· Public charity
Public Health Institute of Metropolitan Chicago
Public Health Institute of Metropolitan Chicago (phimc) enhances the capacity of public health and healthcare systems to promote health equity and expand access to services.
What you funded, over time
Every grant clustered by its grantee’s IRS cause code (NTEE), by year — across FY2018–2024.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2024
- $10k–50k8 grants · $229k
- $50k–250k14 grants · $1.9M
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| Aids Healthcare FoundationCALOR | $234,962 |
| Center on Halsted | $195,796 |
| Chicago House & Social Service | $180,201 |
| Black United Fund | $178,302 |
| Proactive Community Services | $171,461 |
| Greater Elgin Family Care Center | $158,686 |
| Central Illinois Friends | $118,639 |
| Chicago Recovery Alliance | $114,518 |
| Hektoen Institute LLC | $103,644 |
| Men & Women In Prison Ministries | $100,518 |
| Chosen Family Network | $85,690 |
| Puerto Rican Cultural Center | $84,656 |
| Corazon Community Services | $80,164 |
| Douglas County | $66,663 |
| Kenneth Young Center | $48,368 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY18–24, $2.0M) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
64 repeat relationships — 18 still active in FY2024, 46 since wound down; 4 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 78% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $461k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- AFAIDS Foundation of Chicago6× · 2018–2023 · $1.5M · revenue +44%
- HAHEALTHCARE ALTERNATIVE SYSTEMS INC3× · 2018–2020 · $1.0M · revenue +162%
- PCPROACTIVE COMMUNITY SERVICES7× · 2018–2024 · $800k · revenue +667% · 26% of their budget
Funded once
- BHBROTHERS HEALTH COLLECTIVEone grant, 2020 · $52k
- IAI AM ABLE CENTER FOR FAMILY DEVELOPMENTone grant, 2018 · $50k · revenue +6%
- CHCHILDREN'S HOME & AID SOCIETY OF ILLgraduatedone grant, 2019 · $50k · revenue +32%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Our mission at the university of chicago medicine is to provide superior health care through rigorous research, innovative education, and comprehensive care and healing. in partnership with our colleagues, we pursue life-changing…
Chh honors every person's right to a home and health care, by bridging the housing and health care systems, to improve the lives of chicagoans experiencing homelessness.
Infant welfare society of chicago (iws) (d/b/a iws family health) provides quality medical, dental and behavioral health services for the health, physical and mental development of children and their families in the chicagoland community.
The organization is committed to the mission of facilitating the empowerment of women, trans people, and young people by providing access to health care and health education in a respectful environment where people pay what they can afford.
Chicago family health center will promote health, work to prevent disease and provide treatment through the delivery of quality, accessible primary healtcare that is culturally sensitive, affordable, and responsive to community and…
Provide affordable, high-quality health services and remove inequities to improve the lives of all.
Dchc is a primary care organization committed to providing accessible, affordable and quality service to all members of the communities we serve.
Heartland alliance health's mission is to transform healthcare for the most vulnerable, particularly people experiencing homelessness, mental illness or addictions, or struggling with multiple chronic illnesses, improving health for all…
To strengthen the resilience and hope of our diverse community members by improving their health and well-being.
The mission of mchc chicago hospital council is to foster, promote, support, develop and encourage charitable, educational, scholastic and scientific purposes; promote cooperative effort and action between hospitals and other health care…
Swedish Covenant Health follows the mission of Endeavor Health to "help everyone in our communities be their best."
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Community Health Improvement Center and the most unlike its peers is Proactive Community Services. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
Your grantees are a median of 40 years old; the field is 17. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 21% startups (under 5 years old) — 1% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 2% lost their exemption, against 16% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
71 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 71 of the 94 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds McDermott Center ↗
- Who funds AIDS Foundation of Chicago ↗
- Who funds THE HEKTOEN INSTITUTE OF MEDICINE ↗
- Who funds THE CHICAGO RECOVERY ALLIANCE ↗
- Who funds HEALTHCARE ALTERNATIVE SYSTEMS INC ↗
- Who funds PROACTIVE COMMUNITY SERVICES ↗
- Who funds MEN & WOMEN IN PRISON MINISTRIES ↗
- Who funds AIDS HEALTHCARE FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds MAPSCORPS ↗
- Who funds COOK COUNTY HEALTH FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds ACCESS COMMUNITY HEALTH NETWORK ↗
- Who funds PCC COMMUNITY WELLNESS CENTER ↗
- Who funds LOYOLA UNIVERSITY OF CHICAGO ↗
- Who funds Christian Community Health Center ↗
- Who funds ESPERANZA HEALTH CENTERS ↗
- Who funds MK LEVEL PLAYING FIELD INSTITUTE ↗
- Who funds PUERTO RICAN CULTURAL CENTER ↗
- Who funds Alexian Brothers Bonaventure House ↗
- Who funds LAWNDALE CHRISTIAN HEALTH CENTER ↗
- Who funds RENZ ADDICTION COUNSELING CENTER ↗
- Who funds Howard Brown Health Center ↗
- Who funds ECKER CENTER FOR BEHAVIORAL HEALTH INC ↗
- Who funds CORAZON COMMUNITY SERVICES ↗
- Who funds A SAFE HAVEN FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds The Womens Treatment Center DBA TWTC Changed to Windy City Cares ↗
- Who funds St Leonard's Ministries ↗
- Who funds GREATER FAMILY HEALTH ↗
- Who funds Ann & Robert H Lurie Children's Hospital of Chicago ↗
- Who funds Rosalind Franklin University of Medicine and Science ↗
- Who funds Making A Daily Effort ↗
- Who funds Center on Halsted ↗
- Who funds KENNETH YOUNG CENTER ↗
- Who funds POLISH AMERICAN ASSOCIATION ↗
- Who funds CHICAGO HOUSE & SOCIAL SERVICE AGENCY ↗
- Who funds Chicago State Foundation ↗
- Who funds ALTERNATIVES INC ↗
- Who funds University of Chicago ↗
- Who funds BLACK UNITED FUND OF ILLINOIS INC ↗
- Who funds Rush University Medical Center ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: United Way of Metropolitan Chicago Inc · The Chicago Community Trust · Arie and Ida Crown Memorial · AIDS Foundation of Chicago · Polk Bros Foundation Inc · Illinois Children's Healthcare Foundation · Michael Reese Health Trust · Circle of Service Foundation · Robert R McCormick Foundation · Lloyd a Fry Foundation · Illinois Primary Health Care Association · Healthy Communities Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Public Health Institute of Metropolitan Chicago funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus
How do I get to Public Health Institute of Metropolitan Chicago?
Find your warmest path to Public Health Institute of Metropolitan Chicago through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.
Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.