Skip to content

· Private foundation

Press Adelman Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$16k
Granted FY2025still arriving
7
Grants FY2025still arriving
2
States reached
$4k
Largest
01What it funds
0199% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Human Services$38kFood & Nutrition$30kYouth Development$21kEducation$15kInternational$10kArts & Culture$7kHealth$3kPhilanthropy$3kOther$0
02FY2025 · 7 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$2,000
Median grant
2
States reached
$247k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
LITTLE BROTHERS - FRIENDS OF THE ELDERLY$4,000
SOUTH BEND EDUCATION FOUNDATION$2,000
JUST ONE CHESED$2,000
FOOD BANK OF NORTHERN INDIANA$2,000
COMMON PANTRY$2,000
BOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF CHICAGO$2,000
RUTH PAGE CENTER FOR THE ARTS$1,500
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–25, $40k) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 12%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 12%THE INSPIRATION CORPORATION: $2k → 14%THE NIGHT MINISTRY: $2k → 14%THE NIGHT MINISTRY: $2k → 14%THE NIGHT MINISTRY: $2k → 14%LITTLE BROTHERS - FRIENDS OF THE ELDERLY: $4k → 14%LITTLE BROTHERS - FRIENDS OF THE ELDERLY: $4k → 14%LITTLE BROTHERS - FRIENDS OF THE ELDERLY: $4k → 14%LITTLE BROTHERS - FRIENDS OF THE ELDERLY: $3k → 14%LITTLE BROTHERS - FRIENDS OF THE ELDERLY: $3k → 14%LITTLE BROTHERS - FRIENDS OF THE ELDERLY: $2k → 14%LITTLE BROTHERS - FRIENDS OF THE ELDERLY: $2k → 14%LITTLE BROTHERS - FRIENDS OF THE ELDERLY: $2k → 14%LITTLE BROTHERS - FRIENDS OF THE ELDERLY: $2k → 14%SALT & LIGHT COALITION: $1k → 14%SHALVA: $5k → 14%SHALVA: $2k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

93%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$119k · 12 repeat orgs$9k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +74% since the first grant, against +18% for those funded once.

12 repeat relationships: 7 still active in FY2025, 5 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

12
7

Total granted

$119k
$9k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+74%
+18%

Still filing today

83%
71%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Human ServicesFood & NutritionInternationalHealthYouth DevelopmentEducationOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • FB
    FOOD BANK OF NORTHERN INDIANA INC
    7× · 2017–2025 · $16k · revenue +129%
  • BA
    BOYS AND GIRLS CLUBS OF CHICAGO
    7× · 2019–2025 · $15k · revenue +23%
  • CP
    COMMON PANTRY
    7× · 2017–2025 · $13k · revenue +155%

Funded once

  • BI
    BEACON INC
    one grant, 2021 · $2k · revenue +14%
  • IC
    Inspiration Corporationgraduated
    one grant, 2022 · $2k · revenue +35%
  • HH
    HOOSIER HILLS FOOD BANK INC
    one grant, 2019 · $2k · revenue +18%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Meals On Wheels Chicago

Our mission is to ensure that Chicago seniors and people with disabilities benefit from nutritious meal programs that improve their quality of life and maximize independence.

Food & Nutrition
2
Nourishing Hope

Nourishing hope provides food, mental health support, and social services to help all our neighbors thrive.

—
3
New Hope House Northwest D/B/a New Hope Community Food Pantry

New hope house northwest is a volunteer-driven food pantry dedicated to providing emergency food assistance to individuals and families in need. the pantry serves chicago's far northwest side, norridge, and harwood heights residents,…

Food & Nutrition
4
Homebound Meals Inc

The Organization's mission is to assist shut-ins, usually the elderly, by delivering hot, nutritious and low-cost meals to them in their homes.

—
5
Street Samaritans

Street samaritans is an illinois not for profit corporation incorporated in 2017. the purpose of the organization is to provide chicagoland's homeless population with fulfillment of their most pressing needs including food, water and…

Human Services
6
Chicago Hope Inc

Chicago Hope runs a food pantry twice a week that serves over 100 families. The organization is working toward the furtherance of wrap around services.

Human Services
7
A Better Chicago

A better chicago is changing how chicago fights poverty by investing in bold ideas that create opportunity for our youth.

Human Services
8
Chicago Jobs Council

Chicago Jobs Council (CJC) pursues its mission through advocacy, applied research, public education and capacity-building initiatives focused on influencing the development or reform of public policies and programs. From 18 original…

—
9
Feeding Indiana's Hungry Inc

By drawing on varied resources within public agencies and the private sector, we hope to provide hunger relief for those in need throughout Indiana.

Human Services
10
Maot Chitim of Greater Chicago Inc

Maot chitim of greater chicago provides meaningful opportunities, through the delivery of food and other necessities, to help those in need celebrate jewish life with dignity and joy.

