Skip to content
Pidc Local Development Corporation at a glanceAlso receives grants: funding profile →

· Public charity

Pidc Local Development Corporation

See schedule o.pidc-ldc administers, as a subrecipient of the city of philadelphia, various federally funded grant programs, including community development block grants, housing and urban development loans, and economic development administration loans.

$2.0M
Granted FY2024still arriving
39
Grants FY2024still arriving
1
States reached
$696k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its fieldRead
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2018 to 2024.

Community Improvement$27MHousing & Shelter$2.9MPublic Benefit$2.0MEnvironment$752kArts & Culture$428kHuman Services$284kFood & Nutrition$160kRecreation & Sports$131kOther$0
02FY2024 · 39 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k3 grants · $25k
  • $10k–50k32 grants · $737k
  • $50k–250k2 grants · $148k
  • $250k+2 grants · $1.1M
$25,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$203M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
THE TRUST FOR PUBLIC LAND$695,900
RUGGIERO PLANTE LAND DESIGN LLC$365,045
TYISHA BECKHAM$96,273
WOMEN'S OPPORTUNITY RESOURCE CENTER$52,005
COURTSIDE VIDEO ENTERTAINMENT$35,000
PHILLY CUTS BARBERSHOP$35,000
JEANNE'S BUSINESS SERVICES$35,000
CUSTOM ARTS STUDIO LLC$35,000
OK FOOD CENTURY LLC$35,000
CC PHILA 21 LLC$35,000
LEANGHIEK CHEUNG$30,000
EL BUEN VIVIR GROCERY$30,000
KIDDIE KLUBHOUSE LLC$30,000
GREEN STORMWATER SOLUTIONS LLC$28,537
BEYOND BASIC 3 LLC$25,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY18–24) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 8%. 48% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants spread fairly evenly across need levels.

area typical 8%PEER Environmental: $1.2M → 10%RHYTHM AND BRUNCH: $46k → 22%ZELDAS RESTAURANT AND BAR: $50k → 13%VISION OPTICS: $50k → 7%Trans-Pacific Engineering Corp: $823k → 7%ON POINT CUISINE LLC: $50k → 22%ISS Management LLC: $16.4M → 7%TINY WPA: $50k → 22%LITTLE SPOON: $50k → 22%GOLDEN DOODLE CHARLIE: $50k → 22%TRIPLE EIGHT INVESTMENTS: $50k → 22%CERULEAN ARTS: $50k → 22%ALLEGHENT WEST FOUNDATION: $247k → 22%PHILLY HOMEBREW CORPORATION: $50k → 22%SUNSHINE MEAT MARKET: $50k → 22%Mission First Housing Group: $2.5M → 22%AXALTA COATING SYSTEMS: $750k → 22%CITY OF PHILADELPHIA: $2.7M → 22%THE TRUST FOR PUBLIC LAND: $696k → 22%CITY OF PHILADELPHIA: $2.0M → 22%FRANK RECRUITMENT GROUP: $150k → 22%WELCOME AMERICA: $760k → 22%URBAN AFFAIRS COALITION: $100k → 22%HILL INTERNATIONAL: $345k → 22%WOMEN'S OPPORTUNITY RESOURCE CENTER: $52k → 22%CHAMBER OF COMMERCE FOR: $75k → 22%ECONOMY LEAGUE OF GTR: $50k → 22%ASTAN HAIR BRAIDING: $50k → 22%HARRISON CONSULTANTS: $50k → 22%La Puppet Regime DBA Juggernaut: $49k → 22%1338 INC: $50k → 22%GERMANTOWN DEVELOPMENT ASSOCIATESLLC: $47k → 22%Bart's Beagles LLC: $50k → 22%BEST HOUSE PIZZERIA: $50k → 22%LIL' POP SHOP LLC: $45k → 22%5301 DEVELOPMENT ASSOCIATES LLC: $50k → 22%RUGGIERO PLANTE LAND DESIGN LLC: $365k → 22%ACANA: $129k → 22%ABBI PRINT LLC: $50k → 22%URBAN EXCHANGE PROJECT INC: $50k → 22%BAUM'S INC: $50k → 22%TYISHA BECKHAM: $96k → 22%MAGALY SPA LLC: $45k → 22%Black Hart LLC: $50k → 22%ASIAN ARTS INITIATIVE: $50k → 22%CDS REALTY LLC: $50k → 22%AMALGAM COMICS & COFFEEHOUSE INC: $49k → 22%Hussian College of Art: $259k → 22%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Philadelphia Chinatown Development Corporation

