Skip to content

· Private foundation

Pinki and Dennis Meals Charitable Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$51k
Granted FY2025still arriving
19
Grants FY2025still arriving
2
States reached
$15k
Largest
01What it funds
0199% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2020 to 2025.

Religion$75kHousing & Shelter$52kFood & Nutrition$40kHuman Services$26kAnimals$18kEducation$18kInternational$5kHealth$5kOther$0
02FY2025 · 19 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k18 grants · $36k
  • $10k–50k1 grant · $15k
$1,500
Median grant
2
States reached
$547k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
ARLINGTON HEIGHTS UNITED METHODIST CHURCH$15,000
MEALS ON WHEELS$5,000
TARRANT AREA FOOD BANK$5,000
PRESBYTERIAN NIGHT SHELTER$5,000
DRC - COMMUNITY SOLUTIONS TO END HOMELESSNESS$5,000
THE WOMEN'S CENTER$3,280
RONALD MCDONALD HOUSE CHARITIES$1,500
CENTRAL TEXAS FOOD BANK$1,500
SAVING HOPE FOUNDATION$1,500
SECOND CHANCE FARMS$1,500
KAKENYAS DREAM$1,500
SPAY AND NEUTER NETWORK$1,000
AUSTIN PETS ALIVE$1,000
NORTHSIDE INTER-COMMUNITY AGENCY$1,000
SPOTLIGHT CAST AND CREW$1,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY20–25, $35k) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 7%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 7%CENTER FOR TRANSFORMING LIVES: $750 → 11%CENTER FOR TRANSFORMING LIVES: $750 → 11%CENTER FOR TRANSFORMING LIVES: $250 → 11%CENTER FOR TRANSFORMING LIVES: $250 → 11%CENTER FOR TRANSFORMING LIVES: $250 → 11%CENTER FOR TRANSFORMING LIVES: $250 → 11%MEALS ON WHEELS: $5k → 11%MEALS ON WHEELS: $5k → 11%MEALS ON WHEELS: $4k → 11%MEALS ON WHEELS: $4k → 11%MEALS ON WHEELS: $4k → 11%MEALS ON WHEELS: $4k → 11%NORTHSIDE INTER-COMMUNITY AGENCY: $1k → 11%NORTHSIDE INTER-COMMUNITY AGENCY: $1k → 11%NORTHSIDE INTER-COMMUNITY AGENCY: $1k → 11%NORTHSIDE INTER-COMMUNITY AGENCY: $1k → 11%NORTHSIDE INTER-COMMUNITY AGENCY: $1k → 11%NORTHSIDE INTER-COMMUNITY AGENCY: $1k → 11%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

96%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$242k · 17 repeat orgs$10k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +16% since the first grant, against +3% for those funded once.

17 repeat relationships: 13 still active in FY2025, 4 since wound down; 6 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

17
9

Total granted

$242k
$5k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+16%
+3%

Still filing today

76%
56%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 91% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $5k went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’21’22’23’24’25
AnimalsHuman ServicesHealthHousing & ShelterEducationPublic BenefitOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • TP
    THE PRESBYTERIAN NIGHT SHELTER OF TARRANT COUNTY
    6× · 2020–2025 · $26k · revenue +81%
  • MO
    MEALS ON WHEELS
    6× · 2020–2025 · $26k · revenue +16%
  • TW
    THE WOMEN'S CENTER OF TARRANT COUNTY INC
    6× · 2020–2025 · $18k · revenue +11%

Funded once

  • FW
    FORT WORTH REPORT
    one grant, 2022 · $2k · revenue +13%
  • MA
    MODERN ART MUSEUM OF FORT WORTH
    one grant, 2020 · $1k
  • SL
    ST LUKE'S EPISCOPAL CHURCH
    one grant, 2023 · $1k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
The Humane Society of Austin & Travis County Inc

The austin humane society (ahs) offers comprehensive, humane, life-saving animal services, transforming the lives of animals and those who love them. because we believe homeless animals deserve a chance to thrive in a loving environment,…

Animals
2
One Tail At a Time West Texas

One tail at a time west texas otat wtx serves the rural communities of west texas by supporting animal shelter operations rescuing and sheltering homeless unwanted companion animals dogs and cats primarily arranging their veterinary care…

Animals
3
North Texas Food Bank

To close the hunger gap in north texas by working through over 500 feeding partners to provide access to nutritious food and address the root causes of hunger.

