· Public charity
Plumbers Local Union No 1
To encourage good workmanship, adopt and maintain a fair rate of wages and working conditions, protect the members from unjust and injurious competition and secure unity of action for their mutual protection.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2024.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
The 7 grants below total $52,845 — the rows itemised in this filing. The $90,174 headline is the total grant expense reported on the return, so the remaining $37,329 is giving the schedule does not break out: grants under the $5,000 itemisation floor, grants to individuals, and grants reported on other schedules. Every figure below describes the itemised rows only.
By grant size · FY2024
- Under $10k6 grants · $42k
- $10k–50k1 grant · $11k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| PEGGY BROWNING FUND | $11,000 |
| NY HELMETS TO HARDHATS | $9,000 |
| OUTREACH DEVELOPEMENT CORPORATION | $8,200 |
| THE BUILDING TRADES EMPLOYERS ASSOCIATION | $7,580 |
| BUILDING & CONSTRUCTION TRADES COUNCIL | $6,400 |
| SUNRISE DAY CAMP - LONG ISLAND | $5,400 |
| ASSOCIATION OF CONTRACTING PLUMBERS OF CITY OF NEW YORK INC | $5,265 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY24–24, $5k) land where the poverty rate runs at 6%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 0% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Your grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +26% since the first grant, against +21% for the ones you funded once.
4 repeat relationships — 4 still active in FY2024, 0 since wound down; 3 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 68% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $17k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- NHNY HELMETS TO HARDHATS INC5× · 2020–2024 · $43k · revenue +39%
- BTBUILDING TRADES EMPLOYERS ASSOCIATION (B3× · 2018–2024 · $27k · revenue +13%
- PBPEGGY BROWNING FUND2× · 2020–2024 · $21k · revenue +8%
Funded once
- UCUA CHARITABLE FUND TRUSTone grant, 2017 · $30k · revenue -90%
- CFCENTER FOR MILITARY RECRUITMENT ASSESSMENT AND VETERANS EMPLOYMENTgraduatedone grant, 2017 · $14k · revenue +65%
- HEHealing Emergency Aid Response Team 911graduatedone grant, 2018 · $11k · revenue +114%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
All activities conducted by the association are to enable it to:a. establish a better understanding between the members and companies in the construction and related industries.b. foster reasonable and just regulations by governments c.…
To assist workers and employers in solving problems of mutual concern not susceptible to resolution within the collective bargaining process, to improve the employment opportunities for employees, to expand the market for the construction…
The organization's mission is to assist in current issues, represent member causes & handle union contract negotiations for member general contractors in the new york metropolitan area.
To create a better working environment for the construction industry and its members.
Promoting and encouraging the interests of organized labor within the construction industry for the counties of nassau & suffolk in the state of new york.
Negotiation between employers & unions.
Labor union maintaining and improving the benefit and working conditions of members engaged in the carpentry trade.
The purpose of the association is to represent its members in the negotiation of collective bargaining agreements with representatives of labor, providing for terms and conditions of employment and the administration of grievances. in…
Operation of laborers local union for the benefit of its members.
The organization is a labor union and operates a dispatch hall for union painters.
The local union acts as the collective bargaining agent for its members
The objectives of the philadelphia building trades council are to enlist the voluntary cooperation and support of every eligible local union to the end that wage scales and desirable working conditions may be established and maintained in…
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Ny Helmets to Hardhats Inc and the most unlike its peers is Gianna Effect Foundation Corp. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
16 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 16 of the 19 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds NY HELMETS TO HARDHATS INC ↗
- Who funds UA CHARITABLE FUND TRUST ↗
- Who funds BUILDING TRADES EMPLOYERS ASSOCIATION (B ↗
- Who funds PEGGY BROWNING FUND ↗
- Who funds OUTREACH DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION ↗
- Who funds CENTER FOR MILITARY RECRUITMENT ASSESSMENT AND VETERANS EMPLOYMENT ↗
- Who funds Healing Emergency Aid Response Team 911 ↗
- Who funds FRIENDS OF ST DOMINIC'S INC ↗
- Who funds SUB-CONTRACTORS TRADE ASSOCIATION INC ↗
- Who funds AMERICAN FEDERATION OF LABOR & CONG OF INDUSTRIAL ORGS NYC BLDG % CONST ↗
- Who funds THE EDWARD J MALLOY INITIATIVE FOR CONSTRUCTION SKILLS INC ↗
- Who funds SUNRISE DAY CAMPS ASSOCIATION INC ↗
- Who funds ASSOCIATION OF CONTRACTING PLUMBERS OF THE CITY OF NEW YORK INC ↗
- Who funds NEW YORK STATE BUILDING & CONSTRUCTION TRADES COUNCIL AFL-CIO ↗
- Who funds GIANNA EFFECT FOUNDATION CORP ↗
- Who funds NONTRADITIONAL EMPLOYMENT FOR WOMEN ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Carpenter Contractor Alliance of Metropolitan New York Inc · New York City & Vicinity District Council Ubcja · International Union of Painters and Allied Trades District Council No 9 · International Brotherhood of Tmstrs Local 282 Tcwh · International Union of Bricklayers & Allied Craftworkers · United Brotherhood of Carpenters Local Union 157 · Sheet Metal Workers Local Union No28 Labor Management Committee and Trust · Local Union 1556 · New York City Carpenters Relief and Charity Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Plumbers Local Union No 1 funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.