Skip to content

· Public charity

Planned Parenthood Global Inc

To advance the planned parenthood mission internationally, including support for the provision and protection of sexual and reproductive health services and rights, and ensuring that all people have access to reproductive and sexual healthcare.

$6.7M
Granted FY2025still arriving
1
Grants FY2025still arriving
1
States reached
$62k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Health$400kInternational$140kPhilanthropy$62k
02FY2025 · 1 grant

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

How this is measured
The 1 grants below total $61,768, the rows itemized in this filing. The $6,669,270 headline is the total grant expense on the return; the other $6,607,502 is giving the schedule does not break out (grants under the $5,000 itemization floor, grants to individuals, grants on other schedules). Every figure below describes the itemized rows only.
$61,768
Median grant
1
States reached
$3.0M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
CAPITAL FOR GOOD$61,768
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY17–25) land where the poverty rate runs at 15%, against an area that typically sits at 12%. 80% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 12%Society of Family Planning Research Fund: $72k → 22%PP OF CENTRAL & WESTERN NY: $10k → 14%Planned Parenthood of Greater Texas Inc: $11k → 14%PLANNED PARENTHOOD SOUTH TEXAS: $15k → 16%Planned Parenthood Gulf Coast Inc: $15k → 16%CAPITAL FOR GOOD: $62k → 14%Planned Parenthood of Southern New England Inc: $11k → 12%Planned Parenthood of Middle and East Tennessee I: $14k → 14%PLANNED PARENTHOOD GREATER MEMPHIS REGION INC DBA PLANNED PARENTHOOD OF TEN: $15k → 17%PP SOUTH ATLANTIC: $14k → 8%PP SOUTHEAST: $13k → 13%PLANNED PARENTHOOD OF THE ROCKY MOUNTAINS INC: $50k → 12%PLANNED PARENTHOOD OF GREATER OHIO: $50k → 13%PP OF NORTHERN CENTRAL & SOUTHERN NJ: $15k → 4%Planned Parenthood of Maryland Inc: $15k → 19%Planned Parenthood of Greater Texas Inc: $10k → 14%PLANNED PARENTHOOD GULF COAST INC: $5k → 16%PLANNED PARENTHOOD OF METROPOLITAN WASHINGTON DC INC: $15k → 14%PP SOUTHEAST INC: $11k → 13%PP OF GREATER OHIO: $15k → 13%Planned Parenthood of Metropolitan Washington DC: $11k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

NY
OH
PA
NJ
CT
CO
MD
TN
NC
DC
GA
TX

Grants abroad, by region: $6.6M on the FY2025 return

Schedule F, as filed: 5 regions. The IRS asks for region and purpose, not the recipient, so no country or grantee can be named here.

Sub-Saharan Africa$4.5M · 67% · 28 grants

Stated purpose: TO SUPPORT PROGRAMS REGARDING REPRODUCTIVE HEALTH

South America$1.2M · 17% · 22 grants

Stated purpose: TO SUPPORT PROGRAMS REGARDING REPRODUCTIVE HEALTH

Central America and the Caribbean$459k · 7% · 11 grants

Stated purpose: TO SUPPORT PROGRAMS REGARDING REPRODUCTIVE HEALTH

North America (Canada and Mexico)$367k · 6% · 6 grants

Stated purpose: TO SUPPORT PROGRAMS REGARDING REPRODUCTIVE HEALTH

Europe (including Iceland and Greenland)$178k · 3% · 2 grants

Stated purpose: TO SUPPORT PROGRAMS REGARDING REPRODUCTIVE HEALTH

How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving. Grants abroad on Schedule F are filed by region, purpose and amount with no recipient name, so they are shown by region and cannot be placed on the country map or matched to a grantee.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

26%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$155k · 5 repeat orgs$446k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +55% since the first grant, against +30% for those funded once.