—
4
Houston Pets Alive

Houston Pets Alive!s (HPA!) mission is to save the lives of at-risk companion cats and dogs and find them loving homes.

Animals
5
Target Hunger Inc

The mission of Target Hunger is to alleviate hunger and its root causes in the Houston neighborhoods we serve. Target Hunger is on the front lines of hunger every day through its food distribution system that includes multiple food…

Human Services
6
Central Texas Spca

Rescue neglected, unwanted homeless dogs and cats nurture and provide shelter until they are placed with a forever family strive to reduce animal overpopulation prevent cruelty to animals teach responsible pet ownership through an outreach…

Animals
7
Feeding Texas

To lead a unified effort for a hunger-free texas.

Community Improvement
8
Visiting Nurse Association of Texas

Established in 1934, vna helps older adults live with dignity and independence at home by providing in-home care, food and friendship for the ill, hungry, and homebound.

Health
9
Spay-Neuter Assistance Program Inc

To prevent the suffering and death of companion animals and to enrich the human-animal bond by providing excellent, accessible, and affordable spay/neuter and veterinary care.

Animals
10
Tarrant County Homeless Coalition

Tarrant County Homeless Coalition leads the community solution to homelessness in greater Tarrant and Parker counties by serving as a catalyst for community transformation.

Human Services
11
Paws Chicago

Paws chicago is a national leader in the no kill animal welfare movement, helping more than 23,842 homeless and at-risk pets each year through comprehensive spay/neuter, medical, and adoption programs.

Animals
12
Pleasant Grove Food Pantry Inc

Pleasant Grove Food Pantry provides nutritious food to qualified residents of Pleasant Grove in southeast Dallas who are food insecure. Fighting food insecurity is the mission and intent of the organization. Services are provided by…

Food & Nutrition
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Central Texas Food Bank Inc; the most unlike its peers is Meals On Wheels. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

21 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 21 of the 32 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
21/21
Grantees still filing
15/21
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

