Skip to content

· Private foundation

Ping and Amy Chao Family Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$1.5M
Granted FY2025still arriving
16
Grants FY2025still arriving
7
States reached
$400k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

International$5.0MEducation$3.7MHealth$2.2MHuman Services$1.0MArts & Culture$589kYouth Development$456kReligion$294kPublic Safety & Disaster$245kOther$0
02FY2025 · 16 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k1 grant · $5k
  • $10k–50k5 grants · $177k
  • $50k–250k8 grants · $695k
  • $250k+2 grants · $650k
$61,550
Median grant
7
States reached
$1.1M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA BERKELEY FOUNDATION$400,000
GANSU PROVINCIAL MATERNITY AND CHILD-CARE HOSPITAL$250,000
FRIENDS WITHOUT A BORDER$160,000
TRANSPARENT FISH FUND INC$120,000
ANGKOR HOSPITAL FOR CHILDREN INC$107,000
LOVE JUSTICE INTERNATIONAL$72,000
BURMA HUMANITARIAN MISSION$68,960
HIMALAYAN HEALTHCARE INC$61,550
CHILDREN ON THE EDGE$53,032
KIDSPIRE$52,000
THE FREEDOM STORY$40,000
1001 FONTAINES POUR DEMAIN$40,000
CHILDRENS HEARTLINK$40,000
HOPE HORIZON EAST PALO ALTO$32,000
RENEWAL CHURCH$25,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

US giving: 85% of grant dollars ($12M). The need read here covers only this US portion; the 15% that went abroad ($2.1M) is mapped below.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–25, $1.2M) land where the poverty rate runs at 8%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 15% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%COMMUNITY PARTNERS INTERNATIONAL: $20k → 10%KIDSPIRE: $99k → 8%KIDSPIRE: $52k → 8%BURMA HUMANITARIAN MISSION: $69k → 8%COMMUNITY PARTNERS INTERNATIONAL: $50k → 10%KIDSPIRE: $54k → 8%BURMA HUMANITARIAN MISSION: $40k → 8%KIDSPIRE: $50k → 8%BURMA HUMANITARIAN MISSION: $6k → 8%COMMUNITY PARTNERS INTERNATIONAL: $50k → 10%KIDSPIRE: $48k → 8%BURMA HUMANITARIAN MISSION: $66k → 8%KIDSPIRE: $48k → 8%BURMA HUMANITARIAN MISSION: $57k → 8%COMMUNITY PARTNERS INTERNATIONAL: $50k → 10%KIDSPIRE: $45k → 8%BURMA HUMANITARIAN MISSION: $56k → 8%KIDSPIRE: $43k → 8%BURMA HUMANITARIAN MISSION: $55k → 8%KIDSPIRE: $38k → 8%BURMA HUMANITARIAN MISSION: $47k → 8%KIDSPIRE: $38k → 8%BURMA HUMANITARIAN MISSION: $40k → 8%KIDSPIRE: $4k → 8%BURMA HUMANITARIAN MISSION: $38k → 8%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

VT
MN
IL
NY
OR
OH
PA
CT
CA
UT
NE
MD

Beyond the US: 15% of all-years giving ($2.1M)

4 countries, by the recipient’s country on the filing.

grant dollars sentlessmore
China$964k · 10 grants
France$589k · 9 grants
United Kingdom$436k · 9 grants
Hong Kong$69k · 2 grants
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving. International giving is mapped by the recipient’s country from the same 990 filings; comparable need data isn’t available at that grain.
04

Where the work is directed

The same grants placed two ways: where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose sends the money.

About 16% of Ping and Amy Chao Family Foundation’s grant dollars are earmarked for a different county than the recipient’s own address.

