· Private foundation
Poznanski Foundation
Its FY2020 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2020.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2020
- Under $10k4 grants · $17k
- $10k–50k11 grants · $195k
- $50k–250k3 grants · $390k
- $250k+2 grants · $520k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| CAMP ST ANDREWS | $270,000 |
| BROADWAY ROSE THEATRE CO | $250,000 |
| MERIDIAN PARK MEDICAL FOUNDATION | $185,000 |
| TUCKER MAXON SCHOOL | $125,000 |
| FRIENDLY HOUSE | $80,000 |
| BOYS AND GIRLS AID SOCIETY | $40,000 |
| Individual grant recipient | $25,000 |
| HAVEN UNIVERSE | $20,000 |
| PORTLAND ROSE FESTIVAL FOUNDATION | $20,000 |
| UPLIFT FAMILY SERVICES | $20,000 |
| Individual grant recipient | $15,000 |
| WARFIGHTER OUTFITTERS | $15,000 |
| Individual grant recipient | $10,000 |
| AMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY | $10,000 |
| SANTA MARIA URBAN MINISTRY | $10,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY17–20, $380k) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 7%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +48% since the first grant, against +29% for the ones you funded once.
20 repeat relationships — 9 still active in FY2020, 11 since wound down; 11 grantees were first funded in FY2020 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2020, 88% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $130k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
BROADWAY ROSE THEATRE CO4× · 2017–2020 · $870k · revenue +48%- CSCAMP ST ANDREWS INC3× · 2017–2020 · $610k · revenue +54%
- MPMERIDIAN PARK MEDICAL FOUNDATION4× · 2017–2020 · $535k · revenue +97%
Funded once
- BIBRAIN INJURY ASSOCIATIONone grant, 2018 · $5k
- OAOPEN ARMS INTERNATIONAL DBA STAND BY ME USAone grant, 2017 · $5k · revenue -45%
- DCDOERNBECHER CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL FOUNDATIONone grant, 2018 · $5k · revenue -43%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Building brighter futures with children and families.
To help strengthen and heal children and families, and the community. olalla center's staff believes all children and families can heal and this premise is the foundation of olalla center's treatment philosophy and the basis for their work.
As expressions of god's healing love, witnessed through the ministry of jesus, we are steadfast in serving all, especially those who are poor and vulnerable.
The mission of children's hospital & research center at oakland is to protect and advance the health and well-being of children through clinical care, teaching and research.
To advance hope, healing and the best healthcare for children and their families.
Listen and Talk teaches deaf and hard of hearing children to communicate and learn through listening and spoken language.
Depaul serves children and families involved in the child welfare system and children and adults with developmental disabilities. vision: opening doors to hope and belonging. corporate mission: we work to support the success of our cients…
Fact oregon empowers families, youth, and communities to navigate disability systems, advocating together for disability justice and policy change so that people with disabilities have what they need to thrive at home, in school, and in…
We champion the health needs of children and families. we are committed to improving children's health by providing the highest-quality, family centered care, advanced through research and education.
Our mission is to enhance the lives of individuals living with physical, cognitive, emotional, and behavioral challenges by providing innovative, accessible and safe equine-assisted therapeutic programs of the highest quality. we are…
The bender jcc embraces and welcomes the diversity of our community and encourages everyone to seek meaning and fulfillment by participating in our rich programming inspired by our jewish heritage. we open our doors to everyone, including…
We are a premier provider dedicated to healing children and young adults, strengthening families, and transforming communities through quality comprehensive services and advocacy. we envision a world in which children and young adults,…
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Meals On Wheels People Inc and the most unlike its peers is Warfighter Outfitters. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
20 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 20 of the 39 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds BROADWAY ROSE THEATRE CO ↗
- Who funds CAMP ST ANDREWS INC ↗
- Who funds MERIDIAN PARK MEDICAL FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds FRIENDLY HOUSE INC ↗
- Who funds TUCKER MAXON SCHOOL ↗
- Who funds WARFIGHTER OUTFITTERS ↗
- Who funds HAVEN UNIVERSE INC ↗
- Who funds MEALS ON WHEELS PEOPLE INC ↗
- Who funds PORTLAND ROSE FESTIVAL FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds Portland YouthBuilders ↗
- Who funds PACIFIC CLINICS ↗
- Who funds GRESHAM BARLOW EDUCATION FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds OPEN ARMS INTERNATIONAL DBA STAND BY ME USA ↗
- Who funds DOERNBECHER CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds Braking Cycles ↗
- Who funds CURE JM FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds VANCOUVER SCHOOL DISTRICT FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds ALZHEIMER'S DISEASE & RELATED DISORDERS ASSOCIATION INC ↗
- Who funds FAMILY DOGS NEW LIFE SHELTER ↗
- Who funds Hope - A Dementia Support Group ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Juan Young Trust · The Oregon Community Foundation · The Jackson Foundation · OCF Joseph E Weston Public Foundation · Clark Foundation · The Robert D and Marcia H Randall Charitable Trust · Onpoint Community Credit Union · The Autzen Foundation · Hillman Family Foundations · The Blackbaud Giving Fund · Silicon Valley Community Foundation · Jpmorgan Chase Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Poznanski Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal, a single department, or state — and drag the year to watch it move.
- Portland YouthBuilders — 35% of income from government
- Friendly House Inc — 3% of income from government
- Portland Rose Festival Foundation — 1% of income from government
- Broadway Rose Theatre Co — 1% of income from government
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus
How do I get to Poznanski Foundation?
Find your warmest path to Poznanski Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.
Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.