Skip to content

· Private foundation

Philip E Lattavo Family Foundation Lattavo

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$97k
Granted FY2025still arriving
14
Grants FY2025still arriving
5
States reached
$77k
Largest
01What it funds
0194% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Housing & Shelter$491kReligion$67kHuman Services$31kRecreation & Sports$31kEducation$22kArts & Culture$21kHealth$16kInternational$10kOther$0
02FY2025 · 14 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k13 grants · $20k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $77k
$2,000
Median grant
5
States reached
$1.6M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
HABITAT OF STARK COUNTY$76,500
FLORIDA SHERIFFS YOUTH RANCHES$2,000
UNIVERSITY OF NOTRE DAME$2,000
MALONE UNIVERSITY$2,000
ST FRANCIS OF ASSIS CATHOLIC CHURC$2,000
ARTS IN STARK$2,000
STARK COUNTY HUMANE SOCIETY$2,000
DOLLY PARTON IMAGINATION LIBRARY$2,000
CANTON BALLET$1,000
PATHWAY CARING FOR CHILDREN$1,000
HILLSDALE COLLEGE$1,000
CENTRAL CATHOLIC HIGH SCHOOL$1,000
ST JOHNS VILLA$1,000
TUNNELS TO TOWERS FOUNDATION$1,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–25, $14k) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%ST JOHNS VILLA: $2k → 12%ST JOHNS VILLA: $1k → 12%ST JOHNS VILLA: $1k → 12%ST JOHNS VILLA: $1k → 12%ST JOHNS VILLA: $1k → 12%ST JOHNS VILLA: $1k → 12%ST JOHNS VILLA: $500 → 12%ST JOHNS VILLA: $500 → 12%ST JOHNS VILLA: $500 → 12%YOUTH ON THEIR OWN: $5k → 15%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

MI
NY
OR
IA
IN
OH
CA
AZ
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

88%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$613k · 15 repeat orgs$81k to everyone else

15 repeat relationships: 7 still active in FY2025, 8 since wound down; 5 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

15
35

Total granted

$613k
$73k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+46%
+50%

Still filing today

60%
29%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 91% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $8k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
EducationPhilanthropyHuman ServicesHealthArts & CultureReligionOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • RO
    REFUGE OF HOPE MINISTRIES
    7× · 2017–2024 · $64k · revenue +36%
  • AI
    ARTS IN STARK
    5× · 2021–2025 · $10k · revenue +45%
  • SJ
    ST JOHN'S VILLA INC
    9× · 2017–2025 · $9k · revenue +46%

Funded once

  • HA
    HABITAT AGING IN PLACE
    one grant, 2022 · $10k
  • TC
    TUCSON CHARITY BRIDGE CLUB INC
    one grant, 2021 · $10k · revenue -71%
  • PS
    Pregnancy Support Networkgraduated
    one grant, 2022 · $7k · revenue +27%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Fred Hutchinson Cancer Center

Fred hutch cancer center ("fred hutch") unites innovative research and compassionate care to prevent and eliminate cancer and infectious disease. continued on schedule o

Health
2
John Carroll University

As a jesuit catholic university committed to academic rigor, inclusive excellence, and care for the whole person, john carroll university inspires individuals of intellect and character to learn, lead and serve in the community and…

Education
3
University of Miami

See Form 990, Part I, Line 1, Description of Organization Mission.

Education
4
St Catherine University

We educate women to lead and influence. we educate at all degree levels through valuing and integrating the liberal arts and professional education within the catholic intellectual tradition, see schedule oemphasizing scholarly inquiry and…

Education
5
University of Southern California

The central mission of the university of southern california is the development of human beings and society as a whole through the cultivation and enrichment of the human mind and spirit. the principal means by which our mission is…

Education
6
A T Still University of Health Sciences

A.T. Still University of Health Sciences serves as a learning-centered university dedicated to preparing highly competent professionals through innovative academic programs. The University is committed to continuing its osteopathic…

Education
7
Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center

Leadership in the prevention, treatment, and cure of cancer through excellence, vision and cost effectiveness in patient care, outreach programs, research, and education.

Health
8
Texas Christian University

Texas christian university is an institution of higher education which includes nine major academic units: liberal arts, science and engineering, business, education, fine arts, communication, honors, nursing and health sciences, and the…

Education
9
The Board of Trustees of the Leland Stanford Junior University

Stanford university is one of a select group of american universities that have achieved eminence in both undergraduate and graduate education and research - cont'd sch o.

Education
10
La Roche University

La roche university advances learning informed by ethical and service-oriented values, reflecting its catholic heritage and the charism of the sisters of divine providence.

Education
11
Southern California University of Health Sciences

The mission of southern california university of health sciences (scu) is to educate students as competent, caring and successful practitioners of integrative healthcare. the university is committed to providing excellence in academics,…

Education
12
St Marys University of Minnesota

Enriched by the lasallian catholic heritage, saint mary's university of minnesota awakens, nurtures, and empowers learners to ethical lives of service and leadership.