5 repeat relationships: 0 still active in FY2025, 5 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

5
13

Total granted

$155k
$385k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+55%
+30%

Still filing today

100%
62%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 0% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $62k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’22’23’24’25
HealthPhilanthropyOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • PP
    PLANNED PARENTHOOD OF GREATER OHIO
    2× · 2018–2022 · $65k · revenue +55%
  • PP
    PLANNED PARENTHOOD OF METROPOLITAN WASHINGTON DC INC
    2× · 2020–2023 · $26k · revenue +58%
  • PLANNED PARENTHOOD SOUTHEAST INC
    2× · 2017–2018 · $24k · revenue +59%

Funded once

  • AL
    Asociacion Luna Salud de la Mujer
    one grant, 2019 · $75k
  • SO
    SOCIETY OF FAMILY PLANNING RESEARCH FUND
    one grant, 2024 · $72k · revenue -92%
  • AD
    Asociacion de Mujeres en Solidaridad -AMES
    one grant, 2019 · $59k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Planned Parenthood of Greater New York Inc

Ppgny is a leading provider of sexual and reproductive health services and information, a fierce advocate, and a committed partner to advance equity and improve health outcomes for all.

Health
2
Planned Parenthood of Greater Texas Family Planning and Preventative Health

Planned Parenthood of Greater Texas Family Planning and Preventative Health provides comprehensive and complementary health care services in settings that preserve and protect the essential privacy and rights of the individual, advocates…

Health
3
Planned Parenthood of Southwest and Central Florida Inc

The mission of planned parenthood of southwest and central florida, inc. is to provide affordable access to comprehensive reproductive healthcare and accurate health information through patient care, education, and advocacy.

Health
4
Planned Parenthood Pasadena and San Gabriel Valley Inc

Planned Parenthood Pasadena and San Gabriel Valley, Inc. ("PPPSGV") are essential health care providers and trusted educators who center our work on sexual and reproductive care and advocate for all people to live authentic and healthy…

Health
5
Planned Parenthood

To educate, inform, and empower individuals through accessible reproductive health services and evidence-based resources that support informed choices and personal agency.

Health
6
Planned Parenthood Southeastern Pa

Our mission is to provide sexual, reproductive and complementary health services, deliver comprehensive sexuality education, and advocate fiercely for the protection and advancement of health equity and access to care, all with a strong…

Health
7
Planned Parenthood of Greater Tx Surgical Health Services Inc

Planned parenthood of greater texas surgical health services was established and maintains operations to support and provide clinical health services to its patients in texas, as permitted by law in the organizations clinical settings.

Health
8
Intermountain Planned Parenthood

Planned Parenthood of Montana empowers all people to make informed decisions and ensures the freedom to manage their own sexuality, and personal health by providing the highest quality confidential healthcare services, education, and…

Health
9
Planned Parenthood San Antonio

Provide family planning and reproductive healthcare services to both adults and teenagers, with particular emphasis on serving low-income and medically underserved populations.

Health
10
Planned Parenthood League of Massachusetts Inc

To protect and promote sexual and reproductive health and freedom of choice by providing clinical services, education and advocacy.

Health
11
Planned Parenthood of the Columbia Willamette Inc

The mission of planned parenthood of the columbia willamette (ppcw) is to provide, promote and protect access to quality reproductive and sexual health care in oregon and southwest washington.

Health
12
Planned Parenthood Los Angeles

To provide convenient and affordable access to a comprehensive range of quality reproductive health care and sexual health information through patient services, education, and advocacy.

