Skip to content
Project Dialogue at a glanceAlso receives grants: funding profile →

· Private foundation

Project Dialogue

$12k
Granted FY2022
12
Grants FY2022
6
States reached
$5k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
05Through PlinthRead
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2021 to 2022.

International$8kHealth$4kCivil Rights$3kHuman Services$2kHousing & Shelter$2kEducation$2kFood & Nutrition$2kCommunity Improvement$1kOther$0
02FY2022 · 12 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$750
Median grant
6
States reached
$0
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Partners in Health$4,500
Trevor Project$950
Schools on Wheels$750
Planned Parenthood Keystone$750
The Purple Door$750
MAPS$750
Individual grant recipient$750
Innocence project$750
WRRAP$750
We Care Youth Coalition$600
North Texas Food Bank$550
Individual grant recipient$500
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY21–22, $2k) land where the poverty rate runs at 16%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%National Indigenous Women's Resource Center: $500 → 18%Innocence project: $750 → 17%Young Eisner Scholars (YES): $500 → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

MT
NY
MA
PA
CA
MO
DC
GA
TX
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

14%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$4k · 3 repeat orgs$23k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +64% since the first grant, against +22% for those funded once.

3 repeat relationships: 3 still active in FY2022, 0 since wound down; 9 grantees were first funded in FY2022 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

3
25

Total granted

$4k
$13k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+64%
+22%

Still filing today

67%
72%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2022, 17% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $10k went to new ones.

50%100%’21’22
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’21’22
HealthHuman ServicesCivil RightsPhilanthropyInternationalEducationOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • TREVOR PROJECT INC
    2× · 2021–2022 · $1k · revenue +64%
  • WC
    We Care Youth Coalition
    2× · 2021–2022 · $1k
  • NT
    NORTH TEXAS FOOD BANK
    2× · 2021–2022 · $1k · revenue +12%

Funded once

  • G(
    GlobalGiving (Aid to Afghanistan)
    one grant, 2021 · $720
  • PI
    Partners in Health (for Haiti Relief)
    one grant, 2021 · $600
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2021 · $500
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Actionaid Usa

Actionaid is an international network building a just, equitable, and sustainable world in solidarity with communities on the frontlines of poverty and injustice. actionaid usa is the u.s. branch of actionaid international, which works in…

Social Science
2
Pathfinder International

Pathfinder expands access to sexual and reproductive health services, opening the door to opportunities for women and all individuals to thrive-economically, educationally, and civically. driven by our country-led leadership and local…

International
3
Intrahealth International Inc

Our mission is to improve the performance of health workers and strengthen the systems in which they work.

Health
4
Direct Action for Women Now World-Wide Inc Formerly Indias Daughters Inc
Philanthropy
5
Women Winning

To encourage, promote, support, and elect pro-choice women of all political parties to all levels of public office in minnesota.

Public Benefit
6
Women Donors Network

Women donors network advances a just, equitable, and sustainable world through the power of philanthropy, women's leadership, and collective and individual action.

Philanthropy
7
UltraViolet Education Fund

Ultraviolet education fund (uvef) is a 501c3 organization. ultraviolet is the premier national organization advocating for gender justice issues using creative, strategic campaigning and digital-first organizing. ultraviolet drives…

Civil Rights
8
Elizabeth Glaser Pediatric Aids Foundation

The elizabeth glaser pediatric aids foundation (egpaf) is a proven leader in the fight against pediatric hiv/aids and has reached over 33 million pregnant women with services to prevent transmission of hiv to their babies. to date, egpaf…

Health
9
Women in Global Health Inc

Women in global health (wgh) is a global movement and organization that brings together all genders and backgrounds to achieve gender equality in global health leadership.

Public Benefit
10
Patient Access Network Foundation

As a leading charitable foundation and healthcare advocacy organization, the pan foundation is dedicated to accelerating access to treatment for those who need it most and empowering patients on their healthcare journeys. we provide…

—
11
The Population Council Inc

We generate ideas, produce evidence, and design solutions to improve the lives of underserved populations around the world. we take a multidisciplinary, intergenerational, life-cycle approach that contributes to (see schedule o)four global…

International
12
National Institute for Reproductive Health Inc

National institute for reproductive health, inc. works to protect and advance equitable access to reproductive health care by building power at the state and local level. using an approach that is rooted in partnerships with state and…

Civil Rights
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is National Coalition for Women With Heart Disease Inc; the most unlike its peers is Partners in Health a Nonprofit Corporation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

26 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2026.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2026, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 26 of the 37 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
4
Early backer (in before they grew)
26/26
Grantees still filing
16/26
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

