· Public charity
Providence Plan Partners
As expressions of god's healing love, witnessed through the ministry of jesus, we are steadfast in serving all, especially those who are poor and vulnerable.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2018–2024.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
The 16 grants below total $547,500 — the rows itemised in this filing. The $1,075,216 headline is the total grant expense reported on the return, so the remaining $527,716 is giving the schedule does not break out: grants under the $5,000 itemisation floor, grants to individuals, and grants reported on other schedules. Every figure below describes the itemised rows only.
By grant size · FY2024
- Under $10k2 grants · $16k
- $10k–50k12 grants · $357k
- $50k–250k2 grants · $175k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| PANOW | $100,000 |
| ST VINCENT DE PAUL | $75,000 |
| BLANCHET HOUSE | $41,500 |
| ROSE HAVEN | $40,000 |
| LIFE SERVICES | $40,000 |
| WISEPLACE | $40,000 |
| CENTRAL CITY CONCERN | $40,000 |
| PORTLAND BIBLE CHURCH | $30,000 |
| NORTHWEST HARVEST | $30,000 |
| MEALS ON WHEELS PEOPLE | $30,000 |
| COMMUNITY ACTION PARTNERSHIP OF ORANGE COUNTY | $30,000 |
| CENTRO CULTURAL | $15,000 |
| RONALD MCDONALD HOUSE SPOKANE | $10,000 |
| SUMMIT ASSISTANCE DOGS | $10,000 |
| CASCADE AIDS PROJECT | $8,500 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY18–24, $517k) land where the poverty rate runs at 10%, against an area that typically sits at 8%. 76% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +76% since the first grant, against +65% for the ones you funded once.
20 repeat relationships — 10 still active in FY2024, 10 since wound down; 6 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 77% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $124k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
Project Access Now4× · 2018–2024 · $317k · revenue +192%- NBNORTH BY NORTHEAST COMMUNITY HEALTH CENTER5× · 2018–2023 · $260k · revenue +118%
Central City Concern6× · 2018–2024 · $210k · revenue +99%
Funded once
- WSWASHINGTON STATE HEALTH INSURANCE POOLone grant, 2019 · $97k · revenue -74%
- MFMetropolitan Family Servicegraduatedone grant, 2022 · $90k · revenue +29%
- HAHARMONY ACADEMYgraduatedone grant, 2022 · $75k · revenue +266%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Clackamas service center is an inclusive, "one-stop" community center for individuals and families seeking food relief and resources for improved health, dignity, and stability.
Impact nw prevents homelessness by supporting people as they navigate their journey to stability and strength. founded in portland in 1966, impact nw now serves 26,944 people a year in the greater portland, oregon metro area, including…
To connect individuals to the housing and community resources they seek.
To help empower african americans and others achieve equality in education, employment, and economic security.
Northwest housing alternatives (nha)s mission is to create opportunity through housing. nha develops, builds, and manages affordable rental housing for families, seniors, and people with disabilities across oregon. these homes help…
Our central hub empowers oregon and southwest washington communities by helping people identify, navigate and connect with the local resources they need.
Positive change for thriving communities: to empower people to work toward social and economic independence, otherwise improving the lives of those served by the corporation, under relevant community services block grant programs.
We partner with our community to make good health possible for all. wallace serves individuals and families who face barriers to care throughout the east multnomah county in the portland metropolitan area.
Mission: creating a healthy community with respect, compassion and acceptance for all. vision: working together to empower individuals to improve their health, well-being and safety. core values: community - the safe, caring, and inclusive…
Sea mar community health centers is a community-based organization committed to providing quality, comprehensive health, human, housing, educational, and cultural services to diverse communities, specializing in service to latinos.
Welcome Home is a diverse coalition in the Portland metropolitan region that uses its collective resources to create healthy communities by ensuring everyone has an affordable and stable home. We use community education and collaboration…
Our village gardens brings a spirit of hope to the people by growing and sharing food, learning and teaching skills, and empowering community leadership.(continued on schedule o)our village gardens leverages community organizing, skill…
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Mid Willamette Valley Community Action Agency and the most unlike its peers is Reclaiming Lives. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.
Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.
