Skip to content

· Private foundation

Price Foundation Inc

Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$2.0M
Granted FY2025still arriving
8
Grants FY2025still arriving
4
States reached
$500k
Largest
01What it funds
0193% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Religion$7.9MHuman Services$2.0MEducation$1.9MHealth$656kRecreation & Sports$612kPhilanthropy$201kHousing & Shelter$200kYouth Development$65kOther$0
02FY2025 · 8 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k2 grants · $10k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $150k
  • $250k+5 grants · $1.9M
$250,000
Median grant
4
States reached
$11M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
SUMMIT MINISTRIES$500,000
LOVE CITY INC$458,336
ASBURY UNIVERSITY$400,000
GO MINISTIRES$250,000
CARE FOR PASTORS$250,000
PREBORN$150,000
REDEMPTION CHRISTIAN CHURCH$5,000
SCARLET HOPE$5,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–25, $2.3M) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 78% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%SPRINGS RESCUE MISSION: $20k → 9%PRE-BORN: $50k → 16%AWAKE MINISTRIES: $147k → 9%TRANSFORMATION MINISTRIES: $7k → 19%PREBORN: $150k → 16%AWAKE MINISTRIES: $75k → 9%PREBORN: $125k → 16%AWAKE MINISTRIES: $65k → 9%PREBORN: $125k → 16%AWAKE MINISTRIES: $65k → 9%PRE-BORN: $110k → 16%AWAKE MINISTRIES: $60k → 9%AWAKE MINISTRIES: $60k → 9%CROSSROADS MISSIONS: $50k → 15%CROSSROADS MISSIONS: $50k → 15%CROSSROADS MISSIONS: $50k → 15%SCARLET HOPE: $157k → 15%SCARLET HOPE: $30k → 15%SCARLET HOPE: $30k → 15%SCARLET HOPE: $30k → 15%SCARLET HOPE: $5k → 15%SCARLET HOPE: $700 → 15%SCARLET HOPE: $600 → 15%SCARLET HOPE: $400 → 15%APRON INC: $1k → 15%LOVE CITY INC: $458k → 15%LOVE CITY INC: $183k → 15%LOVE CITY INC: $150k → 15%LOVE CITY: $5k → 15%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

WA
MT
IN
OH
CO
MO
KY
NC
GA
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
04

Where the work is directed

The same grants placed two ways: where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose sends the money.

About 59% of Price Foundation Inc’s grant dollars are earmarked for a different county than the recipient’s own address. By recipient address, 47% of the giving stays in KY; by stated purpose, 9%.

Price Foundation Inclessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient address
How this is measured
Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the funder’s own 990 grant descriptions.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

94%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$13M · 35 repeat orgs$842k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +87% since the first grant, against 0% for those funded once.

35 repeat relationships: 8 still active in FY2025, 27 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

35
27

Total granted

$13M
$842k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+87%
0%

Still filing today

54%
30%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Human ServicesReligionEducationYouth DevelopmentHealthCrime & LegalOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • SM
    SUMMIT MINISTRIES INC
    9× · 2017–2025 · $3.5M · revenue +94%
  • CF
    CARE FOR PASTORS INC
    8× · 2017–2025 · $1.8M · revenue +144% · 40% of their budget
  • LC
    Love City Inc
    4× · 2018–2025 · $796k · revenue +83%

Funded once

  • DD
    D1 DISCIPLESHIP
    one grant, 2021 · $250k · revenue -73% · 26% of their budget
  • SC
    SOUTHEAST CHRISTIAN CHURCH OF JEFFERSON COUNTY KENTUCKY INC
    one grant, 2020 · $200k
  • OL
    ONE LIFE CHURCH
    one grant, 2021 · $100k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Encounter Church

Church

Religion
2
Christian Mission for the United Nations Community

Christian Mission for the United Nations Community is a ministry aimed at leading the head of every nation and other top leaders to faith in Jesus Christ and helping them to walk in dependence upon God as they discharge the…

—
3
Kingdom Community Ministries

To bring people into a closer relation with jesus christ, and help them overcome the crippling effects of sin and guilt. we accomplish this mission by offering our counselees a christ-centered scripturally - rotted approach; wherein,…

Health
4
Transform Ministries
—
5
One Love Initiative dba Circuit Riders

The ministry of One Love is to establish and equip a generation to obey and fulfill Jesus' Great Commandment and the Great Commission. One Love will work to cultivate a generation of leaders who are wholly given and surrendered to the will…

Religion
6
Jesus in Vietnam Ministries
Religion
7
Christian Life Ministries

Counsel beleivers who are in need of spiritual and mental healing. bring non believers the good news of the gospel of grace. educate others on how to counsel through the word of god. provide seminars and conferences to enhance christian…

Human Services
8
Every Nation Cincinnati Church

The church's mission is to engage individuals with the gospel, to establish them in their faith in jesus christ, to equip them to do the work of the ministry, and to empower them to make disciples.

Religion
9
International Partnerships Inc

To provide support for the efforts of christians of the former soviet union in reaching the influencers of their countries for christ.

