Skip to content

· Private foundation

Querido Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$19k
Granted FY2025still arriving
5
Grants FY2025still arriving
2
States reached
$7k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2021 to 2025.

Public Benefit$31kHuman Services$17kArts & Culture$10kEducation$9kCivil Rights$8kFood & Nutrition$7kReligion$4kAnimals$2kOther$0
02FY2025 · 5 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$5,000
Median grant
2
States reached
$232k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
CIVIC INFLUENCERS$7,000
OLA OF EASTERN LONG ISLAND$5,000
Individual grant recipient$5,000
EVELYN ALEXANDER WILDLIFE RESCUE CENTER$1,500
SPRINGS FOOD PANTRY$500
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY21–23, $9k) land where the poverty rate runs at 7%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 0% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%ELEANOR WHITMORE EARLY CHILDHOOD CENTER: $5k → 7%ELEANOR WHITMORE EARLY CHILDHOOD CENTER: $3k → 7%ELEANOR WHITMORE EARLY CHILDHOOD CENTER: $500 → 7%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
04

Where the work is directed

The same grants placed two ways: where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose sends the money.

About 100% of Querido Foundation’s grant dollars are earmarked for a different county than the recipient’s own address. By recipient address, 55% of the giving stays in NY; by stated purpose, 0%.

Querido Foundationlessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient address
How this is measured
Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the funder’s own 990 grant descriptions.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

83%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$71k · 8 repeat orgs$15k to everyone else

8 repeat relationships: 4 still active in FY2025, 4 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

8
6

Total granted

$71k
$13k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+18%
+51%

Still filing today

75%
33%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 92% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $2k went to new ones.

50%100%’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’21’22’23’24’25
Food & NutritionCivil RightsArts & CultureHuman ServicesAnimalsOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • OO
    OLA OF EASTERN LONG ISLAND INC
    3× · 2021–2025 · $10k · revenue +18%
  • SM
    SEPA MUJER INC
    2× · 2021–2022 · $5k · revenue +251%
  • GL
    GOD'S LOVE WE DELIVER INC
    2× · 2021–2022 · $4k · revenue +62%

Funded once

  • ST
    SPREAD THE VOTE INC
    one grant, 2021 · $8k · revenue -45%
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2021 · $4k
  • AW
    AMBER WAVES FARM INCgraduated
    one grant, 2021 · $2k · revenue +51%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
East End Food Institute

East End Food is a nonprofit organization whose mission is to support, promote and advocate for farmers and producers, while ensuring everyone in the community can enjoy and be nourished by local food. We envision the East End of Long…

Food & Nutrition
2
Western Ny Coalition of Farmworker Serving Agencies Inc

To promote justice, dignity, and equity for migrants and farmworkers through advocacy, education, outreach, and direct services. We empower our communities to achieve self-sufficiency by fostering collaboration among partners.

Human Services
3
Women Empowerment Coalition of Nyc

Wecnyc builds unity and power among communities of diverse immigrant women through education, collective support, direct services and practicing civic engagement.

Human Services
4
Center for the Women of New York

The center for the women of new york helps women overcome financial, violence,social, wellness, and legal issues by raising awareness and advocating for full gender equality for women.

Human Services
5
Worker Justice Center of New York Inc

Worker Justice Center of New York, Inc. (WJCNY) pusues juistice for those denied hian rights, with a focus on agricultural and other low-wage workers, through legal representation, community empowerment and advocacy for institutional…

Crime & Legal
6
Brandworkers International Inc

Brandworkers is a non-profit organization of local food-making workers coming together for a good job and sustainable food system.

Civil Rights
7
Legal Assistance of Western New York Inc

Lawny increases access to justice through excellent legal representation, advocacy and service.

Crime & Legal
8
Asian Immigrant Women Advocates Inc

Asian Immigrant Women Advocates empowers low-income, limited English speaking immigrant women and youth through education, leadership development and civic participation programs.

Human Services
9
Legal Services of Long Island

To provide free legal assistance in non-criminal matters to persons meeting financial eligibility requirements or having other special needs.

—
10
Asylee Women Enterprise Inc

Asylee Women Enterprise (AWE), journeys with asylum seekers and other forced migrants as they navigate the immigration legal process, begin to heal from past trauma, and rebuild their lives in Baltimore.

International
11
Empire State Voices Inc

To educate the public on a range of crucial issues, advocate for economic policies that make life more affordable for hardworking New Yorkers, and encourage federal elected officials to oppose policies that harm New Yorkers.

—
12
Apoyo Legal Migrante Asociado

Serve immigrants, especially immigrant victims of crime.

Crime & Legal
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Spread the Vote Inc; the most unlike its peers is Springs Food Pantry Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
05the grantee network

9 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 9 of the 15 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
9/9
Grantees still filing
6/9
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

CIVIC INFLUENCERS INC: $31,000 · Civil RightsCIVIC INFLUENCERS INCSPREAD THE VOTE INC: $7,500 · Civil RightsSPREAD THE VOTE INCIndividual grant recipient: $8,600 · OtherIndividual grant recipientSEPA MUJER INC: $4,500 · OtherSEPA MUJER INCIndividual grant recipient: $4,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipientCONSERVATIVE SYNAGOGUE OF THE HAMPTONS INC: $3,815 · OtherCONSERVATIVE SYNAGOGUE OF TH…+3 more: $427 · OtherOLA OF EASTERN LONG ISLAND INC: $9,500 · Arts & CultureOLA OF EASTE…ELEANOR WHITMORE EARLY CHILDHOOD CENTER INC: $8,500 · Human ServicesELEANOR WHI…GOD'S LOVE WE DELIVER INC: $4,450 · Food & NutritionGOD'S LOV…AMBER WAVES FARM INC: $1,500 · Food & NutritionAMBER WAV…SPRINGS FOOD PANTRY INC: $1,000 · Food & NutritionSPRINGS F…Evelyn Alexander Wildlife Rescue Center Inc: $1,500 · Animals
Civil Rights$38,500Other$21,342Arts & Culture$9,500Human Services$8,500Food & Nutrition$6,950Animals$1,500

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetCIVIC INFLUENCERS INC: $31,000 over 4y, 0.9% of budgetOLA OF EASTERN LONG ISLAND INC: $9,500 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetELEANOR WHITMORE EARLY CHILDHOOD CENTER INC: $8,500 over 3y, 0.2% of budgetSPREAD THE VOTE INC: $7,500 over 1y, 0.7% of budgetSEPA MUJER INC: $4,500 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetGOD'S LOVE WE DELIVER INC: $4,450 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetAMBER WAVES FARM INC: $1,500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetSPRINGS FOOD PANTRY INC: $1,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Hilaria and Alec Baldwin Foundation IncNY15.7× affinity5 shared granteesties to 9 of 9Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Hilaria and Alec Baldwin Foundation Inc · Jewish Communal Fund · The Reba Judith Sandler Foundation Inc · The New York Community Trust · National Philanthropic Trust · Gs Donor Advised Philanthropy Fund for Wealth Management Inc · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Querido Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Querido Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 10%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%19%38%56%75%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    1get no government money at all
    4report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–75%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Querido Foundation?

    Find your warmest path to Querido Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 15 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Querido’s filings →

    More from the funding graph