Skip to content
Professional Association of Therapeutic Horsemanship Inernational at a glanceAlso receives grants: funding profile →

· Public charity

Professional Association of Therapeutic Horsemanship Inernational

We advance professional equine-assisted services by empowering our members, credentialed professionals, partners and the public through rigorously developed standards, credentials and education that recognize the power of the equine-human relationship.

$556k
Granted FY2025still arriving
11
Grants FY2025still arriving
6
States reached
$10k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
01What it funds
0194% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Health$871kRecreation & Sports$130kHuman Services$106kReligion$59kYouth Development$37kEducation$28kArts & Culture$14kFood & Nutrition$6kOther$0
02FY2025 · 11 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

How this is measured
The 11 grants below total $102,500, the rows itemized in this filing. The $556,205 headline is the total grant expense on the return; the other $453,705 is giving the schedule does not break out (grants under the $5,000 itemization floor, grants to individuals, grants on other schedules). Every figure below describes the itemized rows only.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k3 grants · $23k
  • $10k–50k8 grants · $80k
$10,000
Median grant
6
States reached
$3.1M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
ACHIEVEMENT CENTERS FOR CHILDREN$10,000
BREAKING FREE TRC INC$10,000
CENTENARY UNIVERSITY$10,000
SRU FOUNDATION$10,000
PEGASUS THERAPUTIC RIDING ACADEMY INC$10,000
JF SHEA THERAPEUTIC RIDING CENTER$10,000
DREAMS ON HORSBACK OH$10,000
EQUICENTER INC$10,000
WINSLOW THERAPEUTIC RIDING CENTER$7,500
SUNY COBLESKILL EQUINE CENTER$7,500
MARYLAND THERAPEUTIC RIDING INC$7,500
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–24, $141k) land where the poverty rate runs at 9%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 52% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants spread fairly evenly across need levels.

area typical 9%WINSOME RIDING ACADEMY: $6k → 7%DREAMPOWER HORSEMANSHIP: $11k → 8%XENOPHON THERAPEUTIC RIDING: $6k → 9%QUEEN OF HEARTS: $9k → 11%HEALING WITH HORSES RANCH: $10k → 10%SHINING HOPE FARMS: $20k → 12%STRIDES TO SUCCESS: $12k → 5%DREAMPOWER HORSEMANSHIP: $6k → 8%QUEEN OF HEARTS: $8k → 11%HEALING WITH HORSES RANCH: $6k → 10%SHINING HOPE FARMS: $8k → 12%STRIDES TO SUCCESS: $8k → 5%HOPE FOR HEROES HORSEMANSHIP CENTER: $6k → 9%DREAMPOWER HORSEMANSHIP: $5k → 8%QUEEN OF HEARTS: $5k → 11%SHINING HOPE FARMS: $7k → 12%STRIDES TO SUCCESS: $7k → 5%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

NH
WA
ID
MT
IL
NY
MA
WY
IN
OH
PA
NJ
CT
CA
UT
CO
NE
VA
MD
AZ
NM
TN
NC
GA
TX
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

79%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$1.0M · 35 repeat orgs$285k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +16% since the first grant, against +6% for those funded once.

35 repeat relationships: 1 still active in FY2025, 34 since wound down; 10 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

35
28

Total granted

$1.0M
$192k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+16%
+6%

Still filing today

60%
54%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 10% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $93k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
HealthHuman ServicesRecreation & SportsEducationYouth DevelopmentReligionOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • HH
    HEAVENLY HOOFS INC
    6× · 2019–2024 · $81k · revenue +13%
  • ET
    ENDEAVOR THERAPEUTIC HORSEMANSHIP INC
    6× · 2017–2023 · $55k · revenue +13%
  • EI
    EQUICENTER INC
    4× · 2017–2025 · $41k · revenue +149%

Funded once

  • HF
    HOPE FOR HEROES HORSEMANSHIP CENTER
    one grant, 2023 · $11k · revenue -7%
  • CE
    CHAPS EQUINE ASSISTED THERAPY
    one grant, 2023 · $11k
  • SF
    STRONGWATER FARM THERAPEUTIC EQUESTRIAN CENTER INCgraduated
    one grant, 2022 · $10k · revenue +56%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Wings of Hope Therapeutic Riding Program Inc
—
2
Great Results Equine Assisted Therapies
Health
3
Veteran Equine Therapy Stables
Public Benefit
4
Freedom Hooves Therapeutic Riding of Nw Colorado
—
5
Special Equestrians Inc

To provide therapeautic benefits to handicapped citizens through a horseback riding program.

Health
6
Hidden Acres Therapeutic Riding Center Inc

To improve the minds, bodies and spirits of children and adults with special needs through the benefits of therapeutic riding and equine assisted activities.

Health
7
Therapeutic Riding Institute Inc

To improve the lives and health of children and adults in southwest Ohio with special physical, cognitive, social and psychological needs through equine assisted services and therapies. TRI partners extensively with community organizations…

—
8
Special Equestrians Inc

Special Equestrians provides therapeutic riding programs to individuals with physical, mental, and emotional disabilities.

