· Public charity
Pocono Mountains United Way
POCONO MOUNTAINS UNITED WAY's mission is to engage and mobilize resources to improve lives through accelerated community change.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2025.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
The 13 grants below total $301,501 — the rows itemised in this filing. The $483,307 headline is the total grant expense reported on the return, so the remaining $181,806 is giving the schedule does not break out: grants under the $5,000 itemisation floor, grants to individuals, and grants reported on other schedules. Every figure below describes the itemised rows only.
By grant size · FY2025
- $10k–50k12 grants · $235k
- $50k–250k1 grant · $66k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| SALVATION ARMY - EAST STROUDSBURG | $66,258 |
| SAFE MONROE | $34,445 |
| RESOURCES FOR HUMAN DEVELOPMENT INC | $33,000 |
| POCONO AREA TRANSITIONAL HOUSING | $27,798 |
| COMMUNITY ACTION COMMITTEE - LEHIGH VALLEY (CACLV) | $21,000 |
| MONROE COUNTY HABITAT FOR HUMANITY | $18,000 |
| MONROE COUNTY MEALS ON WHEELS | $18,000 |
| THE GROWING PLACE | $16,000 |
| POCONO SERVICES FOR FAMILIES & CHILDREN | $16,000 |
| PLEASANT VALLEY ECUMENICAL NETWORK (PVEN) | $14,000 |
| POCONO FAMILY YMCA | $13,500 |
| AMERICAN RED CROSS OF THE POCONOS | $13,500 |
| SIGHTS FOR HOPE | $10,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY18–25, $970k) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 14%. 7% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Your grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +32% since the first grant, against +32% for the ones you funded once.
18 repeat relationships — 13 still active in FY2025, 5 since wound down.
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2025, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- PSPOCONO SERVICES FOR FAMILIES AND CHILDREN INCORPORATED8× · 2018–2025 · $267k · revenue +16%
- TGTHE GROWING PLACE CTR FOR CARE AND LEARN OF SALEM-ST PAUL8× · 2018–2025 · $236k · revenue +31%
- WRWOMEN'S RESOURCES OF MONROE CTY INC8× · 2018–2025 · $233k · revenue +1%
Funded once
- VCVARIOUS COMMUNITYone grant, 2017 · $366k
- PAPOCONO ALLIANCE INCone grant, 2018 · $34k · revenue -50%
- NPNURSE-FAMILY PARTNERSHIPone grant, 2024 · $18k · revenue 0%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Establish and maintain a medical group consisting of clinicians employed by lehigh valley health network, part of jefferson health. this medical group will fulfill the charitable mission of promoting community health through health…
Our mission is who we are and what we do: to provide world class care close to home. our vision is what we aim for to best serve our community: to build a healthier community.
Provide emergency ambulance services
To provide high quality, cost effective, primary health care and to coordinate care for patients requiring secondary and tertiary services.
Mon valley initiative is a regional community development coporation representing communities and stakeholders along the monogahela river and its tributaries in three southwestern pennsylvania counties. mvi is organized into three program…
Pocono mountains united way's mission is to engage and mobilize resources to improve lives through accelerated community change.
The agency's mission states "pinebrook family answers nurtures and empowers children, adults and families by providing mental health services and community-based programs throughout the greater lehigh valley. we do this through initiatives…
To assist at-risk individuals
Wayne Memorial Community Health Centers creates and sustains healthy rural communities by providing accessible, high quality medical, dental and behavioral health care for all, while recognizing and addressing other factors that influence…
We partner with the community to address hunger & homelessness one family at a time offering emergency shelter & temporary housing,prevention & stabilization programs, a food pantry, and other support services.
As an active member of the monroe county community, families first supports and assists residents through their financial and life challenges with respectful and empowering services.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Family Promise of the Poconos Inc and the most unlike its peers is Trust for the Benefit of Minsi Trails Council. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
22 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 22 of the 25 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds POCONO SERVICES FOR FAMILIES AND CHILDREN INCORPORATED ↗
- Who funds THE GROWING PLACE CTR FOR CARE AND LEARN OF SALEM-ST PAUL ↗
- Who funds WOMEN'S RESOURCES OF MONROE CTY INC ↗
- Who funds POCONO AREA TRANSITIONAL HOUSING INC ↗
- Who funds FAMILY PROMISE OF THE POCONOS INC ↗
- Who funds Resources for Human Development Inc ↗
- Who funds MONROE COUNTY MEALS ON WHEELS INC ↗
- Who funds COMMUNITY ACTION COMMITTEE OF THE LEHIGH VALLEY INC ↗
- Who funds Pleasant Valley Ecumenical Network ↗
- Who funds American National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches ↗
- Who funds MONROE COUNTY HABITAT FOR HUMANITY ↗
- Who funds SIGHTS FOR HOPE ↗
- Who funds YOUNG MENS CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION OF MONROE COUNTY ↗
- Who funds POCONO ALLIANCE INC ↗
- Who funds VALOR CLINIC FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds CATHOLIC SOCIAL SERVICES OF THE DIOCESE OF SCRANTON INC ↗
- Who funds MONROE COUNTY YOUTH EMPLOYMENT SERVICE INC ↗
- Who funds NURSE-FAMILY PARTNERSHIP ↗
- Who funds LEHIGH VALLEY HOSPITAL - POCONO ↗
- Who funds ST LUKE'S HOSPITAL MONROE CAMPUS ↗
- Who funds TRUST FOR THE BENEFIT OF MINSI TRAILS COUNCIL ↗
- Who funds MINSI TRAILS COUNCIL #502 BOY SCOUTS OF AMERICA ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Allone Charities · The Lester G Abeloff Foundation · Essa Bank & Trust Foundation · Ppl Foundation · R Dale & Frances M Hughes Fdn 47f100011 · Pocono Mountains Community Challenge Foundation Inc · Mount Airy Foundation · Moses Taylor Foundation Inc · Lehigh Valley Community Foundation · Hughes Foundation Inc · Allone Foundation · John a and Margaret Post Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Pocono Mountains United Way funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.