The corporation's mission includes, but is not limited to, combatingcommunity deterioration within chinatown; preserving and developingthe chinatown community; leading the community in neighborhoodplanning, considering land use, and…

Community Improvement
2
Philadelphia Industrial Development Corporation

Pidc plans and implements economic development initiatives (see schedule o) which enhance the competitive environment, generate jobs and produce higher tax ratables throughout philadelphia.

Community Improvement
3
Germantown United Community Development Corporation

To promote and facilitate the sustainable and equitable development of philadelphias germantown neighborhood. gu works to improve the quality of life of germantown residents, support local businesses, and advance commercial corridor…

Community Improvement
4
Build Philly Now

Our mission is to advance bold ideas for the built environment in the City of Philadelphia and the surrounding region, with a specific focus on transformative projects and ideas in the areas of housing, infrastructure, and energy.

—
5
Pidc Development Management Corporation

Pidc dmc administers and coordinates various development projects for the city and other not-for-profit entities.

Community Improvement
6
Philadelphia Works Inc

Philadelphia works, inc. develops and manages smart workforce solutions that respond to business needs and increases economic opportunity for all philadelphia residents.

Employment
7
Philadelphia Association of CDCs

Vision: PACDC works to create an equitable city where every Philadelphian lives works and thrives in a neighborhood that offers an excellent quality of life. Mission: PACDC is a membership association, that fosters strong community…

Community Improvement
8
Philadelphia Housing Development Corporation

Provide affordable housing and financial assistance for home repairs targeted to low income residents.

Housing & Shelter
9
Eastern North Philadelphia Workforce Development Corp

Eastern north philadelphia workforce development corporation ("enpwdc") is a non-profit corporation serving the hispanic community of north philadelphia. enpwdc's primary mission is to assist individuals and families in achieving economic…

Human Services
10
University City District

University city district is a partnership of world-renowned anchor institutions, small businesses and residents that creates opportunity, improves economic vitality and quality of life in the university city area of west philadelphia. our…

Community Improvement
11
Pittsburgh Housing Development Corp

To initiate, plan, finance, develop and manage housing development in the City of Pittsburgh, and upon request, in other municipalities with particular, but not exclusive, emphasis on such development in low to moderate income census…

Housing & Shelter
12
Tacony Community Development Corpor

To revitalize the neighborhood of tacony in philadelphia, pennsylvania

Community Improvement
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is The Enterprise Center Community Development Corporation; the most unlike its peers is People Advancing Reintegration Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

23 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 23 of the 184 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

2
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
12
Early backer (in before they grew)
23/23
Grantees still filing
18/23
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

ISS Management LLC: $16,437,529 · OtherISS Management LLCCITY OF PHILADELPHIA: $5,491,163 · OtherCITY OF PHILADELPHIAPEER Environmental: $1,154,455 · Other+164 more: $6,950,545 · Other+164 moreMISSION FIRST HOUSING GROUP INC: $2,500,000 · Housing & Shelter+4 more: $93,439 · Housing & ShelterTHE TRUST FOR PUBLIC LAND: $695,900 · EnvironmentWOMEN'S OPPORTUNITIES RESOURCE CENTER: $52,005 · Community ImprovementCalled To Serve CDC Inc: $23,923 · Community ImprovementTHE ENTERPRISE CENTER COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION: $22,213 · Community ImprovementPASSYUNK AVENUE REVITALIZATION CORPORATION: $7,751 · Community ImprovementAsian Arts Initiative: $50,000 · Arts & CultureAFRICAN CULTURAL ALLIANCE OF NORTH AMERICA: $35,000 · Arts & CultureHISTORIC GERMANTOWN PRESERVED: $14,000 · Arts & CulturePHILADELPHIA MURAL ARTS ADVOCATES INC: $5,764 · Arts & CultureTINY WPA: $49,993 · Youth DevelopmentGreensgrow Inc: $37,353 · Food & NutritionPEOPLE ADVANCING REINTEGRATION INC: $10,799 · Employment
Other$30,033,692Housing & Shelter$2,593,439Environment$695,900Community Improvement$105,892Arts & Culture$104,764Youth Development$49,993Food & Nutrition$37,353Employment$10,799

