Skip to content

· Public charity

Pledges Inc

To support social development and humanitarian causes across the globe, especially for technical training in developing countries.

$309k
Granted FY2025still arriving
5
Grants FY2025still arriving
2
States reached
$75k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2021 to 2025.

International$872kEnvironment$452kPhilanthropy$326kScience & Tech$160kEmployment$131kCommunity Improvement$126kPublic Safety & Disaster$100kHuman Services$99kOther$0
02FY2025 · 5 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

How this is measured
The 5 grants below total $235,000, the rows itemized in this filing. The $309,263 headline is the total grant expense on the return; the other $74,263 is giving the schedule does not break out (grants under the $5,000 itemization floor, grants to individuals, grants on other schedules). Every figure below describes the itemized rows only.

By grant size · FY2025

  • $10k–50k2 grants · $55k
  • $50k–250k3 grants · $180k
$50,000
Median grant
2
States reached
$4.4M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
PCRF$75,000
APRICOT INC$55,000
HIDDEN HUMANITY$50,000
SAB SATH INC$30,000
UNITED STATES FUND FOR UNICEF$25,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY21–25) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 72% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%Trips Beyond the Classroom: $16k → 11%Sunflower: $360k → 8%ABAHD: $27k → 9%Developers Career Advancement: $76k → 10%APRICOT INC: $55k → 10%PCRF: $125k → 14%Wild Horizon Design LLC: $10k → 14%Sanitation Innovation Fund: $20k → 12%UNITED STATES FUND FOR UNICEF: $25k → 17%Collective of Concerned Black: $25k → 20%Catalyte Nonprofit: $10k → 10%Tigray Development Assoc of North America: $47k → 14%World System Solutions Inc: $452k → 13%Missouri Trust & Investment: $50k → 15%HEALTH PROFESSIONALS NETWORK: $20k → 12%World United Ministry Inc: $20k → 12%Choice Lab LLC: $160k → 17%The Xylom: $6k → 13%SeeMore Impact Labs: $35k → 12%HEAL PALESTINE: $125k → 12%Artic Tern: $11k → 9%SEMA USA INC: $23k → 18%International Society for Be: $20k → 14%Hopewell Helpers LLC: $29k → 11%Lucky Animal Protection Shelter: $22k → 4%Leash Life Unlimited Inc: $20k → 10%Vasona Hill Foundation: $20k → 13%Paul Wang - Agency Fund: $160k → 8%HIDDEN HUMANITY: $50k → 10%PCRF: $75k → 14%Murtadha Tameemi: $55k → 17%Collective of Concerned Black Professionals: $21k → 20%Conway Cloud: $60k → 10%Humanitarian SupportforTigray: $10k → 14%Health Professionals Network for Tigray: $20k → 12%Artic tern: $7k → 9%Comprehensive Disaster Respon: $100k → 4%SAB SATH INC: $30k → 10%Youth EmpowHERment Sleepover: $19k → 14%The People's Fundraiser: $38k → 14%4Ward Group for Teens4Hire: $6k → 10%Humanitarian Aid Tigray: $26k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

WA
IL
NY
OR
NV
OH
NJ
CA
CO
MO
WV
VA
MD
AZ
TN
DC
GA
TX
FL

Grants abroad, by region: $71k on the FY2025 return

Schedule F, as filed: 3 regions, $62k to organizations and $9k to individuals. The IRS asks for region and purpose, not the recipient, so no country or grantee can be named here.

South Asia$48k · 68% · 2 grants · 1 person

Stated purpose: DONATIONS · DONATION · EMAN TABASH

East Asia and the Pacific$13k · 18% · 1 grant

Stated purpose: DONATION RECOVERABLE STUDENT FINANCIAL

South America$10k · 14% · 1 grant

Stated purpose: DONATIONS

How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving. Grants abroad on Schedule F are filed by region, purpose and amount with no recipient name, so they are shown by region and cannot be placed on the country map or matched to a grantee.
04

Where the work is directed

The same grants placed two ways: where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose sends the money.

About 13% of Pledges Inc’s grant dollars are earmarked for a different county than the recipient’s own address. By recipient address, 35% of the giving stays in CA; by stated purpose, 26%.

Pledges Inclessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient address · 13% directed abroad (not shown)
How this is measured
Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the funder’s own 990 grant descriptions.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

14%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$360k · 5 repeat orgs$2.1M to everyone else

5 repeat relationships: 1 still active in FY2025, 4 since wound down; 4 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

5
28

Total granted

$360k
$2.0M

Median revenue growth · since first grant

-44%
0%

Still filing today

60%
32%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 32% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $160k went to new ones.

50%100%’21’22’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’21’22’24’25
InternationalEducationHealthPhilanthropyYouth DevelopmentPublic Safety & DisasterOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • PC
    PALESTINE CHILDREN'S RELIEF FUND
    2× · 2024–2025 · $200k · revenue 0%
  • TD
    TIGRAY DEVELOPMENT ASSOCIATION IN NORTH AMERICA
    2× · 2021–2022 · $57k · revenue -99%
  • CO
    Collective of Concerned Black
    2× · 2021–2022 · $47k

Funded once

  • WS
    World Systems Solutions Inc
    one grant, 2021 · $452k · revenue +16% · 51% of their budget
  • SF
    Sunflower Fund
    one grant, 2022 · $360k · revenue -85%
  • CL
    Choice Lab LLC
    one grant, 2022 · $160k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
World Health Foundation
—
2
Pul Alliance for Digital Health and Equity Inc

According to the World Health Organization, half of the worlds 8 billion people still cannot access essential health services. Even for those who can, the costs are often cripplingly high. NGOs delivering health and humanitarian aid to…

Community Improvement
3
Humanity Increased

Humanity-Increased is an international charity whose mission is to help those in need and promote human transformation. The teachings of Islam inspire our mission, and we strive to embody its values of compassion, empathy, and service to…

International
4
MedGlobal Inc

MedGlobal is a humanitarian non-governmental organization working to serve vulnerable communities around the world by providing innovative, free, and sustainable healthcare. Our health services support refugees, displaced persons, and…

Health
5
Second Nile Global Corp

Our commitment to providing accessible clean water extends beyond the boundaries of countries, continents, and cultures. We are driven by a shared belief in the power of technology to transform lives, uplift communities, and create a more…

International
6
Operation Broken Silence

Operation Broken Silence is building a global movement to empower the Sudanese people through innovate programs as a 501c3 nonprofit organization.

