Skip to content
Plinth
Foundation DossiersAlso receives grants — funding profile →
Plinth

· Public charity

Professional Association of Therapeutic Horsemanship Inernational

We advance professional equine-assisted services by empowering our members, credentialed professionals, partners and the public through rigorously developed standards, credentials and education that recognize the power of the equine-human relationship.

$556k
Granted FY2025still arriving
11
Grants FY2025still arriving
6
States reached
$10k
Largest
01What you fundRead
02The needRead
03Your edgeRead
04Your fieldRead
01What you fund
01

What you funded, over time

By grantee IRS cause code (NTEE).

A cause breakdown isn’t shown here: 41% of PROFESSIONAL ASSOCIATION OF THERAPEUTIC HORSEMANSHIP INERNATIONAL’s grantee dollars fall outside its nine largest cause areas, whether because the recipient carries no IRS cause code or because its cause sits in the long tail. A chart would be mostly one residual band and misrepresent the portfolio.

02FY2025 · 11 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

The 11 grants below total $102,500 — the rows itemised in this filing. The $556,205 headline is the total grant expense reported on the return, so the remaining $453,705 is giving the schedule does not break out: grants under the $5,000 itemisation floor, grants to individuals, and grants reported on other schedules. Every figure below describes the itemised rows only.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k3 grants · $23k
  • $10k–50k8 grants · $80k
$10,000
Median grant
6
States reached
$3.1M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
SRU FOUNDATION$10,000
PEGASUS THERAPUTIC RIDING ACADEMY INC$10,000
CENTENARY UNIVERSITY$10,000
ACHIEVEMENT CENTERS FOR CHILDREN$10,000
EQUICENTER INC$10,000
JF SHEA THERAPEUTIC RIDING CENTER$10,000
DREAMS ON HORSBACK OH$10,000
BREAKING FREE TRC INC$10,000
SUNY COBLESKILL EQUINE CENTER$7,500
WINSLOW THERAPEUTIC RIDING CENTER$7,500
MARYLAND THERAPEUTIC RIDING INC$7,500
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY17–24, $141k) land where the poverty rate runs at 9%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 52% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Your grants spread fairly evenly across need levels.

area typical 9%WINSOME RIDING ACADEMY: $6k → 7%DREAMPOWER HORSEMANSHIP: $11k → 8%XENOPHON THERAPEUTIC RIDING: $6k → 9%QUEEN OF HEARTS: $9k → 11%HEALING WITH HORSES RANCH: $10k → 10%SHINING HOPE FARMS: $20k → 12%STRIDES TO SUCCESS: $12k → 5%DREAMPOWER HORSEMANSHIP: $6k → 8%QUEEN OF HEARTS: $8k → 11%HEALING WITH HORSES RANCH: $6k → 10%SHINING HOPE FARMS: $8k → 12%STRIDES TO SUCCESS: $8k → 5%HOPE FOR HEROES HORSEMANSHIP CENTER: $6k → 9%DREAMPOWER HORSEMANSHIP: $5k → 8%QUEEN OF HEARTS: $5k → 11%SHINING HOPE FARMS: $7k → 12%STRIDES TO SUCCESS: $7k → 5%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

Which US states your grants reach

NH
WA
ID
MT
IL
NY
MA
WY
IN
OH
PA
NJ
CT
CA
UT
CO
NE
VA
MD
AZ
NM
TN
NC
GA
TX
FL

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

79%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$1.0M · 35 repeat orgs$285k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +16% since the first grant, against +6% for the ones you funded once.

