Skip to content

Illinois · Public charity

Planning Implementation and Evaluation Org

PIE builds the capacity of mission-driven organizations to evaluate impact, promote learning, and facilitate equitable change.

$46k
Granted FY2022
2
Itemized grants FY2022
2
Organizations funded FY2022
50%
First-time grantees FY2022
Read the full brief
Itemized, FY2022
$15k
The rest is grants the schedule does not break out
Median grant, FY2022
$8,500
Largest grant, FY2022
$8,500
Organizations funded a year
1 to 13
FY2019 to FY2022
States reached, FY2022
1
Total assets, FY2022
$576k

How open it is to new grantees

In FY2022, 50% of the organizations Planning Implementation and Evaluation Org funded were first-time grantees, receiving 56% of its grant dollars.

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2022, 44% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $9k went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’22
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’21’22
Human ServicesCrime & LegalHealthOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
The numbers by year
Fiscal yearOrganizations fundedTo those organizationsFirst-time grantees
FY20222$15k50%
FY20211$10k100%
FY202013$108k85%
FY20196$75kn/a
100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2019 to 2022.

Human Services$67kHealth$53kCrime & Legal$32kCivil Rights$20kYouth Development$20kCommunity Improvement$10kEducation$8k

Top grantees

Largest recipients by total granted, FY2019 to FY2022, and the share of each one’s budget the grants supplied at peak.

Show all 19 grantees
All grantees of Planning Implementation and Evaluation Org by total granted
GranteeTotal grantedYearsShare of their budget
Allceus$20,6651n/a
Courageous Communication$20,0001n/a
Casa Central Social Services Corporation$16,73020%
Crisis Center for South Suburbia$16,07020%
Chicago Children's Advocacy Center$15,71220%
Youth Network Council Dba Illinois Collaboration on Youth$12,50010%
Children's Research Triangle$11,48210%
Near North Health Service Corporation$10,48210%
Trauma Institute & Child Trauma Institute Inc$10,00011%
Juvenile Protective Association$10,00010%
Vega Partners LLC$10,0001n/a
Children's Advocacy Center of North & Northwest Cook County$8,50011%
Zacharias Sexual Abuse Center$7,5001n/a
Christopher House$7,50010%
Teen Parent Connection Inc$7,00010%
Mujeres Latinas En Accion$7,00010%
New Moms Inc$6,48210%
Between Friends$5,48210%
Family Focus Legacy$5,48210%

Where it is load-bearing

Each grantee by its size and the share of its budget Planning Implementation and Evaluation Org supplied at peak.

25%50%75%100%$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetCasa Central Social Services Corporation: $16,730 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetCrisis Center for South Suburbia: $16,070 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetChicago Children's Advocacy Center: $15,712 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetYouth Network Council Dba Illinois Collaboration on Youth: $12,500 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetChildren's Research Triangle: $11,482 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetNear North Health Service Corporation: $10,482 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetTrauma Institute & Child Trauma Institute Inc: $10,000 over 1y, 0.9% of budgetJuvenile Protective Association: $10,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetChildren's Advocacy Center of North & Northwest Cook County: $8,500 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetChristopher House: $7,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTeen Parent Connection Inc: $7,000 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetMujeres Latinas En Accion: $7,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetNew Moms Inc: $6,482 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetBetween Friends: $5,482 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetFamily Focus Legacy: $5,482 over 1y, 0.0% of budget

Tap a dot to name the grantee.

How this is measured
Share of budget is the funder’s grant in a year over the grantee’s total revenue that year, at its highest across the years we hold; revenue is from all sources. Only grantees confirmed against their own filings, whose grants do not exceed their revenue, are plotted: the largest 15.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

United Way of Metropolitan Chicago IncIL25.7× affinity10 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: United Way of Metropolitan Chicago Inc · Visiting Nurse Association of Chicago (Aka) Vna Foundation · Circle of Service Foundation · The Chicago Community Trust · Blowitz-Ridgeway Foundation · Northwestern Memorial HealthCare Group · Arie and Ida Crown Memorial · North Shore Exchange Nfp · The Pelino Charitable Foundation · George M Eisenberg Foundation for Charities · Robert R McCormick Foundation · Polk Bros Foundation Inc

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Compare Planning Implementation and Evaluation Org with peer funders

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Planning Implementation and Evaluation Org?

Find your warmest path to Planning Implementation and Evaluation Org through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

About Planning Implementation and Evaluation Org

How much does Planning Implementation and Evaluation Org give?
Planning Implementation and Evaluation Org reported 2 itemized grants totaling $15,070, out of $45,520 in total grant expense reported on the return in its FY2022 IRS filing. It funded between 1 and 13 organizations a year over FY2019 to FY2022.
What does Planning Implementation and Evaluation Org fund?
By grant dollars over FY2019 to FY2022, its largest causes are Human Services (32%), Health (25%), Crime & Legal (15%).
Who are Planning Implementation and Evaluation Org's largest grantees?
By total granted over FY2019 to FY2022: Allceus ($21k), Courageous Communication ($20k), Casa Central Social Services Corporation ($17k).
Does Planning Implementation and Evaluation Org fund new organizations?
In FY2022, 50% of the organizations it funded were first-time grantees.
Which funders back the same organizations as Planning Implementation and Evaluation Org?
Its strongest co-funders, measured against what their size predicts, include United Way of Metropolitan Chicago Inc, Visiting Nurse Association of Chicago (Aka) Vna Foundation, Circle of Service Foundation.
Where is Planning Implementation and Evaluation Org based?
Planning Implementation and Evaluation Org is based in IL.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 19 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2022, released 2022. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Possibly out of date. A more recent filing (FY2025) is on record and reports no grant expense, so the figures above are from FY2022, the most recent year this funder made grants.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Planning Implementation and Evaluation Org’s filings →

More from the funding graph