International
7
World Aid Runners
Health
8
Give to the World

Volunteer based aid for global communities in conflict zones

International
9
International Rescue Committee Inc

The International Rescue Committee responds to the world's worst humanitarian crises and helps people whose lives and livelihoods are shattered by conflict and disaster to survive, recover, and gain control of their future.

International
10
Rahma Worldwide Aid and Development

Rahma delivers emergency and development programs to needy communities, without discrimination based on gender, race, religion, or location. we aim to empower and develop individuals and communities affected by hardship globally.

International
11
Global United Foundation
International
12
Sudan Aid 911 Emergency Relief Incorporated

To provide support (food, medical and shelter) for victims and refugees escaping or trapped in the war zone in sudan and currently residing in egypt or sudan. most of these refugees are women and children. we will also support them…

International
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Heal Palestine Inc; the most unlike its peers is World United Ministry Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
05the grantee network

16 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 16 of the 37 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
15/16
Grantees still filing
3/16
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

Choice Lab LLC: $160,000 · OtherChoice Lab LLCIndividual grant recipient: $160,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipientDevelopers Career Advancement: $76,200 · OtherDevelopers Career AdvancementIndividual grant recipient: $60,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipientAPRICOT INC: $55,000 · OtherAPRICOT INCIndividual grant recipient: $54,570 · OtherIndividual grant recipientMissouri Trust & Investment: $50,000 · OtherMissouri Trust & InvestmentCollective of Concerned Black: $46,516 · Other+14 more: $263,393 · Other+14 moreSunflower Fund: $360,457 · InternationalSunflower FundPALESTINE CHILDREN'S RELIEF FUND: $200,000 · InternationalPALESTINE CHILDREN'S RELIEF FUNDHEAL PALESTINE INC: $125,000 · InternationalHEAL PALESTINE INCTIGRAY DEVELOPMENT ASSOCIATION IN NORTH AMERICA: $56,709 · InternationalTIGRAY DEVELOPMENT ASSOCIATION IN NORT…HIDDEN HUMANITY: $50,000 · InternationalHIDDEN HUMANITYSAB SAATH INC: $30,000 · International+2 more: $30,770 · InternationalWorld Systems Solutions Inc: $451,565 · EducationWorld Systems Solution…Seemore Impact Labs: $35,200 · EducationSeemore Impact LabsCOMPREHENSIVE DISASTER RELIEF: $100,000 · Public Safety & DisasterHealth Professionals Network for Tigray: $39,570 · HealthVasona Hill Foundation: $20,000 · HealthOPENCOLLECTIVE FOUNDATION: $43,920 · PhilanthropyWORLD UNITED MINISTRY INC: $20,000 · Youth Development
Other$925,679International$852,936Education$486,765Public Safety & Disaster$100,000Health$59,570Philanthropy$43,920Youth Development$20,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetWorld Systems Solutions Inc: $451,565 over 1y, 51% of budgetPALESTINE CHILDREN'S RELIEF FUND: $200,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetHEAL PALESTINE INC: $125,000 over 1y, 0.6% of budgetCOMPREHENSIVE DISASTER RELIEF: $100,000 over 1y, 4.5% of budgetTIGRAY DEVELOPMENT ASSOCIATION IN NORTH AMERICA: $56,709 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetOPENCOLLECTIVE FOUNDATION: $43,920 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetHealth Professionals Network for Tigray: $39,570 over 2y, 3.7% of budgetSeemore Impact Labs: $35,200 over 1y, 7.3% of budgetSAB SAATH INC: $30,000 over 1y, 11% of budgetPLEDGES INC: $26,859 over 1y, 2.0% of budgetUNITED STATES FUND FOR UNICEF: $25,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetEmpowerment Works Inc: $5,770 over 1y, 0.4% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds World Systems Solutions Inc ↗
  • Who funds Sunflower Fund ↗
  • Who funds PALESTINE CHILDREN'S RELIEF FUND ↗
  • Who funds HEAL PALESTINE INC ↗
  • Who funds COMPREHENSIVE DISASTER RELIEF ↗
  • Who funds TIGRAY DEVELOPMENT ASSOCIATION IN NORTH AMERICA ↗
  • Who funds HIDDEN HUMANITY ↗
  • Who funds OPENCOLLECTIVE FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds Health Professionals Network for Tigray ↗
  • Who funds Seemore Impact Labs ↗
  • Who funds SAB SAATH INC ↗
  • Who funds PLEDGES INC ↗
  • Who funds UNITED STATES FUND FOR UNICEF ↗
  • Who funds WORLD UNITED MINISTRY INC ↗
  • Who funds Vasona Hill Foundation ↗
  • Who funds Empowerment Works Inc ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Paypal Charitable Giving FundDC7.5× affinity6 shared granteesties to 5 of 5Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Paypal Charitable Giving Fund · National Philanthropic Trust · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Pledges Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Pledges Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 30%6%25%56%100%funder's share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    3get no government money at all
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Pledges Inc?

    Find your warmest path to Pledges Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 37 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Pledges’ filings →

    More from the funding graph