How much did PURE INC grant in FY2024?

PURE INC reported 93 grants totaling $28,903,325 in its FY2024 IRS filing.

Foundation Dossiers Also receives grants — funding profile →

· Public charity

PURE INC

Pure charity builds world-class technology solutions for nonprofits and their communities to increase donor advocacy initiatives and fundraising results, while reducing technology and operational costs.

$29M

Granted FY2024

Grants

Communities

$16M

Largest

01What you fund

0190% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant clustered by its grantee’s IRS cause code (NTEE), by year — across FY2017–2024.

Religion$110MInternational$38MHuman Services$26MCrime & Legal$5.0MHealth$3.9MPhilanthropy$2.1MYouth Development$1.3MCivil Rights$1.1MEducation$779kOther$23M

02beneath the categories

Past the labels — and the year it shifted

Beneath the NTEE codes, this is what the grant descriptions actually say.

…and in their own words, year by year

2018

habitatbtffofficesaffordablebeyondwarreduce

2019

dustinprism northnorth educationaldustins dreamempower womengodseventh-day adventist

2020

packpotter'sconnectionshealthychildren youthlocationsrecreational

2021

aolvisaafghan womenaustinlegalimmigrationclients

2022

licensedclotheslove christdaslow incomesocialfaith

2023

food sheltertanzanialion judahmissionarylove christdasdisaster relief

Words distinctive to each year’s grant purposes (TF-IDF) · event-driven terms in cyan.

03FY2024 · 93 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2024

Under $10k12 grants · $87k
$10k–50k37 grants · $940k
$50k–250k31 grants · $3.8M
$250k+13 grants · $23M

$44,125

Median grant

States reached

$1.4M

Total assets

Largest grants

E3 PARTNERS$16,146,405
PATH INTERNATIONAL$1,630,413
HELP ONE NOW$800,317
MERCY HOUSE GLOBAL$634,674
BLESS THE CHILDREN MINISTRIES$508,210
LEGACY COLLECTIVE$489,129
TWELVE21 GLOBAL$404,603
THE MAYFLY PROJECT$391,252
STUDENTS FOR INTERNATIONAL MISSION SERVICE (SIMS)$364,504
DISCIPLES' VILLAGE$308,638
NEIGHBORHOOD ECONOMICS$299,906
WORLD WIDE VILLAGE$289,870
CHILDREN WITH DISABILITIES FUND INTERNATIONAL$250,128
99 BALLOONS$236,315
NEW BEGINNINGS NWA$235,884

02The need

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY17–24, $25.0M) land where the poverty rate runs at 8% — the area typically sits at 10%. 27% of those dollars reach neighborhoods with above-average need. Your grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA, United Way ALICE — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge

repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

97%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.

$206M · 206 repeat orgs$5.7M to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +49% since the first grant, against +28% for the ones you funded once.

206 repeat relationships — 82 still active in FY2024, 124 since wound down; 11 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

206

174

Total granted

$206M

$5.0M

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+49%

+28%

Still filing today

70%

64%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 97% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $684k went to new ones.

RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

Human ServicesInternationalReligionHealthEducationPhilanthropyOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

MH
MERCY HOUSE GLOBAL
8× · 2017–2024 · $5.2M · revenue +119% · 33% of their budget
RI
RESTORE INTERNATIONAL
7× · 2017–2023 · $5.0M · revenue +121% · 48% of their budget
PI
PATH INTERNATIONAL
4× · 2021–2024 · $4.6M · revenue +71% · 80% of their budget

Funded once

O
OTHER
one grant, 2017 · $607k
SL
SUPPORTING LIFELONG SUCCESSgraduated
one grant, 2021 · $500k · revenue +409% · 60% of their budget
HA
HANDS AND FEET PROJECT INC
one grant, 2017 · $237k · revenue +6%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

Child Hope International

We minister to orphans and widows in their distress by transitioning children from orphanages into loving families. We do this through Christ-centered care, training and social work.

Arts & Culture

International Christian Partners

Childrens Home and Ministry in India

Religion

Hands of Hope Adoption & Orphan Care Ministry Inc

To uniquely and deeply love orphans at home and around the world. We do this by offering child sponsorships and sending teams to our partner Childrens Homes around the world and supporting families who are adopting and caring for children…

Human Services

Hilo Ministries Inc

To be an organization where people are excited to assist in the love and care of the orphan and those in foster care, as well as providing temporary housing and training for those in the worldwide missionary field.

Human Services

Hope Arising Inc

to promote self reliance among orphan- and woman-led households in Africa

International

Shared Blessings International

Provides aid to orphans in devastated areas, primarily Uganda, India, and Myanmar. Children are directly sponsored and specific projects which will benefit the children that are underwritten. Projects include hospitals, schools, and other…

Human Services

World Renew

World Renew's mission is to engage God's people in redeeming resources and developing gifts in collaborative acts of mercy, justice, and compassion. This work, which is focused on relief and community development.

