Skip to content

· Private foundation

Planet in Peace Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$4k
Granted FY2025still arriving
15
Grants FY2025still arriving
5
States reached
$1k
Largest
01What it funds
0199% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2019 to 2025.

International$17kEnvironment$11kHuman Services$4kCivil Rights$3kCrime & Legal$2kReligion$2kHealth$2kPublic Safety & Disaster$2kOther$0
02FY2025 · 15 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$100
Median grant
5
States reached
$5k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
UNICEF$1,335
WESTERN ENVIRONMENTAL LAW CENTER$500
UKRAINE CHILDREN'S ACTION FOUNDATION$500
NAACP LEGAL DEFENSE FUND$250
USA FOR UNHCR$228
FRATERNAL ORDER OF EAGLES LADIES AUXILIARY 3489$150
FUTURES WITHOUT VIOLENCE$100
ROCKY MOUNTAIN YOUTH CORP$100
AMERICAN RIVERS$100
GLOBAL GIVING$100
DREAMTREE PROJECT$100
TAOS SEARCH AND RESCUE$100
EL PUBLITO SHARED TABLE$100
NEW ENERGY ECONOMY$100
PLANNED PARENTHOOD$25
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY19–25, $2k) land where the poverty rate runs at 17%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%Dreamtree Project Inc: $250 → 18%The Food Depot: $250 → 12%The Food Depot: $120 → 12%COMMUNITY AGAINST VIOLENCE: $103 → 18%Dreamtree Project Inc: $103 → 18%Community Against Violence: $103 → 18%DREAM TREE PROJECT: $103 → 18%Not Forgotten Outreach Inc: $100 → 18%Community Against Violence: $100 → 18%DREAM TREE PROJECT: $100 → 18%Dreamtree Project: $100 → 18%Community Against Violence: $100 → 18%DREAMTREE PROJECT: $100 → 18%COMMUNITY AGAINST VIOLENCE: $100 → 18%DREAMTREE PROJECT: $100 → 18%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

MN
IL
NY
MA
OR
CA
UT
CO
VA
MD
DE
AZ
NM
DC
AL
TX
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

76%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$36k · 36 repeat orgs$12k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +47% since the first grant, against +36% for those funded once.

36 repeat relationships: 12 still active in FY2025, 24 since wound down; 3 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

36
42

Total granted

$36k
$11k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+47%
+36%

Still filing today

67%
52%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 80% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $750 went to new ones.

50%100%’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
EnvironmentInternationalHuman ServicesAnimalsCrime & LegalHealthOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • UNITED STATES FUND FOR UNICEF
    6× · 2020–2025 · $9k · revenue +46%
  • WE
    WESTERN ENVIRONMENTAL LAW CENTER
    7× · 2019–2025 · $5k · revenue +58%
  • SP
    SOUTHERN POVERTY LAW CENTER INC
    5× · 2019–2023 · $2k · revenue +28%

Funded once

  • WORLD CENTRAL KITCHEN INC
    one grant, 2022 · $1k · revenue -40%
  • IR
    International Rescue Committee INC
    one grant, 2022 · $1k · revenue -4%
  • US
    U S-UKRAINE FOUNDATION
    one grant, 2022 · $525 · revenue -77%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Rainforest Foundation Inc

The purpose of rainforest foundation us is to support indigenous peoples and forest communities in their efforts to secure their lands, protect their environment, and uphold their rights.

Environment
2
Rainforest Trust

Rainforest trust saves endangered wildlife and protects our planet by creating rainforest reserves through partnerships, community engagement, and donor support.

International
3
Natural Resources Defense Council Inc

We safeguard the earth: its people, its plants and animals, and (see schedule o) the natural systems on which all life depends. we work to restore the integrity of the elements that sustain life - air, land, and water - to defend…

Environment
4
Friends of the Earth

Friends of the earth strives for a more healthy and just world by defendng the environment and human health while advancing social and economic justice by conducting research and education, transforming the economy so it protects the…

Environment
5
Conservation International Foundation

Ci works to spotlight and secure the critical benefits that nature provides to humanity.

Environment
6
Asociacion Interamericana Para La Defensa Del Ambiente

To strenghten people's ability to guarantee their individual and collective right to a healthy environment, via the development, implementation, and effective enforcement of national and international law.

Crime & Legal
7
Rainforest Alliance Holding Inc

RA works at the intersection of business, agriculture & forests to improve lives & protect nature by transforming how land is used, production of goods & consumer choices.