35 repeat relationships — 1 still active in FY2025, 34 since wound down; 10 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

35
28

Total granted

$1.0M
$192k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+16%
+6%

Still filing today

60%
54%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 10% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $93k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
HealthHuman ServicesRecreation & SportsEducationYouth DevelopmentReligionOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • HH
    HEAVENLY HOOFS INC
    6× · 2019–2024 · $81k · revenue +13%
  • ET
    ENDEAVOR THERAPEUTIC HORSEMANSHIP INC
    6× · 2017–2023 · $55k · revenue +13%
  • EI
    EQUICENTER INC
    4× · 2017–2025 · $41k · revenue +207%

Funded once

  • HF
    HOPE FOR HEROES HORSEMANSHIP CENTER
    one grant, 2023 · $11k · revenue -7%
  • CE
    CHAPS EQUINE ASSISTED THERAPY
    one grant, 2023 · $11k
  • SF
    STRONGWATER FARM THERAPEUTIC EQUESTRIAN CENTER INCgraduated
    one grant, 2022 · $10k · revenue +56%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Wings of Hope Therapeutic Riding Program Inc
—
2
Great Results Equine Assisted Therapies
Health
3
Veteran Equine Therapy Stables
Public Benefit
4
Freedom Hooves Therapeutic Riding of Nw Colorado
—
5
Special Equestrians Inc

To provide therapeautic benefits to handicapped citizens through a horseback riding program.

Health
6
Hidden Acres Therapeutic Riding Center Inc

To improve the minds, bodies and spirits of children and adults with special needs through the benefits of therapeutic riding and equine assisted activities.

Health
7
Therapeutic Riding Institute Inc

To improve the lives and health of children and adults in southwest Ohio with special physical, cognitive, social and psychological needs through equine assisted services and therapies. TRI partners extensively with community organizations…

—
8
Special Equestrians Inc

Special Equestrians provides therapeutic riding programs to individuals with physical, mental, and emotional disabilities.

Recreation & Sports
9
Equest Center for Therapeutic Riding Inc

We improve quality of life through equine-based therapy to physically, mentally and socially/emotionally challenged individuals. Our unique program integrates academic, social and physical skills using the horse as a catalyst.

Health
10
Heroes Equine Assisted Riding Therapy
—
11
Spirithorse Rehabilitation Center

Our mission is to help every individual reach their full potential; horses and humans alike. We have three great programs that come together in harmony to accomplish that.

Human Services
12
Whispers of Hope Horse Farm

Enable mentally and/or physically challenged youth or adults in a therapeutic horseback riding program.

Human Services

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Upreach Therapeutic Equestrian Center Inc and the most unlike its peers is Charity Navigator. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.

← shrinkinggrowing →↓ leaning in → pulling backsteadyAnimal Rescue and AdoptionFaith-Based Liberal Arts Co…Public University Foundatio…Developmental Disabilities …Youth Sports Booster Organi…
the sector your giving your giving is ahead of the sector the sector’s ahead of you· dot size = how much the theme matters to each side
Ordered by the change in your giving — leaning in on top, pulling back at the bottom. The bar between the two dots is how out of step you are with the sector. Hover any row for detail.

Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.

Your grantees are a median of 26 years old; the field is 16. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

THE FIELDby orgYOUR GRANTEESby number22%0%<5yr14%5%5–10yr19%21%10–20yr16%54%20–35yr13%12%35–55yr16%9%55yr+
THE FIELDby orgYOUR MONEYby value22%0%<5yr14%2%5–10yr19%19%10–20yr16%64%20–35yr13%11%35–55yr16%5%55yr+

The field is 22% startups (under 5 years old) — 0% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close — 2% lost their exemption, against 13% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund
2%1/49
the rest of the field
13%
240,395/1,819,516

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

04the grantee network

48 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 48 of the 73 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
8
Early backer (in before they grew)
46/48
Grantees still filing
26/48
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