We Care Youth Coalition: $1,200 · OtherWe Care Youth CoalitionNORTH TEXAS FOOD BANK: $1,150 · OtherNORTH TEXAS FOOD BANKWOMEN'S SHELTER OF SOUTH TEXAS: $750 · OtherWOMEN'S SHELTER OF SOUTH TEXASIndividual grant recipient: $750 · OtherIndividual grant recipientMAPS: $750 · OtherMAPSGlobalGiving (Aid to Afghanistan): $720 · OtherGlobalGiving (Aid to Afghanistan)Partners in Health (for Haiti Relief): $600 · OtherPartners in Health (for Haiti Relief)Individual grant recipient: $500 · OtherFamily Promise: $500 · OtherAli Forney Center in New York: $500 · OtherAtlanta Urban Debate League: $500 · OtherIndividual grant recipient: $500 · OtherTime For Change Foundation: $500 · OtherAmerican Civil Liberties Union: $500 · OtherAMERICANS FOR IMMIGRANT JUSTICE INC F/K/A FLA IMMIGRANT ADVOCACY CENTER: $500 · OtherBOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF PBC: $500 · OtherBLACK ECONOMIC COUNCIL OF MASSACHUSETTS INC: $500 · OtherPARTNERS IN HEALTH A NONPROFIT CORPORATION: $4,500 · HealthPARTNERS IN HEALTH A NONPROFIT CORP…Women's Reproductive Rights Assistance Project: $750 · HealthWomen's Reproductive Rights Assista…PLANNED PARENTHOOD KEYSTONE: $750 · HealthPLANNED PARENTHOOD KEYSTONENATIONAL COALITION FOR WOMEN WITH HEART DISEASE INC: $500 · HealthNATIONAL COALITION FOR WOMEN WITH H…Grace Medical Home Inc: $500 · HealthGrace Medical Home IncBLOOD CANCER UNITED INC: $500 · HealthBLOOD CANCER UNITED INCMALARIA CONSORTIUM US INC: $500 · HealthMALARIA CONSORTIUM US INCThe Against Malaria Foundation: $500 · HealthThe Against Malaria FoundationTHE INNOCENCE PROJECT INC: $750 · Human ServicesTHE INNOCEN…POETIC: $500 · Human ServicesPOETICNATIONAL INDIGENOUS WOMENS RESOURCE CENTER INC: $500 · Human ServicesNATIONAL IN…GIVEDIRECTLY INC: $500 · Human ServicesGIVEDIRECTL…Young Eisner Scholars: $500 · Human ServicesYoung Eisne…TREVOR PROJECT INC: $1,450 · Civil RightsASIAN AMERICANS ADVANCING JUSTICE - AAJC INC: $500 · Civil RightsYouth With Faces: $500 · PhilanthropyPARKLAND CARES INC: $500 · PhilanthropyHELEN KELLER INTERNATIONAL: $500 · InternationalPROJECT HEALTHY CHILDREN INC: $500 · InternationalSCHOOL ON WHEELS INC: $750 · Education
Other$10,920Health$8,500Human Services$2,750Civil Rights$1,950Philanthropy$1,000International$1,000Education$750

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetPARTNERS IN HEALTH A NONPROFIT CORPORATION: $4,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTREVOR PROJECT INC: $1,450 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetNORTH TEXAS FOOD BANK: $1,150 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetWomen's Reproductive Rights Assistance Project: $750 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE INNOCENCE PROJECT INC: $750 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetPLANNED PARENTHOOD KEYSTONE: $750 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetWOMEN'S SHELTER OF SOUTH TEXAS: $750 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSCHOOL ON WHEELS INC: $750 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetPOETIC: $500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetYouth With Faces: $500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetNATIONAL COALITION FOR WOMEN WITH HEART DISEASE INC: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetNATIONAL INDIGENOUS WOMENS RESOURCE CENTER INC: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetGrace Medical Home Inc: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetAMERICANS FOR IMMIGRANT JUSTICE INC F/K/A FLA IMMIGRANT ADVOCACY CENTER: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetBOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF PBC: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetHELEN KELLER INTERNATIONAL: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetBLOOD CANCER UNITED INC: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMALARIA CONSORTIUM US INC: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetASIAN AMERICANS ADVANCING JUSTICE - AAJC INC: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetPARKLAND CARES INC: $500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetGIVEDIRECTLY INC: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTime For Change Foundation: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetBLACK ECONOMIC COUNCIL OF MASSACHUSETTS INC: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetThe Against Malaria Foundation: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetPROJECT HEALTHY CHILDREN INC: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetYoung Eisner Scholars: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Silicon Valley Commun…Charities Aid Foundat…National Philanthropi…Gs Donor Advised Phil…The Blackbaud Giving …The Pfizer Foundation…Network for GoodMorgan Stanley Global…The Bank of America C…Donor Advised Charita…Natl Christian Charit…Vanguard Charitable E…
Silicon Valley Community FoundationCA16.3× affinity7 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Silicon Valley Community Foundation · Charities Aid Foundation America · National Philanthropic Trust · Gs Donor Advised Philanthropy Fund for Wealth Management Inc · The Blackbaud Giving Fund · The Pfizer Foundation Inc · Network for Good · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Natl Christian Charitable Fdn Inc · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Project Dialogue funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Project Dialogue. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 20%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →median 0%
  • Partners in Health a Nonprofit Corporation: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
2get no government money at all
10report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Project Dialogue?

Find your warmest path to Project Dialogue through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 37 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2022, released 2022. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Possibly out of date. A more recent filing (FY2024) is on record and reports no grant expense, so the figures above are from FY2022, the most recent year this funder made grants.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Project Dialogue’s filings →

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The endowment market
who holds foundation money, and what just moved
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home