ARLINGTON HEIGHTS UNITED METHODIST CHURCH: $74,211 · OtherARLINGTON HEIGHTS UNITED METHODIST CHURCHDRC - COMMUNITY SOLUTIONS TO END HOMELESSNESS: $25,500 · OtherDRC - COMMUNITY SOLUTIONS TO END HOMELESSNESSTarrant Area Food Bank: $12,000 · OtherTarrant Area Food BankYOUNG WOMEN'S LEADERSHIP ACADEMY: $5,000 · Other+13 more: $12,064 · Other+13 moreMEALS ON WHEELS: $26,000 · Human ServicesMEALS ON WHEELSNORTHSIDE INTERCOMMUNITY AGENCY INC: $6,000 · Human ServicesNORTHSIDE INTER…CENTER FOR TRANSFORMING LIVES: $2,500 · Human ServicesCENTER FOR TRAN…THE PRESBYTERIAN NIGHT SHELTER OF TARRANT COUNTY: $26,000 · Housing & ShelterTHE PRESBYT…+1 more: $413 · Housing & ShelterTHE MAGELLAN SCHOOL: $17,500 · EducationTHE MAGELL…KAKENYA CENTER FOR EXCELLENCE: $5,278 · EducationKAKENYA CE…THE WOMEN'S CENTER OF TARRANT COUNTY INC: $17,560 · HealthTHE WOMEN…PLANNED PARENTHOOD OF GREATER TEXAS INC: $4,500 · HealthPLANNED P…+1 more: $100 · HealthSAVING HOPE FOUNDATION: $7,000 · AnimalsSECOND CHANCE FARM: $6,500 · AnimalsAUSTIN PETS ALIVE INC: $1,000 · Animals+1 more: $50 · AnimalsSPOTLIGHT CAST & CREW: $3,000 · Arts & Culture
Other$128,775Human Services$34,500Housing & Shelter$26,413Education$22,778Health$22,160Animals$14,550Arts & Culture$3,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetTHE PRESBYTERIAN NIGHT SHELTER OF TARRANT COUNTY: $26,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetMEALS ON WHEELS: $26,000 over 6y, 3.3% of budgetTHE WOMEN'S CENTER OF TARRANT COUNTY INC: $17,560 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetTHE MAGELLAN SCHOOL: $17,500 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetTarrant Area Food Bank: $12,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetSAVING HOPE FOUNDATION: $7,000 over 6y, 0.2% of budgetSECOND CHANCE FARM: $6,500 over 6y, 0.3% of budgetNORTHSIDE INTERCOMMUNITY AGENCY INC: $6,000 over 6y, 0.2% of budgetKAKENYA CENTER FOR EXCELLENCE: $5,278 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetPLANNED PARENTHOOD OF GREATER TEXAS INC: $4,500 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetSPOTLIGHT CAST & CREW: $3,000 over 3y, 1.4% of budgetCENTER FOR TRANSFORMING LIVES: $2,500 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetFORT WORTH REPORT: $2,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetCentral Texas Food Bank Inc: $1,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetFORT WORTH AREA HABITAT FOR HUMANITY: $413 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCARITAS OF AUSTIN: $104 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCaringBridge: $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetHumane Society of North Texas: $50 over 2y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds THE PRESBYTERIAN NIGHT SHELTER OF TARRANT COUNTY ↗
  • Who funds MEALS ON WHEELS ↗
  • Who funds THE WOMEN'S CENTER OF TARRANT COUNTY INC ↗
  • Who funds THE MAGELLAN SCHOOL ↗
  • Who funds Tarrant Area Food Bank ↗
  • Who funds SAVING HOPE FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds SECOND CHANCE FARM ↗
  • Who funds NORTHSIDE INTERCOMMUNITY AGENCY INC ↗
  • Who funds KAKENYA CENTER FOR EXCELLENCE ↗
  • Who funds PLANNED PARENTHOOD OF GREATER TEXAS INC ↗
  • Who funds SPOTLIGHT CAST & CREW ↗
  • Who funds CENTER FOR TRANSFORMING LIVES ↗
  • Who funds FORT WORTH REPORT ↗
  • Who funds RONALD McDONALD HOUSE CHARITIES OF GREATER NORTH TEXAS INC ↗
  • Who funds Central Texas Food Bank Inc ↗
  • Who funds AUSTIN PETS ALIVE INC ↗
  • Who funds FORT WORTH AREA HABITAT FOR HUMANITY ↗
  • Who funds CARITAS OF AUSTIN ↗
  • Who funds CaringBridge ↗
  • Who funds Ft Bend County Child Advocates Inc ↗
  • Who funds Humane Society of North Texas ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Thomas M Helen McKee & John P Ryan Fo John P Ryan Foundation IncTX17.8× affinity6 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Thomas M Helen McKee & John P Ryan Fo John P Ryan Foundation Inc · Rainwater Charitable Foundation · Garvey Texas Foundation Inc · Amon G Carter Foundation · Sid W Richardson Foundation · Bnsf Railway Foundation · Mary Potishman Lard Trust Walker C Friedman Co Trustee · The Morris Foundation · The Roach Foundation Inc · The Alcon Foundation Inc · America's Charities · Community Foundation of North Texas (Tax

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Pinki and Dennis Meals Charitable Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Pinki and Dennis Meals Charitable Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%6%25%56%100%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    5report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 32 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Pinki and Dennis Meals’ filings →

    More from the funding graph