Skip to content

Ohio · Private foundation

Fred F Silk Charitable Foundation

Its FY2021 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$534k
Granted FY2020
16
Grants FY2020
14
Organizations funded FY2020
29%
First-time grantees FY2020
Read the full brief

Read this first · the figures below need context

90% of Fred F Silk Charitable Foundation’s FY2021 grant dollars went to Stark Community Foundation, not to grantees.

Its money now reaches organizations through that sponsor, which does not report who recommended each grant. FY2021 names 19 organizations directly, so a portfolio cannot be read from it. Everything below is therefore FY2020, the last year Fred F Silk Charitable Foundation named its own grantees at scale: 9 organizations, $534k. It is dated, not current.

Organizations named directly on the return

15
’17
16
’18
18
’19
9
’20
19
’21

Amber years are those where most dollars went to a sponsor.

Median grant, FY2020
$9,800
Largest grant, FY2020
$150,000
Organizations funded a year
14 to 21
FY2017 to FY2020
States reached, FY2020
2
Applications
Preselected organizations only
Per its most recent filing; check its own site

How open it is to new grantees

In FY2020, 29% of the organizations Fred F Silk Charitable Foundation funded were first-time grantees, receiving 41% of its grant dollars.

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2020, 59% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $217k went to new ones.

50%100%’18’19’20
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’18’19’20
Human ServicesReligionArts & CultureAnimalsOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
The numbers by year
Fiscal yearOrganizations fundedTo those organizationsFirst-time grantees
FY202014$529k29%
FY201921$655k19%
FY201819$494k42%
FY201721$519kn/a
99% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2021.

Philanthropy$17MEducation$2.1MHuman Services$533kHousing & Shelter$369kArts & Culture$349kHealth$325kReligion$173kFood & Nutrition$100kOther$0

Top grantees

Largest recipients by total granted, FY2017 to FY2021, and the share of each one’s budget the grants supplied at peak.

Show all 28 grantees
All grantees of Fred F Silk Charitable Foundation by total granted
GranteeTotal grantedYearsShare of their budget
Stark State College Foundation$578,487442%
Malone University$350,00011%
Walsh University Inc$335,00030%
Habitat for Humanity East Central Ohio$304,22542%
University of Mount Union$250,00010%
YMCA of Central Stark County$180,01131%
St John's Villa Inc$174,27551%
Refuge of Hope Ministries$171,00025%
Stark County Historical Society$150,10037%
Mercy Development Foundation$117,000211%
Aultman Health Foundation$112,8503n/a
Goshen College Inc$89,50050%
Canton Symphony Orchestra Association$80,00043%
Young Mens Christian Association of Massillon YMCA Of Western Stark County$70,00051%
J R Coleman Senior Outreach$50,57511%
Heartbeats to the City$50,00019%
Pathway Caring for Children$48,00041%
Massillon Museum$40,00021%
Arts in Stark$25,00050%
Whole Latte Love Cafe Inc$20,00019%
Canines Helping Independent People$19,0002n/a
The Canton Student Loan Foundation$15,00013%
En-Rich-Ment$13,50052%
A Chorus for a Cause$10,000110%
Magnolia Area Historical Society$5,000115%
Stop Heroin From Killing Committee$5,0001n/a
Ohio Mennonite Camp Association Inc$3,25040%
Wycliffe Bible Translators Inc$1,7503n/a

Plus 15 recipients with no EIN on record ($821k), not named here.

Where it is load-bearing

Fred F Silk Charitable Foundation supplied at least a quarter of the budget for 1 of its grantees at some point. The chart plots its 24 largest grantees; load-bearing ones sit top left.

