Skip to content
Plinth
Foundation DossiersAlso receives grants — funding profile →
Plinth

· Public charity

Poudre Valley Health Care Inc

We improve lives.

$77M
Granted FY2025still arriving
19
Grants FY2025still arriving
3
States reached
$73M
Largest
01What you fundRead
02The needRead
03Your edgeRead
04Your fieldRead
01What you fund
01100% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2025.

Health$461MEducation$1.1MPhilanthropy$300kArts & Culture$97kCommunity Improvement$94kFood & Nutrition$79kPublic Benefit$69kYouth Development$60kOther$0
02FY2025 · 19 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k10 grants · $71k
  • $10k–50k7 grants · $97k
  • $250k+2 grants · $77M
$8,495
Median grant
3
States reached
$11.7B
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
UCHEALTH MEDICAL GROUP$73,106,283
UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MEDICINE$3,825,892
FREEDOM SERVICE DOGS$22,464
COLORADO STATE UNIVERSITY$20,000
UNITED WAY OF LARIMER COUNTY$14,062
SUMMITSTONE HEALTHCARE PARTNERS$10,000
THE CENTER FOR FAMILY OUTREACH$10,000
OUTREACH FORT COLLINS$10,000
FORT COLLINS AREA CHAMBER OF COMMERCE$10,000
AMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY$8,495
PARTNERSHIP FOR AGE-FRIENDLY COMMUNITIES IN LARIMER COUNTY$8,477
RESPITE CARE$7,500
CHRIST CLINIC$7,500
FAMILY HOUSING NETWORK$7,500
HOMEWARD ALLIANCE$7,500
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY19–25, $52k) land where the poverty rate runs at 10%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 56% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 9%FREEDOM SERVICE DOGS: $22k → 8%PARTNERSHIP FOR AGE-FRIENDLY COMMUNITIES IN LARIMER COUNTY: $8k → 11%THE FAMILY CENTERLA FAMILIA: $6k → 11%RESPITE CARE: $8k → 11%FAMILY HOUSING NETWORK: $8k → 11%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

100%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$461M · 16 repeat orgs$1.2M to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +29% since the first grant, against +8% for the ones you funded once.

16 repeat relationships — 7 still active in FY2025, 9 since wound down; 11 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

16
17

Total granted

$461M
$1.1M

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+29%
+8%

Still filing today

75%
88%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $114k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
HealthHuman ServicesYouth DevelopmentPhilanthropyEducationArts & CultureOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • PV
    POUDRE VALLEY MEDICAL GROUP LLC
    9× · 2017–2025 · $414M · revenue +174%
  • GP
    GREELEY PHILHARMONIC ORCHESTRA ASSOCIATION INC
    3× · 2017–2023 · $97k · revenue +29%
  • UNITED WAY OF WELD COUNTY INC
    5× · 2017–2024 · $84k · revenue +68%

Funded once

  • CS
    COLORADO STATE UNIVERSITY
    one grant, 2020 · $893k
  • LC
    LARIMER COUNTY PARTNERS DBA PARTNERS MENTORING YOUTHgraduated
    one grant, 2017 · $24k · revenue +78%
  • EP
    Estes Park Medical Center Foundation
    one grant, 2021 · $19k · revenue -29%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
The Colorado Health Foundation
Health
2
Center for Improving Value in Health Care

To equip partners and communities in colorado and across the nation with the resources, services and unbiased data needed to improve health and health care. we help communities, organizations and individuals identify opportunities to…

Health
3
Colorado Physician Health Program Corporation

The mission of the Colorado Physician Health Program Corporation is to promote the health and well-being of physicians and physician assistants through evaluation, treatment referral, support education and research.

Health
4
Summit Community Care Clinic Inc

Provide exceptional, integrated, patient-centered health care services designed to meet the needs of all patients, particularly those who experience barriers to accessing care, regardless of their ability to pay.

