Skip to content
Plus Foundation (Fka Standard Plus Foundation) at a glanceAlso receives grants: funding profile →

· Public charity

Plus Foundation (Fka Standard Plus Foundation)

To conduct a charitable, scientific, educational, and religious program through grant-making to other organizations and to individuals.

$63k
Granted FY2024still arriving
6
Grants FY2024still arriving
5
States reached
$10k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its fieldRead
04Through PlinthRead
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2021 to 2024.

Education$85kHousing & Shelter$75kArts & Culture$35kPublic Safety & Disaster$10kCommunity Improvement$8kHealth$5kYouth Development$5k
02FY2024 · 6 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

How this is measured
The 6 grants below total $50,000, the rows itemized in this filing. The $63,283 headline is the total grant expense on the return; the other $13,283 is giving the schedule does not break out (grants under the $5,000 itemization floor, grants to individuals, grants on other schedules). Every figure below describes the itemized rows only.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k2 grants · $10k
  • $10k–50k4 grants · $40k
$10,000
Median grant
5
States reached
$26k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
HABITAT FOR HUMANITY CHICAGO$10,000
WESTHAB INC$10,000
MIRIAM'S KITCHEN$10,000
LAWNDALE ELEMENTARY SCHOOL DISTRICT$10,000
URBAN LEAGUE OF PALM BEACH COUNTY INC$5,000
BOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF CAPISTRANO VALLEY$5,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY23–24, $40k) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%THE GIVING SPIRIT: $25k → 14%MIRIAM'S KITCHEN: $10k → 14%URBAN LEAGUE OF PALM BEACH COUNTY INC: $5k → 11%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

IL
NY
MA
CA
DC
AL
TX
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Habitat for Humanity Las Vegas

Habitat for humanity las vegas, inc. (habitat) a not-for-profit organization located in las vegas, nevada was established in 1990. habitat's purpose is to build low cost houses with the help of the homeowner families, which are transferred…

Housing & Shelter
2
Habitat for Humanity New York City and Westcherster County Inc

Habitat for humanity new york city and westchester county transforms lives and communities by building and preserving affordable homes with families in need, and by uniting all new yorkers around the cause of affordable housing.

Housing & Shelter
3
Interval House

The mission of the organization is to ensure safety and stability for people who are battered, abused, homeless or at risk; to create public awareness about the epidemic of violence; and to mobilize the community to prevent violence and…

Human Services
4
Habitat for Humanity East Bay Silicon Valley

We believe everyone deserves a decent place to live. by building, preserving, and expanding fair access to affordable homeownership, habitat partners with people and families to build strong futures on the foundation of a stable home.

Housing & Shelter
5
Breaking Ground Housing Development Fund Corporation

We offer affordable housing and support programs for homeless and vulnerable new yorkers.

Housing & Shelter
6
Habitat for Humanity Greater San Francisco

Habitat for humanity greater san francisco builds and sustains affordable homeownership opportunities for families in marin, san francisco and san mateo counties.

—
7
Greater Charlottesville Habitat for Humanity Inc

Seeking to put god's love into action, habitat for humanity brings people together to build homes, communities and hope to realize our vision of a world where everyone has a decent place to live. habitat for humanity greater…

—
8
Affordable Housing Accreditation Board
—
9
Urban Triage Incorporated

Urban triage transforms culture, institutions, and communities to ensure a humane future.

Philanthropy
10
Habitat for Humanity of Greater Baton Rouge Inc

Habitat for humanity of greater baton rouge builds and renovates houses in partnership with the community. we provide opportunities for families in need to purchase their own homes and improve their lives. we help build the community by…

—
11
Habitat Community Housing Development Inc

Development of affordable housing

—
12
Foundation for Quality Housing Opportunities Inc
Housing & Shelter
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Habitat for Humanity Chicago; the most unlike its peers is Giving Bak Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

13 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 13 of the 14 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
13/13
Grantees still filing
8/13
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

PROJECT DESTINED INC: $75,000 · EducationPROJECT DESTINED INCTHE GIVING SPIRIT: $25,000 · Human ServicesTHE GIVING SPIRITMIRIAM'S KITCHEN: $10,000 · Human ServicesMIRIAM'S KITCHENUrban League of Palm Beach County Inc: $5,000 · Human ServicesUrban League of Palm…INNER-CITY ARTS: $35,000 · Arts & CultureINNER-CITY ARTSHABITAT FOR HUMANITY CHICAGO: $10,000 · Housing & ShelterHABITAT FOR HUM…Westhab Inc: $10,000 · Housing & ShelterWesthab IncHOUSING ON MERIT: $10,000 · Housing & ShelterHOUSING ON MERI…LAWNDALE ELEMENTARY SCHOOL DISTRICT: $10,000 · OtherLAWNDALE EL…THE LASALLE FOUNDATION: $2,500 · OtherTHE LASALLE…GAVIN FOUNDATION INC: $5,000 · OtherGAVIN FOUND…BOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF CAPISTRANO VALLEY: $5,000 · OtherBOYS & GIRL…GIVING BAK FOUNDATION: $10,000 · Food & NutritionApartment Life Inc: $10,000 · Religion
Education$75,000Human Services$40,000Arts & Culture$35,000Housing & Shelter$30,000Other$22,500Food & Nutrition$10,000Religion$10,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetPROJECT DESTINED INC: $75,000 over 2y, 1.5% of budgetINNER-CITY ARTS: $35,000 over 2y, 0.5% of budgetTHE GIVING SPIRIT: $25,000 over 1y, 2.6% of budgetHABITAT FOR HUMANITY CHICAGO: $10,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetMIRIAM'S KITCHEN: $10,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetGIVING BAK FOUNDATION: $10,000 over 1y, 8.0% of budgetWesthab Inc: $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetApartment Life Inc: $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetHOUSING ON MERIT: $10,000 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetGAVIN FOUNDATION INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetBOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF CAPISTRANO VALLEY: $5,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetUrban League of Palm Beach County Inc: $5,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetTHE LASALLE FOUNDATION: $2,500 over 1y, 0.3% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

National Philanthropi…Jpmorgan Chase Founda…Charities Aid Foundat…American Endowment Fo…Morgan Stanley Global…The Bank of America C…Vanguard Charitable E…American Online Givin…Donor Advised Charita…Fidelity Investments …Amazonsmile Foundation
National Philanthropic TrustPA10.2× affinity7 shared granteesties to 10 of 10Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: National Philanthropic Trust · Jpmorgan Chase Foundation · Charities Aid Foundation America · American Endowment Foundation · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Plus Foundation (Fka Standard Plus Foundation) funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Plus Foundation (Fka Standard Plus Foundation). Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%1%3%6%10%funder's share of their income ↑0%8%15%22%30%share of the org’s income from government →median 12%
  • Gavin Foundation Inc: 12% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
0get no government money at all
5report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–30%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
04Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Plus Foundation (Fka Standard Plus Foundation)?

Find your warmest path to Plus Foundation (Fka Standard Plus Foundation) through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 14 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Plus Foundation (Fka Standard Plus Foundation)’s filings →

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The endowment market
who holds foundation money, and what just moved
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home