Education
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Disabled American Veterans (Dav) Charitable Service Trust; the most unlike its peers is Therapeutic Riding of Tucson Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

25 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 25 of the 57 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
6
Early backer (in before they grew)
25/25
Grantees still filing
18/25
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

HABITAT OF STARK COUNTY: $477,900 · OtherHABITAT OF STARK COUNTY+42 more: $100,860 · Other+42 moreREFUGE OF HOPE MINISTRIES: $64,000 · ReligionREFUGE OF …University of Notre Dame du Lac: $16,300 · EducationMALONE UNIVERSITY: $9,500 · EducationHILLSDALE COLLEGE: $2,000 · EducationDolly Parton's Imagination Library: $2,000 · EducationCASE WESTERN RESERVE UNIVERSITY: $1,500 · Education+1 more: $1,000 · EducationST JOHN'S VILLA INC: $8,500 · Human ServicesYOUTH ON THEIR OWN: $5,000 · Human ServicesARTS IN STARK: $10,000 · Arts & CultureCANTON BALLET: $1,000 · Arts & CulturePATHWAY CARING FOR CHILDREN: $6,745 · Health+1 more: $100 · HealthTherapeutic Riding of Tucson Inc: $5,600 · Recreation & Sports
Other$578,760Religion$64,000Education$32,300Human Services$13,500Arts & Culture$11,000Health$6,845Recreation & Sports$5,600

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetREFUGE OF HOPE MINISTRIES: $64,000 over 7y, 1.6% of budgetUniversity of Notre Dame du Lac: $16,300 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetTUCSON CHARITY BRIDGE CLUB INC: $10,000 over 1y, 16% of budgetARTS IN STARK: $10,000 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetMALONE UNIVERSITY: $9,500 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetST JOHN'S VILLA INC: $8,500 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetPregnancy Support Network: $7,200 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetPATHWAY CARING FOR CHILDREN: $6,745 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetTherapeutic Riding of Tucson Inc: $5,600 over 2y, 0.6% of budgetROTAPLAST INTERNATIONAL INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetYOUTH ON THEIR OWN: $5,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetSTARK COUNTY HUMANE SOCIETY: $4,000 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetHabitat for Humanity Tucson Inc: $3,500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetHILLSDALE COLLEGE: $2,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetDisabled American Veterans (DAV) Charitable Service Trust: $2,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetFlorida Sheriffs Youth Ranches Inc: $2,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE GIVING PLATE: $2,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetDolly Parton's Imagination Library: $2,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetA COMMUNITY CHRISTMAS OF STARK COUNTY INC: $1,500 over 3y, 1.0% of budgetCASE WESTERN RESERVE UNIVERSITY: $1,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCANTON BALLET: $1,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetEL RIO FOUNDATION INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetST BALDRICK'S FOUNDATION INC: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetBLOOD CANCER UNITED INC: $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds REFUGE OF HOPE MINISTRIES ↗
  • Who funds University of Notre Dame du Lac ↗
  • Who funds TUCSON CHARITY BRIDGE CLUB INC ↗
  • Who funds ARTS IN STARK ↗
  • Who funds MALONE UNIVERSITY ↗
  • Who funds ST JOHN'S VILLA INC ↗
  • Who funds Pregnancy Support Network ↗
  • Who funds PATHWAY CARING FOR CHILDREN ↗
  • Who funds Therapeutic Riding of Tucson Inc ↗
  • Who funds ROTAPLAST INTERNATIONAL INC ↗
  • Who funds YOUTH ON THEIR OWN ↗
  • Who funds STARK COUNTY HUMANE SOCIETY ↗
  • Who funds Habitat for Humanity Tucson Inc ↗
  • Who funds HILLSDALE COLLEGE ↗
  • Who funds Disabled American Veterans (DAV) Charitable Service Trust ↗
  • Who funds Florida Sheriffs Youth Ranches Inc ↗
  • Who funds THE GIVING PLATE ↗
  • Who funds Dolly Parton's Imagination Library ↗
  • Who funds A COMMUNITY CHRISTMAS OF STARK COUNTY INC ↗
  • Who funds CASE WESTERN RESERVE UNIVERSITY ↗
  • Who funds CANTON BALLET ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Stark Community FoundationOH23.9× affinity9 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Stark Community Foundation · Timken Co Charitable & Educational Fund · Diebold Employees Charitable Fd Ta · Albert W & Edith V Flowers Charitable · Fred F Silk Charitable Foundation · Ada C Rank & Helen J Rank Charitable · The Belden Brick Charitable Trust · Hoover Foundation Income Account · Sisters of Charity Foundation of Canton · Timken Foundation of Canton · Premier Bank Foundation · Synchrony Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Philip E Lattavo Family Foundation Lattavo funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Philip E Lattavo Family Foundation Lattavo. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 20%1%5%11%20%funder's share of their income ↑0%6%13%19%25%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    2get no government money at all
    7report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–25%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 57 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Philip E Lattavo Family Foundation Lattavo’s filings →

    More from the funding graph