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetTHE TRUST FOR PUBLIC LAND: $695,900 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetTHE ALLEGHENY WEST FOUNDATION: $246,871 over 1y, 34% of budgetURBAN AFFAIRS COALITION: $100,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetCHAMBER OF COMMERCE FOR GREATER PHILADEPHIA: $75,000 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetWOMEN'S OPPORTUNITIES RESOURCE CENTER: $52,005 over 1y, 1.6% of budgetPENNSYLVANIA ECONOMY LEAGUE INC: $50,000 over 1y, 1.2% of budgetAsian Arts Initiative: $50,000 over 1y, 2.7% of budgetTINY WPA: $49,993 over 1y, 4.8% of budgetFRANKFORD COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION: $42,290 over 2y, 1.0% of budgetGreensgrow Inc: $37,353 over 1y, 9.7% of budgetAFRICAN CULTURAL ALLIANCE OF NORTH AMERICA: $35,000 over 1y, 3.8% of budgetNueva Esperanza Housing and Economic Development Corporation: $34,848 over 1y, 5.4% of budgetMT AIRY USA: $33,000 over 1y, 1.4% of budgetCalled To Serve CDC Inc: $23,923 over 1y, 26% of budgetTHE ENTERPRISE CENTER COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION: $22,213 over 1y, 0.6% of budgetHISTORIC GERMANTOWN PRESERVED: $14,000 over 1y, 4.0% of budgetPASSYUNK AVENUE REVITALIZATION CORPORATION: $7,751 over 1y, 1.1% of budgetMT VERNON MANOR INC: $6,301 over 1y, 0.7% of budgetPHILADELPHIA MURAL ARTS ADVOCATES INC: $5,764 over 1y, 0.1% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds MISSION FIRST HOUSING GROUP INC ↗
  • Who funds THE TRUST FOR PUBLIC LAND ↗
  • Who funds THE ALLEGHENY WEST FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds URBAN AFFAIRS COALITION ↗
  • Who funds CHAMBER OF COMMERCE FOR GREATER PHILADEPHIA ↗
  • Who funds WOMEN'S OPPORTUNITIES RESOURCE CENTER ↗
  • Who funds PENNSYLVANIA ECONOMY LEAGUE INC ↗
  • Who funds Asian Arts Initiative ↗
  • Who funds TINY WPA ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Pennsylvania Cdfi Net…The William Penn Foun…The Philadelphia Foun…The Merchants Fund of…Philadelphia Industri…The Barra Foundation …Philadelphia Activiti…Wsfs Cares FoundationPidc Financing Corpor…Philadelphia City Fun…The Patricia Kind Fam…Temple University - O…
Pennsylvania Cdfi NetworkPA36.1× affinity23 shared granteesties to 9 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Pennsylvania Cdfi Network · The William Penn Foundation · The Philadelphia Foundation · The Merchants Fund of Philadelphia · Philadelphia Industrial Development Corporation · The Barra Foundation Inc · Philadelphia Activities Fund Inc · Wsfs Cares Foundation · Pidc Financing Corporation · Philadelphia City Fund Inc · The Patricia Kind Family Foundation · Temple University - Of The Commonwealth System of Higher Education

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Pidc Local Development Corporation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Pidc Local Development Corporation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%1%3%6%10%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    11report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 184 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Pidc Local Development’s filings →

    More from the funding graph

    The unnamed billions
    grants reported with no recipient in the public record
    The regranting layer
    51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
    The DAF merry-go-round
    $9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
    The endowment market
    who holds foundation money, and what just moved
    The camps
    funders cluster by geography, not ideology
    By state
    where grant money is based, and what stays home