BRAVEHEARTS THERAPEUTIC — $90,016 · OtherBRAVEHEARTS THERAPEUTICEQUINE IMMERSION PROGRAMS — $61,907 · OtherEQUINE IMMERSION PROGRAMSDREAM CATCHERS — $39,645 · OtherDREAM CATCHERSTHERAPEUTIC RIDING AT CENTENARY — $30,150 · OtherIndividual grant recipient — $28,115 · OtherSHANGRI-LA THERAPEUTIC ACADEMY — $26,826 · OtherSIRE INC — $21,545 · Other+28 more — $272,205 · Other+28 moreHEAVENLY HOOFS INC — $81,199 · HealthHEAVENLY HOOFS INCSTABLE STRIDES FARM — $62,135 · HealthSTABLE STRIDES FARMENDEAVOR THERAPEUTIC HORSEMANSHIP INC — $54,689 · HealthENDEAVOR THERAPEUTIC HORSEMANSHIP…EQUICENTER INC — $41,450 · HealthEQUICENTER INCHEARTS & HORSES INC — $35,696 · HealthHEARTS & HORSES INCHORSES SPIRITS HEALING INC — $31,105 · HealthHORSES SPIRITS HEALING INCTriple H Equitherapy Center — $20,550 · HealthLOUDOUN THERAPEUTIC RIDING FOUNDATION INC — $20,550 · Health+6 more — $47,734 · Health+6 moreShining Hope Farms — $35,145 · Human ServicesShining Hope…STRIDES TO SUCCESS INC — $26,616 · Human ServicesSTRIDES TO S…QUEEN OF HEARTS THERAPUTIC RIDING CENTER — $22,502 · Human ServicesQUEEN OF HEA…The Dreampower Foundation — $22,330 · Human ServicesThe Dreampow…HEALING WITH HORSES RANCH — $15,676 · Human ServicesHEALING WITH…Charity Navigator — $6,460 · Human ServicesXENOPHON THERAPEUTIC RIDING CENTER — $6,300 · Human ServicesWINSOME RIDING ACADEMY INC — $5,610 · Human ServicesREACH THERAPEUTIC RIDING CENTER — $19,125 · Recreation & SportsUPREACH THERAPEUTIC EQUESTRIAN CENTER INC — $11,550 · Recreation & SportsHOPE FOR HEROES HORSEMANSHIP CENTER — $10,965 · Recreation & SportsJF SHEA THERAPEUTIC RIDING CENTER INC FKA FRAN JOSWICK THERAP RIDING CTR INC — $10,000 · Recreation & SportsNATIONAL ABILITY CENTER — $7,725 · Recreation & SportsTherapeutic Riding of Tucson Inc — $6,825 · Recreation & SportsCHASTAIN HORSE PARK LTD — $5,950 · Recreation & SportsSAN DIEGO THERAPEUTIC HORSEMANSHIP — $5,685 · Recreation & SportsStableStrides — $58,692 · ReligionALL STAR EQUESTRIAN FOUNDATION INC — $16,539 · EducationSLIPPERY ROCK UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION INC — $10,000 · EducationCENTENARY UNIVERSITY — $10,000 · EducationSUNY COBLESKILL COLLEGE FOUNDATION — $7,500 · EducationEQUINE ASSISTED THERAPY ANDHANDICAPPED RIDING OF NEW JERSEY — $5,400 · EducationGAIT THERAPEUTIC RIDING CENTER — $5,175 · EducationLEG UP FARM INC — $27,815 · Animals
Other$570,409Health$395,108Human Services$140,639Recreation & Sports$77,825Religion$58,692Education$54,614Animals$27,815

