Skip to content

· Private foundation

Pike-Jackson Foundation Inc

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$166k
Granted FY2025still arriving
8
Grants FY2025still arriving
4
States reached
$84k
Largest
01What it funds
0199% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Education$359kHealth$141kRecreation & Sports$121kScience & Tech$50kYouth Development$44kArts & Culture$34kHuman Services$11kInternational$10kOther$0
02FY2025 · 8 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k3 grants · $13k
  • $10k–50k4 grants · $69k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $84k
$10,600
Median grant
4
States reached
$2.7M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
UNIVERSITY OF DELEWARE$84,000
TELLURIDE MOUNTAIN CLUB$33,500
MAKE A WISH AZ$15,000
NOT MY KID$10,600
TELLURIDE SCIENCE CENTER$10,000
MAYO CLINIC$5,000
SAN MIGUEL MENTORING PROGRAM ONE TO ONE$5,000
TELLURIDE MEDICAL CENTER$3,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY25–25, $11k) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%NOT MY KID: $11k → 11%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

MN
OH
PA
CA
CO
MD
DE
AZ
NC
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
04

Where the work is directed

The same grants placed two ways: where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose sends the money.

About 7% of Pike-Jackson Foundation Inc’s grant dollars are earmarked for a different county than the recipient’s own address.

Pike-Jackson Foundation Inclessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient address
How this is measured
Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the funder’s own 990 grant descriptions.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

89%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$650k · 12 repeat orgs$79k to everyone else

12 repeat relationships: 5 still active in FY2025, 7 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

12
14

Total granted

$650k
$64k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+29%
+39%

Still filing today

42%
29%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 90% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $16k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
HealthInternationalRecreation & SportsHuman ServicesYouth DevelopmentEducationOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • UNIVERSITY OF DELAWARE
    8× · 2018–2025 · $300k · revenue +29%
  • TM
    Telluride Mountain Club
    6× · 2019–2025 · $119k · revenue +503%
  • MF
    MAKE-A-WISH FOUNDATION OF ARIZONA INC
    4× · 2022–2025 · $60k · revenue +11%

Funded once

  • AA
    AH AAA SCHOOL
    one grant, 2018 · $13k
  • US
    USC SCHAEFFER CENTER
    one grant, 2018 · $10k
  • SF
    SPECIAL FRIENDS FOUNDATION INC
    one grant, 2023 · $10k · revenue +12%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
The Telluride Institute Inc

The telluride institute is an innovative non-profit organization that fosters the transition to a sustainable world. we work with communities, business, and the public sector to create and advance real solutions that support the health of…

Social Science
2
Telluride Association Inc

To support higher education

Education
3
Telluride Mountain School Inc

The School delivers a program of challenging academics that promotes critical thinking, aesthetic expression and ethical behavior, while encompassing a commitment to community service, global citizenship and engagement with the natural…

Education
4
Tmc Healthcare

Our mission is to provide exceptional health care with compassion.

Health
5
Massachusetts Institute of Technology

The mission of mit is to advance knowledge and educate students in science, technology, and other areas of scholarship that will best serve the nation and the world in the 21st century.

Education
6
Tmc Health Foundation

The tmc health foundation supports the charitable mission of tucson medical center and is dedicated to improving the health and quality of life in our community.

Health
7
The Scripps Research Institute

The scripps research institute ("tsri") performs high impact basic biomedical research, improves the human condition by fostering translation of its discoveries into useful products and engages in the highest quality graduate scientific…

Health
8
United States Telecom Association

See schedule oustelecom exists to ensure members can compete, grow and thrive to build a world where families, enterprises and communities are connected through the power of broadband.our member companies have committed a considerable…

—
9
Western University of Health Sciences

To produce, in a humanistic tradition, health care professionals and biomedical knowledge that will enhance and extend the quality of life in our communities.

—
10
The Water Research Foundation

The purpose of the water research foundation (wrf) is a definitive research organization to advance the science of all things water to better meet the evolving needs of its subscribers and the water sector. to engage exclusively in…

Environment
11
Tides Network

The tides entities work in partnership with community leaders, nonprofits, donors, foundations, and corporations to provide fiscal sponsorship, donor advised funds, grantmaking, and other philanthropic services.

