Skip to content

· Private foundation

Quesenbery Educational Tr

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$300k
Granted FY2024still arriving
9
Grants FY2024still arriving
6
States reached
$200k
Largest

Read this first · the figures below need context

75% of Quesenbery Educational Tr’s FY2024 grant dollars went to Hillsdale College, not to grantees.

Its money now reaches organizations through that sponsor, which does not report who recommended each grant. FY2024 names 6 organizations directly, so a portfolio cannot be read from it.

Organizations named directly on the return

6
’17
11
’18
8
’19
8
’20
2
’21
6
’22
5
’23
6
’24

Amber years are those where most dollars went to a sponsor.

01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Education$1.5MPublic Benefit$235kArts & Culture$120kReligion$100kHuman Services$55kYouth Development$50kCommunity Improvement$45kCivil Rights$45k
02FY2024 · 9 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k3 grants · $15k
  • $10k–50k5 grants · $85k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $200k
$15,000
Median grant
6
States reached
$5.1M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
HILLSDALE COLLEGE$200,000
THE LEADERSHIP INSTITUTE$25,000
UNREPORTED STORY SOCIETY$20,000
CONVENTION OF STATES FOUNDATION$15,000
THE TORCH OF FREEDOM FOUNDATION$15,000
TULSA YOUTHWORKS$10,000
JOHN 3 16 MISSION$5,000
PRAGER UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION$5,000
EDCHOICE$5,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–24, $50k) land where the poverty rate runs at 15%, against an area that typically sits at 12%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 12%JOHN 3 16 MISSION: $5k → 14%THE ASSISTANCE LEAGUE OF TULSA: $10k → 15%THE ASSISTANCE LEAGUE OF TULSA: $10k → 15%THE ASSISTANCE LEAGUE OF TULSA: $5k → 15%TULSA CORNERSTONE ASSISTANCE NETWORK: $15k → 15%TULSA CORNERSTONE ASSISTANCE NETWORK: $5k → 15%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

MI
IN
CA
VA
KS
DC
OK
TX
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

78%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$766k · 16 repeat orgs$216k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +19% since the first grant, against +10% for those funded once.

16 repeat relationships: 4 still active in FY2024, 12 since wound down; 3 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

16
10

Total granted

$766k
$191k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+19%
+10%

Still filing today

63%
30%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 67% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $25k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
EducationHuman ServicesCivil RightsArts & CulturePublic Safety & DisasterPublic BenefitOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • US
    Unreported Story Society
    6× · 2019–2024 · $120k · revenue +61%
  • TR
    THE RONALD REAGAN PRESIDENTIAL FOUNDATION AND INSTITUTE
    5× · 2018–2023 · $70k · revenue +2%
  • CF
    CENTER FOR URBAN RENEWAL & EDUCATION
    5× · 2017–2022 · $45k · revenue +19%

Funded once

  • KC
    KIRK CROSSING INC
    one grant, 2023 · $100k
  • SC
    SOUTH COUNTY EVANGELICAL PRESBYTERIAN CHURCH INC
    one grant, 2019 · $45k
  • AF
    AMERICAN FEDERATION FOR CHILDREN GROWTH FUND INC
    one grant, 2018 · $13k · revenue +10%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
American Enterprise Institute for Public Policy Research

The american enterprise institute is a community of scholars and supporters committed to expanding liberty, increasing individual opportunity, and strengthening free enterprise. aei pursues these ideals through independent thinking and the…

Social Science
2
Competitive Enterprise Institute

Competitive enterprise institute (cei) is a non-profit public policy organization dedicated to the principles of free enterprise and limited government. we believe that consumers are best helped not by government regulation but by being…

—
3
Peter G Peterson Institute for International Economics

The peterson institute for international economics (piie) is an independent nonprofit, nonpartisan research organization dedicated to strengthening prosperity and human welfare in the global economy through expert analysis and practical…

Social Science
4
Partnership for Public Service Inc

Making our government work better is a daunting task, and we are a small organization seeking to transform a government that employs millions of civilians and manages trillions of dollars in taxpayer revenue needed to protect public…

Employment
5
Augustana College

Rooted in the liberal arts & sciences & lutheran expression of the christian faith, & is committed to offering a challenging education that develops qualities of mind, spirit, & body necessary for a rewarding life of leadership & service…

Education
6
Oklahoma City University

Inspired by a culture of creativity, Oklahoma City University fosters an immersive, personalized experience that welcomes and prepares students to pursue boundless opportunities.

Education
7
Open Markets Institute

The open markets institute works to help people relearn how to use competition policy to build stronger democracies, more just and equitable societies, more innovative and sustainable economies, and a more secure and peaceful world.

Education
8
R Street Institute

The r street institute is a nonprofit, nonpartisan, public-policy research organization ("think tank"). our mission is to engage in policy research and outreach to promote free markets and limited, effective government. (continued on…

Education
9
Public Knowledge

Public knowledge promotes freedom of expression, an open internet, and access to affordable communications tools and creative works. we work to shape policy on behalf of the public interest.

Public Benefit
10
The Roosevelt Institute

To create a nation where everyone enjoys a fair share of our collective prosperity.

Education
11
Open Campus Media Inc

Higher education shapes the future of every community in america-determining who moves up the economic ladder, where good jobs develop, and how regions prosper. this promise depends on the public's ability to see and understand how their…

Arts & Culture
12
Evangel University

Evangel is a comprehensive christian university that is committed to excellence in educating and equipping students to become spirit empowered servants of god who will impact the church and society globally.

