Skip to content

· Public charity

Pittsburgh History & Landmarks Foundation

Phlf works within a 250-mile radius of pittsburgh, pennsylvania to: identify and save historically significant places; renew historic neighborhoods, towns, and urban areas; preserve historic farms and historically designated landscapes; and educate people about the pittsburgh region's rich architectural heritage.

$217k
Granted FY2025still arriving
14
Grants FY2025still arriving
2
States reached
$25k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Religion$531kArts & Culture$138kCommunity Improvement$67kHousing & Shelter$20kPublic Benefit$20kHuman Services$10kEducation$5k
02FY2025 · 14 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

How this is measured
The 14 grants below total $151,341, the rows itemized in this filing. The $217,498 headline is the total grant expense on the return; the other $66,157 is giving the schedule does not break out (grants under the $5,000 itemization floor, grants to individuals, grants on other schedules). Every figure below describes the itemized rows only.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k10 grants · $83k
  • $10k–50k4 grants · $68k
$9,500
Median grant
2
States reached
$1.5M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
WESTERN RESERVE LAND CONSERVANCY$25,000
CHILDREN'S MUSEUM OF PITTSBURGH$23,000
MOUNT VERNON COMMUNITY PRESBYTERIAN CHURCH$10,000
MARS AREA HISTORY AND LANDMARKS SOCIETY$10,000
EASTMINSTER PRESBYTERIAN CHURCH$9,880
HILLCREST UNITED PRESBYTERIAN CHURCH$9,500
THE BAPTIST TEMPLE CHURCH OF PITTSBURGH$9,500
ST PAUL AME CHURCH$9,500
MT ARARAT BAPTIST CHURCH$9,500
FIRST UNITED METHODIST CHURCH OF PITTSBURGH$8,190
FAIRHAVEN UNITED METHODIST CHURCH$8,190
FIRST UNITARIAN CHURCH OF PITTSBURGH$7,334
NABHI CHRISTIAN MINISTRIES$6,387
CHURCH OF THE ASCENSION$5,360
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY24–24, $10k) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%CENTRAL PRESBYTERIAN CBURCH: $10k → 11%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

47%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$444k · 13 repeat orgs$499k to everyone else

13 repeat relationships: 3 still active in FY2025, 10 since wound down; 11 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

13
44

Total granted

$444k
$375k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

-28%
+8%

Still filing today

23%
23%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 18% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $124k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Arts & CultureCommunity ImprovementEnvironmentHuman ServicesReligionPublic BenefitOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • NH
    NEVILLE HOUSE ASSOCIATES INC
    5× · 2017–2022 · $118k · revenue +105% · 70% of their budget
  • RB
    Rosedale Block Cluster Inc
    3× · 2018–2021 · $58k
  • FB
    FIRST BAPTIST CHURCH
    4× · 2018–2024 · $38k

Funded once

  • AA
    AFRICAN AMERICAN CHAMBER OF COMMERCE OF WESTERN PAgraduated
    one grant, 2024 · $12k · revenue +63%
  • PC
    PHIPPS CONSERVATORY AND BOTANICAL GARDENS INC
    one grant, 2024 · $11k · revenue -8%
  • FP
    FIRST PRESBYTERIAN CHURCH
    one grant, 2019 · $10k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Uptown Partners of Pittsburgh

Uptown partners is a community-based organization of residents, institutions, and business owners-working together to build a vibrant uptown community.

Community Improvement
2
Delaware and Lehigh National Heritage Corridor Inc

See schedule oper the bylaws of the delaware & lehigh national heritage corridor(which were updated by the merged board of the national canal musuem and the d&l), our mission is to work with government entities, non-profit organizations…

Arts & Culture
3
The Friends of the Pittsburgh Institutions
—
4
Dunham Tavern Museum & Gardens

To preserve, develop, and share historic dunham tavern and its campus as an educational and cultural resource. we aspire for dunham tavern as an institution to provide an urban green space in midtown cleveland, and to return the tavern to…

Arts & Culture
5
Pittsburgh Botanic Garden

Pittsburgh Botanic Garden inspires people to value plants, garden design and the natural world by cultivating plant collections of the Allegheny Plateau and temperate regions, creating display gardens, conducting educational programs and…

Youth Development
6
Western Pennsylvania Conservancy

The western pennsylvania conservancy protects and restores exceptional places to provide our region with clean waters and healthy forests, wildlife and natural areas for the benefit of present and future generations. the conservancy…

Environment
7
Carpenters' Company of the City and County of Philadelphia

The carpenters' company preserves and interprets carpenters' hall and our collections as unique historical assets that are tied to our nation's founding and the master builder tradition, and we convene the public to explore and inspire new…

Arts & Culture
8
Lancaster Chamber of Commerce & Industry

The lancaster chamber of commerce & industry's mission is to create the environment, facilitate partnerships, and lead on issues that elevate business success. the strategic plan is to position lancaster county businesses to thrive. by…

—
9
Children's Museum of the Mov Inc

Creating an enrironment for children and the community that exercises curiosity, promotes exploration, and develops imagination through one of a kind hands-on experiences accessible to all.