Philanthropy
12
The Telluride Academy Inc

Inspire children and teens through experiential education that promotes physical activity, creative learning, environmental stewardship, responsibility to others, and positive life choices.

Education
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Telluride Foundation; the most unlike its peers is World Relief Corp of National Association of Evangelicals. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
05the grantee network

13 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2026.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2026, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 13 of the 30 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
13/13
Grantees still filing
11/13
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

UNIVERSITY OF DELAWARE: $300,000 · OtherUNIVERSITY OF DELAWARETELLURIDE SCIENCE CENTER: $40,000 · OtherTELLURIDE SCIENCE CENTERTELLURIDE SCIENCE: $40,000 · OtherTELLURIDE SCIENCETelluride Hospital District: $21,000 · OtherMAKE-A-WISH: $20,000 · OtherAHA HAA SCHOOL: $18,340 · Other+14 more: $71,000 · Other+14 moreTelluride Mountain Club: $118,500 · Recreation & SportsTelluride Mountai…+1 more: $2,500 · Recreation & SportsMAKE-A-WISH FOUNDATION OF ARIZONA INC: $60,000 · HealthMAKE-A-WISH FOUND…MAYO CLINIC: $45,000 · HealthMAYO CLINICSPECIAL FRIENDS FOUNDATION INC: $10,000 · HealthSPECIAL FRIENDS F…+1 more: $3,500 · HealthNOTMYKID: $10,600 · Human ServicesWORLD RELIEF CORP OF NATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF EVANGELICALS: $10,000 · InternationalSAN MIGUEL MENTORING PROGRAM: $5,000 · Youth DevelopmentTHE HILL CENTER INC: $1,000 · Education
Other$510,340Recreation & Sports$121,000Health$118,500Human Services$10,600International$10,000Youth Development$5,000Education$1,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetUNIVERSITY OF DELAWARE: $300,000 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetTelluride Mountain Club: $118,500 over 6y, 7.0% of budgetMAKE-A-WISH FOUNDATION OF ARIZONA INC: $60,000 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetMAYO CLINIC: $45,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetTELLURIDE SCIENCE: $40,000 over 4y, 0.9% of budgetNOTMYKID: $10,600 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetWORLD RELIEF CORP OF NATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF EVANGELICALS: $10,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetSPECIAL FRIENDS FOUNDATION INC: $10,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetARIZONA WOMEN'S BOARD: $3,500 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetTELLURIDE FOUNDATION: $2,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTELLURIDE VOLUNTEER FIRE DEPARTMENT: $1,000 over 1y, 1.4% of budgetTHE HILL CENTER INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds UNIVERSITY OF DELAWARE ↗
  • Who funds Telluride Mountain Club ↗
  • Who funds MAKE-A-WISH FOUNDATION OF ARIZONA INC ↗
  • Who funds MAYO CLINIC ↗
  • Who funds TELLURIDE SCIENCE ↗
  • Who funds NOTMYKID ↗
  • Who funds WORLD RELIEF CORP OF NATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF EVANGELICALS ↗
  • Who funds SPECIAL FRIENDS FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds SAN MIGUEL MENTORING PROGRAM ↗
  • Who funds ARIZONA WOMEN'S BOARD ↗
  • Who funds TELLURIDE FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds TELLURIDE VOLUNTEER FIRE DEPARTMENT ↗
  • Who funds THE HILL CENTER INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust IncIN10.2× affinity5 shared granteesties to 5 of 5Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · National Philanthropic Trust · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Pike-Jackson Foundation Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Pike-Jackson Foundation Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%1%3%6%10%funder's share of their income ↑0%19%38%56%75%share of the org’s income from government →median 67%
  • World Relief Corp of National Association of Evangelicals: 67% of income from government
  • University of Delaware: 30% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
0get no government money at all
4report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
1rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–75%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Pike-Jackson Foundation Inc?

Find your warmest path to Pike-Jackson Foundation Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 30 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Pike-Jackson’s filings →

More from the funding graph