Skip to content
Phoenix Pride Inc at a glanceMostly funded, not a grantmaker: see who funds it →

· Public charity

Phoenix Pride Inc

Phoenix pride unites, educates, and engages people to support and empower the lgbtq community and our allies.

$77k
Granted FY2024still arriving
3
Grants FY2024still arriving
1
States reached
$64k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
05Through PlinthRead
01What it funds
0198% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Education$322kHealth$121kRecreation & Sports$81kPhilanthropy$47kHuman Services$37kYouth Development$30kArts & Culture$21kCrime & Legal$19kOther$0
02FY2024 · 3 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k2 grants · $13k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $64k
$7,148
Median grant
1
States reached
$718k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Others under 5K$64,088
City of Phoenix$7,148
RipplePHX Inc$5,434
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY19–22, $29k) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%BEATITUDES CAMPUS FND: $9k → 11%CHICANOS POR LA CASA: $20k → 11%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

26%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$122k · 6 repeat orgs$351k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +47% since the first grant, against +23% for those funded once.

6 repeat relationships: 1 still active in FY2024, 5 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

6
20

Total granted

$122k
$280k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+47%
+23%

Still filing today

83%
60%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 7% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $71k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’22’23’24
HealthHuman ServicesCivil RightsArts & CultureCrime & LegalYouth DevelopmentOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • RI
    RipplePHX Inc
    3× · 2022–2024 · $25k · revenue +113%
  • PC
    PRISMA COMMUNITY CARE (FKA SOUTHWEST CENTER HIV/AIDS INC)
    2× · 2019–2022 · $20k · revenue +295%
  • PP
    PLANNED PARENTHOOD ARIZONA INC
    2× · 2019–2022 · $20k · revenue +9%

Funded once

  • AC
    AZ COMMUNITY FND
    one grant, 2023 · $71k
  • Southern Arizona AIDS Foundationgraduated
    one grant, 2022 · $27k · revenue +65%
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2022 · $21k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Arizona Latin-American Medical Association
Unclassified
2
Gay & Lesbian Community Center of Southern Nevada

The lgbtq+ center of las vegas ("the center") serves as a welcoming system of care and support for lgbtqia+ individuals, families, and allies, advancing its mission through three interconnected pillars: community building, advocacy, and…

Human Services
3
Alianza of New Mexico

Alianza's mission is to empower hard-to-reach, vulnerable, and underserved populations through education and supportive services aimed at working with everyone we serve to achieve better outcomes and higher quality of life.

Human Services
4
Codac Health Recovery & Wellness

Codac provides tools, support and services to individuals, families, and communities so they may live with dignity, free from the harmful effects of mental illness, substance use disorders and trauma.

—
5
Southern Arizona Senior Pride

We recognize and respond to the unique concerns and interests of LGBTQI+ older adults and their younger allies by delivering Social Programming in three areas: Social & Learning Health & Wellbeing and Arts & Culture Delivering Supportive…

Human Services
6
Lesbian and Gay Community Services Center Inc

EMPOWERING LGBT PEOPLE, BUILDING STRONG COMMUNITY. NEW YORK CITY'S LESBIAN, GAY, BISEXUAL, & TRANSGENDER COMMUNITY CENTER EMPOWERS PEOPLE TO LEAD HEALTHY, SUCCESSFUL LIVES. The Center celebrates our community and advocates for justice and…

Human Services
7
Arizona Healthiest State Foundation
—
8
Legacy Community Health Services Inc

The mission of legacy community health services is, "driving healthy change in our communities." our vision is, "connecting our communities to health every day, in every way."

Health
9
Prism Network

Building bridges for rural lgbtq communities across northern arizona

Community Improvement
10
The Dons of Arizona
Education
11
Northern Arizona Pride Association

Together, we support, unite, and strengthen our LGBTQIA2S+ community. We envision a Flagstaff and Northern Arizona where LGBTQIA2S+ individuals are welcomed, supported, and able to live safely, authentically, and free from discrimination,…

Education
12
Pro-Choice Arizona

Pro-Choice Arizona centers abolition and reproductive justice values to prioritize community needs. We advance reproductive equity, pregnancy and family justice, and abortion access for all folks living in Arizona through direct service…

Health
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Big Brothers Big Sisters of Central Arizona; the most unlike its peers is Glsen Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

21 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 21 of the 30 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
7
Early backer (in before they grew)
19/21
Grantees still filing
16/21
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