Food & Nutrition
11
Greater Chicago Food Depository

The greater chicago food depository is the nonprofit food bank serving cook county. our mission - is to end hunger. we believe food is a basic human right. to achieve our mission, we work in partnership with a network of community-based…

Food & Nutrition
12
Care for Friends

Care for Friends provides fundamental food, clothing and healthcare programs for individuals in Chicago experiencing or at risk of homelessness. Our "no questions asked" policy removes the most common barriers to assistance and allows us…

Human Services
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is The Night Ministry; the most unlike its peers is NoStigmas. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

15 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 15 of the 19 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
4
Early backer (in before they grew)
15/15
Grantees still filing
11/15
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

LITTLE BROTHERS - FRIENDS OF THE ELDERLY: $25,000 · Human ServicesLITTLE BROTHERS - FRIENDS OF THE EL…SHALVA INC: $7,000 · Human ServicesSHALVA INCTHE NIGHT MINISTRY: $5,000 · Human ServicesTHE NIGHT MINISTRYInspiration Corporation: $2,000 · Human Services+1 more: $1,000 · Human ServicesSOUTH BEND EDUCATION FOUNDATION: $13,000 · OtherSOUTH BEND EDUCATION FOUNDAT…COMMON PANTRY: $12,500 · OtherCOMMON PANTRYRUTH PAGE CENTER FOR THE ARTS: $5,500 · OtherRUTH PAGE CENTER FOR THE ART…+2 more: $1,250 · OtherFOOD BANK OF NORTHERN INDIANA INC: $16,000 · Food & NutritionFOOD BANK OF NO…HOOSIER HILLS FOOD BANK INC: $1,500 · Food & NutritionHOOSIER HILLS F…BOYS AND GIRLS CLUBS OF CHICAGO: $15,000 · Youth DevelopmentBOYS AND GIRL…FRIENDS OF THE ISRAEL DEFENSE FORCES: $9,500 · InternationalFRIENDS OF TH…JUNIOR ACHIEVEMENT OF CHICAGO: $5,500 · InternationalJUNIOR ACHIEV…NoStigmas: $1,600 · HealthOperation Walk Chicago: $1,500 · HealthJust One Chesed Inc: $3,000 · PhilanthropyBEACON INC: $2,000 · Education
Human Services$40,000Other$32,250Food & Nutrition$17,500Youth Development$15,000International$15,000Health$3,100Philanthropy$3,000Education$2,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetLITTLE BROTHERS - FRIENDS OF THE ELDERLY: $25,000 over 9y, 0.1% of budgetFOOD BANK OF NORTHERN INDIANA INC: $16,000 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetBOYS AND GIRLS CLUBS OF CHICAGO: $15,000 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetCOMMON PANTRY: $12,500 over 7y, 0.1% of budgetFRIENDS OF THE ISRAEL DEFENSE FORCES: $9,500 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetSHALVA INC: $7,000 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetJUNIOR ACHIEVEMENT OF CHICAGO: $5,500 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetTHE NIGHT MINISTRY: $5,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetJust One Chesed Inc: $3,000 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetBEACON INC: $2,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetInspiration Corporation: $2,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetNoStigmas: $1,600 over 2y, 3.6% of budgetHOOSIER HILLS FOOD BANK INC: $1,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetOperation Walk Chicago: $1,500 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetSALT AND LIGHT COALITION NFP: $1,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds LITTLE BROTHERS - FRIENDS OF THE ELDERLY ↗
  • Who funds FOOD BANK OF NORTHERN INDIANA INC ↗
  • Who funds BOYS AND GIRLS CLUBS OF CHICAGO ↗
  • Who funds COMMON PANTRY ↗
  • Who funds FRIENDS OF THE ISRAEL DEFENSE FORCES ↗
  • Who funds SHALVA INC ↗
  • Who funds JUNIOR ACHIEVEMENT OF CHICAGO ↗
  • Who funds THE NIGHT MINISTRY ↗
  • Who funds Just One Chesed Inc ↗
  • Who funds BEACON INC ↗
  • Who funds Inspiration Corporation ↗
  • Who funds NoStigmas ↗
  • Who funds HOOSIER HILLS FOOD BANK INC ↗
  • Who funds Operation Walk Chicago ↗
  • Who funds SALT AND LIGHT COALITION NFP ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Jewish Federation of Metropolitan ChicagoIL13.3× affinity4 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Jewish Federation of Metropolitan Chicago · Gs Donor Advised Philanthropy Fund for Wealth Management Inc · Renaissance Charitable Foundation Inc · The Blackbaud Giving Fund · National Philanthropic Trust · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · Network for Good · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Press Adelman Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Press Adelman Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%15%30%45%60%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    6report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–60%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Press Adelman Foundation?

    Find your warmest path to Press Adelman Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 19 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Press Adelman’s filings →

    More from the funding graph