Skip to content
Plinth

· Public charity

Phoenix Pride Inc

Phoenix pride unites, educates, and engages people to support and empower the lgbtq community and our allies.

$77k
Granted FY2024still arriving
3
Grants FY2024still arriving
1
States reached
$64k
Largest
01What you fund
0198% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20172024.

Education$322kHealth$121kRecreation & Sports$81kPhilanthropy$47kHuman Services$37kYouth Development$30kArts & Culture$21kCrime & Legal$19kOther$0
02FY2024 · 3 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k2 grants · $13k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $64k
$7,148
Median grant
1
States reached
$718k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Others under 5K$64,088
City of Phoenix$7,148
RipplePHX Inc$5,434
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY19–22, $29k) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%BEATITUDES CAMPUS FND: $9k → 11%CHICANOS POR LA CASA: $20k → 11%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

26%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$122k · 6 repeat orgs$351k to everyone else

6 repeat relationships — 1 still active in FY2024, 5 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

6
20

Total granted

$122k
$280k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+47%
+52%

Still filing today

83%
60%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 7% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $71k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’22’23’24
HealthHuman ServicesCivil RightsArts & CultureCrime & LegalYouth DevelopmentOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • RI
    RipplePHX Inc
    3× · 2022–2024 · $25k · revenue +113%
  • PC
    PRISMA COMMUNITY CARE (FKA SOUTHWEST CENTER HIV/AIDS INC)
    2× · 2019–2022 · $20k · revenue +295%
  • PP
    PLANNED PARENTHOOD ARIZONA INC
    2× · 2019–2022 · $20k · revenue +9%

Funded once

  • AC
    AZ COMMUNITY FND
    one grant, 2023 · $71k
  • Southern Arizona AIDS Foundationgraduated
    one grant, 2022 · $27k · revenue +65%
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2022 · $21k

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Arizona Latin-American Medical Association
Unclassified
2
Alianza of New Mexico

Alianza's mission is to empower hard-to-reach, vulnerable, and underserved populations through education and supportive services aimed at working with everyone we serve to achieve better outcomes and higher quality of life.

Human Services
3
Codac Health Recovery & Wellness

Codac provides tools, support and services to individuals, families, and communities so they may live with dignity, free from the harmful effects of mental illness, substance use disorders and trauma.

4
Southern Arizona Senior Pride

We recognize and respond to the unique concerns and interests of LGBTQI+ older adults and their younger allies by delivering Social Programming in three areas: Social & Learning Health & Wellbeing and Arts & Culture Delivering Supportive…

Human Services
5
Lesbian and Gay Community Services Center Inc

EMPOWERING LGBT PEOPLE, BUILDING STRONG COMMUNITY. NEW YORK CITY'S LESBIAN, GAY, BISEXUAL, & TRANSGENDER COMMUNITY CENTER EMPOWERS PEOPLE TO LEAD HEALTHY, SUCCESSFUL LIVES. The Center celebrates our community and advocates for justice and…

Human Services
6
Arizona Healthiest State Foundation
7
Legacy Community Health Services Inc

The mission of legacy community health services is, "driving healthy change in our communities." our vision is, "connecting our communities to health every day, in every way."

Health
8
Prism Network

Building bridges for rural lgbtq communities across northern arizona

Community Improvement
9
The Dons of Arizona
Education
10
Northern Arizona Pride Association

Together, we support, unite, and strengthen our LGBTQIA2S+ community. We envision a Flagstaff and Northern Arizona where LGBTQIA2S+ individuals are welcomed, supported, and able to live safely, authentically, and free from discrimination,…

Education
11
Pro-Choice Arizona

Pro-Choice Arizona centers abolition and reproductive justice values to prioritize community needs. We advance reproductive equity, pregnancy and family justice, and abortion access for all folks living in Arizona through direct service…

Health
12
The San Diego Lesbian Gay Bisexual Transgender Community Center

The san diego lgbt community center enhances and sustains the health & well-being of the lesbian, gay, bisexual, queer, transgender, nonbinary, immigrant, and hiv communities to the betterment of our entire san diego region.

Health

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Prisma Community Care (Fka Southwest Center Hiv/Aids Inc) and the most unlike its peers is Glsen Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.

← shrinkinggrowing →↓ leaning in → pulling backsteadyHomeless & At-Risk Support …Senior Affordable HousingCommunity Foundation FundsPerforming Arts Organizatio…Arizona Civic Advocacy Orga…
the sector your giving your giving is ahead of the sector the sector’s ahead of you· dot size = how much the theme matters to each side
Ordered by the change in your giving — leaning in on top, pulling back at the bottom. The bar between the two dots is how out of step you are with the sector. Hover any row for detail.

Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.

04the grantee network

21 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 21 of the 30 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
8
Early backer (in before they grew)
19/21
Grantees still filing
17/21
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

ARIZONA COMMUNITY FOUNDATION — $252,234 · PhilanthropyARIZONA COMMUNITY FOUNDATION+1 more — $7,345 · PhilanthropyAZ COMMUNITY FND — $71,198 · OtherAZ COMMUNITY FNDOthers under 5K — $64,088 · OtherOthers under 5KIndividual grant recipient — $20,912 · OtherIndividual grant recipientDRAG STORY HOUR - ARIZONA — $10,000 · OtherNative PFLAG — $10,000 · OtherARIZONA TRANS YOUTH AND PARENT ORGANIZATION — $10,000 · OtherPHOENIX STORM RUGBY FOOTBALL CLUB INC — $9,951 · OtherGRAND CANYON SISTERS OF PERPETUAL INDULGENCE INC — $9,643 · OtherGRAND CANYON MENS CHORALE — $9,514 · OtherONE COMMUNITY FOUNDATION — $10,000 · Other+4 more — $28,240 · Other+4 moreSouthern Arizona AIDS Foundation — $27,000 · HealthSouthern Arizona A…RipplePHX Inc — $25,434 · HealthRipplePHX IncPRISMA COMMUNITY CARE (FKA SOUTHWEST CENTER HIV/AIDS INC) — $20,000 · HealthPRISMA COMMUNITY C…PLANNED PARENTHOOD ARIZONA INC — $20,000 · HealthPLANNED PARENTHOOD…BRIGHTER WAY INSTITUTE — $10,000 · HealthBRIGHTER WAY INSTI…AUNT RITA'S FOUNDATION — $10,000 · HealthAUNT RITA'S FOUNDA…ADELANTE HEALTHCAREINC — $8,910 · HealthADELANTE HEALTHCAR…CHICANOS POR LA CAUSA INC CPLC — $20,000 · Human ServicesThe Imperial Court of Arizona Inc — $17,628 · Human ServicesTHE BEATITUDES CAMPUS FOUNDATION — $8,760 · Human ServicesGLSEN INC — $28,000 · Civil Rights1N10 INC — $5,500 · Civil RightsTHE PHOENIX THEATRE COMPANY AND SUBSIDIARY — $11,070 · Arts & CultureFLORENCE IMMIGRANT & REFUGEE RIGHTS PROJECT INC — $10,000 · Crime & Legal
Philanthropy$259,579Other$253,546Health$121,344Human Services$46,388Civil Rights$33,500Arts & Culture$11,070Crime & Legal$10,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetARIZONA COMMUNITY FOUNDATION — $252,234 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetGLSEN INC — $28,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetSouthern Arizona AIDS Foundation — $27,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetRipplePHX Inc — $25,434 over 3y, 1.9% of budgetPRISMA COMMUNITY CARE (FKA SOUTHWEST CENTER HIV/AIDS INC) — $20,000 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetCHICANOS POR LA CAUSA INC CPLC — $20,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetPLANNED PARENTHOOD ARIZONA INC — $20,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetThe Imperial Court of Arizona Inc — $17,628 over 2y, 18% of budgetTHE PHOENIX THEATRE COMPANY AND SUBSIDIARY — $11,070 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetBRIGHTER WAY INSTITUTE — $10,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetFLORENCE IMMIGRANT & REFUGEE RIGHTS PROJECT INC — $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetONE COMMUNITY FOUNDATION — $10,000 over 1y, 9.6% of budgetADELANTE HEALTHCAREINC — $8,910 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE BEATITUDES CAMPUS FOUNDATION — $8,760 over 1y, 1.2% of budgetBIG BROTHERS BIG SISTERS OF CENTRAL ARIZONA — $7,500 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetJEWISH COMMUNITY ASSOCIATION OF GREATER PHOENIX — $7,345 over 1y, 0.1% of budget1N10 INC — $5,500 over 1y, 0.3% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Arizona Community FoundationAZ25.2× affinity11 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Arizona Community Foundation · Virginia G Piper Charitable Trust · The Diane and Bruce Halle Foundation · American Express Foundation · The Foundation for Community and Health Advancement · The Albertsons Companies Foundation · Jpmorgan Chase Foundation · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · American Endowment Foundation · Network for Good · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · National Philanthropic Trust

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Phoenix Pride Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 00%1%3%6%10%your share of their income ↑0%13%25%38%50%share of the org’s income from government
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    5report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–50%
    typical government reliance, FY2025

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Phoenix Pride Inc?

    Find your warmest path to Phoenix Pride Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 30 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph