Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

Price Family Foundation Dba Tom and Gwen Price Family Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$165k
Granted FY2025still arriving
17
Grants FY2025still arriving
4
States reached
$100k
Largest
01What you fund
01

What you funded, over time

By grantee IRS cause code (NTEE).

A cause breakdown isn’t shown here: 78% of PRICE FAMILY FOUNDATION DBA TOM AND GWEN PRICE FAMILY FOUNDATION’s grantee dollars fall outside its nine largest cause areas, whether because the recipient carries no IRS cause code or because its cause sits in the long tail. A chart would be mostly one residual band and misrepresent the portfolio.

02FY2025 · 17 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k13 grants · $20k
  • $10k–50k3 grants · $45k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $100k
$2,000
Median grant
4
States reached
$118k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
UNIVERSITY OF SAN DIEGO$100,000
NEPAL YOUTH FOUNDATION$20,000
GLADSTONE INSTITUTES$15,000
PEBBLE BEACH FOUNDATION$10,000
SALVATION ARMY$2,500
HAWAII COMMUNITY FOUNDATION$2,500
BELVEDERE TIBURON LIBRARY FOUNDATION$2,500
CHRONICLE SEASON OF SHARING FUND$2,500
FOUNTAIN VALLEY SCHOOL OF COLORADO$2,000
CPMC FOUNDATION$1,000
HUCKLEBERRY YOUTH PROGRAMS$1,000
PETERSON AUTOMOTIVE MUSEUM$1,000
SCHOOLS RULE MARIN$1,000
FRIENDS' CENTRAL SCHOOL$1,000
BELVEDERE COMMUNITY FOUNDATION$1,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY19–25, $3k) land where the poverty rate runs at 10%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 85% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 9%LYME LIGHT FOUNDATION: $250 → 7%HUCKLEBERRY YOUTH PROGRAMS: $1k → 10%HUCKLEBERRY YOUTH PROGRAMS: $1k → 10%HUCKLEBERRY YOUTH PROGRAMS: $100 → 10%HUCKLEBERRY YOUTH PROGRAMS: $100 → 10%HUCKLEBERRY YOUTH PROGRAMS: $100 → 10%HUCKLEBERRY YOUTH PROGRAMS: $100 → 10%HUCKLEBERRY YOUTH PROGRAMS: $100 → 10%HOSPICE BY THE BAY: $100 → 8%HOSPICE BY THE BAY: $100 → 8%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

04

Where the work is directed

The same grants, placed two ways — where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose earmarks the money.

About 29% of Price Family Foundation Dba Tom and Gwen Price Family Foundation’s grant dollars are earmarked, by their stated purpose, for a different county than the recipient’s own address — money that lands at a nonprofit in one place but is meant to do its work in another. Read by recipient address, 97% of the giving stays in CA; read by stated purpose it is 72% — less of the work is directed home than the recipients' locations suggest.

Price Family Foundation Dba Tom and Gwen Price Family Foundationlessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient address

Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the foundation’s own 990 grant descriptions.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

98%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$1.3M · 21 repeat orgs$26k to everyone else

21 repeat relationships — 14 still active in FY2025, 7 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

21
8

Total granted

$1.3M
$25k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+43%
+56%

Still filing today

76%
50%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 99% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $1k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Human ServicesEducationPhilanthropyHealthArts & CultureInternationalOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • UO
    UNIVERSITY OF SAN DIEGO
    9× · 2017–2025 · $900k · revenue +60%
  • NY
    NEPAL YOUTH FOUNDATION
    9× · 2017–2025 · $100k · revenue +60%
  • PB
    Pebble Beach Company Foundation
    4× · 2017–2021 · $40k · revenue +83%

Funded once

  • CS
    COMMON SENSE MEDIAgraduated
    one grant, 2019 · $20k · revenue +28%
  • UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA SAN FRANCISCO FOUNDATION
    one grant, 2024 · $2k · revenue 0%
  • SA
    STAR ACADEMY
    one grant, 2019 · $2k

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Ucsf Foundation Investment Company

The organization provides professional investment management services for endowed gifts and financial assets entrusted to the ucsf foundation.

Education
2
Uc Santa Barbara Foundation

The uc santa barbara foundation actively works to further the goals of the university of california, santa barbara. the foundation seeks to maintain and nurture the university's quality and distinction. on behalf of the campus, the…

Education
3
The Uc Davis Foundation

The mission of the uc davis foundation is to secure, steward and manage private gifts for uc davis.

Education
4
Uc Riverside Foundation

To support educational, research and public functions and programs of the riverside campus of the university of california.

Education
5
Uc Santa Cruz Foundation

To benefit the university of california santa cruz.

Education
6
Berkeley Public Library Foundation

The Berkeley Public Library Foundation (BPLF) amplifies the public investment to make a great public library extraordinary. To that end, we provide vital funds and ongoing advocacy to advance the Library's mission, vision, and strategic…

Philanthropy
7
Community Foundation Santa Cruz County

To promote philanthropy to make santa cruz county a better place to live, now and in the future.we bring together people, ideas, and resources to inspire philanthropy and accomplish great things.

Philanthropy
8
Silicon Schools Fund Inc

The mission of the silicon schools fund is to improve education through supporting the launch of excellent new schools, improving academic instruction in existing schools, and by funding some of the boldest innovations in education…

Education
9
Califonia State University East Bay Foundation Inc

Csu east bay foundation is an auxiliary organization of california state university east bay and the california state university system. the organization's mission is to provide services that aid, supplement, and advance the educational…

Education
10
Ucla Foundation

The ucla foundation is the giving, receiving, and investing arm of the ucla campus. the foundation enables private donors to help build, sustain and advance one of the world's finest academic and research institutions. private philanthropy…

Education
11
University of California Berkeley Foundation

The university of california berkeley foundation's mission is to advance the interest and promote the welfare of the university of california, berkeley (the "university"), to develop and increase the facilities of the university and to…

Education
12
Berkeley Lab Foundation

To support the scientific and educational purposes of the regents of the university of california (the "university"), in its specific capacity as manager and operator of the lawrence berkeley national laboratory and to carry on other…

Education

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is California Pacific Medical Center Foundation and the most unlike its peers is Nepal Youth Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

Your grantees are a median of 36 years old; the field is 14. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

THE FIELDby orgYOUR GRANTEESby number24%0%<5yr15%0%5–10yr19%23%10–20yr18%23%20–35yr11%41%35–55yr13%14%55yr+
THE FIELDby orgYOUR MONEYby value24%0%<5yr15%0%5–10yr19%2%10–20yr18%6%20–35yr11%17%35–55yr13%76%55yr+

The field is 24% startups (under 5 years old) — 0% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close 0.0% lost their exemption, against 14% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund
0.0%0/24
the rest of the field
14%
13,222/94,148

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

05the grantee network

22 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 22 of the 32 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
5
Early backer (in before they grew)
22/22
Grantees still filing
17/22
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

UNIVERSITY OF SAN DIEGO — $900,000 · OtherUNIVERSITY OF SAN DIEGOGLADSTONE INSTITUTES — $80,000 · OtherGLADSTONE INSTITUTES+17 more — $64,300 · Other+17 moreNEPAL YOUTH FOUNDATION — $100,000 · InternationalPebble Beach Company Foundation — $40,000 · PhilanthropyHAWAII COMMUNITY FOUNDATION — $27,500 · PhilanthropyBELVEDERE COMMUNITY FOUNDATION — $7,000 · Philanthropy+1 more — $2,000 · PhilanthropyBelvedere Tiburon Library Foundation — $20,000 · EducationFOUNTAIN VALLEY SCHOOL OF COLORADO — $9,000 · EducationUNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA SAN FRANCISCO FOUNDATION — $1,500 · EducationCALIFORNIA PACIFIC MEDICAL CENTER FOUNDATION — $22,000 · HealthTO CELEBRATE LIFE BREAST CANCER FOUNDATION — $2,000 · HealthCOMMON SENSE MEDIA — $20,000 · Arts & CulturePETERSEN AUTOMOTIVE MUSEUM FOUNDATION — $4,000 · Arts & CultureCHRONICLE SEASON OF SHARING FUND — $17,500 · Food & Nutrition
Other$1,044,300International$100,000Philanthropy$76,500Education$30,500Health$24,000Arts & Culture$24,000Food & Nutrition$17,500

