10k–50k13 grants · $285k
  • $50k–250k6 grants · $300k
$25,000
Median grant
6
States reached
$5.4M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
PAWS 4 YOU RESCUE INC$50,000
THIS IS THE DOG INC$50,000
MIAMI VETERINARY FOUNDATION INC$50,000
THE HUMANE LEAGUE$50,000
FRIENDS OF MALIBU URGENT CARE CENTER$50,000
MERCY FOR ANIMALS$50,000
TRUSTEES OF COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY IN THE CITY OF NEW YORK - BO SHEN FUND$45,000
THRIVE PHILANTHROPY$35,000
CEDARS HOME FOR CHILDREN FOUNDATION INC$35,000
FARM SANCTUARY INC$25,000
GRID ALTERNATIVES AFFILIATES AND SUBSIDIARIES$25,000
THE CAT NETWORK INC$20,000
SOCIALLY RESPONSIBLE AGRICULTURE PROJECT INC$20,000
HEALTHCARE FOR HOMELESS ANIMALS$15,000
FOXY AND THE HOUNDS$15,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY21–25, $73k) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 99% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%CEDARS HOME FOR CHILDREN FOUNDATION INC: $35k → 13%CHALLENGED ATHLETES FOUNDATION: $500 → 11%CEDARS HOME FOR CHILDREN FOUNDATION INC: $35k → 13%JEWISH COMMUNITY SERVICES: $1k → 15%JEWISH COMMUNITY SERVICES: $1k → 15%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

ME
NY
OR
CA
NE
MD
DE
TX
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
04

Where the work is directed

The same grants placed two ways: where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose sends the money.

About 14% of Quint Family Foundation Inc’s grant dollars are earmarked for a different county than the recipient’s own address.

Quint Family Foundation Inclessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient address
How this is measured
Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the funder’s own 990 grant descriptions.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

89%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$1.4M · 19 repeat orgs$179k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +18% since the first grant, against -3% for those funded once.

19 repeat relationships: 13 still active in FY2025, 6 since wound down; 4 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

19
10

Total granted

$1.4M
$79k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+18%
-3%

Still filing today

95%
60%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 81% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $100k went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’21’22’23’24’25
AnimalsHealthHuman ServicesEducationEnvironmentArts & CultureOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • TH
    THE HUMANE LEAGUE
    6× · 2020–2025 · $165k · revenue +43%
  • MF
    MERCY FOR ANIMALS INC
    6× · 2020–2025 · $135k · revenue +86%
  • FS
    FARM SANCTUARY INC
    6× · 2020–2025 · $115k · revenue +18%

Funded once

  • CE
    CLIMATE EMERGENCY FUND
    one grant, 2022 · $25k · revenue -7%
  • A(
    AFMDA (MAGEN DAVID ADOM)
    one grant, 2023 · $10k
  • SS
    SYNAGOGUE SECURITY INITIATIVE
    one grant, 2022 · $10k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Animal Outlook Inc

Animal outlook is a national animal protection organization working to end the abuse of farmed animals using a variety of strategies, including investigations, legal advocacy, corporate and food system reform, and vegan outreach.

Animals
2
Animal Agriculture Alliance

The animal agriculture alliance is a nonprofit organization that helps bridge the communication gap between farm and fork. we connect food industry stakeholders, engage food chain influencers and promote consumer choice by helping key…

Food & Nutrition
3
United Animal Nations Dba Redrover

To bring animals out of crisis and strengthen the bond between people and animals through emergency sheltering, disaster relief services, financial assistance and education. redrover accomplishes its mission by engaging volunteers and…

—
4
Animal Care Sanctuary

Animal care sanctuary's lifesaving mission as a no kill organization envisions a community that promotes turning compassion into action for companion animals by: 1.) adopting healthy pet companions into loving homes. 2.) promoting the…

Animals
5
Friends for Animals of Metro Detroit

The friends are dedicated to the rescue, protection, and adoption of companion animals in need while inspiring the human-animal bond. we meet our mission by:-saving 100% of healthy and treatable animals.-providing high-quality animal care…

Animals
6
Michigan Humane Society

To improve and save lives through compassionate care, community engagement and advocacy for animals.

Animals
7
Animal Care and Control of New York City Inc

Animal care centers of nyc's (acc) mission is to end animal homelessness in nyc.

Animals
8
Marin Humane Society

Marin humane transforms lives through exceptional animal care, humane education, and advocacy. every day, marin humane inspires compassion and positive relationships between people and animals.

Animals
9
Animal Equality

Animal equality is an international organization working with society, governments, and companies to end cruelty to farmed animals.

Animals
10
Global Animal Partnership
Animals
11
All About Animals Rescue

All about animals rescue's mission is no more homeless pets.

Animals
12
Better Food Foundation Inc

To promote dietary changes to build a healthy, equitable, humane, and environmentally-sustainable food system.

Food & Nutrition
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Mercy for Animals Inc; the most unlike its peers is This Is the Dog Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
05the grantee network

30 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2026.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2026, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 30 of the 35 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

2
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
5
Early backer (in before they grew)
30/30
Grantees still filing
20/30
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

