Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

Praise the Lord Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$3k
Granted FY2025still arriving
3
Grants FY2025still arriving
3
States reached
$1k
Largest
01What you fund
0198% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20172025.

Religion$1.4MHuman Services$112kPublic Benefit$30kEmployment$21kEducation$20kCivil Rights$6kInternational$5kFood & Nutrition$3kOther$0
02FY2025 · 3 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

$1,200
Median grant
3
States reached
$779k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
KENNETH COPELAND MINISTRIES$1,200
WARRIOR NOTES$1,200
KINGDOM OF GOD GLOBAL CHURCH$700
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY17–17, $50k) land where the poverty rate runs at 10%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 0% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Your grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%AIM HIGH: $30k → 10%FIRST PLACE FOR YOUTH: $20k → 10%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

Which US states your grants reach

MI
OH
CA
CO
VA
NC
OK
LA
GA
TX

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

55%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$889k · 18 repeat orgs$741k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +90% since the first grant, against +10% for the ones you funded once.

18 repeat relationships — 3 still active in FY2025, 15 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

18
24

Total granted

$889k
$741k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+90%
+10%

Still filing today

17%
33%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
ReligionEmploymentHuman ServicesInternationalArts & CulturePhilanthropyOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • DH
    DAVID HERNANDEZ MINISTRIES
    5× · 2018–2023 · $600k
  • PR
    PROPHET ROB SANCHEZ MINISTRIES
    3× · 2020–2022 · $65k
  • SW
    SHEKINAH WORLD MISSION CENTER
    4× · 2017–2021 · $50k

Funded once

  • BC
    BRIDGE CHURCH OF WNC
    one grant, 2021 · $470k
  • LM
    LIVG MINISTRY
    one grant, 2022 · $80k
  • H4
    HOMES 4 FAMILIES
    one grant, 2021 · $45k

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Global Mission

To bring the gospel of jesus christ to those who have never heard it and take care of orphans

Religion
2
Activation International Ministries

Teaching and ministering to pastors internationally and in the usa.

Religion
3
Christ to the World Ministries Inc

Proclaim and share the Gospel of Christ in unique ways throughout Asia to reach Christians and non-Christians.

Religion
4
Livingwaterinme Ministries

To spread the love of christ, to restore joy to people, and to revive the lands - revival prayer walks in the us; prayer walks in other countries; speeches and life testimony sharing; mercy ministry; worship & music ministry; children…

Religion
5
Impact International Ministries Inc

Preach and teach gospel of jesus christ

Religion
6
Knowing Love Ministries

Teaching the gospel

Religion
7
Soon Movement Global

To win people to know jesus christ and have a personal relationship with god, build people to be spiritual mutiplying disciple, and send people to win the world with fulfilling the holy spirit.

Religion
8
Propagate Media Incorporaton

This media outreach tool affords preachers and teachers of the Word in Christs Kingdom the global projection of media gospel. Our vision of Propagate Media Incorporation is to lift Jesus Christ higher for the world to see! But I, when I am…

Religion
9
Transformation Prayer Ministry International Inc

Facilitate prayer ministry throughout the world through web ministry training and distribution of training materials

Religion
10
Gods Promise Ministries International

Religious Purposes

Housing & Shelter
11
Kingdom Living Now Dba Break the Cycle Global

Ministry

Religion
12
Word Alive Ministries

Preaching the word of god plus ministering in song.

Religion

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Alabaster Heart Foundation and the most unlike its peers is Shin Shin Educational Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

Your grantees are a median of 26 years old; the field is 14. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

THE FIELDby orgYOUR GRANTEESby number24%8%<5yr15%15%5–10yr20%15%10–20yr17%31%20–35yr11%15%35–55yr13%15%55yr+
THE FIELDby orgYOUR MONEYby value24%4%<5yr15%3%5–10yr20%4%10–20yr17%14%20–35yr11%7%35–55yr13%69%55yr+

The field is 24% startups (under 5 years old) — 8% of your grantees by number, and just 4% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close 0.0% lost their exemption, against 14% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund
0.0%0/28
the rest of the field
14%
26,003/186,950

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

04the grantee network

14 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 14 of the 42 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
4
Early backer (in before they grew)
11/14
Grantees still filing
7/14
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

DAVID HERNANDEZ MINISTRIES — $599,600 · OtherDAVID HERNANDEZ MINISTRIESBRIDGE CHURCH OF WNC — $470,000 · OtherBRIDGE CHURCH OF WNCLIVG MINISTRY — $80,000 · OtherLIVG MINISTRYPROPHET ROB SANCHEZ MINISTRIES — $65,448 · OtherSHEKINAH WORLD MISSION CENTER (SWMC) — $49,993 · Other+24 more — $190,395 · Other+24 morePROPHETIC LIFE MINISTRY — $29,000 · ReligionAndrew Wommack Ministries Inc — $22,700 · ReligionCOMPASSION TO ACTION INC — $10,000 · ReligionWarrior Notes — $7,700 · ReligionGLORY AND WONDERS WORLD MISSION — $5,000 · Religion+1 more — $2,000 · ReligionAIM HIGH — $30,000 · Human ServicesFIRST PLACE FOR YOUTH — $20,000 · Human ServicesSUMMER SEARCH — $20,000 · Employment+1 more — $500 · EmploymentSHIN SHIN EDUCATIONAL FOUNDATION — $20,000 · InternationalALABASTER HEART FOUNDATION — $7,000 · Philanthropy2 LIVVV — $1,000 · Arts & Culture
Other$1,455,436Religion$76,400Human Services$50,000Employment$20,500International$20,000Philanthropy$7,000Arts & Culture$1,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetPROPHETIC LIFE MINISTRY — $29,000 over 3y, 3.6% of budgetAndrew Wommack Ministries Inc — $22,700 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetFIRST PLACE FOR YOUTH — $20,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetSUMMER SEARCH — $20,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetSHIN SHIN EDUCATIONAL FOUNDATION — $20,000 over 1y, 1.7% of budgetWarrior Notes — $7,700 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetALABASTER HEART FOUNDATION — $7,000 over 1y, 12% of budgetGLORY AND WONDERS WORLD MISSION — $5,000 over 1y, 8.1% of budgetMEALS ON WHEELS INC — $3,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetTD JAKES FOUNDATION — $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds AIM HIGH
  • Who funds PROPHETIC LIFE MINISTRY
  • Who funds Andrew Wommack Ministries Inc
  • Who funds FIRST PLACE FOR YOUTH
  • Who funds SUMMER SEARCH
  • Who funds SHIN SHIN EDUCATIONAL FOUNDATION
  • Who funds COMPASSION TO ACTION INC
  • Who funds Warrior Notes
  • Who funds ALABASTER HEART FOUNDATION
  • Who funds GLORY AND WONDERS WORLD MISSION
  • Who funds MEALS ON WHEELS INC
  • Who funds GO FORTH MINISTRIES
  • Who funds 2 LIVVV
  • Who funds TD JAKES FOUNDATION

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Glass Family FoundationAR13.6× affinity4 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Glass Family Foundation · Servant Foundation · Natl Christian Charitable Fdn Inc · Gs Donor Advised Philanthropy Fund for Wealth Management Inc · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · National Philanthropic Trust · The Blackbaud Giving Fund · Charities Aid Foundation America · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · American Endowment Foundation · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · American Online Giving Foundation Inc

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Praise the Lord Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 00%1%4%8%15%your share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    1report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
    typical government reliance, FY2025

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Praise the Lord Foundation?

    Find your warmest path to Praise the Lord Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 42 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph