Skip to content
Plinth
← FundingAlso makes grants — grantmaker profile →

Louisiana · Nonprofit

Warrior Notes

Warrior Notes (Louisiana) receives grants from 6 organizations whose IRS filings report $123,088 to it, the largest being LIGHTHOUSE FOUNDATION ($63,500). 5 of them have funded it in more than one year.

$13M
Revenue FY2024
6
Funders on record
$123k
Grants received
$19M
Net assets
5/6 repeat funderspeak grant-dependency 0%

Against its field

Warrior Notes has grown faster than three-quarters of the 249 religion nonprofits its size.

Operating margin6% · above the median
Months of reserve2.4mo · above the median
Revenue growth (annualized)83% · top quartile

this organization peer median middle 50% of peers· 249 religion nonprofits $10M–$100M, FY2024

Three funders worth looking at

Grantmakers with no record of funding this organization, ranked by how strongly the co-funder graph and the mission embeddings agree. The evidence is in section 03.

See all 12 prospects and why each one surfaced →
01The organization over time

The organization over time

Each line starts at 100 in 2017, so what you read is the shape rather than the size: 150 means half as much again as 2017, 50 means half. The number beside each label in the key is where it ended. The shaded band is where the middle 50% of its peers' revenue would sit, given their growth.

100 = 20172017 Revenue 100 ($186k) Expenses 100 ($72k) Net assets 100 ($69k)2018 Revenue 133 ($247k) Expenses 270 ($194k) Net assets 158 ($109k)2019 Revenue 1095 ($2.0M) Expenses 1082 ($777k) Net assets 1991 ($1.4M)2020 Revenue 3622 ($6.7M) Expenses 2193 ($1.6M) Net assets 9483 ($6.5M)2021 Revenue 4731 ($8.8M) Expenses 6049 ($4.3M) Net assets 15761 ($11M)2022 Revenue 6512 ($12M) Expenses 12048 ($8.6M) Net assets 20720 ($14M)2023 Revenue 7156 ($13M) Expenses 13943 ($10M) Net assets 25844 ($18M)2024 Revenue 6750 ($13M) Expenses 16390 ($12M) Net assets 27032 ($19M)
'17'18'19'20'21'22'23'24
Revenue (6750)Expenses (16390)Net assets (27032)Peer revenue range

How it's funded, over time

Each bar is one year's revenue split into where it came from, and every bar is the same height — these are shares, not amounts, so a year that raised twice as much looks the same size. Hover a bar for the split.

2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
ContributionsProgram revenueInvestmentOther

Government-grant reliance: 2018 99% · 2020 95%. Grants only. Government contracts and fees sit inside program revenue.

73% of Warrior Notes’s revenue is contributions — about as donation-reliant as the typical peer (84% for the typical peer).

This organization
Typical peer · 289 orgs

Surplus & reserves

Operating surplus or deficit each year, and months of liquidity in hand. 0 of the last 8 reported years ran a deficit.

$114k
17
$53k
18
$1.3M
19
$5.2M
20
$4.5M
21
$3.5M
22
$3.3M
23
$795k
24
2.4
months of
reserve
02Who funds it

Who funds it, year by year

2019 → 2023: the base broadened from 1 funder to 5 funders, grant income rose $500 → $19k.

4 of 6 of your funders are donor-advised or pass-through sponsors (tagged DAF)42% of grant dollars received. That money is really individual donors directing a sponsor; the institutions to cultivate are the non-DAF funders.

From the IRS filings of Warrior Notes’s funders (the co-funder graph). Association, not causation. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.

How concentrated its funding is

Warrior Notes leans on a few funders — its largest provides 52% of grant income and the top three 82%; half comes from just 1 funder.

the vertical line marks half of all grant income — 1 funder to its left

42% of the income these shares are computed over arrives through pass-through sponsors or from payers whose filings do not say what kind of payment it is. Concentration is still measured over all of it, because the money is real; what it does not support is a claim about how many institutions have chosen to fund Warrior Notes.

52%
largest funder
82%
top three
~3
effective funders

Largest funder’s share by year: 2019 100% · 2020 57% · 2021 90% · 2022 93% · 2023 54%diversifying over time.

“Effective funders” = inverse Herfindahl index (1 / Σ shareᵢ²) — the number of equal-sized funders that would give the same concentration. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.

Where its funders are

Warrior Notes draws 100% of its grant income from funders outside Louisiana, across 2 states in all.

CA
TX

In-state vs out-of-state, by year

19
20
21
22
23
Louisiana out of state home

Funder states come from each funder’s own filing. $52k arriving through sponsors registered in 4 statesis excluded from the map and the split above: a sponsor holds money on a donor’s behalf, so its registered address would place those dollars somewhere no donor need ever have been. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.

03Its place in the field

Funders to approach

Grantmakers that don’t fund you yet, surfaced two ways: they back organizations that share your funders, or their grantees resemble your mission. The ones both signals agree on come first.

From the co-funder graph (funders backing at least two comparable organizations, shrunk for grantee count, donor-advised and mega-funds excluded) and the universe embeddings. A research starting point; overlap is association, not a guarantee of fit.

Organizations like Warrior Notes

Nonprofits whose mission and program text most resemble this one, by semantic similarity over the universe of US filings — the closest peers, and often the clearest route to shared or prospective funders.

In Louisiana

Nationally

04Profile & governance

Read directly from this organization’s own Form 990, as neutral context.

Where the money goes

19% of spending goes to programs.

Program 19%Management 81%Fundraising 0%

Governance

3
board members
33%
independent
Conflict-of-interest policyWhistleblower policyDocument retentionBoard reviewed the 990Audited financials

Public support

99%

Share of support from the public (Schedule A) — the basis for its public-charity status.

Screen this organization

A dated, signed PDF of the compliance screen for Warrior Notes: IRS status (Business Master File, Publication 78, auto-revocation), the OFAC sanctions lists, the Internal Revenue Bulletin, and California registration, with the Rev. Proc. 2018-32 §8.01 reliance elements stated element by element. Generated from the current files at the moment you download it.

A paid feature, included from the $75 plan up. Sign in to download.

Screens are triage, not determinations; a source that cannot be read reports not screened, never clear. How the screen works · on the API as GET /api/screening/{ein}?format=pdf

Questions and answers

Who funds Warrior Notes?
Warrior Notes (Louisiana) receives grants from 6 organizations whose IRS filings report $123,088 to it, the largest being LIGHTHOUSE FOUNDATION ($63,500). 5 of them have funded it in more than one year.
How many funders does Warrior Notes have?
IRS filings report 6 organizations giving $123,088 in grants to Warrior Notes, 5 of which have funded it in more than one year.
Who is the largest funder of Warrior Notes?
LIGHTHOUSE FOUNDATION is the largest funder on record, with $63,500 in grants. The full list of funders is on this page.
How can an organization like Warrior Notes find more funders?
Start with the funders already giving here, then look at the foundations that back similar organizations in Louisiana. The funding by cause and by state pages list the largest funders for a given area and how to approach them.

These figures are read directly from IRS Form 990 / 990-PF e-file XML: this organization’s own return for FY2024 (financials across 2017–2024), and the filings of 6funders that report grants to it. “On record” means captured in the filings we have parsed — a funder that does not e-file, or whose grant detail is not itemized, will not appear. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind. Trends on this page end at FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving; later years are shown and marked, and move no figure. Data on this page was exported August 27, 2026. What this page cannot tell you · view filing