Loading…
· Public charity
QUALITAS OF LIFE FOUNDATION
QUALITAS OF LIFE FOUNDATION is a non-profit organization that provides basic financial education to hispanic individuals and their families in order to foster their financial security and improve their standard of living.
$527k
Granted FY2020
14
Grants
1
Communities
$50k
Largest
01What you fund
02FY2020 · 14 grants
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2020
- $10k–50k13 grants · $340k
- $50k–250k1 grant · $50k
$25,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$444k
Total assets
Largest grants
- ST JEROME'S HANDS COMMUNITY CENTER$50,000
- CONSULATE GENERAL OF MEXICO IN NEW YORK$40,000
- CENTRO DE RECURSOS EDUCATIVOS PARA ADULTOS INC$40,000
- NEW YORK STATE FEDERATION OF GROWERS' & PROCESSORS' AGRI-BUSINESS CHILD DEV$35,000
- STATEN ISLAND COMMUNITY JOB CENTERLA COLMENA$30,000
- MERCY CENTER INC$27,500
- WORKERS JUSTICE PROJECT$25,000
- MASA-MEXED INC$25,000
- MIXTECA ORGANIZATION INC$25,000
- RED DE PUEBLOS TRANSNACIONALES$25,000
- NEW IMMIGRANT COMMUNITY EMPOWERMENT$20,000
- MEXICAN COALITION FOR THE EMPOWERMENT OF YOUTH AND FAMILIES$20,000
- VIOLENCE INTERVENTION PROGRAM$15,000
- LA PLAZA DE PAULO INC$12,500
02The need
03
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
show:
Your human-services grants (FY20–20, $115k) land where the poverty rate runs at 20% — the area typically sits at 12%. 74% of those dollars reach neighborhoods with above-average need. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA, United Way ALICE — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
03Your field
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
1
Northern Manhattan Coalition
to educate, defend and protect the rights of immigrants. Recognized by the Board of Immigration Appeals, NMCIR is committed to expanding access to legal immigration services, participating in policy making and community organizing.
Community Improvement
2
New York Immigration Coalition Inc
To unite immigrants, members and allies so all new yorkers can thrive.
—
3
National Institute of Mexican
Civil Rights
4
La Colaborativa Inc
The mission of the organization is to empower latinx immigrants to enhance the social and economic health of our community and people; and to hold institutional decision makers accountable to the communities they serve. in 2019, the…
Human Services
5
Center for New Americans Inc
Support for immigrants, such as free english classes and citizenship and immigration legal services.
Unclassified
6
Center for the Integration & Advancement of New Americans Inc
To reach out to marginalized new immigrants and provide them with language and culturally competent social services in order to facilitate their successful integration into the larger american community. (contd)
Human Services
7
La Esperanza Inc
Seek to enrich our communities by welcoming cultural diversity and by providing services to our clients to help them progress towards employment, education, self-sufficiency and citizenship.
Employment
8
Comite En Union Para Salvadorenos
Comite en union para salvadorenos (ceus) is a non-profit, community-based agency that serves and organizes hispanic immigrants in north jersey. center programs include educational, community development and cultural activities. based in…
International
9
New Women New Yorkers Inc
To provide workforce development and other programs to empower immigrant women to obtain meaningful employment or pursue higher education in nyc. to offer a safe, inclusive space where immigrant women can build community and share their…
Human Services
10
Aspira of New York Inc
To develop the intellectual and creative minds of latino youth to enter and continue their education in the professions, arts, and technical fields to solve community problems.
Human Services
11
Mexican American Unity Council Inc
MAUC is a multiservice organization with a mission to empower communities through housing, education, and economic opportunity.MAUC is committed to creating and preserving livable and sustainable affordable housing by offering a wide array…
Human Services
12
Center for Latino Progress
To educate and create job opportunities for minorities in the greater hartford, ct area.
Unclassified
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Masa-Mexed Inc and the most unlike its peers is Third Sector New England Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network
10 grantees, every filing reconciled, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue.
