Skip to content
Plinth
Foundation DossiersAlso receives grants — funding profile →
Plinth

· Public charity

Pure Inc

Pure, inc.

$29M
Granted FY2024still arriving
93
Grants FY2024still arriving
28
States reached
$16M
Largest
01What you fundRead
02The needRead
03Your edgeRead
04Your fieldRead
05Through PlinthRead
01What you fund
0199% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2024.

Religion$112MInternational$49MHuman Services$23MHealth$8.2MCommunity Improvement$5.0MCrime & Legal$4.6MEducation$3.0MYouth Development$1.6MOther$0
02FY2024 · 93 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

The 93 grants below total $27,330,228 — the rows itemised in this filing. The $28,903,325 headline is the total grant expense reported on the return, so the remaining $1,573,097 is giving the schedule does not break out: grants under the $5,000 itemisation floor, grants to individuals, and grants reported on other schedules. Every figure below describes the itemised rows only.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k12 grants · $87k
  • $10k–50k37 grants · $940k
  • $50k–250k31 grants · $3.8M
  • $250k+13 grants · $23M
$44,125
Median grant
28
States reached
$1.4M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
E3 PARTNERS$16,146,405
PATH INTERNATIONAL$1,630,413
HELP ONE NOW$800,317
MERCY HOUSE GLOBAL$634,674
BLESS THE CHILDREN MINISTRIES$508,210
LEGACY COLLECTIVE$489,129
TWELVE21 GLOBAL$404,603
THE MAYFLY PROJECT$391,252
STUDENTS FOR INTERNATIONAL MISSION SERVICE (SIMS)$364,504
DISCIPLES' VILLAGE$308,638
NEIGHBORHOOD ECONOMICS$299,906
WORLD WIDE VILLAGE$289,870
CHILDREN WITH DISABILITIES FUND INTERNATIONAL$250,128
99 BALLOONS$236,315
NEW BEGINNINGS NWA$235,884
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY17–24, $25.0M) land where the poverty rate runs at 8%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 27% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Your grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%MADISON ADOPTION ASSOCIATES: $61k → 10%PEOPLE BRIDGE: $150k → 13%NEIGHBORHOOD ECONOMICS: $300k → 12%SECOND CHANCE GLOBAL INC: $370k → 13%CCAI: $91k → 8%ADOPTTOGETHER: $5.0M → 6%SENDING HOPE INTERNATIONAL: $79k → 15%THE HUB URBAN MINISTRIES: $57k → 22%PEOPLE BRIDGE: $147k → 13%SPONSORED BY GRACE: $192k → 14%SECOND CHANCE GLOBAL INC: $312k → 13%ADOPTTOGETHER: $3.9M → 6%SENDING HOPE INTERNATIONAL: $53k → 15%AMERICA WORLDONE ORPHAN: $88k → 6%ABILITY TREE: $89k → 8%PEOPLE BRIDGE: $146k → 13%SPONSORED BY GRACE: $176k → 14%SECOND CHANCE GLOBAL INC: $277k → 13%HOPING HEART (ADOPT TOGETHER): $3.4M → 6%SUPPORTING LIFELONG SUCCESS: $500k → 14%PEOPLE BRIDGE: $129k → 13%SECOND CHANCE GLOBAL INC: $212k → 13%BUILD IN GUATE INC: $75k → 13%ADOPTTOGETHER: $2.6M → 6%GREAT WALL CHINA ADOPTION: $82k → 10%99 BALLOONS: $373k → 14%PEOPLE BRIDGE: $124k → 13%SECOND CHANCE GLOBAL INC: $139k → 13%BUILD IN GUATE INC: $60k → 13%ADOPT TOGETHER: $1.1M → 6%99 BALLOONS: $236k → 14%SECOND CHANCE GLOBAL INC: $128k → 13%ADOPTTOGETHER: $929k → 6%ORKEESWA: $82k → 13%SECOND CHANCE GLOBAL INC: $78k → 13%99 BALLOONS: $172k → 14%SECOND CHANCE GLOBAL INC: $76k → 13%HEARTLINE MINISTRIES - HAITI: $149k → 11%99 BALLOONS: $148k → 14%99 BALLOONS: $139k → 14%ABIDE COLLECTIVE: $110k → 14%99 BALLOONS: $101k → 14%99 BALLOONS: $96k → 14%MADE IN THE STREETS: $65k → 4%SAMARITAN COMMUNITY CENTER: $113k → 8%SAMARITAN COMMUNITY CENTER: $90k → 8%99 BALLOONS: $86k → 14%ABIDE COLLECTIVE: $57k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

