Loading…
Loading…
· Public charity
PIDC LOCAL DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION (pidc-ldc) administers, as a subrecipient of the city of philadelphia, various federally funded grant programs.
By grantee IRS cause code (NTEE).
A cause breakdown isn’t shown here: 89% of PIDC LOCAL DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION’s grantee dollars go to organizations outside the IRS cause taxonomy (common for large international and research funders), so a chart would be mostly “unclassified” and misrepresent the portfolio.
Beneath the NTEE codes, this is what the grant descriptions actually say.
…and in their own words, year by year
Words distinctive to each year’s grant purposes (TF-IDF) · event-driven terms in cyan.
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2024
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Dollar for dollar, your grants (FY18–24) land where the poverty rate runs at 13% — the area typically sits at 8%. 48% of your dollars reach neighborhoods with above-average need. Your grants spread fairly evenly across need levels.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA, United Way ALICE — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
To promote and facilitate the sustainable and equitable development of philadelphias germantown neighborhood. gu works to improve the quality of life of germantown residents, support local businesses, and advance commercial corridor…
Pcdc provides bilingual, culturally sensitive assistance and services to clients in philadelphia's chinatown neighborhood
Administers and coordinates various development projects for the city and other nfp entities.
PACDC is a membership association of organizations committed to equitable neighborhood revitalization. We focus our efforts in two key areas: advocacy for systems reform and increased access to resources; and technical
Philadelphia works, inc. strives to build a stronger workforce through career, skills training, employment services for career seekers, business services for employers, and labor market insights for smart workforce solutions and innovation.
To enhance the quality of lives and communities by advocating for, creating, and sustaining affordable housing options in the city and county of york, pa.
Pidc plans and implements economic development initiatives (see schedule o) which enhance the competitive environment, generate jobs and produce higher tax ratables throughout philadelphia.
To study, support, and promote circular economy principles and markets and to educate the public on the circular economy.
The fairmount park conservancy works as a collaborative partner to lead (cont'd in sch o)and support efforts which preserve and improve the fairmount park system in order to enhance the quality of life and stimulate economic development of…
Provide affordable housing and financial assistance for home repairs targeted to low income residents.
PCRG is a coalition of community leaders working for economic justice, equitable investment practices and sufficient financial resources to revitalize communities throughout Allegheny County, PA
Drwc's mission is to maintain and promote the use and development ofthe city of philadelphia's central waterfront. this task is of vitalimportance to the city and one which the city would otherwise berequired to perform itself absent the…
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Mt Airy Usa and the most unlike its peers is People Advancing Reintegration Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
Your grantees are a median of 30 years old; the field is 14. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 23% startups (under 5 years old) — 0% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 14% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: The William Penn Foundation · Pennsylvania Cdfi Network · The Philadelphia Foundation · Philadelphia Industrial Development · Philadelphia City Fund Inc · The Philadelphia Cultural Fund Inc · Pidc-Financing Corporation · Philanthropy Network Greater · Bread and Roses Community Fund · The Barra Foundation Inc · Philadelphia Activities Fund Inc · The Patricia Kind Family Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Every dot is one organisation PIDC LOCAL DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.
Through Plinth
This dossier was generated cold from public filings. In Plinth it’s a working system — every applicant assessed and every grant monitored. Here’s a taste, run on one of your grantees: ALLEGHENT WEST FOUNDATION.
Agentic due diligence · confidence × risk
~0 months of operating runway; revenue grew over 8 filed years.
8 years of Form 990 filings, still active.
US 501(c)(3); EIN 231924667 on file with current IRS Form 990 filings.
Board composition & governance documents — verified live in Plinth from the applicant.
OFAC / UN sanctions screening — run live in Plinth at assessment.
Staffing, M&E and activity alignment — assessed live in Plinth from submitted proposals.
Live · Plinth’s real DD engine
Run the actual assessment on ALLEGHENT WEST FOUNDATION, cold from public data.
Generated live from public IRS filings + open web sources by Plinth’s agentic engine. Shown as an illustration of the product, not a formal assessment.
Post-award monitoring · continuous checks
What you see here is static and public. In Plinth it’s operational — the full six-pillar framework on every applicant (with their own documents + live registry and sanctions checks), monitoring dashboards on every award, custom board reports, and eligibility routing for intake.
Preview generated from this grantee’s public IRS filings and independent reporting. Pillars marked “live in Plinth” require the applicant’s submitted documents. Shown as illustration, not a formal assessment.
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPro
Find your warmest path to Pidc Local Development Corporation through people who sit on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the introduction across shared trustees and officers.
Every link is a documented governance overlap in public IRS 990 filings — not a personal network — and each hop carries its own confidence tier. Low-confidence or distant paths are held back rather than guessed.