Skip to content
Planned Parenthoodorange and San Bernardino Counties Inc at a glanceMostly funded, not a grantmaker: see who funds it →

· Public charity

Planned Parenthoodorange and San Bernardino Counties Inc

Planned parenthood orange and san bernardino counties provides an exceptional health care experience for every patient, protects and promotes the fundamental right of all individuals to make their own personal health decisions, and advocates for and delivers comprehensive education to create healthier communities.

$1.4M
Granted FY2025still arriving
5
Grants FY2025still arriving
3
States reached
$981k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2018 to 2025.

Health$5.9MCivil Rights$3.1MEducation$10k
02FY2025 · 5 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • $10k–50k2 grants · $20k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $100k
  • $250k+2 grants · $1.2M
$100,000
Median grant
3
States reached
$136M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
COMMUNITY ACTION FUND OF PPOSBC$981,110
PLANNED PARENTHOOD GREATER MEMPHIS REGION INC$250,000
PLANNED PARENTHOOD SOUTH TEXAS$100,000
PLANNED PARENTHOOD PASADENA & SAN GABRIEL VALLEY$10,000
PLANNED PARENTHOOD LOS ANGELES$10,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY18–25) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 41% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants spread fairly evenly across need levels.

area typical 11%PLANNED PARENTHOOD MINNESOTA NORTH DAKOTA SOUTH DAKOTA: $250k → 14%Planned Parenthood Northern California: $5k → 9%UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA IRVINE FOUNDATION: $10k → 10%Planned Parenthood Orange and San Bernardino Counties Action Fund: $200k → 12%PLANNED PARENTHOOD PASADENA & SAN GABRIEL VALLEY: $10k → 14%PPFA - PLANNED PARENTHOOD FEDERATION OF AMERICA: $25k → 17%PP GREATER TEXAS: $250k → 14%Planned Parenthood South Texas: $500k → 16%PLANNED PARENTHOOD GULF COAST: $250k → 16%PLANNED PARENTHOOD GREAT PLAINS: $100k → 5%AFFILIATE CHIEF EXECUTIVES COUNCIL INC: $1.0M → 5%AFFILIATE CHIEF EXECUTIVES COUNCIL INC: $187k → 14%PLANNED PARENTHOOD GREATER MEMPHIS REGION INC: $250k → 17%PLANNED PARENTHOOD SOUTH ATLANTIC INC: $150k → 8%PLANNED PARENTHOOD OF THE ROCKY MOUNTAINS INC: $350k → 12%Planned Parenthood Indiana & Kentucky: $25k → 16%PLANNED PARENTHOOD OF SOUTHWEST OHIO REGION: $300k → 16%PLANNED PARENTHOOD OF ILLINOIS: $200k → 14%Community Action Fund of Planned Parenthood Orange & San Bernardino: $408k → 10%PLANNED PARENTHOOD ORANGE AND SAN BERNARDINO COUNTRIES ACTION FUND: $100k → 12%PLANNED PARENTHOOD LOS ANGELES: $10k → 14%PP SOUTH TEXAS: $250k → 16%AFFILIATE CHIEF EXECUTIVES COUNCIL INC: $353k → 5%PLANNED PARENTHOOD SOUTH ATLANTIC: $150k → 8%PP OF THE ROCKY MOUNTAINS: $200k → 12%PP ILLINOIS: $150k → 14%COMMUNITY ACTION FUND OF PPOSBC: $2.2M → 10%PLANNED PARENTHOOD SOUTH TEXAS: $100k → 16%Affiliate Chief Executive Council Inc: $35k → 5%PP OF THE ROCKY MOUNTAINS SERVICE CORPORATION: $100k → 12%COMMUNITY ACTION FUND OF PPOSBC: $981k → 10%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

MN
IL
WI
NY
IN
OH
CA
CO
KS
TN
NC
TX
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

83%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$7.5M · 7 repeat orgs$1.6M to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +12% since the first grant, against +11% for those funded once.

7 repeat relationships: 2 still active in FY2025, 5 since wound down; 3 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

7
10

Total granted

$7.5M
$1.3M

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+12%
+11%

Still filing today

86%
80%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 80% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $270k went to new ones.