Health
5
Clinica Colorado

To provide equitable primary health care and resources to those with limited access across colorado, especially to those who are uninsured.

Health
6
Colorado Health Institute
Health
7
Healthier Colorado

Healthier colorado is a nonpartisan, nonprofit organization dedicated to raising the voices of coloradans in the public policy process to improve the health of our state's residents. we believe that every coloradan should have a fair…

Health
8
Colorado Chamber of Commerce Fka Co Assn of Commerce & Industry

The colorado chamber of commerce mission is to enhance the business climate of the state of colorado by promoting a positive legislative and regulatory environment and providing programs and services for its members, economic education,…

—
9
Pueblo Community Health Center Inc

To provide primary health care to those in need by offering top quality care through accessibility, leadership, and financial independence.

—
10
Colorado Digital Health

Prime health advances health justice, equity, access quality and cost through innovation, collaboration, and community building.

Health
11
Colorado Center On Law and Policy

Colorado center on law and policy is an antipoverty organization advancing the rights of every coloradan.

Crime & Legal
12
The Colorado Prevention Center

Improving health through innovative science and community engagement.

Health

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is The Colorado Nonprofit Development Center and the most unlike its peers is American Heart Association Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

Your grantees are a median of 37 years old; the field is 14. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

THE FIELDby orgYOUR GRANTEESby number24%0%<5yr15%9%5–10yr19%3%10–20yr17%34%20–35yr12%34%35–55yr14%20%55yr+
THE FIELDby orgYOUR MONEYby value24%0%<5yr15%90%5–10yr19%0%10–20yr17%0%20–35yr12%2%35–55yr14%8%55yr+

The field is 24% startups (under 5 years old) — 0% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close — 2% lost their exemption, against 14% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund
2%1/46
the rest of the field
14%
1,911/13,830

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

04the grantee network

40 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 40 of the 45 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
9
Early backer (in before they grew)
39/40
Grantees still filing
23/40
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

POUDRE VALLEY MEDICAL GROUP LLC — $414,338,657 · HealthPOUDRE VALLEY MEDICAL GROUP LLC+9 more — $213,951 · HealthREGENTS OF THE UNIVERSITY OF COLORADO — $37,706,140 · OtherREGENTS OF …UCHEALTH NORTHERN COLORADO FOUNDATION — $8,373,839 · OtherUCHEALTH NO…+20 more — $1,308,272 · OtherUNITED WAY OF LARIMER COUNTY — $182,206 · PhilanthropyUNITED WAY OF WELD COUNTY INC — $83,541 · PhilanthropyCANDID — $21,926 · PhilanthropyColorado Rockies Baseball Club Foundation — $12,266 · PhilanthropyGREELEY PHILHARMONIC ORCHESTRA ASSOCIATION INC — $96,974 · Arts & CultureThe Food Bank for Larimer County — $64,543 · Food & NutritionTHE COLORADO NONPROFIT DEVELOPMENT CENTER — $60,189 · Community ImprovementFREEDOM SERVICE DOGS INC — $22,464 · Human ServicesPartnership for Age Friendly Commununities in Lari — $8,477 · Human ServicesRESPITE CARE INC — $7,500 · Human ServicesFamily Housing Network of Fort Collins Inc — $7,500 · Human ServicesHOMEWARD ALLIANCE INC — $7,500 · Human ServicesTHE FAMILY CENTERLA FAMILIA — $5,600 · Human Services
Health$414,552,608Other$47,388,251Philanthropy$299,939Arts & Culture$96,974Food & Nutrition$64,543Community Improvement$60,189Human Services$59,041