Your grantees are a median of 36 years old; the field is 18. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 20% startups (under 5 years old) — 0% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 11% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
58 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 58 of the 64 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds THE OREGON COMMUNITY FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds PROVIDENCE PORTLAND MEDICAL FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds Project Access Now ↗
- Who funds NORTH BY NORTHEAST COMMUNITY HEALTH CENTER ↗
- Who funds Central City Concern ↗
- Who funds SOCIETY OF ST VINCENT DE PAUL OF PORTLAND OREGON ↗
- Who funds SOCIETY OF ST VINCENT DE PAUL ROGUE VALLEY COUNCIL ↗
- Who funds ROSE HAVEN CIC ↗
- Who funds MEALS ON WHEELS PEOPLE INC ↗
- Who funds STAND FOR CHILDREN LEADERSHIP CENTER INC ↗
- Who funds WASHINGTON STATE HEALTH INSURANCE POOL ↗
- Who funds Metropolitan Family Service ↗
- Who funds NEIGHBORHOOD HEALTH CENTER ↗
- Who funds HARMONY ACADEMY ↗
- Who funds Black Parent Initiative ↗
- Who funds BLANCHET HOUSE OF HOSPITALITY ↗
- Who funds FISH Food Bank ↗
- Who funds YOUTH VILLAGES INC ↗
- Who funds NORTHWEST CHILDRENS OUTREACH ↗
- Who funds ADELANTE MUJERES ↗
- Who funds COMMUNITY ACTION PARTNERSHIP OF ORANGE COUNTY ↗
- Who funds NORTHWEST HARVEST EMM ↗
- Who funds TRILLIUM FAMILY SERVICES ↗
- Who funds BOYS AND GIRLS CLUBS OF PORTLAND METROPOLITAN AREA ↗
- Who funds Reclaiming Lives ↗
- Who funds OREGON FOOD BANK ↗
- Who funds WISEPLACE ↗
- Who funds LIFE SERVICES OF SPOKANE ↗
- Who funds Family Promise of Tualatin Valley ↗
- Who funds UNITED WAY OF JACKSON COUNTY INC ↗
- Who funds NEWBERG FISH EMERGENCY SERVICE ↗
- Who funds Clatsop Community Action ↗
- Who funds FAMILY BUILDING BLOCKS INC ↗
- Who funds NEIGHBORIMPACT ↗
- Who funds SAVING GRACE ↗
- Who funds HOMEPLATE YOUTH SERVICES ↗
- Who funds CENTRO CULTURAL OF WASHINGTON COUNTY ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: The Oregon Community Foundation · OCF Joseph E Weston Public Foundation · Careoregon Inc · Meyer Memorial Trust · Marie Lamfrom Charitable Foundation Trust · The Collins Foundation · Providence Health & Services - Oregon · Juan Young Trust · Maybelle Clark Macdonald Fund · The Autzen Foundation · Kaiser Foundation Hospitals · M J Murdock Charitable Trust
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Providence Plan Partners funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal, a single department, or state — and drag the year to watch it move.
- Mid Willamette Valley Community Action Agency — 81% of income from government
- Lines for Life — 70% of income from government
- Harmony Academy — 70% of income from government
- Family Building Blocks Inc — 68% of income from government
- Neighborimpact — 68% of income from government
- Access — 65% of income from government
- Neighborhood House Inc — 53% of income from government
- Saving Grace — 48% of income from government
- Reclaiming Lives — 47% of income from government
- Black Parent Initiative — 45% of income from government
- Portland Opportunities Indust Center — 38% of income from government
- Adelante Mujeres — 31% of income from government
- Metropolitan Family Service — 29% of income from government
- Clatsop Community Action — 26% of income from government
- Oregon Food Bank — 21% of income from government
- Homeplate Youth Services — 17% of income from government
- With Love Oregon Inc — 16% of income from government
- Habitat for Humanity Portland Metro East — 14% of income from government
- Cascade Aids Project — 13% of income from government
- United Way of Jackson County Inc — 11% of income from government
- Central City Concern — 10% of income from government
- Neighborhood Health Center — 9% of income from government
- Portland Workforce Alliance — 8% of income from government
- Familias en Accion — 8% of income from government
- Providence Portland Medical Foundation — 5% of income from government
- Marion-Polk Food Share Inc — 5% of income from government
- Food for Lane County — 5% of income from government
- North By Northeast Community Health Center — 4% of income from government
- Trillium Family Services — 2% of income from government
- The Oregon Community Foundation — 2% of income from government
- Project Access Now — 2% of income from government
- Centro Cultural of Washington County — 0% of income from government
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.