—

Global Effect Ministries

Global Effect Ministries teaches principles to build healthy families and strong marriages in developing nations. We care for orphans, widows, and people in need by developing nationals, empower impoverished individuals to find ways to…

International

Christs Hope U S a Inc

Empowering orphaned and vulnerable children to break the cycles of extreme poverty, AIDS, and spiritual brokenness through family-based care and discipleship in Jesus Christ.

Human Services

Sower of Seeds International Ministries

SOS provides assistance to poor and marginalized people in the USA & other countries. SOS feeds the hungry, drills water wells, contributes to schools and operates an orphanage. SOS also rescues and rehabilitates victims of sex trafficking.

Religion

Children of Promise International

Children of promise international is a nonprofit organization providing humanitarian aid, relief and development in approximately 7 countries for the purpose of caring for orphans, widows, and destitute children and outreach to the poor…

—

Hope International Ministries Inc

To rescue the next generation. This organization provides a stable and loving Christian home for displaced children. The care of these children include food, shelter, education and faith based activities.

Human Services

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Child Impact International and the most unlike its peers is Pacific Union College. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.

the sector your giving your giving is ahead of the sector the sector’s ahead of you· dot size = how much the theme matters to each side

Ordered by the change in your giving — leaning in on top, pulling back at the bottom. The bar between the two dots is how out of step you are with the sector. Hover any row for detail.

Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.

Your grantees are a median of 17 years old; the field is 12. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

The field is 26% startups (under 5 years old) — 4% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close — 3% lost their exemption, against 13% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund

3%11/388

the rest of the field

13%

17,175/136,416

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

05the grantee network

285 grantees, every filing reconciled, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue.

Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)

112

Early backer (in before they grew)

261/285

Grantees still filing

195/285

Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

Religion$110,377,917International$37,530,867Human Services$26,413,256Other$26,360,617Crime & Legal$4,966,745Health$3,862,557Philanthropy$2,137,933

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Wal-Mart FoundationAR45.9× affinity29 shared granteesties to 5 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Wal-Mart Foundation · Arkansas Community Foundation Inc · Excellerate Foundation Charitable · Our Rescue · Ephesians 320 Foundation Inc · Promise686 Inc · Orphan Outreach · Brittany's Hope · Amy's Legacy Foundation · Legacy Collective · Grafted Families Inc · Servant Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organisation PURE INC funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024

’20’21’22’23’24

no gov moneyreceives it· size = income

21get no government money at all

0rely on government for over half their income

typical government reliance, FY20–24

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

05Through Plinth

Through Plinth

Your grantmaking, live and operational

This dossier was generated cold from public filings. In Plinth it’s a working system — every applicant assessed and every grant monitored. Here’s a taste, run on one of your grantees: I AM SECOND.

Agentic due diligence · confidence × risk

Financial management

medium risk

~3 months of operating runway; revenue held over 6 filed years.

Track record & reputation

low risk

6 years of Form 990 filings, still active.

Legal standing

low risk

US 501(c)(3); EIN 161680978 on file with current IRS Form 990 filings.

Governance

Live in Plinth

Board composition & governance documents — verified live in Plinth from the applicant.

Compliance & sanctions

Live in Plinth

OFAC / UN sanctions screening — run live in Plinth at assessment.

Program capacity

Live in Plinth

Staffing, M&E and activity alignment — assessed live in Plinth from submitted proposals.

Live · Plinth’s real DD engine

Run the actual assessment on I AM SECOND, cold from public data.

Generated live from public IRS filings + open web sources by Plinth’s agentic engine. Shown as an illustration of the product, not a formal assessment.

Post-award monitoring · continuous checks

WatchFinancial stability— Roughly 3 months of cash on hand.
On trackSustained operations— Filing through 2023; revenue held over the period.
WatchReliance on your funding— Your grants peaked at 98% of their budget — load-bearing; a dependency Plinth would track.
Awaiting reportEvidence of delivery— Plinth collects the grantee's own monitoring reports post-award.

What you see here is static and public. In Plinth it’s operational — the full six-pillar framework on every applicant (with their own documents + live registry and sanctions checks), monitoring dashboards on every award, custom board reports, and eligibility routing for intake.

Agentic due diligenceMonitoring dashboardsCustom board reportsEligibility routing

Preview generated from this grantee’s public IRS filings and independent reporting. Pillars marked “live in Plinth” require the applicant’s submitted documents. Shown as illustration, not a formal assessment.

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPro

How do I get to Pure Inc?

Find your warmest path to Pure Inc through people who sit on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the introduction across shared trustees and officers.

Every link is a documented governance overlap in public IRS 990 filings — not a personal network — and each hop carries its own confidence tier. Low-confidence or distant paths are held back rather than guessed.

PURE INC

What you funded, over time

Past the labels — and the year it shifted

Where the money goes

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Who you back again

Backed again, and grew

Funded once

285 grantees, every filing reconciled, 2017–2025.

Government reliance of your grantees

Your grantmaking, live and operational

How do I get to Pure Inc?

More from the funding graph

PURE INC

What you funded, over time

Past the labels — and the year it shifted

Where the money goes

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Who you back again

Backed again, and grew

Funded once

285 grantees, every filing reconciled, 2017–2025.

Government reliance of your grantees

Your grantmaking, live and operational

How do I get to Pure Inc?

More from the funding graph