Recreation & Sports
9
Equest Center for Therapeutic Riding Inc

We improve quality of life through equine-based therapy to physically, mentally and socially/emotionally challenged individuals. Our unique program integrates academic, social and physical skills using the horse as a catalyst.

Health
10
Heroes Equine Assisted Riding Therapy
—
11
Spirithorse Rehabilitation Center

Our mission is to help every individual reach their full potential; horses and humans alike. We have three great programs that come together in harmony to accomplish that.

Human Services
12
Whispers of Hope Horse Farm

Enable mentally and/or physically challenged youth or adults in a therapeutic horseback riding program.

Human Services
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Upreach Therapeutic Equestrian Center Inc; the most unlike its peers is Charity Navigator. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

48 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 48 of the 73 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
7
Early backer (in before they grew)
46/48
Grantees still filing
25/48
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

BRAVEHEARTS THERAPEUTIC: $90,016 · OtherBRAVEHEARTS THERAPEUTICEQUINE IMMERSION PROGRAMS: $61,907 · OtherEQUINE IMMERSION PROGRAMSDREAM CATCHERS: $39,645 · OtherDREAM CATCHERSTHERAPEUTIC RIDING AT CENTENARY: $30,150 · OtherIndividual grant recipient: $28,115 · OtherSHANGRI-LA THERAPEUTIC ACADEMY: $26,826 · OtherSIRE INC: $21,545 · Other+28 more: $272,205 · Other+28 moreHEAVENLY HOOFS INC: $81,199 · HealthHEAVENLY HOOFS INCSTABLE STRIDES FARM: $62,135 · HealthSTABLE STRIDES FARMENDEAVOR THERAPEUTIC HORSEMANSHIP INC: $54,689 · HealthENDEAVOR THERAPEUTIC HORSEMANSHIP…EQUICENTER INC: $41,450 · HealthEQUICENTER INCHEARTS & HORSES INC: $35,696 · HealthHEARTS & HORSES INCHORSES SPIRITS HEALING INC: $31,105 · HealthHORSES SPIRITS HEALING INCLOUDOUN THERAPEUTIC RIDING FOUNDATION INC: $20,550 · HealthTriple H Equitherapy Center: $20,550 · Health+6 more: $47,734 · Health+6 moreShining Hope Farms: $35,145 · Human ServicesShining Hope…STRIDES TO SUCCESS INC: $26,616 · Human ServicesSTRIDES TO S…QUEEN OF HEARTS THERAPUTIC RIDING CENTER: $22,502 · Human ServicesQUEEN OF HEA…The Dreampower Foundation: $22,330 · Human ServicesThe Dreampow…HEALING WITH HORSES RANCH: $15,676 · Human ServicesHEALING WITH…Charity Navigator: $6,460 · Human ServicesXENOPHON THERAPEUTIC RIDING CENTER: $6,300 · Human ServicesWINSOME RIDING ACADEMY INC: $5,610 · Human ServicesREACH THERAPEUTIC RIDING CENTER: $19,125 · Recreation & SportsUPREACH THERAPEUTIC EQUESTRIAN CENTER INC: $11,550 · Recreation & SportsHOPE FOR HEROES HORSEMANSHIP CENTER: $10,965 · Recreation & SportsJF SHEA THERAPEUTIC RIDING CENTER INC FKA FRAN JOSWICK THERAP RIDING CTR INC: $10,000 · Recreation & SportsNATIONAL ABILITY CENTER: $7,725 · Recreation & SportsTherapeutic Riding of Tucson Inc: $6,825 · Recreation & SportsCHASTAIN HORSE PARK LTD: $5,950 · Recreation & SportsSAN DIEGO THERAPEUTIC HORSEMANSHIP: $5,685 · Recreation & SportsStableStrides: $58,692 · ReligionALL STAR EQUESTRIAN FOUNDATION INC: $16,539 · EducationCENTENARY UNIVERSITY: $10,000 · EducationSLIPPERY ROCK UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION INC: $10,000 · EducationSUNY COBLESKILL COLLEGE FOUNDATION: $7,500 · EducationEQUINE ASSISTED THERAPY ANDHANDICAPPED RIDING OF NEW JERSEY: $5,400 · EducationGAIT THERAPEUTIC RIDING CENTER: $5,175 · EducationLEG UP FARM INC: $27,815 · Animals
Other$570,409Health$395,108Human Services$140,639Recreation & Sports$77,825Religion$58,692Education$54,614Animals$27,815