Which US states your grants reach

ME
NH
WA
ID
MT
ND
MN
IL
MI
NY
MA
OR
WY
IN
OH
PA
NJ
CT
CA
UT
CO
MO
KY
VA
MD
DE
AZ
KS
AR
TN
NC
SC
DC
OK
LA
MS
AL
GA
TX
FL

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

97%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$206M · 206 repeat orgs$5.3M to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +26% since the first grant, against +17% for the ones you funded once.

206 repeat relationships — 82 still active in FY2024, 124 since wound down; 10 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

206
172

Total granted

$206M
$4.9M

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+26%
+17%

Still filing today

70%
65%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 99% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $385k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
Human ServicesInternationalReligionHealthEducationPhilanthropyOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • EP
    E3 Partners Ministry
    8× · 2017–2024 · $96M · revenue +8% · 98% of their budget
  • TM
    THE MERCY MATERNITY HOUSE INC
    8× · 2017–2024 · $5.2M · revenue +119% · 33% of their budget
  • RI
    RESTORE INTERNATIONAL DBA LOVE DOES
    7× · 2017–2023 · $5.0M · revenue +121% · 48% of their budget

Funded once

  • O
    OTHER
    one grant, 2017 · $607k
  • SL
    SPECTRUM LIVING SOLUTIONS INC
    one grant, 2021 · $500k · revenue -8% · 60% of their budget
  • HA
    HANDS AND FEET PROJECT INC
    one grant, 2017 · $237k · revenue +6%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Child Hope International

We minister to orphans and widows in their distress by transitioning children from orphanages into loving families. We do this through Christ- centered care, training and social work.

Arts & Culture
2
International Christian Partners Llc

Childrens Home and Ministry in India

Religion
3
Hilo Ministries Inc

To be an organization where people are excited to assist in the love and care of the orphan and those in foster care, as well as providing temporary housing and training for those in the worldwide missionary field.

Human Services
4
Pearl Ministries Inc

Pearl Ministries partners with individuals, families, and churches to help orphans and vulnerable children in Uganda, the Pearl of Africa, through gospel centered, holistic development of family and community in partnership with indigenous…

Religion
5
Sower of Seeds International Ministries

SOS provides assistance to poor and marginalized people in the USA & other countries. SOS feeds the hungry, drills water wells, contributes to schools and operates an orphanage. SOS also rescues and rehabilitates victims of sex trafficking.

Religion
6
Sonshine Ministries International

We provide homes, a healthy diet, medical treatment, quality education, and counseling for orphaned abused and neglected children in Tanzania, East Africa. Sonshine works directly with Child Welfare Services of Tanzania. CWS provides…

—
7
One With God

To teach the bible to pastors and church leaders in africa and asia, while funding food for orphaned and abandonded children

Health
8
Orphans Hope International
—
9
Reaching Out to the Nations Inc

Reaching Out To The Nations' mission is to both preach and demonstrate the love of Go through its projects and programs which include preaching, food distribution, widow and orphan assistance and leadership training.

Religion
10
Global Effect Ministries

Global Effect Ministries teaches principles to build healthy families and strong marriages in developing nations. We care for orphans, widows, and people in need by developing nationals, empower impoverished individuals to find ways to…

International
11
Hope for the Fatherless

HFTF serves orphaned and vulnerable children in Ethiopia, and its mission is to see every child thriving in a loving family. HFTF accomplishes this through five primary initiatives: in-country adoption training and placement, family…

International
12
Heart Bridge International

Heart Bridge International exists to equip and empower Christians around the world to fulfill the Great Commission. The organization provides free ministry training, discipleship resources, and practical coaching to under-resourced…

Religion

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Child Impact International and the most unlike its peers is Recurrent Resp Papillomatosis Fdtn. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.