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetUNIVERSITY OF SAN DIEGO — $900,000 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetNEPAL YOUTH FOUNDATION — $100,000 over 9y, 0.4% of budgetPebble Beach Company Foundation — $40,000 over 4y, 0.4% of budgetHAWAII COMMUNITY FOUNDATION — $27,500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetCALIFORNIA PACIFIC MEDICAL CENTER FOUNDATION — $22,000 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetCOMMON SENSE MEDIA — $20,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetBelvedere Tiburon Library Foundation — $20,000 over 8y, 0.8% of budgetCHRONICLE SEASON OF SHARING FUND — $17,500 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetCHP 11-99 FOUNDATION — $11,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetFOUNTAIN VALLEY SCHOOL OF COLORADO — $9,000 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetBELVEDERE COMMUNITY FOUNDATION — $7,000 over 7y, 0.8% of budgetSUMMER SEARCH — $4,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetPETERSEN AUTOMOTIVE MUSEUM FOUNDATION — $4,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetTHE BELVEDERE COVE FOUNDATION — $3,500 over 7y, 0.2% of budgetHUCKLEBERRY YOUTH PROGRAMS INC — $2,500 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetBAY AREA LYME FOUNDATION — $2,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetTO CELEBRATE LIFE BREAST CANCER FOUNDATION — $2,000 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetUNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA SAN FRANCISCO FOUNDATION — $1,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE FUND FOR THE TIGER — $1,500 over 2y, 1.4% of budgetTAHOE FUND — $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetLymeLight Foundation — $250 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetBY THE BAY HEALTH — $200 over 2y, 0.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds UNIVERSITY OF SAN DIEGO
  • Who funds NEPAL YOUTH FOUNDATION
  • Who funds Pebble Beach Company Foundation
  • Who funds HAWAII COMMUNITY FOUNDATION
  • Who funds CALIFORNIA PACIFIC MEDICAL CENTER FOUNDATION
  • Who funds COMMON SENSE MEDIA
  • Who funds Belvedere Tiburon Library Foundation
  • Who funds CHRONICLE SEASON OF SHARING FUND
  • Who funds CHP 11-99 FOUNDATION
  • Who funds FOUNTAIN VALLEY SCHOOL OF COLORADO
  • Who funds BELVEDERE COMMUNITY FOUNDATION
  • Who funds SUMMER SEARCH
  • Who funds PETERSEN AUTOMOTIVE MUSEUM FOUNDATION
  • Who funds THE BELVEDERE COVE FOUNDATION
  • Who funds HUCKLEBERRY YOUTH PROGRAMS INC
  • Who funds BAY AREA LYME FOUNDATION
  • Who funds TO CELEBRATE LIFE BREAST CANCER FOUNDATION
  • Who funds UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA SAN FRANCISCO FOUNDATION
  • Who funds THE FUND FOR THE TIGER
  • Who funds TAHOE FUND
  • Who funds LymeLight Foundation
  • Who funds BY THE BAY HEALTH

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Marin Community FoundationCA18.8× affinity7 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Marin Community Foundation · Silicon Valley Community Foundation · The San Francisco Foundation · Jewish Community Federation of San Francisco the Peninsula Marin & Sonoma · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · National Philanthropic Trust · American Endowment Foundation · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Price Family Foundation Dba Tom and Gwen Price Family Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%your share of their income ↑0%4%8%11%15%share of the org’s income from government
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    3report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–15%
    typical government reliance, FY2025

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Price Family Foundation Dba Tom and Gwen Price Family Foundation?

    Find your warmest path to Price Family Foundation Dba Tom and Gwen Price Family Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 32 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph