Skip to content
Plinth
Foundation DossiersMostly funded, not a grantmaker — see who funds it →
Plinth

· Public charity

Neighborhood Allies Inc

Our mission is to engage pittsburgh area residents and organizations with innovative tools that expand opportunity for transformative community change.

$475k
Granted FY2025still arriving
16
Grants FY2025still arriving
1
States reached
$71k
Largest
01What you fundRead
02The needRead
03Your edgeRead
04Your fieldRead
01What you fund
0168% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant clustered by its grantee’s IRS cause code (NTEE), by year — across FY2017–2025.

Education$1.0MHousing & Shelter$760kCommunity Improvement$714kHuman Services$660kYouth Development$301kPhilanthropy$105kArts & Culture$91kEmployment$30kHealth$6kOther$1.8M
02FY2025 · 16 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

The 16 grants below total $374,500 — the rows itemised in this filing. The $475,400 headline is the total grant expense reported on the return, so the remaining $100,900 is giving the schedule does not break out: grants under the $5,000 itemisation floor, grants to individuals, and grants reported on other schedules. Every figure below describes the itemised rows only.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k2 grants · $16k
  • $10k–50k11 grants · $158k
  • $50k–250k3 grants · $202k
$15,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$18M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH COMMUNITY ENGAGEMENT CENTER$70,750
CCAC EDUCATIONAL FOUNDATION$70,000
HOMEWOOD CHILDREN'S VILLAGE$60,750
ASSEMBLE$15,750
A'S VISION$15,000
CAMBRI CAPITAL INVESTMENTS LLC$15,000
HOTEL TERRACE HALL LLC$15,000
THAW INC$15,000
UJAMAA COLLECTIVE$15,000
AMANI CHRISTIAN COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION$15,000
TECH 25$15,000
NEW SUN RISING$15,000
CLOUD COLLECTIVE MEDIA PRODUCTIONS$11,750
THE PEARL AT 760 LLC$10,000
HORD PROPERTY LLC$8,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY17–25, $660k) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 9%THE BRASHEAR ASSOCIATION: $30k → 11%YMCA OF GREATER PITTSBURGH: $35k → 11%LANDFORCE - PGH CONSERVATION CORPS: $65k → 11%THAW INC: $15k → 11%NEW SUN RISING: $15k → 11%NEW SUN RISING: $15k → 11%NEW SUN RISING: $12k → 11%NEW SUN RISING: $72k → 11%NORTHSIDE PARTNERSHIP PROGRAM: $15k → 11%CENTER OF LIFE: $75k → 11%AWAKEN PITTSBURGH: $15k → 11%POORLAW: $11k → 11%HOMEWOOD-BRUSHTON YMCA: $88k → 11%HOMEWOOD-BRUSHTON YMCA: $70k → 11%HOMEWOOD-BRUSHTON YMCA: $30k → 11%HOMEWOOD-BRUSHTON YMCA: $8k → 11%THE CENTER THAT CARES: $75k → 11%REIMAGINE REENTRY INC: $15k → 11%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

49%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$2.6M · 20 repeat orgs$2.8M to everyone else

20 repeat relationships — 10 still active in FY2025, 10 since wound down; 6 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

20
66

Total granted

$2.6M
$2.7M

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+4%
+38%

Still filing today

70%
53%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 79% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $78k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’21’22’23’24’25
Community ImprovementHuman ServicesEducationHousing & ShelterArts & CultureYouth DevelopmentOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH
    6× · 2017–2025 · $376k · revenue +44%
  • PA
    PENNSYLVANIA AFFORDABLE HSG CORP
    2× · 2023–2024 · $320k · revenue +4% · 33% of their budget
  • NS
    NEW SUN RISING
    4× · 2017–2025 · $114k · revenue +69%

Funded once

  • FD
    FIFTH & DINWIDDIE EAST LLC
    one grant, 2023 · $300k
  • SM
    SALEM'S MARKET CENTRE LLC
    one grant, 2024 · $250k
  • LB
    LEVEL-EQUITY BUILDING INC
    one grant, 2022 · $225k · 25% of their budget

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Pittsburgh Housing Development Corp

To initiate, plan, finance, develop and manage housing development in the City of Pittsburgh, and upon request, in other municipalities with particular, but not exclusive, emphasis on such development in low to moderate income census…

Housing & Shelter
2
Pittsburgh Economic and Industrial Development Corporation

The Organization's purpose is to formulate, implement and promote commercial, industrial and other economic development goals, strategies and projects in the City of Pittsburgh. This includes purchase and master-leasing of real estate, as…

Community Improvement
3
Pittsburgh Community Reinvestment G

PCRG is a coalition of community leaders working for economic justice, equitable investment practices and sufficient financial resources to revitalize communities throughout Allegheny County, PA

Community Improvement
4
The Regional Opportunity Center D/B/a Vibrant Pittsburgh

Vibrant pittsburgh's mission is to accelerate the business community toward equitable, inclusive, and diverse workplaces, creating a future-forward region.

Arts & Culture
5
Pittsburgh United

Pittsburgh United, Inc. strives to advance social & economic justice in the

Community Improvement
6
Regional Workforce Collaborative - Swpa

To provide policy guidance, technical assistance, and program oversight for the city of pittsburgh and allegheny county, and to assist in the economic development of southwestern pa region.

Community Improvement
7
Hilltop Urban Farm

To create and sustain a new, regional asset in south Pittsburghs Hilltop community, that is committed to growing food, growing farmers and growing a community. Hilltop Urban Farm will benefit its neighbors by being a catalyst for community…

Food & Nutrition
8
Build Philly Now

Our mission is to advance bold ideas for the built environment in the City of Philadelphia and the surrounding region, with a specific focus on transformative projects and ideas in the areas of housing, infrastructure, and energy.

—
9
World Affairs Council of Pittsburgh

The world affairs council of pittsburgh's mission is to convene and connect people around global issues to build a competitive, thriving, and inclusive pittsburgh.

International
10
Philadelphia Industrial Development Corporation

Pidc plans and implements economic development initiatives (see schedule o) which enhance the competitive environment, generate jobs and produce higher tax ratables throughout philadelphia.

Community Improvement
11
Pittsburgh Works Together Inc

Educate and advocate on behalf of the construction, energy, and manufacturing industries and the resulting economic and job growth in pennsylvania.

Community Improvement
12
Prevention Point Pittsburgh

To provide health empowerment services to injection drug users and prevent the spread of hiv.

Health

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Community Empowerment Association Inc and the most unlike its peers is Boyd Nelson Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.

← shrinkinggrowing →↓ leaning in → pulling backsteadyEmergency Assistance & Basi…Performing Arts Organizatio…Community Development Corpo…Senior Affordable HousingPittsburgh Regional Develop…Public Library SystemsFraternal Benefit SocietiesRegional Arts OrganizationsIndependent K-8 SchoolsParks & Environmental Conse…Regional Business Associati…Disability Services and Sup…Youth Development & Communi…Faith-Based Educational Ins…
the sector your giving your giving is ahead of the sector the sector’s ahead of you· dot size = how much the theme matters to each side
Ordered by the change in your giving — leaning in on top, pulling back at the bottom. The bar between the two dots is how out of step you are with the sector. Hover any row for detail.

Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.

Your grantees are a median of 14 years old; the field is 20. You back the younger end — and your money leans older still.

THE FIELDby orgYOUR GRANTEESby number16%9%<5yr12%23%5–10yr19%30%10–20yr21%19%20–35yr16%13%35–55yr16%6%55yr+
THE FIELDby orgYOUR MONEYby value16%10%<5yr12%21%5–10yr19%24%10–20yr21%13%20–35yr16%25%35–55yr16%8%55yr+

The field is 16% startups (under 5 years old) — 9% of your grantees by number, and just 10% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close — 2% lost their exemption, against 8% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund
2%2/118
the rest of the field
8%
762/9,788

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

04the grantee network

76 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 76 of the 94 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

6
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
25
Early backer (in before they grew)
71/76
Grantees still filing
41/76
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