50%100%’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
HealthEducationOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • CA
    COMMUNITY ACTION FUND OF PLANNED PARENTHOOD ORANGE & SAN BERNARDINO
    3× · 2018–2025 · $3.6M · revenue +103% · 91% of their budget
  • AC
    AFFILIATE CHIEF EXECUTIVES COUNCIL INC
    4× · 2019–2022 · $1.6M · revenue +12% · 43% of their budget
  • PP
    Planned Parenthood South Texas
    3× · 2019–2025 · $850k · revenue +3%

Funded once

  • PP
    PLANNED PARENTHOOD OF SOUTHWEST OHIO REGIONgraduated
    one grant, 2024 · $300k · revenue +34%
  • PP
    PLANNED PARENTHOOD MINNESOTA NORTH DAKOTA SOUTH DAKOTA
    one grant, 2021 · $250k · revenue +3%
  • PP
    Planned Parenthood Gulf Coast Inc
    one grant, 2022 · $250k · revenue -39%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Planned Parenthood

To educate, inform, and empower individuals through accessible reproductive health services and evidence-based resources that support informed choices and personal agency.

Health
2
Planned Parenthood of Southwest and Central Florida Inc

The mission of planned parenthood of southwest and central florida, inc. is to provide affordable access to comprehensive reproductive healthcare and accurate health information through patient care, education, and advocacy.

Health
3
Planned Parenthood of Maryland Inc

The mission is to enable all marylanders to have access to a wide range of high quality, affordable reproductive health care services. by providing medical services, education, training and advocacy, ppm seeks to help individuals make…

Health
4
Planned Parenthood California Central Coast

To improve our communities' sexual and reproductive health outcomes through health care, education, and advocacy.

Health
5
Planned Parenthood San Antonio

Provide family planning and reproductive healthcare services to both adults and teenagers, with particular emphasis on serving low-income and medically underserved populations.

Health
6
Planned Parenthood of Metropolitan Washington Dc Inc

Ppmw provides high-quality, compassionate healthcare, including reproductive care; promote sexual health; and advocate for reproductive rights and health equity for all.

Health
7
Planned Parenthood of Greater Texas Family Planning and Preventative Health

Planned Parenthood of Greater Texas Family Planning and Preventative Health provides comprehensive and complementary health care services in settings that preserve and protect the essential privacy and rights of the individual, advocates…

Health
8
Planned Parenthood Affiliates of California Inc

Organized to promote and coordinate the provision of education, counseling and clinical services and to support or oppose administrative action, regulations and legislation in the field of family planning and comprehensive sexual and…

—
9
Intermountain Planned Parenthood

Planned Parenthood of Montana empowers all people to make informed decisions and ensures the freedom to manage their own sexuality, and personal health by providing the highest quality confidential healthcare services, education, and…

Health
10
Planned Parenthood of the Heartland Inc

To provide, promote and protect reproductive and sexual health through health services, education and advocacy.

Health
11
Planned Parenthood of the Pacific Southwest

To ensure broad public access to sexual and reproductive health care through direct service, education and advocacy.

Health
12
Planned Parenthood of the Columbia Willamette Inc

The mission of planned parenthood of the columbia willamette (ppcw) is to provide, promote and protect access to quality reproductive and sexual health care in oregon and southwest washington.

Health
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Planned Parenthood Great Plains; the most unlike its peers is Planned Parenthood of the Rocky Mountains Service Corporation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

18 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 18 of the 20 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

2
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
17/18
Grantees still filing
11/18
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