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetHEAVENLY HOOFS INC: $81,199 over 6y, 4.8% of budgetSTABLE STRIDES FARM: $62,135 over 3y, 6.6% of budgetStableStrides: $58,692 over 3y, 1.8% of budgetENDEAVOR THERAPEUTIC HORSEMANSHIP INC: $54,689 over 6y, 1.7% of budgetEQUICENTER INC: $41,450 over 4y, 1.1% of budgetDREAM CATCHERS: $39,645 over 3y, 2.0% of budgetHEARTS & HORSES INC: $35,696 over 4y, 0.5% of budgetShining Hope Farms: $35,145 over 3y, 1.8% of budgetHORSES SPIRITS HEALING INC: $31,105 over 4y, 3.5% of budgetLEG UP FARM INC: $27,815 over 2y, 0.5% of budgetSTRIDES TO SUCCESS INC: $26,616 over 3y, 5.8% of budgetQUEEN OF HEARTS THERAPUTIC RIDING CENTER: $22,502 over 3y, 8.4% of budgetThe Dreampower Foundation: $22,330 over 3y, 1.9% of budgetSIRE INC: $21,545 over 2y, 1.0% of budgetLOUDOUN THERAPEUTIC RIDING FOUNDATION INC: $20,550 over 3y, 1.5% of budgetTriple H Equitherapy Center: $20,550 over 2y, 1.6% of budgetREACH THERAPEUTIC RIDING CENTER: $19,125 over 2y, 5.3% of budgetEquine Assisted Therapies of South Florida Inc: $17,475 over 2y, 1.4% of budgetALL STAR EQUESTRIAN FOUNDATION INC: $16,539 over 2y, 3.0% of budgetHEALING WITH HORSES RANCH: $15,676 over 2y, 2.2% of budgetHORSES HEALING HUMANS INC: $13,675 over 2y, 3.9% of budgetHOPE THERAPY INC: $11,920 over 2y, 5.2% of budgetUPREACH THERAPEUTIC EQUESTRIAN CENTER INC: $11,550 over 2y, 0.9% of budgetHOPE FOR HEROES HORSEMANSHIP CENTER: $10,965 over 1y, 6.5% of budgetSTRONGWATER FARM THERAPEUTIC EQUESTRIAN CENTER INC: $10,490 over 1y, 1.4% of budgetBreaking Free Therapeutic Riding Center Inc: $10,000 over 1y, 7.1% of budgetJF SHEA THERAPEUTIC RIDING CENTER INC FKA FRAN JOSWICK THERAP RIDING CTR INC: $10,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetSLIPPERY ROCK UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION INC: $10,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetPegasus Therapeutic Riding Academy Inc: $10,000 over 1y, 1.5% of budgetACHIEVEMENT CENTERS FOR CHILDREN: $10,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetNATIONAL ABILITY CENTER: $7,725 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetCLC FOUNDATION INC: $7,500 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetSUNY COBLESKILL COLLEGE FOUNDATION: $7,500 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetPrancing Horse Inc: $6,830 over 1y, 1.8% of budgetTherapeutic Riding of Tucson Inc: $6,825 over 1y, 1.2% of budgetLOVING THUNDER THERAPEUTIC RIDING INC: $6,600 over 1y, 2.2% of budgetCharity Navigator: $6,460 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetHope Reins Inc: $6,314 over 1y, 8.6% of budgetXENOPHON THERAPEUTIC RIDING CENTER: $6,300 over 1y, 1.2% of budgetCHASTAIN HORSE PARK LTD: $5,950 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetWINSOME RIDING ACADEMY INC: $5,610 over 1y, 3.1% of budgetEQUINE ASSISTED THERAPY ANDHANDICAPPED RIDING OF NEW JERSEY: $5,400 over 1y, 5.3% of budgetGAIT THERAPEUTIC RIDING CENTER: $5,175 over 1y, 1.5% of budgetCHARIOT RIDERS INC: $5,100 over 1y, 2.4% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Christopher Reeve Fou…Oliver-Hoffmann Found…Disabled Veterans Nat…The Latham Foundation…Disabled American Vet…The Richard M Schulze…Duke Energy FoundationBaird Foundation IncThe Bank of America C…Enterprise Holdings F…American Online Givin…Verizon Foundation
Christopher Reeve FoundationNJ18.4× affinity7 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Christopher Reeve Foundation · Oliver-Hoffmann Foundation · Disabled Veterans National Foundation · The Latham Foundation for the Promotion of Humane Education · Disabled American Veterans (DAV) Charitable Service Trust · The Richard M Schulze Family Foundation · Duke Energy Foundation · Baird Foundation Inc · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · Enterprise Holdings Foundation · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Verizon Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Professional Association of Therapeutic Horsemanship Inernational funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Professional Association of Therapeutic Horsemanship Inernational. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 70%1%3%6%10%funder's share of their income ↑0%13%25%38%50%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    7get no government money at all
    9report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–50%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 73 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Professional Association of Therapeutic Horsemanship Inernational’s filings →

    More from the funding graph

    The unnamed billions
    grants reported with no recipient in the public record
    The regranting layer
    51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
    The DAF merry-go-round
    $9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
    The endowment market
    who holds foundation money, and what just moved
    The camps
    funders cluster by geography, not ideology
    By state
    where grant money is based, and what stays home