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetPOUDRE VALLEY MEDICAL GROUP LLC — $414,338,657 over 9y, 9.1% of budgetUCHEALTH NORTHERN COLORADO FOUNDATION — $8,373,839 over 8y, 22% of budgetUNITED WAY OF LARIMER COUNTY — $182,206 over 8y, 0.6% of budgetGREELEY PHILHARMONIC ORCHESTRA ASSOCIATION INC — $96,974 over 3y, 19% of budgetUNITED WAY OF WELD COUNTY INC — $83,541 over 5y, 0.9% of budgetAMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY INC — $70,127 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetThe Food Bank for Larimer County — $64,543 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetCHEYENNE REGIONAL MEDICAL CENTER FOUNDATION — $63,421 over 5y, 0.8% of budgetTHE COLORADO NONPROFIT DEVELOPMENT CENTER — $60,189 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetIVINSON MEMORIAL HOSPITAL FOUNDATION — $26,536 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetLARIMER COUNTY PARTNERS DBA PARTNERS MENTORING YOUTH — $24,000 over 1y, 3.0% of budgetFREEDOM SERVICE DOGS INC — $22,464 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetCANDID — $21,926 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetEstes Park Medical Center Foundation — $19,436 over 1y, 1.6% of budgetYAMPA VALLEY MEDICAL CENTER FOUNDATION — $18,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetSummitstone Health Partners — $15,625 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetFood For Thought Denver — $14,598 over 1y, 0.6% of budgetLOVELAND CHAMBER OF COMMERCE INC — $13,900 over 2y, 0.8% of budgetNorthern Colorado United for Youth — $13,400 over 1y, 5.6% of budgetColorado Rockies Baseball Club Foundation — $12,266 over 1y, 0.6% of budgetCenter for Family Outreach Inc — $10,000 over 1y, 1.1% of budgetDOWNTOWN FORT COLLINS BUSINESS ASSOCIATION INC — $10,000 over 1y, 1.3% of budgetBOOK TRUST — $9,050 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetTHE CRAWFORD CHILD ADVOCACY CENTER — $8,600 over 1y, 1.5% of budgetAmerican Heart Association Inc — $8,442 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetRESPITE CARE INC — $7,500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetFamily Housing Network of Fort Collins Inc — $7,500 over 1y, 1.6% of budgetCHRIST CLINIC INC — $7,500 over 1y, 3.8% of budgetADVENTURE WEST COUNCIL BOY SCOUTS OF AMERICA — $7,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetCHEYENNE COUNTY HOSPITAL & HEALTH CENTER FOUNDATION — $6,000 over 1y, 9.7% of budgetBOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF LARIMER COUNTY — $5,651 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetTHE FAMILY CENTERLA FAMILIA — $5,600 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetHOPE LIVES THE LYDIA DODY BREAST CANCER SUPPORT CENTER — $5,400 over 1y, 2.8% of budgetALLIANCE FOR SUICIDE PREVENTION OF LARIMER COUNTY — $5,200 over 1y, 4.2% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Community Foundation …Colorado Gives Founda…Otter Cares Foundatio…Medical Center of the…United Way of Larimer…Don & May Wilkins Cha…Woodward Governor Cha…Anschutz Family Found…Realities for Childre…El Pomar FoundationThe Colorado Health F…Northern Colorado Uni…
Community Foundation of Northern ColoradoCO49.9× affinity22 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Community Foundation of Northern Colorado · Colorado Gives Foundation · Otter Cares Foundation AKA OTTERCARES FOUNDATION · Medical Center of the Rockies · United Way of Larimer County · Don & May Wilkins Charitable Trust · Woodward Governor Charitable Trust · Anschutz Family Foundation · Realities for Children Charities · El Pomar Foundation · The Colorado Health Foundation · Northern Colorado United for Youth

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Poudre Valley Health Care Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%2%6%14%25%your share of their income ↑0%5%10%15%20%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    13report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–20%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 45 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph

    The unnamed billions
    grants reported with no recipient in the public record
    The regranting layer
    51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
    The DAF merry-go-round
    $9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
    The endowment market
    who holds foundation money, and what just moved
    The camps
    funders cluster by geography, not ideology
    By state
    where grant money is based, and what stays home