FIFTH & DINWIDDIE EAST LLC — $300,000 · OtherFIFTH & DINWIDDIE EAST LLCSALEM'S MARKET CENTRE LLC — $250,000 · OtherSALEM'S MARKET CENTRE LLCBENEDICT DWELLINGS LLC — $140,000 · OtherBENEDICT DWELLINGS LLCOMICELO CARES INC — $105,000 · OtherOMICELO CARES INCOPERATION BETTER BLOCK INC — $87,000 · OtherCOMMUNITY EMPOWERMENT ASSOCIATION — $75,000 · OtherTHE KINGSLEY ASSOCIATION — $75,000 · OtherHILL DISTRICT FEDERAL CRED — $75,000 · Other+44 more — $773,300 · Other+44 moreCOMMUNITY COLLEGE OF ALLEGHENY COUNTY EDUCATIONAL FOUNDATION — $516,306 · EducationCOMMUNITY COLLEGE OF …UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH — $375,750 · EducationUNIVERSITY OF PITTSBU…PROPEL SCHOOLS FOUNDATION — $75,000 · EducationPROPEL SCHOOLS FOUNDA…+3 more — $60,000 · Education+3 morePENNSYLVANIA AFFORDABLE HSG CORP — $320,000 · Housing & ShelterPENNSYLVANIA AF…LEVEL-EQUITY BUILDING INC — $225,000 · Housing & ShelterLEVEL-EQUITY BU…MCKEES ROCKS COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION — $75,000 · Housing & ShelterMCKEES ROCKS CO…REBUILDING TOGETHER PITTSBURGH — $75,000 · Housing & ShelterREBUILDING TOGE…OAKLAND PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION — $50,000 · Housing & ShelterOAKLAND PLANNIN…+1 more — $15,000 · Housing & ShelterLOCAL INITIATIVES SUPPORT CORPORATION — $200,000 · Community ImprovementLOCAL INITIATI…The Greenwood Plan — $115,000 · Community ImprovementThe Greenwood …Catapult Greater Pittsburgh — $83,750 · Community ImprovementCatapult Great…WILKINSBURG CDC HOLDING CO — $75,000 · Community ImprovementWILKINSBURG CD…MILLVALE BOROUGH DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION — $45,000 · Community ImprovementMILLVALE BOROU…UJAMAA COLLECTIVE — $45,000 · Community ImprovementUJAMAA COLLECT…Mount Washington Community Development Corporation — $40,000 · Community ImprovementMount Washingt…MON VALLEY INITIATIVE — $35,000 · Community ImprovementHAZELWOOD INITIATIVE INC — $30,000 · Community Improvement+3 more — $45,000 · Community Improvement+3 moreYOUNG MEN'S CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION OF GREATER PITTSBURGH — $230,000 · Human ServicesYOUNG MEN'S C…NEW SUN RISING — $114,000 · Human ServicesNEW SUN RISIN…THE CENTER THAT CARES — $75,000 · Human ServicesTHE CENTER TH…CENTER OF LIFE — $75,000 · Human ServicesCENTER OF LIF…PITTSBURGH CONSERVATION CORPS — $65,000 · Human ServicesPITTSBURGH CO…THE BRASHEAR ASSOCIATION INC — $30,000 · Human Services+5 more — $71,400 · Human Services+5 moreHOMEWOOD CHIDREN'S VILLAGE — $270,750 · Youth DevelopmentTHE PROMISE CENTER OF HOMEWOOD INC — $15,000 · Youth DevelopmentBOYD NELSON FOUNDATION — $15,000 · Youth DevelopmentPOISE FOUNDATION — $45,000 · PhilanthropyAmani Christian Comm Dev Corp — $30,000 · PhilanthropyHOMELESS CHILDREN'S EDUCATION FUND — $15,000 · PhilanthropyTHE BEAVER COUNTY FOUNDATION — $15,000 · Philanthropy
Other$1,880,300Education$1,027,056Housing & Shelter$760,000Community Improvement$713,750Human Services$660,400Youth Development$300,750Philanthropy$105,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetCOMMUNITY COLLEGE OF ALLEGHENY COUNTY EDUCATIONAL FOUNDATION — $516,306 over 5y, 8.1% of budgetUNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH — $375,750 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetPENNSYLVANIA AFFORDABLE HSG CORP — $320,000 over 2y, 33% of budgetHOMEWOOD CHIDREN'S VILLAGE — $270,750 over 5y, 3.3% of budgetYOUNG MEN'S CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION OF GREATER PITTSBURGH — $230,000 over 5y, 0.3% of budgetLEVEL-EQUITY BUILDING INC — $225,000 over 1y, 25% of budgetLOCAL INITIATIVES SUPPORT CORPORATION — $200,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetThe Greenwood Plan — $115,000 over 2y, 4.6% of budgetNEW SUN RISING — $114,000 over 4y, 2.7% of budgetOMICELO CARES INC — $105,000 over 4y, 33% of budgetOPERATION BETTER BLOCK INC — $87,000 over 2y, 5.1% of budgetCatapult Greater Pittsburgh — $83,750 over 3y, 3.7% of budgetTHE