0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
6
Early backer (in before they grew)
10/10
Grantees still filing
10/10
Grew since you first funded
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Other$137,500Human Services$115,000Education$65,000Recreation & Sports$27,500Community Improvement$25,000Civil Rights$20,000
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds CENTRO DE RECURSOS EDUCATIVOS PARA ADULTOS INC ↗
- Who funds NEW YORK STATE FEDERATION OF GROWERS' & PROCESSORS' AGRI-BUSINESS CHILD DEV ↗
- Who funds STATEN ISLAND COMMUNITY JOB CENTERLA COLMENA ↗
- Who funds MERCY CENTER INC ↗
- Who funds MIXTECA ORGANIZATION INC ↗
- Who funds MASA-MEXED INC ↗
- Who funds WORKERS JUSTICE PROJECT ↗
- Who funds MEXICAN COALITION FOR THE EMPOWERMENT OF YOUTH AND FAMILIES ↗
- Who funds NEW IMMIGRANT COMMUNITY EMPOWERMENT (QUEENS) ↗
- Who funds VIOLENCE INTERVENTION PROGRAM ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Tacombi Foundation IncNY20.4× affinity7 shared granteesties to 7 of 7Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →
Open a dossier: Tacombi Foundation Inc · Hispanic Federation Inc · Robin Hood Foundation · New York Immigration Coalition Inc · New York Women's Foundation Inc · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organisation QUALITAS OF LIFE FOUNDATION funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
2025
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
0get no government money at all
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–50%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.
04Through Plinth
Through Plinth
Your grantmaking, live and operational
This dossier was generated cold from public filings. In Plinth it’s a working system — every applicant assessed and every grant monitored. Here’s a taste, run on one of your grantees: CENTRO DE RECURSOS EDUCATIVOS PARA ADULTOS INC.
Agentic due diligence · confidence × risk
Financial management
insufficient risk
Limited financial data in public filings.
Track record & reputation
low risk
7 years of Form 990 filings, still active.
Legal standing
low risk
US 501(c)(3); EIN 824149759 on file with current IRS Form 990 filings.
Governance
Live in Plinth
Board composition & governance documents — verified live in Plinth from the applicant.
Compliance & sanctions
Live in Plinth
OFAC / UN sanctions screening — run live in Plinth at assessment.
Program capacity
Live in Plinth
Staffing, M&E and activity alignment — assessed live in Plinth from submitted proposals.
Live · Plinth’s real DD engine
Run the actual assessment on CENTRO DE RECURSOS EDUCATIVOS PARA ADULTOS INC, cold from public data.
Generated live from public IRS filings + open web sources by Plinth’s agentic engine. Shown as an illustration of the product, not a formal assessment.
Post-award monitoring · continuous checks
- Awaiting reportFinancial stability— Runway not derivable from filings.
- On trackSustained operations— Filing through 2025; revenue grew over the period.
- On trackReliance on your funding— Your grants peaked at 22% of their budget — diversified.
- Awaiting reportEvidence of delivery— Plinth collects the grantee's own monitoring reports post-award.
What you see here is static and public. In Plinth it’s operational — the full six-pillar framework on every applicant (with their own documents + live registry and sanctions checks), monitoring dashboards on every award, custom board reports, and eligibility routing for intake.
Agentic due diligenceMonitoring dashboardsCustom board reportsEligibility routing
Preview generated from this grantee’s public IRS filings and independent reporting. Pillars marked “live in Plinth” require the applicant’s submitted documents. Shown as illustration, not a formal assessment.
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPro
How do I get to Qualitas of Life Foundation?
Find your warmest path to Qualitas of Life Foundation through people who sit on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the introduction across shared trustees and officers.
Every link is a documented governance overlap in public IRS 990 filings — not a personal network — and each hop carries its own confidence tier. Low-confidence or distant paths are held back rather than guessed.
More from the funding graph
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars pass through an intermediary
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
Strange bedfellows
the named clusters of US funding
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home
State money flows
the interactive map of money crossing state lines