Health
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Planned Parenthood of Metropolitan Washington Dc Inc; the most unlike its peers is Capital for Good Usa. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

16 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 16 of the 19 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
14/16
Grantees still filing
10/16
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

PLANNED PARENTHOOD OF GREATER OHIO: $64,700 · HealthPLANNED PARENTHOOD OF GREATER OHIOROCKY MOUNTAIN PLANNED PARENTHOOD INC: $50,000 · HealthROCKY MOUNTAIN PLANNED PARENTHOOD INCPLANNED PARENTHOOD OF METROPOLITAN WASHINGTON DC INC: $25,500 · HealthPLANNED PARENTHOOD OF METROPOLITAN WASHINGTON DC INCPLANNED PARENTHOOD SOUTHEAST INC: $23,900 · HealthPLANNED PARENTHOOD SOUTHEAST INCPLANNED PARENTHOOD OF GREATER TEXAS INC: $20,699 · HealthPLANNED PARENTHOOD OF GREATER TEXAS INCPlanned Parenthood Gulf Coast Inc: $20,246 · HealthPlanned Parenthood Gulf Coast IncPLANNED PARENTHOOD OF NORTHERN CENTRAL AND SOUTHERN NEW JERSEY INC: $15,000 · HealthPlanned Parenthood South Texas: $15,000 · HealthPLANNED PARENTHOOD GREATER MEMPHIS REGION INC: $15,000 · HealthPLANNED PARENTHOOD OF MARYLAND INC: $15,000 · HealthPLANNED PARENTHOOD SOUTH ATLANTIC INC: $14,410 · HealthPLANNED PARENTHOOD OF SOUTHERN NEW ENGLAND INC: $10,500 · HealthPLANNED PARENTHOOD OF CENTRAL AND WESTERN NEW YORK INC: $10,400 · HealthAsociacion Luna Salud de la Mujer: $74,604 · OtherAsociacion Luna Salud de la MujerSOCIETY OF FAMILY PLANNING RESEARCH FUND: $71,921 · OtherSOCIETY OF FAMILY PLANNING RESEARCH FUNDAsociacion de Mujeres en Solidaridad -AMES: $59,254 · OtherAsociacion de Mujeres en Solidaridad -AMESAsociacin Generando Equidad Liderazgo y Oportuni: $19,218 · OtherAsociacin Generando Equidad Liderazgo y Oport…PLANNED PARENTHOOD OF MIDDLE & EAST TENNESSE INC: $14,375 · OtherPLANNED PARENTHOOD OF MIDDLE & EAST TENNESSE …Capital for Good USA: $61,768 · PhilanthropyCapital for…
Health$300,355Other$239,372Philanthropy$61,768

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%grantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetPLANNED PARENTHOOD OF GREATER OHIO: $64,700 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetCapital for Good USA: $61,768 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetROCKY MOUNTAIN PLANNED PARENTHOOD INC: $50,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetPLANNED PARENTHOOD OF METROPOLITAN WASHINGTON DC INC: $25,500 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetPLANNED PARENTHOOD SOUTHEAST INC: $23,900 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetPLANNED PARENTHOOD OF GREATER TEXAS INC: $20,699 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetPlanned Parenthood Gulf Coast Inc: $20,246 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetPlanned Parenthood South Texas: $15,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetPLANNED PARENTHOOD GREATER MEMPHIS REGION INC: $15,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetPLANNED PARENTHOOD OF MARYLAND INC: $15,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetPLANNED PARENTHOOD SOUTH ATLANTIC INC: $14,410 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetPLANNED PARENTHOOD OF SOUTHERN NEW ENGLAND INC: $10,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetPLANNED PARENTHOOD OF CENTRAL AND WESTERN NEW YORK INC: $10,400 over 1y, 0.1% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Planned Parenthood Federation of America IncNY17.8× affinity6 shared granteesties to 9 of 9Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Planned Parenthood Federation of America Inc · The Susan Thompson Buffett Foundation · Charities Aid Foundation America · National Philanthropic Trust · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Planned Parenthood Global Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Planned Parenthood Global Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%5%10%15%20%share of the org’s income from government →median 10%
  • Planned Parenthood of Southern New England Inc: 10% of income from government
  • Planned Parenthood of Maryland Inc: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
0get no government money at all
7report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–20%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 19 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Planned Parenthood Global’s filings →

More from the funding graph