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetStark State College Foundation: $578,487 over 4y, 42% of budgetMalone University: $350,000 over 1y, 0.8% of budgetWalsh University Inc: $335,000 over 3y, 0.3% of budgetHabitat for Humanity East Central Ohio: $304,225 over 4y, 2.1% of budgetUniversity of Mount Union: $250,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetYMCA of Central Stark County: $180,011 over 3y, 0.7% of budgetSt John's Villa Inc: $174,275 over 5y, 1.2% of budgetRefuge of Hope Ministries: $171,000 over 2y, 4.6% of budgetStark County Historical Society: $150,100 over 3y, 6.8% of budgetMercy Development Foundation: $117,000 over 2y, 11% of budgetGoshen College Inc: $89,500 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetCanton Symphony Orchestra Association: $80,000 over 4y, 3.5% of budgetYoung Mens Christian Association of Massillon YMCA Of Western Stark County: $70,000 over 5y, 0.9% of budgetJ R Coleman Senior Outreach: $50,575 over 1y, 1.2% of budgetHeartbeats to the City: $50,000 over 1y, 9.0% of budgetPathway Caring for Children: $48,000 over 4y, 0.6% of budgetMassillon Museum: $40,000 over 2y, 1.3% of budgetArts in Stark: $25,000 over 5y, 0.3% of budgetWhole Latte Love Cafe Inc: $20,000 over 1y, 9.1% of budgetThe Canton Student Loan Foundation: $15,000 over 1y, 2.9% of budgetEn-Rich-Ment: $13,500 over 5y, 1.7% of budgetA Chorus for a Cause: $10,000 over 1y, 10% of budgetMagnolia Area Historical Society: $5,000 over 1y, 15% of budgetOhio Mennonite Camp Association Inc: $3,250 over 4y, 0.3% of budget

Tap a dot to name the grantee.

How this is measured
Share of budget is the funder’s grant in a year over the grantee’s total revenue that year, at its highest across the years we hold; revenue is from all sources. Only grantees confirmed against their own filings, whose grants do not exceed their revenue, are plotted: the largest 24.

Nonprofits that may fit its grantmaking

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Stark Community FoundationOH46.5× affinity20 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Stark Community Foundation · Hoover Foundation Income Account · Timken Foundation of Canton · Timken Co Charitable & Educational Fund · Ada C Rank & Helen J Rank Charitable · Henry & Louise Timken Foundation · Albert W & Edith V Flowers Charitable · The Belden Brick Charitable Trust · Sisters of Charity Foundation of Canton · The Paul and Carol David Foundation · Austin-Bailey Health & Wellness Foundation · Health Foundation of Greater Massillon

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Compare Fred F Silk Charitable Foundation with peer funders

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Fred F Silk Charitable Foundation?

Find your warmest path to Fred F Silk Charitable Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

About Fred F Silk Charitable Foundation

How much does Fred F Silk Charitable Foundation give?
Fred F Silk Charitable Foundation reported 16 grants totaling $533,660 in its FY2020 IRS filing. It funded between 14 and 21 organizations a year over FY2017 to FY2020.
What does Fred F Silk Charitable Foundation fund?
By grant dollars over FY2017 to FY2021, its largest causes are Philanthropy (80%), Education (10%), Human Services (3%).
Who are Fred F Silk Charitable Foundation's largest grantees?
By total granted over FY2017 to FY2021: Stark State College Foundation ($578k), Malone University ($350k), Walsh University Inc ($335k).
Does Fred F Silk Charitable Foundation fund new organizations?
In FY2020, 29% of the organizations it funded were first-time grantees.
Does Fred F Silk Charitable Foundation accept unsolicited applications?
Its most recent filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and does not take unsolicited requests. Check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.
Which funders back the same organizations as Fred F Silk Charitable Foundation?
Its strongest co-funders, measured against what their size predicts, include Stark Community Foundation, Hoover Foundation Income Account, Timken Foundation of Canton.
Where is Fred F Silk Charitable Foundation based?
Fred F Silk Charitable Foundation is based in OH.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 44 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2020, released 2020. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Fred F Silk’s filings →

More from the funding graph