Skip to content

· Private foundation

Porter Family Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$23k
Granted FY2025still arriving
5
Grants FY2025still arriving
2
States reached
$10k
Largest
01What it funds
0185% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Education$40kHealth$31kReligion$31kInternational$6kPhilanthropy$3kYouth Development$2kRecreation & Sports$2kEmployment$2kOther$0
02FY2025 · 5 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k4 grants · $13k
  • $10k–50k1 grant · $10k
$2,500
Median grant
2
States reached
$1k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Town School for Boys$10,000
PLAYGROUP$7,500
EDGEWOOD CENTER FOR CHILDREN FAMILI$2,500
Bay Area Discovery Museum$1,500
Minneapolis Public Schools$1,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY17–25) land where the poverty rate runs at 9%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 47% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants spread fairly evenly across need levels.

area typical 9%Minneapolis Public Schools: $1k → 11%Home Hope: $1k → 7%Bay Area Discovery Museum: $2k → 8%EDGEWOOD CENTER FOR CHILDREN FAMILI: $3k → 10%WOMEN ALZHEIMERS MOVEMENT: $1k → 14%HIDDEN WINGS: $1k → 14%BREAST CANCER RESEARCH FOUNDATION: $50 → 17%FILTER OF HOPE: $1k → 17%DAISY MULLEN: $2k → 20%GIRLS ON THE RUN WESTERN COLORADO: $202 → 11%Justin Shilling Memorial Fund: $100 → 9%ST MATTHEWS EPISCOPAL CHURCH: $10k → 7%EDGEWOOD CENTER FOR CHILDREN FAMILI: $3k → 10%HIDDEN WINGS: $1k → 14%DAISY MULLEN: $2k → 20%ST MATTHEWS EPISCOPAL CHURCH: $10k → 7%EDGEWOOD CENTER FOR CHILDREN FAMILI: $1k → 10%DAISY MULLEN: $2k → 20%ST MATTHEWS EPISCOPAL CHURCH: $5k → 7%San Francisco Youth Hockey Associat: $1k → 10%MOUNT OLIVE BAPTIST CHURCH: $1k → 20%ST MATTHEWS EPISCOPAL CHURCH: $5k → 7%PLAYGROUP: $10k → 10%DAISY MULLEN: $500 → 20%CAMINAR FOR MENTAL HEALTH: $5k → 7%PLAYGROUP: $8k → 10%Various: $445 → 7%PLAYGROUP: $5k → 10%MISSION HOSPICE HOME CARE: $250 → 7%Town School for Boys: $10k → 10%SAN MATEO PARK ASSOCIATION: $1k → 7%THE BATTERY FOUNDATION: $3k → 10%CAMINAR FOR MENTAL HEALTH: $15k → 7%CAMINAR FOR MENTAL HEALTH: $5k → 7%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

81%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$103k · 8 repeat orgs$24k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +61% since the first grant, against +40% for those funded once.

8 repeat relationships: 2 still active in FY2025, 6 since wound down; 3 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

8
13

Total granted

$103k
$11k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+61%
+40%

Still filing today

50%
31%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 44% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $13k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’20’21’22’23’24’25
EducationHealthPhilanthropyPublic Safety & DisasterArts & CultureRecreation & SportsOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • P
    PlayGroup
    3× · 2023–2025 · $23k · revenue +4%
  • FO
    FILTER OF HOPE INC
    2× · 2017–2023 · $6k · revenue +581%
  • HW
    HIDDEN WINGS
    2× · 2023–2024 · $2k · revenue +61%

Funded once

  • TB
    THE BATTERY FOUNDATION
    one grant, 2017 · $3k · revenue -41%
  • S
    SQUASHDRIVEgraduated
    one grant, 2018 · $2k · revenue +28%
  • SM
    SAN MATEO PARK ASSOCIATION
    one grant, 2020 · $1k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Mark Day School

Innovative and full of heart, mark day school nurtures each child to pursue their curiosity, think critically, embrace challenge with courage and joy, and work in partnership with others to build more caring and inclusive communities.

—
2
The San Francisco School

A private school that cultivates and celebrates the intellectual, imaginative, and humanitarian promise of each student in a community that practices mutual respect, embraces diversity, and inspires passion for learning.

—
3
The Oaks School

In an atmosphere of mutual respect and responsibility, the oaks school prepares students to meet the world with the combined wisdom of an intelligent mind, a skilled hand, and a compassionate heart.