CENTER THAT CARES — $75,000 over 1y, 3.1% of budgetMCKEES ROCKS COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION — $75,000 over 1y, 8.8% of budgetREBUILDING TOGETHER PITTSBURGH — $75,000 over 2y, 1.2% of budgetCENTER OF LIFE — $75,000 over 1y, 2.5% of budgetTHE KINGSLEY ASSOCIATION — $75,000 over 1y, 3.8% of budgetPROPEL SCHOOLS FOUNDATION — $75,000 over 2y, 3.1% of budgetPITTSBURGH CONSERVATION CORPS — $65,000 over 1y, 13% of budgetOAKLAND PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION — $50,000 over 2y, 2.8% of budgetAssemble Inc — $45,750 over 2y, 2.1% of budgetMILLVALE BOROUGH DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION — $45,000 over 4y, 19% of budgetUJAMAA COLLECTIVE — $45,000 over 3y, 13% of budgetPOISE FOUNDATION — $45,000 over 3y, 0.3% of budgetMount Washington Community Development Corporation — $40,000 over 3y, 31% of budgetGOODWILL OF SOUTHWESTERN PENNSYLVANIA — $30,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetTHE BRASHEAR ASSOCIATION INC — $30,000 over 3y, 1.3% of budgetYoung Black Motivated Kings & Queen — $30,000 over 2y, 12% of budgetHAZELWOOD INITIATIVE INC — $30,000 over 1y, 0.9% of budgetAmani Christian Comm Dev Corp — $30,000 over 2y, 5.4% of budgetBREW HOUSE ARTS — $21,000 over 1y, 7.4% of budgetFOOD21 OF PENNSYLVANIA — $15,000 over 1y, 4.1% of budgetHILL COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION — $15,000 over 2y, 1.3% of budgetAwaken Pittsburgh — $15,000 over 1y, 3.6% of budgetINNOVATEPGH PARTNERSHIP — $15,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetThree Rivers Business Alliance Foundation — $15,000 over 1y, 57% of budget25 CARRICK AVE PROJECT — $15,000 over 1y, 1.5% of budgetHOMELESS CHILDREN'S EDUCATION FUND — $15,000 over 1y, 0.9% of budgetTHAW INC — $15,000 over 1y, 13% of budgetGREATER PITTSBURGH ARTS COUNCIL — $15,000 over 2y, 0.6% of budgetTHE PROMISE CENTER OF HOMEWOOD INC — $15,000 over 1y, 4.4% of budgetALLIES & ROSS MANAGEMENT AND DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION — $15,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetHandmade Arcade — $15,000 over 1y, 8.1% of budgetRADIANT HALL STUDIOS — $15,000 over 2y, 2.9% of budgetREIMAGINE REENTRY INC — $15,000 over 1y, 0.9% of budgetTHE PITTSBURGH CONTINGENCY INC — $15,000 over 2y, 0.5% of budgetBOYD NELSON FOUNDATION — $15,000 over 1y, 83% of budgetTHE EARLY EXCELLENCE PROJECT — $15,000 over 1y, 1.5% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Hillman Family Founda…The Pittsburgh Founda…The Heinz EndowmentsOpportunity FoundationPoise FoundationThe Grable FoundationRichard King Mellon F…Program to Aid Citize…McAuley MinistriesBridgeway Capital IncThe Buhl FoundationMcElhattan Foundation
Hillman Family FoundationsPA93.6× affinity53 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Hillman Family Foundations · The Pittsburgh Foundation · The Heinz Endowments · Opportunity Foundation · Poise Foundation · The Grable Foundation · Richard King Mellon Foundation · Program to Aid Citizen Enterprise Inc · McAuley Ministries · Bridgeway Capital Inc · The Buhl Foundation · McElhattan Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Neighborhood Allies Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%6%25%56%100%your share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    22report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    typical government reliance, FY20–25

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 94 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph

    The unnamed billions
    grants reported with no recipient in the public record
    The regranting layer
    51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
    The DAF merry-go-round
    $9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
    The camps
    funders cluster by geography, not ideology
    By state
    where grant money is based, and what stays home
    State money flows
    the interactive map of money crossing state lines