· Public charity
Project Management Institute Educational Foundation
Enable youth to realize their potential and transform lives through project management.
What you funded, over time
Every grant clustered by its grantee’s IRS cause code (NTEE), by year — across FY2017–2024.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
The 11 grants below total $2,688,648 — the rows itemised in this filing. The $4,631,764 headline is the total grant expense reported on the return, so the remaining $1,943,116 is giving the schedule does not break out: grants under the $5,000 itemisation floor, grants to individuals, and grants reported on other schedules. Every figure below describes the itemised rows only.
By grant size · FY2024
- Under $10k4 grants · $29k
- $10k–50k1 grant · $40k
- $50k–250k4 grants · $824k
- $250k+2 grants · $1.8M
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| JA WORLDWIDE | $1,445,084 |
| SPECIAL OLYMPICS INC | $351,640 |
| COOP FOR ASSISTANCE & RELIEF (CARE) | $248,538 |
| AFRICAN LEADERSHIP FOUNDATION | $223,850 |
| NATIONAL ENGINEERS WEEK FOUNDATION DBA DISCOVERE | $201,514 |
| THE EDISON INSTITUTE DBA THE HENRY FORD | $150,000 |
| FUTURE PROBLEM SOLVING PROGRAM INTERNATIONAL INC | $39,522 |
| WILLIAM WOODS UNIVERSITY | $7,500 |
| PITTSBURG STATE UNIVERSITY | $7,500 |
| UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH | $7,500 |
| FOUNDATION FOR STUDENT COMMUNICATION INC | $6,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Dollar for dollar, your grants (FY17–24) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 87% of your dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
Grants abroad, by region — $1.9M on the FY2024 return
Schedule F, as filed: 5 regions. The IRS asks for region and purpose, not the recipient, so no country or grantee can be named here.
Stated purpose: EMPOWER YOUTH/GENERAL SUPPORT
Stated purpose: EMPOWER YOUTH/GENERAL SUPPORT
Stated purpose: EMPOWER YOUTH/GENERAL SUPPORT
Stated purpose: EMPOWER YOUTH/GENERAL SUPPORT
Stated purpose: EMPOWER YOUTH/GENERAL SUPPORT
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving. Grants abroad on Schedule F are filed by region, purpose and amount with no recipient name, so they are shown by region and cannot be placed on the country map or matched to a grantee.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +44% since the first grant, against +17% for the ones you funded once.
11 repeat relationships — 6 still active in FY2024, 5 since wound down; 5 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 93% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $179k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- JWJA WORLDWIDE INC3× · 2022–2024 · $3.2M · revenue +33%
- SOSPECIAL OLYMPICS INC5× · 2017–2024 · $2.4M · revenue +44%
- DIDESTINATION IMAGINATION INC3× · 2021–2023 · $1.5M · revenue +186% · 27% of their budget
Funded once
- TATHE ASIA SOCIETYone grant, 2017 · $424k · revenue -12%
- WFWORLD FEDERATION OF UNITED NATIONS ASSOCIATIONSone grant, 2017 · $272k · revenue -40%
- HKHELEN KELLER INTERNATIONALgraduatedone grant, 2017 · $175k · revenue +44%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Aacsb international provides quality assurance of business school programs, the latest in business education intelligence, thought leadership, and learning and development services.
Creating a more sustainable, peaceful, and just world through education, development, and exchange since 1932. as both an accredited academic institution and an international ngo, world learning, inc. offers the best of theory and practice…
Under the auspices of the united nations and guided by its ideals, the united nations international school (unis) provides an inclusive and diverse learning environment in which rigorous international programs foster academic excellence,…
The mission of ja africa is to inspire and prepare young people in africa to succeed in a global economy.
Advance science, engineering, and innovation throughout the world for the benefit of all. the world's largest multidisciplinary scientific society and a leading publisher of cutting-edge research through its science family of journals,…
The university's goal in the coming decade is to advance learning through the integration of teaching, research and service to others. the core of this goal is to prepare graduates to engage with the world and lead lives of meaning. to do…
The mission of mit is to advance knowledge and educate students in science, technology, and other areas of scholarship that will best serve the nation and the world in the 21st century.
The council on foreign relations (cfr) is an independent, nonpartisan membership organization, think tank, and publisher dedicated to being a resource for its members, government officials, business executives, journalists, educators and…
The primary mission of furman as a liberal arts institution is to provide a distinctive education in fine arts, humanities, social sciences, mathematics and the sciences, as well as selected professional disciplines.
Research, education and general - princeton university is a private not-for-profit, non-sectarian institution of higher learning with approximately 5,700 undergraduate and 3,300 graduate students. 2,500 students graduated in the 2024-2025…
As a diverse community of learners, we cultivate integrity, curiosity, connection and resilience.
To educate students to be ethical and socially responsible leaders in a global community.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Children International and the most unlike its peers is Future Problem Solving Program International Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.
Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.
Your grantees are a median of 41 years old; the field is 16. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 22% startups (under 5 years old) — 0% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 13% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
24 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 24 of the 25 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds JA WORLDWIDE INC ↗
- Who funds SPECIAL OLYMPICS INC ↗
- Who funds DESTINATION IMAGINATION INC ↗
- Who funds NATIONAL ENGINEERS WEEK FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds Children International ↗
- Who funds AFRICAN LEADERSHIP FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds THE ASIA SOCIETY ↗
- Who funds COOPERATIVE FOR ASSISTANCE AND RELIEF EVERYWHERE INC ↗
- Who funds JUNIOR ACHIEVEMENT USA ↗
- Who funds WORLD FEDERATION OF UNITED NATIONS ASSOCIATIONS ↗
- Who funds NATIONAL CENTER FOR CIVIC INNOVATION IN ↗
- Who funds HELEN KELLER INTERNATIONAL ↗
- Who funds FUTURE PROBLEM SOLVING PROGRAM INTERNATIONAL INC ↗
- Who funds THE EDISON INSTITUTE INC ↗
- Who funds TRUE COLORS UNITED INC ↗
- Who funds WORLD RELIEF CORP OF NATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF EVANGELICALS ↗
- Who funds BEREA COLLEGE ↗
- Who funds 114th Partnership Inc ↗
- Who funds PRATHAM USA ↗
- Who funds The George Washington University ↗
- Who funds JUNIOR ACHIEVEMENT OF CHICAGO ↗
- Who funds UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH ↗
- Who funds WILLIAM WOODS UNIVERSITY ↗
- Who funds FOUNDATION FOR STUDENT COMMUNICATIONINC ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · National Philanthropic Trust · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Amazonsmile Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Project Management Institute Educational Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
- World Relief Corp of National Association of Evangelicals — 67% of income from government
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus
How do I get to Project Management Institute Educational Foundation?
Find your warmest path to Project Management Institute Educational Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.
Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.