Education
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is The Heritage Foundation; the most unlike its peers is Unreported Story Society. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

19 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 19 of the 31 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
3
Early backer (in before they grew)
18/19
Grantees still filing
13/19
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

HILLSDALE COLLEGE: $1,065,000 · EducationHILLSDALE COLLEGETHE RONALD REAGAN PRESIDENTIAL FOUNDATION AND INSTITUTE: $70,000 · EducationTHE RONALD REAGAN PRESIDENTIAL FOUNDATION AND INSTITUTE+5 more: $96,500 · Education+5 moreIndividual grant recipient: $137,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipien…KIRK CROSSING INC: $100,000 · OtherKIRK CROSSING INCCOLLEGIATE HALL - COLLEGE PREP CHARTER SCHOOL: $50,000 · OtherCOLLEGIATE HALL - COLLEGE…TULSA YOUTH WORKS: $50,000 · OtherTULSA YOUTH WORKSSOUTH COUNTY EVANGELICAL PRESBYTERIAN CHURCH INC: $45,000 · OtherSOUTH COUNTY EVANGELICAL …COS FOUNDATION CO TOM COBURN LEGACY FUND FOR CONST EDUCATION: $40,000 · OtherCOS FOUNDATION CO TOM COB…TULSA HOPE ACADEMY INC: $20,000 · Other+6 more: $33,500 · Other+6 moreUnreported Story Society: $120,000 · Arts & CultureCENTER FOR URBAN RENEWAL & EDUCATION: $45,000 · Arts & CultureLeadership Institute: $90,000 · Public BenefitTHE HERITAGE FOUNDATION: $30,000 · Public BenefitCITIZENS FOR SELF-GOVERNANCE: $45,000 · Civil RightsOKLAHOMA POLICY INC: $10,000 · Civil RightsASSISTANCE LEAGUE OF TULSA INC: $25,000 · Human ServicesTULSA CORNERSTONE ASSISTANCE NETWOR: $20,000 · Human ServicesJOHN 316 MISSION: $5,000 · Human ServicesOKLAHOMA COUNCIL OF PUBLIC AFFAIRS INC: $35,000 · Public Safety & DisasterTULSA DREAM CENTER INC: $5,000 · Youth Development
Education$1,231,500Other$475,500Arts & Culture$165,000Public Benefit$120,000Civil Rights$55,000Human Services$50,000Public Safety & Disaster$35,000Youth Development$5,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetHILLSDALE COLLEGE: $1,065,000 over 8y, 0.1% of budgetUnreported Story Society: $120,000 over 6y, 2.3% of budgetLeadership Institute: $90,000 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetTHE RONALD REAGAN PRESIDENTIAL FOUNDATION AND INSTITUTE: $70,000 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetCITIZENS FOR SELF-GOVERNANCE: $45,000 over 4y, 0.8% of budgetCENTER FOR URBAN RENEWAL & EDUCATION: $45,000 over 5y, 0.7% of budgetYouth Entrepreneurs Inc: $40,000 over 4y, 0.3% of budgetOKLAHOMA COUNCIL OF PUBLIC AFFAIRS INC: $35,000 over 2y, 1.2% of budgetTHE HERITAGE FOUNDATION: $30,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetASSISTANCE LEAGUE OF TULSA INC: $25,000 over 3y, 0.4% of budgetEdChoice Inc: $24,000 over 7y, 0.1% of budgetTULSA CORNERSTONE ASSISTANCE NETWOR: $20,000 over 2y, 10% of budgetTORCH OF FREEDOM FOUNDATION: $15,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetAMERICAN FEDERATION FOR CHILDREN GROWTH FUND INC: $12,500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetOKLAHOMA POLICY INC: $10,000 over 1y, 1.1% of budgetPRAGER UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTULSA DREAM CENTER INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetJOHN 316 MISSION: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds HILLSDALE COLLEGE ↗
  • Who funds Unreported Story Society ↗
  • Who funds Leadership Institute ↗
  • Who funds THE RONALD REAGAN PRESIDENTIAL FOUNDATION AND INSTITUTE ↗
  • Who funds CITIZENS FOR SELF-GOVERNANCE ↗
  • Who funds CENTER FOR URBAN RENEWAL & EDUCATION ↗
  • Who funds Youth Entrepreneurs Inc ↗
  • Who funds OKLAHOMA COUNCIL OF PUBLIC AFFAIRS INC ↗
  • Who funds THE HERITAGE FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds ASSISTANCE LEAGUE OF TULSA INC ↗
  • Who funds EdChoice Inc ↗
  • Who funds TULSA HOPE ACADEMY INC ↗
  • Who funds TULSA CORNERSTONE ASSISTANCE NETWOR ↗
  • Who funds TORCH OF FREEDOM FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds AMERICAN FEDERATION FOR CHILDREN GROWTH FUND INC ↗
  • Who funds OKLAHOMA POLICY INC ↗
  • Who funds PRAGER UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds TULSA DREAM CENTER INC ↗
  • Who funds JOHN 316 MISSION ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Tulsa Community FoundationOK18.2× affinity7 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Tulsa Community Foundation · Donors Trust Inc · George Kaiser Family Foundation · The Anne and Henry Zarrow Foundation · National Philanthropic Trust · Natl Christian Charitable Fdn Inc · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · American Endowment Foundation · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Quesenbery Educational Tr funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Quesenbery Educational Tr. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 60%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%8%15%22%30%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    6get no government money at all
    1report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–30%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 31 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Quesenbery Educational Tr’s filings →

    More from the funding graph