Arts & Culture
10
The Phillips Collection

The phillips collection is the oldest museum of modern and contemporary art in the u.s. in addition to presentation of works from the permanent collection and special exhibitions, the museum maintains active educational, academic,…

Arts & Culture
11
Historical Society of Western Pennsylvania

The historical society of western pennsylvania is an educational institution that engages and inspires a large and inclusive audience with links to the past, understanding in the present, and guidance for the future by preserving regional…

Arts & Culture
12
Cleveland Museum of Art

The mission of the cleveland museum of art (cma) is to fulfill its dual roles as one of the world's most distinguished comprehensive art museums and as one of northeastern ohio's principal civic and cultural institutions. the museum,…

Arts & Culture
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Manchester Bidwell Corporation; the most unlike its peers is St Andrews Episcopal Church Jackson. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

15 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 15 of the 68 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

2
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
4
Early backer (in before they grew)
15/15
Grantees still filing
6/15
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

FIRST BAPTIST CHURCH: $38,190 · OtherFIRST BAPTIST CHURCHEASTMINSTER UNITED PRESBYTERIAN CHURCH: $36,277 · OtherEASTMINSTER UNITED PRESBYTERIAN CHURCHEPISCOPAL CHURCH OF THE REDEEMER: $35,671 · OtherEPISCOPAL CHURCH OF THE REDEEMERTHIRD PRESBYTERIAN CHURCH: $26,061 · Other+51 more: $495,307 · Other+51 moreNEVILLE HOUSE ASSOCIATES INC: $117,631 · Arts & CultureNEVILLE HOUSE ASSO…CHILDREN'S MUSEUM OF PITTSBURGH: $23,000 · Arts & CultureCHILDREN'S MUSEUM …+2 more: $10,000 · Arts & Culture+2 moreRosedale Block Cluster Inc: $57,620 · Community ImprovementRosedale B…UNION PROJECT: $17,500 · Community ImprovementUNION PROJ…AFRICAN AMERICAN CHAMBER OF COMMERCE OF WESTERN PA: $12,000 · Community ImprovementAFRICAN AM…WESTERN RESERVE LAND CONSERVANCY: $25,000 · EnvironmentPHIPPS CONSERVATORY AND BOTANICAL GARDENS INC: $10,600 · EnvironmentTHE CENTER FOR THE LIVING CITY: $10,000 · EnvironmentMANCHESTER BIDWELL CORPORATION: $10,000 · Public BenefitFCP SERVICES INC: $10,000 · Human ServicesKING OF KINGS BAPTIST MINISTRIES OF PITTSBURGH PENNSYLVANIA INC: $8,190 · Religion
Other$631,506Arts & Culture$150,631Community Improvement$87,120Environment$45,600Public Benefit$10,000Human Services$10,000Religion$8,190

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetNEVILLE HOUSE ASSOCIATES INC: $117,631 over 5y, 70% of budgetWESTERN RESERVE LAND CONSERVANCY: $25,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetCHILDREN'S MUSEUM OF PITTSBURGH: $23,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetUNION PROJECT: $17,500 over 2y, 1.1% of budgetAFRICAN AMERICAN CHAMBER OF COMMERCE OF WESTERN PA: $12,000 over 1y, 5.2% of budgetPHIPPS CONSERVATORY AND BOTANICAL GARDENS INC: $10,600 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetMANCHESTER BIDWELL CORPORATION: $10,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetTHE CENTER FOR THE LIVING CITY: $10,000 over 1y, 9.3% of budgetFCP SERVICES INC: $10,000 over 1y, 9.4% of budgetST ANDREWS EPISCOPAL CHURCH JACKSON: $8,190 over 1y, 58% of budgetKING OF KINGS BAPTIST MINISTRIES OF PITTSBURGH PENNSYLVANIA INC: $8,190 over 1y, 8.0% of budgetColebrookdale Railroad Preservation Trust: $5,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetTHE MATTRESS FACTORY LTD: $5,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetPOINT PARK UNIVERSITY: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds NEVILLE HOUSE ASSOCIATES INC ↗
  • Who funds Rosedale Block Cluster Inc ↗
  • Who funds WESTERN RESERVE LAND CONSERVANCY ↗
  • Who funds CHILDREN'S MUSEUM OF PITTSBURGH ↗
  • Who funds UNION PROJECT ↗
  • Who funds AFRICAN AMERICAN CHAMBER OF COMMERCE OF WESTERN PA ↗
  • Who funds PHIPPS CONSERVATORY AND BOTANICAL GARDENS INC ↗
  • Who funds MANCHESTER BIDWELL CORPORATION ↗
  • Who funds THE CENTER FOR THE LIVING CITY ↗
  • Who funds FCP SERVICES INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Pittsburgh FoundationPA25.7× affinity13 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Pittsburgh Foundation · Poise Foundation · The Heinz Endowments · Hillman Family Foundations · The Grable Foundation · Allegheny Foundation · Eden Hall Foundation · Richard King Mellon Foundation · Eqt Foundation · Upmc Group · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · National Philanthropic Trust

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Pittsburgh History & Landmarks Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Pittsburgh History & Landmarks Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%4%15%34%60%funder's share of their income ↑0%5%10%15%20%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    3report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–20%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 68 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Pittsburgh History & Landmarks’ filings →

    More from the funding graph