THE HUMANE LEAGUE: $165,000 · AnimalsTHE HUMANE LEAGUEMERCY FOR ANIMALS INC: $135,000 · AnimalsMERCY FOR ANIMALS INCPAWS 4 YOU RESCUE INC: $120,000 · AnimalsPAWS 4 YOU RESCUE INCFARM SANCTUARY INC: $115,000 · AnimalsFARM SANCTUARY INCTHIS IS THE DOG INC: $80,000 · AnimalsTHIS IS THE DOG INCTHE CAT NETWORK INC: $70,000 · AnimalsTHE CAT NETWORK INCHEALTHCARE FOR HOMELESS ANIMALS: $65,000 · AnimalsHEALTHCARE FOR HOMELESS ANIMALSFRIENDS OF HOMELESS ANIMALS OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA: $50,000 · AnimalsFRIENDS OF HOMELESS ANIMALS OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIAFOXY AND THE HOUNDS: $35,000 · AnimalsTHE TRUSTEES OF COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY IN THE CITY OF NEW YORK: $225,000 · EducationTHE TRUSTEES O…Teach for America Inc: $10,000 · Education+1 more: $6,000 · EducationMIAMI VETERINARY FOUNDATION INC: $115,000 · OtherMIAMI VETERINARY FOUNDATI…BAPTIST HEALTH FOUNDATION: $75,550 · OtherBAPTIST HEALTH FOUNDATIONSOCIALLY RESPONSIBLE AGRICULTURE PROJECT INC: $70,000 · OtherSOCIALLY RESPONSIBLE AGRI…THRIVE PHILANTHROPY INCORPORATED: $60,000 · OtherTHRIVE PHILANTHROPY INCOR…GRID ALTERNATIVES AFFILIATES & SUBSIDIARIES: $25,000 · OtherGRID ALTERNATIVES AFFILIA…CLIMATE EMERGENCY FUND: $25,000 · OtherCLIMATE EMERGENCY FUND+5 more: $35,500 · Other+5 moreFRIENDS OF MALIBU URGENT CARE CENTER: $50,000 · HealthIMMUNE DEFICIENCY FOUNDATION: $20,000 · HealthBaptist Health South Florida Foundation Inc: $15,000 · HealthTHE CALIFORNIA WILDLIFE CENTER: $10,000 · HealthPLANNED PARENTHOOD FEDERATION OF AMERICA INC: $5,000 · Health+1 more: $2,500 · HealthADRIENNE ARSHT CENTER TRUST INC: $100,000 · Arts & CultureGREATER MIAMI JEWISH FEDERATION INC: $44,500 · PhilanthropyANGIOSARCOMA AWARENESS INC: $30,000 · PhilanthropyTHE CEDARS HOME FOR CHILDREN FOUNDATION: $70,000 · Human Services+2 more: $2,900 · Human Services
Animals$835,000Education$241,000Other$406,050Health$102,500Arts & Culture$100,000Philanthropy$74,500Human Services$72,900

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetTHE TRUSTEES OF COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY IN THE CITY OF NEW YORK: $225,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetTHE HUMANE LEAGUE: $165,000 over 6y, 0.2% of budgetMERCY FOR ANIMALS INC: $135,000 over 6y, 0.2% of budgetPAWS 4 YOU RESCUE INC: $120,000 over 6y, 2.3% of budgetFARM SANCTUARY INC: $115,000 over 6y, 0.2% of budgetMIAMI VETERINARY FOUNDATION INC: $115,000 over 5y, 6.3% of budgetADRIENNE ARSHT CENTER TRUST INC: $100,000 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetTHIS IS THE DOG INC: $80,000 over 4y, 19% of budgetTHE CEDARS HOME FOR CHILDREN FOUNDATION: $70,000 over 2y, 0.7% of budgetTHE CAT NETWORK INC: $70,000 over 6y, 4.1% of budgetSOCIALLY RESPONSIBLE AGRICULTURE PROJECT INC: $70,000 over 4y, 0.7% of budgetHEALTHCARE FOR HOMELESS ANIMALS: $65,000 over 6y, 5.2% of budgetTHRIVE PHILANTHROPY INCORPORATED: $60,000 over 2y, 3.3% of budgetFRIENDS OF MALIBU URGENT CARE CENTER: $50,000 over 1y, 3.5% of budgetFRIENDS OF HOMELESS ANIMALS OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA: $50,000 over 6y, 75% of budgetGREATER MIAMI JEWISH FEDERATION INC: $44,500 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetFOXY AND THE HOUNDS: $35,000 over 3y, 5.4% of budgetANGIOSARCOMA AWARENESS INC: $30,000 over 2y, 25% of budgetCLIMATE EMERGENCY FUND: $25,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetIMMUNE DEFICIENCY FOUNDATION: $20,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetBaptist Health South Florida Foundation Inc: $15,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE CALIFORNIA WILDLIFE CENTER: $10,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetTeach for America Inc: $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE BREAKTHROUGH COLLABORATIVE: $6,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetPLANNED PARENTHOOD FEDERATION OF AMERICA INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetDIABETES RESEARCH INSTITUTE FOUNDATION INC: $2,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetJEWISH COMMUNITY SERVICES OF SOUTH FLORIDA INC: $2,400 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetCHALLENGED ATHLETES INC: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Assurant FoundationMightycause Charitabl…The Batchelor Foundat…Morgan Stanley Global…AbbVie FoundationJpmorgan Chase Founda…Paypal Charitable Giv…Network for GoodAmerican Online Givin…The Bank of America C…American Endowment Fo…National Philanthropi…
Assurant FoundationGA18.1× affinity7 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Assurant Foundation · Mightycause Charitable Foundation · The Batchelor Foundation Inc · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · AbbVie Foundation · Jpmorgan Chase Foundation · Paypal Charitable Giving Fund · Network for Good · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · American Endowment Foundation · National Philanthropic Trust

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Quint Family Foundation Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Quint Family Foundation Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 70%5%19%42%75%funder's share of their income ↑0%13%25%38%50%share of the org’s income from government →median 1%
  • Jewish Community Services of South Florida Inc: 1% of income from government
  • Adrienne Arsht Center Trust Inc: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
7get no government money at all
5report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–50%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Quint Family Foundation Inc?

Find your warmest path to Quint Family Foundation Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 35 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Quint Family’s filings →

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The endowment market
who holds foundation money, and what just moved
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home