Ping and Amy Chao Family Foundationlessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient address · 35% directed abroad (not shown)
How this is measured
Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the funder’s own 990 grant descriptions.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

97%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$13M · 34 repeat orgs$435k to everyone else

34 repeat relationships: 15 still active in FY2025, 19 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

34
13

Total granted

$13M
$410k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+21%
+21%

Still filing today

59%
77%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 98% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $25k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
InternationalEducationReligionHuman ServicesPhilanthropyCrime & LegalOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • UO
    UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA BERKELEY FOUNDATION
    3× · 2021–2025 · $2.9M · revenue +5%
  • TF
    TRANSPARENT FISH FUND INC
    9× · 2017–2025 · $1.2M · revenue +18% · 56% of their budget
  • FW
    FRIENDS WITHOUT A BORDER
    9× · 2017–2025 · $1.0M · revenue +54%

Funded once

  • TN
    The NCTU Foundationgraduated
    one grant, 2021 · $147k · revenue +154% · 32% of their budget
  • LI
    LOVE146 INCgraduated
    one grant, 2019 · $95k · revenue +115%
  • ASIAN AMERICAN LEGAL DEFENSE AND EDUCATION FUND
    one grant, 2020 · $40k · revenue +21%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Humanitarian China

Provide humanitarian support in China. Help to develop a civil society in China. Promote rule-of-law,human rights, and freedom of expressions.Focus on grass-root and people who are neglected by the outside world

International
2
Chinese Agape Foundation

Provide food, clothing, shelter, education, and medical care to underprivileged children in Asia.

Human Services
3
Asian Hope Inc

By altering the future of vulnerable children in cambodia through life changing programs of christian education and community development, asian hope is creating a generation of compassionate, equipped, christian leaders.

Philanthropy
4
Asia Us Impact

Religious

Religion
5
Child Family Health International

Child Family Health International is dedicated to transformative Global Health Education programs, research, and thought leadership emphasizing community leadership, global citizenship, and ethical engagement.

International
6
Chab Dai International

Chab dai international is dedicated to addressing human trafficking and labor exploitation in the united states, cambodia and around the globe through coalition-building, capacity-building, advocacy and research.

International
7
Giving Back Life Inc

Serve the medical and emotional needs of marginalized men, women, and especially children in china, providing eternal hope for a brighter future.

Human Services
8
Partners Asia

At Partners Asia, we build relationships with innovative organizers in these communities and with international donors, bridging the gap between local leaders and global resources.

Arts & Culture
9
Asia Harvest Inc

To help spread the Gospel of Jesus Christ by providing resources and financial support to projects throughout Asia

International
10
Thrive Networks Global

Thrive Networks' expertise is built on over 30 years of experience of designing, testing, and implementing cutting-edge, evidence-based programs in water supply, sanitation and hygiene WASH, economic empowerment, gender equity, healthy…

International
11
Himalayan Childrens Fund

The Himalayan Children's Fund is a way for people around the world, and the west in particular, to connect with the lives of people in the Himalayan Region of Nepal, India and Tibet. HCF provides support for Thrangu Rinpoche's many…

International
12
Chin Health Organization Inc

To fill in the gaps of health service needs prioritizing conflict affected community provide life saving emergency services and frontline first aid care help strengthen resistance and resilience of the healthcare workers as well as help to…

Human Services
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Transparent Fish Fund Inc; the most unlike its peers is The Nctu Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
05the grantee network

34 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2026.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2026, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 34 of the 49 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