Education
4
The International School of San Francisco

Guided by the principles of academic rigor and diversity, the international school of san francisco offers programs of study in french and english to prepare its graduates for a world in which the ability to think critically and to…

Education
5
Presidio Hill School

Presidio hill school is a co-ed k-8 independent, progressive school. learning is collaborative and an active experience with an emphasis on inquiry. students are engaged in their own learning and guided by an expert faculty through a…

Education
6
San Francisco Friends School

At san francisco friends school, students learn in a community grounded in the quaker values of reflection, integrity, peaceful problem-solving and stewardship. our teachers challenge students with a dynamic curriculum that inspires…

Education
7
The Seven Hills School

The institution provides educational instruction and activities to students ranging from preschool through 8th grade.

—
8
The Peak School

The peak school seeks to ignite a passion for learning, to develop students of diverse talents and backgrounds who think critically and act with integrity, and to graduate compassionate, confident, capable students who will embrace their…

Education
9
The Buckley School

The buckley school is a dynamic, nurturing learning community committed to equity and inclusion. our innovative teachers and challenging programs inspire creativity, courage, and collaboration. by promoting a balanced development of mind,…

—
10
Redwood Day School

Redwood day inspires students to reach for their next challenge, embrace differences and develop the intellectual and emotional courage to be ready for anything.

Education
11
Berkeley Hall School Foundation

Our mission is to "empower children to fulfill their unlimited, god-given potential as fearless scholars and conscientious citizens."

Education
12
St Paul's Day School of Oakland Dba St Paul's Episcopal School

St. paul's prepares students to be confident and skilled learners, cultivates in them a strong sense of purpose, and inspires them to be generous and active citizens of the world.

—
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Bay Area Discovery Museum; the most unlike its peers is PlayGroup. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

10 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2026.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2026, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 10 of the 24 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
3
Early backer (in before they grew)
10/10
Grantees still filing
6/10
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

ST MATTHEWS EPISCOPAL CHURCH: $30,000 · OtherST MATTHEWS EPISCOPAL CHURCHCAMINAR FOR MENTAL HEALTH: $25,000 · OtherCAMINAR FOR MENTAL HEALTHDARAJA EDUCATION FUND: $6,800 · OtherDARAJA EDUCATION FUNDFILTER OF HOPE INC: $6,000 · OtherFILTER OF HOPE INCIndividual grant recipient: $5,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipient+10 more: $6,697 · Other+10 morePlayGroup: $22,500 · EducationPlayGroupTOWN SCHOOL FOR BOYS: $10,000 · EducationTOWN SCHOOL FOR BOYSSQUASHDRIVE: $2,000 · EducationSQUASHDRIVEEDGEWOOD CENTER FOR CHILDREN AND FAMILIES: $6,000 · HealthHIDDEN WINGS: $2,000 · HealthTHE BATTERY FOUNDATION: $2,500 · PhilanthropyBAY AREA DISCOVERY MUSEUM: $1,500 · Arts & CultureSAN FRANCISCO YOUTH HOCKEY ASSOCIATION: $1,000 · Recreation & SportsTHE BREAST CANCER RESEARCH FOUNDATION INC: $50 · Public Safety & Disaster
Other$79,497Education$34,500Health$8,000Philanthropy$2,500Arts & Culture$1,500Recreation & Sports$1,000Public Safety & Disaster$50

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetPlayGroup: $22,500 over 3y, 0.4% of budgetTOWN SCHOOL FOR BOYS: $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetFILTER OF HOPE INC: $6,000 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetEDGEWOOD CENTER FOR CHILDREN AND FAMILIES: $6,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetTHE BATTERY FOUNDATION: $2,500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetHIDDEN WINGS: $2,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetSQUASHDRIVE: $2,000 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetSAN FRANCISCO YOUTH HOCKEY ASSOCIATION: $1,000 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetTHE BREAST CANCER RESEARCH FOUNDATION INC: $50 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds PlayGroup ↗
  • Who funds TOWN SCHOOL FOR BOYS ↗
  • Who funds FILTER OF HOPE INC ↗
  • Who funds EDGEWOOD CENTER FOR CHILDREN AND FAMILIES ↗
  • Who funds THE BATTERY FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds HIDDEN WINGS ↗
  • Who funds SQUASHDRIVE ↗
  • Who funds BAY AREA DISCOVERY MUSEUM ↗
  • Who funds SAN FRANCISCO YOUTH HOCKEY ASSOCIATION ↗
  • Who funds THE BREAST CANCER RESEARCH FOUNDATION INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Jewish Community Federation of San Francisco the Peninsula Marin & SonomaCA13.1× affinity4 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Jewish Community Federation of San Francisco the Peninsula Marin & Sonoma · Silicon Valley Community Foundation · American Endowment Foundation · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · Gs Donor Advised Philanthropy Fund for Wealth Management Inc · National Philanthropic Trust · Charities Aid Foundation America · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Porter Family Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Porter Family Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 24 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Porter Family’s filings →

    More from the funding graph