Skip to content

California · Private foundation

Proper Giving

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$61k
Granted FY2025(still arriving)
15
Grants FY2025
12
Organizations funded FY2024
8%
First-time grantees FY2024
Read the full brief
Median grant, FY2025
$2,170
Largest grant, FY2025
$15,965
Organizations funded a year
3 to 18
FY2018 to FY2024
States reached, FY2025
4
Total assets, FY2025
$74k
Applications
Preselected organizations only
Per its most recent filing; check its own site

How open it is to new grantees

In FY2024, 8% of the organizations Proper Giving funded were first-time grantees, receiving 12% of its grant dollars.

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 88% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $3k went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’21’22’23’24
Human ServicesAnimalsFood & NutritionHealthYouth DevelopmentInternationalOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
The numbers by year
Fiscal yearOrganizations fundedTo those organizationsFirst-time grantees
FY2025still arriving15$61k53%
FY202412$28k8%
FY202318$56k56%
FY202213$208k31%
FY20219$45k56%
FY20208$14k100%
FY20183$9kn/a
96% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2018 to 2025.

International$176kHousing & Shelter$49kReligion$43kAnimals$41kFood & Nutrition$24kHuman Services$23kPublic Safety & Disaster$19kYouth Development$19kOther$0

Where its grants go

Grant dollars by states, across the years we hold.

Which US states its grants reach

WA
NY
CA
UT
DC
HI
TX
FL

Top grantees

Largest recipients by total granted, FY2018 to FY2025, and the share of each one’s budget the grants supplied at peak.

GranteeTotal grantedYearsShare of their budget
The People Concern$35,35530%
Path$32,94030%
Best Friends Animal Society$29,11150%
The Mission La$17,25721%
Mobile Loaves & Fishes Inc$14,59150%
World Central Kitchen Inc$12,3921n/a
Larkin Street Youth Services$10,77860%
Caritas of Austin$8,25340%
California Fire Foundation$7,0001n/a
St Anthonys$5,7562n/a
Show all 27 grantees
All grantees of Proper Giving by total granted
GranteeTotal grantedYearsShare of their budget
The People Concern$35,35530%
Path$32,94030%
Best Friends Animal Society$29,11150%
The Mission La$17,25721%
Mobile Loaves & Fishes Inc$14,59150%
World Central Kitchen Inc$12,3921n/a
Larkin Street Youth Services$10,77860%
Caritas of Austin$8,25340%
California Fire Foundation$7,0001n/a
St Anthonys$5,7562n/a
Austin Pets Alive Inc$5,17650%
Civic Center Community Benefit District$5,00010%
Canine Rescue Club Inc$4,8281n/a
St Anthony Foundation$4,4933n/a
Food in Need of Distribution Inc$4,48620%
Shoal Creek Conservancy$3,49011%
Alonzo King Lines Ballet$3,20010%
The Richmond Ermet Aid Foundation$3,00011%
Upward Bound House$2,16320%
Westside Food Bank$2,00020%
Friends of the Children - Austin$1,91610%
Boys and Girls Club of Santa Monica Inc$1,16310%
Safe Place for Youth Inc$1,03610%
Partnerships for Children$1,00010%
Concerned Citizens of Montauk$4261n/a
Cedars-Sinai Medical Center$40020%
Change the Ref Inc$25010%

What it could do for these grantees

Plus 12 recipients with no EIN on record ($203k), not named here.

Where it is load-bearing

Each grantee by its size and the share of its budget Proper Giving supplied at peak.

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetThe People Concern: $35,355 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetPath: $32,940 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetBest Friends Animal Society: $29,111 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetThe Mission La: $17,257 over 2y, 1.0% of budgetMobile Loaves & Fishes Inc: $14,591 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetLarkin Street Youth Services: $10,778 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetCaritas of Austin: $8,253 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetAustin Pets Alive Inc: $5,176 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetCivic Center Community Benefit District: $5,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetFood in Need of Distribution Inc: $4,486 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetShoal Creek Conservancy: $3,490 over 1y, 0.9% of budgetAlonzo King Lines Ballet: $3,200 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetThe Richmond Ermet Aid Foundation: $3,000 over 1y, 0.9% of budgetUpward Bound House: $2,163 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetWestside Food Bank: $2,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetFriends of the Children - Austin: $1,916 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetBoys and Girls Club of Santa Monica Inc: $1,163 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSafe Place for Youth Inc: $1,036 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetPartnerships for Children: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCedars-Sinai Medical Center: $400 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetChange the Ref Inc: $250 over 1y, 0.1% of budget

Tap a dot to name the grantee.

How this is measured
Share of budget is the funder’s grant in a year over the grantee’s total revenue that year, at its highest across the years we hold; revenue is from all sources. Only grantees confirmed against their own filings, whose grants do not exceed their revenue, are plotted: the largest 21.

Nonprofits that may fit its grantmaking

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust IncIN12.4× affinity8 shared granteesties to 7 of 7Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · National Philanthropic Trust · Charities Aid Foundation America · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Compare Proper Giving with peer funders

About Proper Giving

How much does Proper Giving give?
Proper Giving reported 15 grants totaling $60,716 in its FY2025 IRS filing. It funded between 3 and 18 organizations a year over FY2018 to FY2024.
What does Proper Giving fund?
By grant dollars over FY2018 to FY2025, its largest causes are International (42%), Housing & Shelter (12%), Religion (10%).
Who are Proper Giving's largest grantees?
By total granted over FY2018 to FY2025: The People Concern ($35k), Path ($33k), Best Friends Animal Society ($29k).
Does Proper Giving fund new organizations?
In FY2024, 8% of the organizations it funded were first-time grantees.
Does Proper Giving accept unsolicited applications?
Its most recent filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and does not take unsolicited requests. Check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.
Which funders back the same organizations as Proper Giving?
Its strongest co-funders, measured against what their size predicts, include Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc, National Philanthropic Trust, Charities Aid Foundation America.
Where is Proper Giving based?
Proper Giving is based in CA.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 40 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Proper Giving’s filings →

More from the funding graph