7
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
10
Early backer (in before they grew)
31/34
Grantees still filing
23/34
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA BERKELEY FOUNDATION: $2,898,562 · EducationUNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA BERKELEY F…FRIENDS WITHOUT A BORDER: $1,014,000 · EducationFRIENDS WITHOUT A BORDERPRESIDENT-BOARD OF TRUSTEES SANTA CLARA COLLEGE: $157,000 · Education+4 more: $367,650 · Education+4 moreGANSU PROVINCIAL MATERNITY AND CHILD-CARE HOSPITAL: $774,000 · OtherGANSU PROVINCIAL MATERNITY AND CHI…CHILDREN'S HEARTLINK: $758,450 · OtherCHILDREN'S HEARTLINK1001 FONTAINES POUR DEMAIN: $588,500 · Other1001 FONTAINES POUR DEMAINCHILDREN ON THE EDGE: $436,012 · OtherCHILDREN ON THE EDGEONE HEART WORLD-WIDE: $360,705 · OtherONE HEART WORLD-WIDEWATERING MINDS INC: $290,186 · OtherWATERING MINDS INCSTEPPING STONES CHINA LIMITED: $148,822 · OtherEqualize Health Formerly D-Rev: $261,000 · OtherEqualize Health Formerly D-RevINNOVATION WORKS INC: $180,000 · Other+15 more: $501,600 · Other+15 moreTRANSPARENT FISH FUND INC: $1,200,000 · InternationalTRANSPARENT FISH FUND…LOVE JUSTICE INTERNATIONAL: $564,104 · InternationalLOVE JUSTICE INTERNAT…HIMALAYAN HEALTHCARE INC: $471,550 · InternationalHIMALAYAN HEALTHCARE …SAHAYA INTERNATIONAL INC: $173,800 · InternationalSAHAYA INTERNATIONAL …The Freedom Story: $150,000 · InternationalThe Freedom Story+2 more: $35,000 · InternationalKIDSPIRE: $519,178 · Human ServicesKIDSPIREBURMA HUMANITARIAN MISSION: $474,484 · Human ServicesBURMA HUM…COMMUNITY PARTNERS INTERNATIONAL: $170,000 · Human ServicesCOMMUNITY…ANGKOR HOSPITAL FOR CHILDREN INC: $641,000 · PhilanthropyONE HEART HEALTH: $170,000 · PhilanthropyCHINESE CANCER MEMORIAL FOUNDATION: $90,000 · PhilanthropySan Francisco City Impact: $301,000 · Youth DevelopmentHOPE HORIZON EAST PALO ALTO: $214,000 · ReligionAGAPE FISH FUND INC: $44,500 · ReligionGOSPEL OPERATION INTERNATIONAL (USA): $10,000 · Religion+1 more: $5,000 · Religion
Education$4,437,212Other$4,299,275International$2,594,454Human Services$1,163,662Philanthropy$901,000Youth Development$301,000Religion$273,500