COMMUNITY ACTION FUND OF PLANNED PARENTHOOD ORANGE & SAN BERNARDINO: $3,552,302 · OtherCOMMUNITY ACTION FUND OF PLANNED PARENTHOOD ORANGE & SAN BERNARDINOAFFILIATE CHIEF EXECUTIVES COUNCIL INC: $1,575,485 · OtherAFFILIATE CHIEF EXECUTIVES COUNCIL INCPlanned Parenthood Orange and San Bernardino Counties Action Fund: $300,000 · OtherPlanned Parenthood Orange and San Bernardino Counties Action Fund+2 more: $125,000 · OtherPlanned Parenthood South Texas: $850,000 · HealthPlanned Parenthood South TexasROCKY MOUNTAIN PLANNED PARENTHOOD INC: $550,000 · HealthROCKY MOUNTAIN PLANNED PARENTHOOD INCPlanned Parenthood of Illinois: $350,000 · HealthPlanned Parenthood of IllinoisPLANNED PARENTHOOD SOUTH ATLANTIC INC: $300,000 · HealthPLANNED PARENTHOOD SOUTH ATLANTIC INCPLANNED PARENTHOOD OF SOUTHWEST OHIO REGION: $300,000 · HealthPLANNED PARENTHOOD OF SOUTHWEST OHIO REGIONPLANNED PARENTHOOD MINNESOTA NORTH DAKOTA SOUTH DAKOTA: $250,000 · HealthPLANNED PARENTHOOD MINNESOTA NORTH DAKOTA S…Planned Parenthood Gulf Coast Inc: $250,000 · HealthPlanned Parenthood Gulf Coast IncPLANNED PARENTHOOD OF GREATER TEXAS INC: $250,000 · HealthPLANNED PARENTHOOD OF GREATER TEXAS INCPLANNED PARENTHOOD GREATER MEMPHIS REGION INC: $250,000 · HealthPLANNED PARENTHOOD GREATER MEMPHIS REGION I…+5 more: $150,000 · HealthUNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA IRVINE FOUNDATION: $10,000 · Education
Other$5,552,787Health$3,500,000Education$10,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetCOMMUNITY ACTION FUND OF PLANNED PARENTHOOD ORANGE & SAN BERNARDINO: $3,552,302 over 3y, 91% of budgetAFFILIATE CHIEF EXECUTIVES COUNCIL INC: $1,575,485 over 4y, 43% of budgetPlanned Parenthood South Texas: $850,000 over 3y, 6.5% of budgetROCKY MOUNTAIN PLANNED PARENTHOOD INC: $550,000 over 2y, 0.6% of budgetPlanned Parenthood of Illinois: $350,000 over 2y, 0.4% of budgetPLANNED PARENTHOOD SOUTH ATLANTIC INC: $300,000 over 2y, 0.4% of budgetPLANNED PARENTHOOD OF SOUTHWEST OHIO REGION: $300,000 over 1y, 2.1% of budgetPLANNED PARENTHOOD MINNESOTA NORTH DAKOTA SOUTH DAKOTA: $250,000 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetPlanned Parenthood Gulf Coast Inc: $250,000 over 1y, 0.6% of budgetPLANNED PARENTHOOD OF GREATER TEXAS INC: $250,000 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetPLANNED PARENTHOOD GREATER MEMPHIS REGION INC: $250,000 over 1y, 1.7% of budgetPLANNED PARENTHOOD GREAT PLAINS: $100,000 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetPLANNED PARENTHOOD OF INDIANA AND KENTUCKY INC: $25,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetPLANNED PARENTHOOD FEDERATION OF AMERICA INC: $25,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetPLANNED PARENTHOOD LOS ANGELES: $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetPlanned Parenthood Pasadena and San Gabriel Valley Inc: $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetUNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA IRVINE FOUNDATION: $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetPlanned Parenthood Shasta-Diablo Inc: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Planned Parenthood Fe…Direct ReliefThe Susan Thompson Bu…National Philanthropi…American Endowment Fo…Morgan Stanley Global…Vanguard Charitable E…American Online Givin…Donor Advised Charita…Fidelity Investments …Amazonsmile Foundation
Planned Parenthood Federation of America IncNY15.7× affinity5 shared granteesties to 10 of 10Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Planned Parenthood Federation of America Inc · Direct Relief · The Susan Thompson Buffett Foundation · National Philanthropic Trust · American Endowment Foundation · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Planned Parenthoodorange and San Bernardino Counties Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Planned Parenthoodorange and San Bernardino Counties Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%6%25%56%100%funder's share of their income ↑0%3%5%8%10%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    10report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–10%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 20 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Planned Parenthoodorange and San Bernardino Counties’ filings →

    More from the funding graph

    The unnamed billions
    grants reported with no recipient in the public record
    The regranting layer
    51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
    The DAF merry-go-round
    $9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
    The endowment market
    who holds foundation money, and what just moved
    The camps
    funders cluster by geography, not ideology
    By state
    where grant money is based, and what stays home