· Public charity
International Union of Painters and Allied Trades District Council No 9
To organize all workers for their moral, economic and social advancement.
What you funded, over time
By grantee IRS cause code (NTEE).
A cause breakdown isn’t shown here: 58% of INTERNATIONAL UNION OF PAINTERS AND ALLIED TRADES DISTRICT COUNCIL NO 9’s grantee dollars fall outside its nine largest cause areas, whether because the recipient carries no IRS cause code or because its cause sits in the long tail. A chart would be mostly one residual band and misrepresent the portfolio.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
The 2 grants below total $24,750 — the rows itemised in this filing. The $63,682 headline is the total grant expense reported on the return, so the remaining $38,932 is giving the schedule does not break out: grants under the $5,000 itemisation floor, grants to individuals, and grants reported on other schedules. Every figure below describes the itemised rows only.
By grant size · FY2025
- Under $10k1 grant · $8k
- $10k–50k1 grant · $17k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| THE PATCH FOUNDATION | $17,250 |
| FIDR FUND | $7,500 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Dollar for dollar, your grants (FY17–25) land where the poverty rate runs at 15%, against an area that typically sits at 7%. 82% of your dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +13% since the first grant, against +8% for the ones you funded once.
12 repeat relationships — 1 still active in FY2025, 11 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2025, 70% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $8k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- TETHE EDWARD J MALLOY INITIATIVE FOR CONSTRUCTION SKILLS INC3× · 2020–2022 · $112k · revenue +29%
- AOASSOC OF WALL-CEILING & CARP IND INC3× · 2017–2019 · $24k · revenue +13%
- NHNY HELMETS TO HARDHATS INC3× · 2017–2020 · $17k · revenue +17%
Funded once
- NSNY State Democractic Committee Housekeeping Acctone grant, 2019 · $80k
- DCDistrict Council No 9 Scholarship Fundone grant, 2020 · $75k · revenue -31%
- DCDISTRICT COUNCIL NO 9 SPECIAL EVENTS FUNDone grant, 2019 · $12k
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
To assist workers and employers in solving problems of mutual concern not susceptible to resolution within the collective bargaining process, to improve the employment opportunities for employees, to expand the market for the construction…
Liason for organized labor in the new york city area.
See Schedule OProviding manpower training and related assistance and supportive services to unemployed and underemployed persons, particularly those from economically disadvantaged areas of the City and State of New York, including…
The long island builders institute, formed in 1941, is an association of building industry professionals who are dedicated to making long island a better place to live and work by creating a balance between the economy, the environment,…
Liason for organized labor.
All activities conducted by the association are to enable it to:a. establish a better understanding between the members and companies in the construction and related industries.b. foster reasonable and just regulations by governments c.…
To be the public voice and advocate for union contractors in new york city.
The New York Committee for Occupational Safety and Health (NYCOSH) is a membership organization of workers, unions, community-based organizations, workers' rights activists, and health and safety professionals. NYCOSH uses training,…
Labor union maintaining and improving the benefit and working conditions of members engaged in the carpentry trade.
Industry association providing negotiation and arbitration of industry labor contracts.
The new york building congress is a private association committed to helping new york city maintain its position as a world class city through constant improvement of the physical environment where people live and work. to this end it…
The organization's mission is to assist in current issues, represent member causes & handle union contract negotiations for member general contractors in the new york metropolitan area.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Nyc Building and Construction Industry Safety Fund and the most unlike its peers is Fight for Sight Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
22 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 22 of the 29 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds BUILD UP NYC LLC ↗
- Who funds THE EDWARD J MALLOY INITIATIVE FOR CONSTRUCTION SKILLS INC ↗
- Who funds PAINTERS AND ALLIED TRADES FOR CHILDREN'S HOPE FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds District Council No 9 Scholarship Fund ↗
- Who funds Association of Master Painters and Decorators ↗
- Who funds ASSOC OF WALL-CEILING & CARP IND INC ↗
- Who funds NY HELMETS TO HARDHATS INC ↗
- Who funds OUTREACH PROJECT INC ↗
- Who funds CENTRO UNIDO DE DETALLISTAS DE PR ↗
- Who funds Healing Emergency Aid Response Team 911 ↗
- Who funds FRIENDS OF ST DOMINIC'S INC ↗
- Who funds LONG ISLAND HISPANIC CHAMBER OF COMMERCE INC ↗
- Who funds GREATER NEW YORK COUNCILS BOY SCOUTS OF AMERICA ↗
- Who funds PEGGY BROWNING FUND ↗
- Who funds AMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY INC ↗
- Who funds BUILDING TRADES EMPLOYERS ASSOC OF WESTCHESTER & PUTNAM COUNTIES OF NYINC ↗
- Who funds BAC Local 7 Tile Marble and Terrazzo Scholarship Fund Inc ↗
- Who funds NONTRADITIONAL EMPLOYMENT FOR WOMEN ↗
- Who funds Fight for Sight Inc ↗
- Who funds NYC BUILDING AND CONSTRUCTION INDUSTRY SAFETY FUND ↗
- Who funds ALIGN THE ALLIANCE FOR A GREATER NEW YORK INC ↗
- Who funds CLIMATE JOBS NY EDUCATION FUND INC ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Carpenter Contractor Alliance of Metropolitan New York Inc · Sheet Metal Workers Local Union No28 Labor Management Committee and Trust · Plumbers Local Union No 1 · New York City & Vicinity District Council Ubcja · New York City Carpenters Relief and Charity Fund · International Brotherhood of Tmstrs Local 282 Tcwh · International Union of Bricklayers & Allied Craftworkers · National Philanthropic Trust · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization International Union of Painters and Allied Trades District Council No 9 funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.