Religion
10
Wounded Spirits Ministries

The focus of the ministry is to establish christian camps and retreats that will reach men and women who have been affected by post traumatic stress disorder with the gospel of jesus christ, and equip them to recognize, manage, and…

Recreation & Sports
11
Mission Partners for Christ Aka Community Health Initiatives
Community Improvement
12
International Impact Ministries in
Religion
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Young Life; the most unlike its peers is Operation Open Arms Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
05the grantee network

28 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 28 of the 62 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

2
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
9
Early backer (in before they grew)
27/28
Grantees still filing
20/28
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

SUMMIT MINISTRIES INC: $3,473,838 · OtherSUMMIT MINISTRIES INCU OF L FCA: $440,000 · OtherU OF L FCAWORLD MISSIONS & EVANGELISM INC: $263,338 · OtherST JOHN CENTER INC: $200,000 · OtherSOUTHEAST CHRISTIAN CHURCH OF JEFFERSON COUNTY KENTUCKY INC: $200,000 · Other+37 more: $1,313,500 · Other+37 moreCARE FOR PASTORS INC: $1,816,647 · ReligionCARE FOR PASTORS INCGO MINISTRIES INC: $350,850 · ReligionGO MINISTRIES INCD1 DISCIPLESHIP: $250,000 · ReligionD1 DISCIPLESHIPTHISTLEBEND MINISTRIES INC: $230,000 · ReligionTHISTLEBEND MINISTRIE…+2 more: $6,660 · ReligionLove City Inc: $796,454 · Human ServicesLove City IncMission Pre-Born Inc: $560,000 · Human ServicesMission Pre-Born I…OPEN DOOR OF HOPE INC: $472,000 · Human ServicesOPEN DOOR OF HOPE …SCARLET HOPE INC: $253,700 · Human ServicesSCARLET HOPE INCCrossroads Missions: $150,000 · Human ServicesCrossroads Mission…+3 more: $28,000 · Human ServicesASBURY COLLEGE: $1,941,000 · EducationASBURY COLLEGE+1 more: $5,000 · EducationTHE CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL FOUNDATION INC: $608,500 · HealthFELLOWSHIP OF CHRISTIAN ATHLETES: $410,000 · Youth DevelopmentYOUNG LIFE: $64,500 · Youth DevelopmentUSA CARES INC: $100,000 · Housing & Shelter
Other$5,890,676Religion$2,654,157Human Services$2,260,154Education$1,946,000Health$608,500Youth Development$474,500Housing & Shelter$100,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetSUMMIT MINISTRIES INC: $3,473,838 over 9y, 7.0% of budgetASBURY COLLEGE: $1,941,000 over 5y, 0.6% of budgetCARE FOR PASTORS INC: $1,816,647 over 8y, 40% of budgetLove City Inc: $796,454 over 4y, 16% of budgetTHE CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL FOUNDATION INC: $608,500 over 4y, 1.4% of budgetMission Pre-Born Inc: $560,000 over 5y, 0.5% of budgetOPEN DOOR OF HOPE INC: $472,000 over 6y, 21% of budgetFELLOWSHIP OF CHRISTIAN ATHLETES: $410,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetGO MINISTRIES INC: $350,850 over 5y, 0.5% of budgetWORLD MISSIONS & EVANGELISM INC: $263,338 over 6y, 2.8% of budgetSCARLET HOPE INC: $253,700 over 8y, 21% of budgetD1 DISCIPLESHIP: $250,000 over 1y, 26% of budgetTHISTLEBEND MINISTRIES INC: $230,000 over 4y, 10% of budgetST JOHN CENTER INC: $200,000 over 2y, 3.4% of budgetCrossroads Missions: $150,000 over 3y, 2.4% of budgetLOVE THY NEIGHBORHOOD: $102,000 over 2y, 9.5% of budgetUSA CARES INC: $100,000 over 2y, 2.8% of budgetYOUNG LIFE: $64,500 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetGILDA'S CLUB KENTUCKIANA INC: $40,000 over 2y, 0.6% of budgetTHE SPRINGS RESCUE MISSION: $20,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetSAMARITAN'S PURSE: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCOMMUNITY CATHOLIC CENTER INC: $5,000 over 1y, 1.1% of budgetOPERATION OPEN ARMS INC: $2,500 over 1y, 1.2% of budgetTHE HEALING PLACE INC: $2,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetIgnite the Ville Inc: $1,660 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetAPRON INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds SUMMIT MINISTRIES INC ↗
  • Who funds ASBURY COLLEGE ↗
  • Who funds CARE FOR PASTORS INC ↗
  • Who funds Love City Inc ↗
  • Who funds THE CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds Mission Pre-Born Inc ↗
  • Who funds OPEN DOOR OF HOPE INC ↗
  • Who funds FELLOWSHIP OF CHRISTIAN ATHLETES ↗
  • Who funds GO MINISTRIES INC ↗
  • Who funds WORLD MISSIONS & EVANGELISM INC ↗
  • Who funds SCARLET HOPE INC ↗
  • Who funds D1 DISCIPLESHIP ↗
  • Who funds THISTLEBEND MINISTRIES INC ↗
  • Who funds ST JOHN CENTER INC ↗
  • Who funds Crossroads Missions ↗
  • Who funds LOVE THY NEIGHBORHOOD ↗
  • Who funds USA CARES INC ↗
  • Who funds NATIONAL CHRISTIAN FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds YOUNG LIFE ↗
  • Who funds GILDA'S CLUB KENTUCKIANA INC ↗
  • Who funds THE SPRINGS RESCUE MISSION ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Community Foundation of Louisville IncKY32.5× affinity14 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Community Foundation of Louisville Inc · The Community Foundation of Louisville Depository Inc · The Community Foundation of Louisville Corporate Depository Inc · The Independent Charitable Gift Fund · The Gheens Foundation Inc · Honorable Order of Kentucky Colonels Inc · The Samaritans Inc · Nicklies Foundation Inc · Baird Foundation Inc · Wood & Marie Hannah Foundation · The King's Daughters and Sons Foundation of Kentucky Inc · Cralle Foundation Inc

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Price Foundation Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Price Foundation Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 10%3%13%28%50%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    1get no government money at all
    5report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Price Foundation Inc?

    Find your warmest path to Price Foundation Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 62 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Price’s filings →

    More from the funding graph