← shrinkinggrowing →↓ leaning in → pulling backsteadyChristian Missionary Organi…Community Food PantriesDevelopmental Disabilities …Faith-Based Social ServicesLocal Food System Organizat…Independent K-12 SchoolsYouth Sports ProgramsFood Banks and PantriesFaith-Based Liberal Arts Co…Immigrant Worker SupportDomestic Violence ServicesChristian Youth CampsCancer Support ServicesHealth Access Advocacy and …Policy Research and AdvocacyAffordable Housing Construc…Affordable Housing Developm…Child Abuse Advocacy Servic…Community Foundations
the sector your giving your giving is ahead of the sector the sector’s ahead of you· dot size = how much the theme matters to each side
Ordered by the change in your giving — leaning in on top, pulling back at the bottom. The bar between the two dots is how out of step you are with the sector. Hover any row for detail.

Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.

Your grantees are a median of 17 years old; the field is 12. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

THE FIELDby orgYOUR GRANTEESby number26%4%<5yr16%14%5–10yr20%39%10–20yr16%25%20–35yr10%9%35–55yr13%10%55yr+
THE FIELDby orgYOUR MONEYby value26%0%<5yr16%6%5–10yr20%32%10–20yr16%58%20–35yr10%1%35–55yr13%2%55yr+

The field is 26% startups (under 5 years old) — 4% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close — 4% lost their exemption, against 15% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund
4%14/387
the rest of the field
15%
20,231/136,417

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

04the grantee network

285 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 285 of the 390 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

71
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
98
Early backer (in before they grew)
261/285
Grantees still filing
182/285
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

E3 Partners Ministry — $96,383,334 · ReligionE3 Partners MinistryPATH International — $4,641,268 · Religion+23 more — $9,217,256 · Religion+23 moreHELP ONE NOW — $8,962,283 · InternationalHELP ONE NOWTHE MERCY MATERNITY HOUSE INC — $5,207,865 · InternationalTHE MERCY MATERNITY …SOLE HOPE INC — $2,641,916 · InternationalSOLE HOPE INCSERVE NORTHWEST ARKANSAS — $2,167,222 · InternationalSERVE NORTHWEST ARKA…DISCIPLES VILLAGE — $1,758,221 · InternationalBLESS THE CHILDREN MINISTRIES INC — $1,705,659 · InternationalWORLD WIDE VILLAGE INCORPORATED — $1,596,894 · InternationalCHRISTS GIFT ACADEMIES — $1,497,647 · InternationalSIXTY FEET INC — $1,411,448 · InternationalELEVATE ORPHAN — $1,353,421 · International+33 more — $8,999,496 · International+33 moreHOPING HEARTS FOUNDATION INC — $16,883,232 · Human ServicesHOPING HEARTS…SECOND CHANCE GLOBAL INC — $1,591,285 · Human ServicesSECOND CHANCE…99 BALLOONS INC — $1,351,662 · Human Services+35 more — $5,837,411 · Human Services+35 moreLEGACY COLLECTIVE — $3,729,713 · OtherLEGACY COLLEC…NEXT Worldwide Inc — $2,285,625 · OtherNEXT Worldwid…A JESUS CHURCH FAMILY INC — $1,831,209 · OtherA JESUS CHURC…THE MAYFLY PROJECT — $1,217,324 · OtherCHILDREN WITH DISABILITIES FUND INTERNATIONAL — $1,100,248 · Other+77 more — $14,434,198 · Other+77 moreRESTORE INTERNATIONAL DBA LOVE DOES — $4,952,205 · Crime & LegalLOMA LINDA UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER — $2,213,780 · HealthHOPE SPEAKS INTERNATIONAL INC — $1,129,302 · HealthAdventist Health SystemWest — $255,700 · Health+3 more — $181,255 · HealthREACHING EAST AFRICAN LIVES FOR CHRIST — $1,704,365 · PhilanthropyGRACE AND GLORY — $172,254 · PhilanthropyHAITI GOSPEL FUND — $101,104 · Philanthropy+2 more — $102,452 · Philanthropy
Religion$110,241,858International$37,302,072Human Services$25,663,590Other$24,598,317Crime & Legal$4,952,205Health$3,780,037Philanthropy$2,080,175