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetUNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA BERKELEY FOUNDATION: $2,898,562 over 3y, 0.4% of budgetTRANSPARENT FISH FUND INC: $1,200,000 over 9y, 56% of budgetFRIENDS WITHOUT A BORDER: $1,014,000 over 9y, 5.7% of budgetCHILDREN'S HEARTLINK: $758,450 over 8y, 9.1% of budgetANGKOR HOSPITAL FOR CHILDREN INC: $641,000 over 6y, 16% of budgetLOVE JUSTICE INTERNATIONAL: $564,104 over 7y, 2.0% of budgetKIDSPIRE: $519,178 over 9y, 23% of budgetBURMA HUMANITARIAN MISSION: $474,484 over 9y, 27% of budgetHIMALAYAN HEALTHCARE INC: $471,550 over 8y, 36% of budgetSan Francisco City Impact: $301,000 over 4y, 1.2% of budgetWATERING MINDS INC: $290,186 over 3y, 29% of budgetEqualize Health Formerly D-Rev: $261,000 over 3y, 6.0% of budgetHOPE HORIZON EAST PALO ALTO: $214,000 over 7y, 2.9% of budgetINNOVATION WORKS INC: $180,000 over 3y, 10% of budgetSAHAYA INTERNATIONAL INC: $173,800 over 5y, 12% of budgetCOMMUNITY PARTNERS INTERNATIONAL: $170,000 over 4y, 0.3% of budgetONE HEART HEALTH: $170,000 over 4y, 48% of budgetPRESIDENT-BOARD OF TRUSTEES SANTA CLARA COLLEGE: $157,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetThe Freedom Story: $150,000 over 4y, 6.9% of budgetThe NCTU Foundation: $147,000 over 1y, 32% of budgetHOLISTIC INTEGRATED SERVICES FOUNDATION: $100,650 over 3y, 8.6% of budgetTHE BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE LELAND STANFORD JUNIOR UNIVERSITY: $100,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetLOVE146 INC: $95,000 over 1y, 2.5% of budgetCHINESE CANCER MEMORIAL FOUNDATION: $90,000 over 2y, 2.4% of budgetAGAPE FISH FUND INC: $44,500 over 2y, 34% of budgetASIAN AMERICAN LEGAL DEFENSE AND EDUCATION FUND: $40,000 over 1y, 1.9% of budgetJENNY LIN FOUNDATION: $31,500 over 9y, 20% of budgetSOUTH EAST ASIA PRAYER CENTER: $25,000 over 1y, 0.8% of budgetNEW HOPE CHINESE CANCER CARE FOUNDATION: $20,000 over 1y, 4.7% of budgetPROFESSIONAL AND EDUCATIONAL SERVICES INTERNATIONAL INC: $10,000 over 1y, 3.3% of budgetPoint Lobos Foundation: $10,000 over 1y, 1.5% of budgetGOSPEL OPERATION INTERNATIONAL (USA): $10,000 over 1y, 0.8% of budget1951 COFFEE COMPANY: $10,000 over 1y, 0.9% of budgetGO LIVE SERVE INTERNATIONAL INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.7% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA BERKELEY FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds TRANSPARENT FISH FUND INC ↗
  • Who funds FRIENDS WITHOUT A BORDER ↗
  • Who funds CHILDREN'S HEARTLINK ↗
  • Who funds ANGKOR HOSPITAL FOR CHILDREN INC ↗
  • Who funds LOVE JUSTICE INTERNATIONAL ↗
  • Who funds KIDSPIRE ↗
  • Who funds BURMA HUMANITARIAN MISSION ↗
  • Who funds HIMALAYAN HEALTHCARE INC ↗
  • Who funds San Francisco City Impact ↗
  • Who funds WATERING MINDS INC ↗
  • Who funds Equalize Health Formerly D-Rev ↗
  • Who funds HOPE HORIZON EAST PALO ALTO ↗
  • Who funds INNOVATION WORKS INC ↗
  • Who funds SAHAYA INTERNATIONAL INC ↗
  • Who funds COMMUNITY PARTNERS INTERNATIONAL ↗
  • Who funds ONE HEART HEALTH ↗
  • Who funds PRESIDENT-BOARD OF TRUSTEES SANTA CLARA COLLEGE ↗
  • Who funds The Freedom Story ↗
  • Who funds The NCTU Foundation ↗
  • Who funds HOLISTIC INTEGRATED SERVICES FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds THE BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE LELAND STANFORD JUNIOR UNIVERSITY ↗
  • Who funds LOVE146 INC ↗
  • Who funds CHINESE CANCER MEMORIAL FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds AGAPE FISH FUND INC ↗
  • Who funds ASIAN AMERICAN LEGAL DEFENSE AND EDUCATION FUND ↗
  • Who funds JENNY LIN FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds SOUTH EAST ASIA PRAYER CENTER ↗
  • Who funds NEW HOPE CHINESE CANCER CARE FOUNDATION ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Transparent Fish Fund IncCA13.6× affinity4 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Transparent Fish Fund Inc · Cherith Christian Private Foundation · Gs Donor Advised Philanthropy Fund for Wealth Management Inc · Silicon Valley Community Foundation · Globalgiving Foundation Inc · The Yelp Foundation · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · T Rowe Price Program for Charitable Giving Inc · AbbVie Foundation · The US Charitable Gift Trust · National Philanthropic Trust · The Pfizer Foundation Inc

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Ping and Amy Chao Family Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Ping and Amy Chao Family Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 30%6%25%56%100%funder's share of their income ↑0%15%30%45%60%share of the org’s income from government →median 49%
  • LOVE146 Inc: 49% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
3get no government money at all
7report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–60%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Ping and Amy Chao Family Foundation?

Find your warmest path to Ping and Amy Chao Family Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 49 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Ping and Amy Chao Family’s filings →

More from the funding graph