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetHEAVENLY HOOFS INC — $81,199 over 6y, 4.8% of budgetSTABLE STRIDES FARM — $62,135 over 3y, 6.6% of budgetStableStrides — $58,692 over 3y, 1.8% of budgetENDEAVOR THERAPEUTIC HORSEMANSHIP INC — $54,689 over 6y, 1.7% of budgetEQUICENTER INC — $41,450 over 4y, 1.1% of budgetDREAM CATCHERS — $39,645 over 3y, 2.0% of budgetHEARTS & HORSES INC — $35,696 over 4y, 0.5% of budgetShining Hope Farms — $35,145 over 3y, 1.8% of budgetHORSES SPIRITS HEALING INC — $31,105 over 4y, 3.5% of budgetLEG UP FARM INC — $27,815 over 2y, 0.5% of budgetSTRIDES TO SUCCESS INC — $26,616 over 3y, 5.8% of budgetQUEEN OF HEARTS THERAPUTIC RIDING CENTER — $22,502 over 3y, 8.4% of budgetThe Dreampower Foundation — $22,330 over 3y, 1.9% of budgetSIRE INC — $21,545 over 2y, 1.0% of budgetTriple H Equitherapy Center — $20,550 over 2y, 1.6% of budgetLOUDOUN THERAPEUTIC RIDING FOUNDATION INC — $20,550 over 3y, 1.5% of budgetREACH THERAPEUTIC RIDING CENTER — $19,125 over 2y, 5.3% of budgetEquine Assisted Therapies of South Florida Inc — $17,475 over 2y, 1.4% of budgetALL STAR EQUESTRIAN FOUNDATION INC — $16,539 over 2y, 3.0% of budgetHEALING WITH HORSES RANCH — $15,676 over 2y, 2.2% of budgetHORSES HEALING HUMANS INC — $13,675 over 2y, 3.9% of budgetHOPE THERAPY INC — $11,920 over 2y, 5.2% of budgetUPREACH THERAPEUTIC EQUESTRIAN CENTER INC — $11,550 over 2y, 0.9% of budgetHOPE FOR HEROES HORSEMANSHIP CENTER — $10,965 over 1y, 6.5% of budgetSTRONGWATER FARM THERAPEUTIC EQUESTRIAN CENTER INC — $10,490 over 1y, 1.4% of budgetSLIPPERY ROCK UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION INC — $10,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetBreaking Free Therapeutic Riding Center Inc — $10,000 over 1y, 7.1% of budgetJF SHEA THERAPEUTIC RIDING CENTER INC FKA FRAN JOSWICK THERAP RIDING CTR INC — $10,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetACHIEVEMENT CENTERS FOR CHILDREN — $10,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetNATIONAL ABILITY CENTER — $7,725 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetCLC FOUNDATION INC — $7,500 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetSUNY COBLESKILL COLLEGE FOUNDATION — $7,500 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetPrancing Horse Inc — $6,830 over 1y, 1.8% of budgetTherapeutic Riding of Tucson Inc — $6,825 over 1y, 1.2% of budgetLOVING THUNDER THERAPEUTIC RIDING INC — $6,600 over 1y, 2.2% of budgetCharity Navigator — $6,460 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetHope Reins Inc — $6,314 over 1y, 8.6% of budgetXENOPHON THERAPEUTIC RIDING CENTER — $6,300 over 1y, 1.2% of budgetCHASTAIN HORSE PARK LTD — $5,950 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetWINSOME RIDING ACADEMY INC — $5,610 over 1y, 3.1% of budgetEQUINE ASSISTED THERAPY ANDHANDICAPPED RIDING OF NEW JERSEY — $5,400 over 1y, 5.3% of budgetGAIT THERAPEUTIC RIDING CENTER — $5,175 over 1y, 1.5% of budgetCHARIOT RIDERS INC — $5,100 over 1y, 2.4% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Christopher Reeve Fou…Oliver-Hoffmann Found…Disabled Veterans Nat…The Latham Foundation…Disabled American Vet…The Richard M Schulze…Duke Energy FoundationBaird Foundation IncThe Bank of America C…Enterprise Holdings F…American Online Givin…Verizon Foundation
Christopher Reeve FoundationNJ18.4× affinity7 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Christopher Reeve Foundation · Oliver-Hoffmann Foundation · Disabled Veterans National Foundation · The Latham Foundation for the Promotion of Humane Education · Disabled American Veterans (DAV) Charitable Service Trust · The Richard M Schulze Family Foundation · Duke Energy Foundation · Baird Foundation Inc · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · Enterprise Holdings Foundation · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Verizon Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Professional Association of Therapeutic Horsemanship Inernational funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal, a single department, or state — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 70%1%3%6%10%your share of their income ↑0%13%25%38%50%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    7get no government money at all
    9report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–50%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 73 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph

    The unnamed billions
    grants reported with no recipient in the public record
    The regranting layer
    51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
    The DAF merry-go-round
    $9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
    The camps
    funders cluster by geography, not ideology
    By state
    where grant money is based, and what stays home
    State money flows
    the interactive map of money crossing state lines