Environment
8
The Nature Conservancy

The mission of the nature conservancy is to conserve the lands and waters on which all life depends.

—
9
Actionaid Usa

Actionaid is an international network building a just, equitable, and sustainable world in solidarity with communities on the frontlines of poverty and injustice. actionaid usa is the u.s. branch of actionaid international, which works in…

Social Science
10
The Union of Concerned Scientists Inc

The union of concerned scientists puts rigorous, independent science into action, developing solutions and advocating for a healthy, safe, and just future.

International
11
Healthy Environment Alliance of Utah

Heal utah's mission is to protect utah's environment and its people by promoting clean air, clean energy, and comprehensive solutions to radioactive and toxic waste.

Environment
12
Resource Renewal Institute

The resource renewal institute facilitates the creation, development and implementation of practical strategies to solve the entire complex environmental problem by addressing it comprehensively.

Environment
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Environmental Defense Fund Incorporated; the most unlike its peers is Magdalene House of Austin. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

48 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 48 of the 83 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
11
Early backer (in before they grew)
48/48
Grantees still filing
36/48
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

WESTERN ENVIRONMENTAL LAW CENTER: $4,750 · OtherWESTERN ENVIRONMENTAL LAW CENTERNAACP Legal Defense and Educational: $1,500 · OtherNAACP Legal Defense and EducationalTAOS ELDERS AND NEIGHBORS TOGETHER: $1,123 · OtherFutures Without Violence: $1,050 · OtherPLANNED PARENTHOOD: $925 · OtherAmigos Bravos Inc: $850 · Other+47 more: $13,955 · Other+47 moreUNITED STATES FUND FOR UNICEF: $8,808 · InternationalUNITED STATES FUND FOR UNICEFUnited States Association for UNHCR: $1,609 · InternationalUnited States Association for UNH…WORLD CENTRAL KITCHEN INC: $1,050 · InternationalWORLD CENTRAL KITCHEN INCInternational Rescue Committee INC: $1,030 · InternationalInternational Rescue Committee IN…PROJECT HOPE - THE PEOPLE-TO-PEOPLE HEALTH FOUNDATION INC: $700 · InternationalU S-UKRAINE FOUNDATION: $525 · International+2 more: $500 · International350ORG: $1,050 · Environment350ORGNEW ENERGY ECONOMY INC: $800 · EnvironmentNEW ENERGY…AMERICAN RIVERS INC: $638 · EnvironmentAMERICAN R…WATERKEEPER ALLIANCE INC: $599 · EnvironmentWATERKEEPE…Rivers & Birds Inc: $300 · EnvironmentRivers & B…WORLD WILDLIFE FUND INC: $225 · EnvironmentENVIRONMENTAL DEFENSE FUND INCORPORATED: $203 · EnvironmentSIERRA CLUB FOUNDATION: $200 · EnvironmentEARTHJUSTICE: $200 · Environment+3 more: $306 · Environment+3 moreSOUTHERN POVERTY LAW CENTER INC: $1,850 · Crime & LegalMAGDALENE HOUSE OF AUSTIN: $100 · Crime & LegalDREAM TREE PROJECT: $856 · Human ServicesCOMMUNITY AGAINST VIOLENCE INC: $506 · Human ServicesTHE FOOD DEPOT: $370 · Human ServicesNOT FORGOTTEN OUTREACH INC: $100 · Human ServicesTHE GIVING BACK FUND: $500 · PhilanthropySANTA FE COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $500 · PhilanthropyPLANNED PARENTHOOD FEDERATION OF AMERICA INC: $700 · HealthMOUNTAIN HOME HEALTH CARE INC: $258 · Health
Other$24,153International$14,222Environment$4,521Crime & Legal$1,950Human Services$1,832Philanthropy$1,000Health$958