Showing your 200 largest grantees by grant value.

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetE3 Partners Ministry — $96,383,334 over 8y, 98% of budgetHOPING HEARTS FOUNDATION INC — $16,883,232 over 7y, 89% of budgetHELP ONE NOW — $8,962,283 over 8y, 43% of budgetTHE MERCY MATERNITY HOUSE INC — $5,207,865 over 8y, 33% of budgetRESTORE INTERNATIONAL DBA LOVE DOES — $4,952,205 over 7y, 48% of budgetPATH International — $4,641,268 over 4y, 80% of budgetLEGACY COLLECTIVE — $3,729,713 over 4y, 81% of budgetSOLE HOPE INC — $2,641,916 over 8y, 63% of budgetNEXT Worldwide Inc — $2,285,625 over 3y, 77% of budgetLOMA LINDA UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER — $2,213,780 over 7y, 0.1% of budgetSERVE NORTHWEST ARKANSAS — $2,167,222 over 8y, 92% of budgetDISCIPLES VILLAGE — $1,758,221 over 6y, 56% of budgetBLESS THE CHILDREN MINISTRIES INC — $1,705,659 over 4y, 49% of budgetREACHING EAST AFRICAN LIVES FOR CHRIST — $1,704,365 over 8y, 58% of budgetWORLD WIDE VILLAGE INCORPORATED — $1,596,894 over 7y, 63% of budgetSECOND CHANCE GLOBAL INC — $1,591,285 over 8y, 93% of budgetCHRISTS GIFT ACADEMIES — $1,497,647 over 8y, 74% of budgetCUSH EMPOWERMENT GROUP — $1,423,671 over 3y, 66% of budgetSIXTY FEET INC — $1,411,448 over 8y, 55% of budgetWORD MADE FLESH INC — $1,361,711 over 6y, 40% of budgetELEVATE ORPHAN — $1,353,421 over 6y, 87% of budget99 BALLOONS INC — $1,351,662 over 8y, 66% of budgetTwelve21 Global Inc — $1,242,723 over 5y, 41% of budgetTHE MAYFLY PROJECT — $1,217,324 over 5y, 56% of budgetHOPE SPEAKS INTERNATIONAL INC — $1,129,302 over 7y, 62% of budgetCHILDREN WITH DISABILITIES FUND INTERNATIONAL — $1,100,248 over 5y, 90% of budgetB LOVED FOUNDATION INC — $991,274 over 8y, 33% of budgetBEST FAMILY MINISTRIES — $840,978 over 8y, 95% of budgetLIVING STONE GLOBAL FOUNDATION — $839,248 over 6y, 37% of budgetPeople Bridge — $727,099 over 6y, 87% of budgetAFRICAN LEADERSHIP AND RECONCILIATION MINISTRIES OF TEXAS — $691,502 over 4y, 18% of budgetBe2live — $681,528 over 6y, 61% of budgetABIDE COLLECTIVE — $649,775 over 7y, 89% of budgetThe Freedom Story — $576,370 over 2y, 64% of budgetELIZABETH'S VOICE INC — $562,112 over 7y, 59% of budgetPARTNERS WITH ETHIOPIA — $542,699 over 4y, 38% of budgetCanopy NWA — $536,160 over 7y, 15% of budgetTREE OF HOPE HAITI INC — $505,963 over 8y, 57% of budgetHappy Sonship — $501,188 over 6y, 10% of budgetSPECTRUM LIVING SOLUTIONS INC — $499,532 over 1y, 60% of budgetBRENT GAMBRELL MINISTRIES — $469,037 over 7y, 38% of budgetArrabon Inc — $462,585 over 5y, 43% of budgetSPONSORED BY GRACE INC — $430,894 over 4y, 53% of budgetWOMENS AND CHILDREN'S ADVOCACY CENT LOOM INTERNATIONAL — $417,747 over 8y, 17% of budgetPURE MISSION INC — $405,960 over 3y, 86% of budgetRESTORE LIFE INCORPORATED — $397,146 over 8y, 41% of budgetSAVE THE STREET CHILDREN INTERNATIONAL — $380,696 over 8y, 72% of budgetTOGETHER FOR HAITI — $371,309 over 4y, 63% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds E3 Partners Ministry ↗