ARIZONA COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $252,234 · PhilanthropyARIZONA COMMUNITY FOUNDATION+1 more: $7,345 · PhilanthropyAZ COMMUNITY FND: $71,198 · OtherAZ COMMUNITY FNDOthers under 5K: $64,088 · OtherOthers under 5KIndividual grant recipient: $20,912 · OtherIndividual grant recipientARIZONA TRANS YOUTH AND PARENT ORGANIZATION: $10,000 · OtherDRAG STORY HOUR - ARIZONA: $10,000 · OtherNative PFLAG: $10,000 · OtherPHOENIX STORM RUGBY FOOTBALL CLUB INC: $9,951 · OtherGRAND CANYON SISTERS OF PERPETUAL INDULGENCE INC: $9,643 · OtherGRAND CANYON MENS CHORALE: $9,514 · OtherFLORENCE IMMIGRANT & REFUGEE RIGHTS PROJECT INC: $10,000 · Other+4 more: $28,240 · Other+4 moreSouthern Arizona AIDS Foundation: $27,000 · HealthSouthern Arizona A…RipplePHX Inc: $25,434 · HealthRipplePHX IncPRISMA COMMUNITY CARE (FKA SOUTHWEST CENTER HIV/AIDS INC): $20,000 · HealthPRISMA COMMUNITY C…PLANNED PARENTHOOD ARIZONA INC: $20,000 · HealthPLANNED PARENTHOOD…AUNT RITA'S FOUNDATION: $10,000 · HealthAUNT RITA'S FOUNDA…BRIGHTER WAY INSTITUTE: $10,000 · HealthBRIGHTER WAY INSTI…ADELANTE HEALTHCAREINC: $8,910 · HealthADELANTE HEALTHCAR…CHICANOS POR LA CAUSA INC CPLC: $20,000 · Human ServicesThe Imperial Court of Arizona Inc: $17,628 · Human ServicesTHE BEATITUDES CAMPUS FOUNDATION: $8,760 · Human ServicesGLSEN INC: $28,000 · Civil Rights1N10 INC: $5,500 · Civil RightsTHE PHOENIX THEATRE COMPANY AND SUBSIDIARY: $11,070 · Arts & CultureONE COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $10,000 · Public Safety & Disaster
Philanthropy$259,579Other$253,546Health$121,344Human Services$46,388Civil Rights$33,500Arts & Culture$11,070Public Safety & Disaster$10,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetARIZONA COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $252,234 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetGLSEN INC: $28,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetSouthern Arizona AIDS Foundation: $27,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetRipplePHX Inc: $25,434 over 3y, 1.9% of budgetPRISMA COMMUNITY CARE (FKA SOUTHWEST CENTER HIV/AIDS INC): $20,000 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetCHICANOS POR LA CAUSA INC CPLC: $20,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetPLANNED PARENTHOOD ARIZONA INC: $20,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetThe Imperial Court of Arizona Inc: $17,628 over 2y, 18% of budgetTHE PHOENIX THEATRE COMPANY AND SUBSIDIARY: $11,070 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetONE COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $10,000 over 1y, 9.6% of budgetFLORENCE IMMIGRANT & REFUGEE RIGHTS PROJECT INC: $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetBRIGHTER WAY INSTITUTE: $10,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetADELANTE HEALTHCAREINC: $8,910 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE BEATITUDES CAMPUS FOUNDATION: $8,760 over 1y, 1.2% of budgetBIG BROTHERS BIG SISTERS OF CENTRAL ARIZONA: $7,500 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetJEWISH COMMUNITY ASSOCIATION OF GREATER PHOENIX: $7,345 over 1y, 0.1% of budget1N10 INC: $5,500 over 1y, 0.3% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Arizona Community Fou…Virginia G Piper Char…The Diane and Bruce H…American Express Foun…The Foundation for Co…The Albertsons Compan…Jpmorgan Chase Founda…The Bank of America C…American Endowment Fo…Network for GoodAmerican Online Givin…National Philanthropi…
Arizona Community FoundationAZ25.2× affinity11 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Arizona Community Foundation · Virginia G Piper Charitable Trust · The Diane and Bruce Halle Foundation · American Express Foundation · The Foundation for Community and Health Advancement · The Albertsons Companies Foundation · Jpmorgan Chase Foundation · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · American Endowment Foundation · Network for Good · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · National Philanthropic Trust

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Phoenix Pride Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Phoenix Pride Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%1%3%6%10%funder's share of their income ↑0%13%25%38%50%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    5report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–50%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Phoenix Pride Inc?

    Find your warmest path to Phoenix Pride Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 30 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Phoenix Pride’s filings →

    More from the funding graph

    The unnamed billions
    grants reported with no recipient in the public record
    The regranting layer
    51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
    The DAF merry-go-round
    $9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
    The endowment market
    who holds foundation money, and what just moved
    The camps
    funders cluster by geography, not ideology
    By state
    where grant money is based, and what stays home