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetUNITED STATES FUND FOR UNICEF: $8,808 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetWESTERN ENVIRONMENTAL LAW CENTER: $4,750 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetSOUTHERN POVERTY LAW CENTER INC: $1,850 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetUnited States Association for UNHCR: $1,609 over 7y, 0.0% of budget350ORG: $1,050 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetWORLD CENTRAL KITCHEN INC: $1,050 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetInternational Rescue Committee INC: $1,030 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetDREAM TREE PROJECT: $856 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetAmigos Bravos Inc: $850 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetNEW ENERGY ECONOMY INC: $800 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetPROJECT HOPE - THE PEOPLE-TO-PEOPLE HEALTH FOUNDATION INC: $700 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetPLANNED PARENTHOOD FEDERATION OF AMERICA INC: $700 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetAMERICAN RIVERS INC: $638 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetROCKY MOUNTAIN YOUTH CORPS: $600 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetWATERKEEPER ALLIANCE INC: $599 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetU S-UKRAINE FOUNDATION: $525 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetGLOBAL EMPOWERMENT MISSION INC: $512 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetHEART OF TAOS: $509 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetROCKY MOUNTAIN YOUTH CORPS: $508 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetCOMMUNITY AGAINST VIOLENCE INC: $506 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetNAACP LEGAL DEFENSE & EDUC FUND INC: $500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetFUTURES WITHOUT VIOLENCE: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE GIVING BACK FUND: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSANTA FE COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetGLOBALGIVING FOUNDATION INC: $400 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetTHE FOOD DEPOT: $370 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetRivers & Birds Inc: $300 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetSearch and Rescue Taos Inc: $300 over 3y, 0.2% of budgetMOUNTAIN HOME HEALTH CARE INC: $258 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetVOLUNTEERS OF AMERICA VOLUNTEERS OF AMERICA - MINNESOTA: $250 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetWORLD WILDLIFE FUND INC: $225 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetENVIRONMENTAL DEFENSE FUND INCORPORATED: $203 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetSIERRA CLUB FOUNDATION: $200 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetEARTHJUSTICE: $200 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetHonnold Foundation: $106 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE GOOD FOOD INSTITUTE INC: $104 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetNATIONAL PARK FOUNDATION: $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetHumane Society of Taos Inc dba Stray Hearts Animal Shelter: $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetRAINFOREST ALLIANCE INC: $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetNEW MEXICO WILDERNESS ALLIANCE: $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC: $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTAOS LAND TRUST: $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetNATIONAL WILDLIFE FEDERATION: $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetHABITAT FOR HUMANITY OF TAOS INC: $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetINEQUALITY MEDIA: $75 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds UNITED STATES FUND FOR UNICEF ↗
  • Who funds WESTERN ENVIRONMENTAL LAW CENTER ↗
  • Who funds SOUTHERN POVERTY LAW CENTER INC ↗
  • Who funds United States Association for UNHCR ↗
  • Who funds 350ORG ↗
  • Who funds WORLD CENTRAL KITCHEN INC ↗
  • Who funds International Rescue Committee INC ↗
  • Who funds DREAM TREE PROJECT ↗
  • Who funds Amigos Bravos Inc ↗
  • Who funds NEW ENERGY ECONOMY INC ↗
  • Who funds PROJECT HOPE - THE PEOPLE-TO-PEOPLE HEALTH FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds PLANNED PARENTHOOD FEDERATION OF AMERICA INC ↗
  • Who funds AMERICAN RIVERS INC ↗
  • Who funds ROCKY MOUNTAIN YOUTH CORPS ↗
  • Who funds WATERKEEPER ALLIANCE INC ↗
  • Who funds U S-UKRAINE FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds GLOBAL EMPOWERMENT MISSION INC ↗
  • Who funds HEART OF TAOS ↗
  • Who funds ROCKY MOUNTAIN YOUTH CORPS ↗
  • Who funds COMMUNITY AGAINST VIOLENCE INC ↗
  • Who funds NAACP LEGAL DEFENSE & EDUC FUND INC ↗
  • Who funds FUTURES WITHOUT VIOLENCE ↗
  • Who funds THE GIVING BACK FUND ↗
  • Who funds SANTA FE COMMUNITY FOUNDATION ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Taos Community Foundation IncNM38.9× affinity16 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Taos Community Foundation Inc · Santa Fe Community Foundation · Reed Family Foundation Inc · Marshall L and Perrine D McCune Charitable Foundation Inc · Grace Family Foundation Inc · Texas Instruments Foundation · Albuquerque Community Foundation · Lor Foundation Inc · Nancy Ann Mellen Foundation · Quail Roost Foundation · Carroll Petrie Foundation · Thornburg Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Planet in Peace Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Planet in Peace Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 20%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →median 0%
  • Global Empowerment Mission Inc: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
2get no government money at all
7report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Planet in Peace Foundation?

Find your warmest path to Planet in Peace Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 83 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Planet in Peace’s filings →

More from the funding graph