  • Who funds HOPING HEARTS FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds HELP ONE NOW ↗
  • Who funds THE MERCY MATERNITY HOUSE INC ↗
  • Who funds RESTORE INTERNATIONAL DBA LOVE DOES ↗
  • Who funds PATH International ↗
  • Who funds LEGACY COLLECTIVE ↗
  • Who funds SOLE HOPE INC ↗
  • Who funds NEXT Worldwide Inc ↗
  • Who funds LOMA LINDA UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER ↗
  • Who funds SERVE NORTHWEST ARKANSAS ↗
  • Who funds DISCIPLES VILLAGE ↗
  • Who funds BLESS THE CHILDREN MINISTRIES INC ↗
  • Who funds REACHING EAST AFRICAN LIVES FOR CHRIST ↗
  • Who funds WORLD WIDE VILLAGE INCORPORATED ↗
  • Who funds SECOND CHANCE GLOBAL INC ↗
  • Who funds CHRISTS GIFT ACADEMIES ↗
  • Who funds CUSH EMPOWERMENT GROUP ↗
  • Who funds SIXTY FEET INC ↗
  • Who funds WORD MADE FLESH INC ↗
  • Who funds ELEVATE ORPHAN ↗
  • Who funds 99 BALLOONS INC ↗
  • Who funds Twelve21 Global Inc ↗
  • Who funds THE MAYFLY PROJECT ↗
  • Who funds HOPE SPEAKS INTERNATIONAL INC ↗
  • Who funds CHILDREN WITH DISABILITIES FUND INTERNATIONAL ↗
  • Who funds B LOVED FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds BEST FAMILY MINISTRIES ↗
  • Who funds LIVING STONE GLOBAL FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds People Bridge ↗
  • Who funds AFRICAN LEADERSHIP AND RECONCILIATION MINISTRIES OF TEXAS ↗
  • Who funds Be2live ↗
  • Who funds ABIDE COLLECTIVE ↗
  • Who funds The Freedom Story ↗

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a loosely connected circle, clustered around a few shared anchors.

Wal-Mart FoundationArkansas Community Fo…Excellerate Foundatio…Ephesians 320 Foundat…Promise686 IncGrafted Families IncOur RescueThe Schmieding Founda…Alice L Walton Founda…Walton Family Foundat…Amy's Legacy Foundati…Orphan Outreach
Wal-Mart FoundationAR51.8× affinity33 shared granteesties to 6 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Wal-Mart Foundation · Arkansas Community Foundation Inc · Excellerate Foundation Charitable Support · Ephesians 320 Foundation Inc · Promise686 Inc · Grafted Families Inc · Our Rescue · The Schmieding Foundation · Alice L Walton Foundation · Walton Family Foundation Inc · Amy's Legacy Foundation · Orphan Outreach

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Pure Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 190%6%25%56%100%your share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →median 29%
  • Adventist Development & Relief Agency International — 35% of income from government
  • Holla — 29% of income from government
  • Big Dog Ranch Rescue Inc — 0% of income from government
  • Laundry Love — 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
19get no government money at all
11report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY20–25

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Pure Inc?

Find your warmest path to Pure Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 390 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home
State money flows
the interactive map of money crossing state lines