· Private foundation
Diebold Employees Charitable Fd Ta
Its FY2024 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2020–2024.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| YMCA | $4,500 |
| STARK COUNTY HUNGER TASK FORCE | $3,000 |
| PEGASUS FARM | $2,500 |
| A COMMUNITY CHRISTMAS | $2,000 |
| AKRONCANTON REGIONAL FOODBANK | $2,000 |
| REFUGE OF HOPE MINISTRIES | $2,000 |
| CANTON PALACE THEATRE | $2,000 |
| HAVEN OF REST MINISTRIES | $2,000 |
| BOYS GIRLS CLUB OF MASSILLON | $1,500 |
| THE VILLAGE NETWORK | $1,500 |
| J BABE STEARN COMMUNITY CENTER | $1,500 |
| AKRON COMMUNITY FOUNDATION | $1,500 |
| LEGACY PROJECT OF STARK | $1,500 |
| THANKSGIVING BASKETS DOWNTOWN INC | $1,500 |
| ASCEND SERVICES | $1,500 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY20–23, $9k) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
31 repeat relationships — 18 still active in FY2024, 13 since wound down; 8 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 77% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $10k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- PFPEGASUS FARM4× · 2020–2024 · $12k · revenue +42%
- ARAKRON-CANTON REGIONAL FOODBANK4× · 2020–2024 · $10k · revenue +1%
- SCStark County Hunger Task Force Inc4× · 2020–2024 · $9k · revenue +89%
Funded once
- ACAkron Canton Regional Foodbankone grant, 2021 · $4k
- SCStark County Humane Societyone grant, 2021 · $4k
- PFPegasus Farmone grant, 2021 · $3k
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Advancement of the economic, industrial, professional, cultural and civic welfare of stark county and its surrounding region and the promotion and preservation of the competitive free enterprise system.
Provide elderly services to allow persons to stay in their own homes
To promote the revitalization of neighborhoods in stark county by leading partnership-based, neighborhood-specific, revitalization efforts and developing programs that support community reinvestment.
Ending homelessness in stark county ohio.
Helping individuals live with dignity through the final stage of life.
Our mission is to provide access to a coordinated system of health care and community resources for those that are underserved and impacted by community conditions.
To improve family quality of life
Hospice of northwest ohio provides specialized medical emotional and spiritual care to people of all ages - and their families - living with any end-stage illness in northwest ohio and southeast michigan
Agricultural matters education
Assist the homeless to rise out of poverty
Provide counseling, psychiatry, and case management services to the citizens of stark and surrounding counties in ohio clients served 4,800
To promote economic self-sufficiency among low-income families and individuals of stark county.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Stark County Humane Society and the most unlike its peers is Pace Dba Alliance Area Domestic Violence Shelter. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.
Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.
Your grantees are a median of 44 years old; the field is 20. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 19% startups (under 5 years old) — 0% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 2% lost their exemption, against 12% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
39 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 39 of the 87 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds PEGASUS FARM ↗
- Who funds AKRON-CANTON REGIONAL FOODBANK ↗
- Who funds Stark County Hunger Task Force Inc ↗
- Who funds A COMMUNITY CHRISTMAS OF STARK COUNTY INC ↗
- Who funds THE LEGACY PROJECT OF STARK ↗
- Who funds REFUGE OF HOPE MINISTRIES ↗
- Who funds STARK COUNTY HUMANE SOCIETY ↗
- Who funds PACE DBA ALLIANCE AREA DOMESTIC VIOLENCE SHELTER ↗
- Who funds The Canton Student Loan Foundation ↗
- Who funds Whispering Grace Horses ↗
- Who funds BOYS' & GIRLS' CLUB OF MASSILLON INC ↗
- Who funds J Babe Stearn Community Center ↗
- Who funds ARTS IN STARK ↗
- Who funds Canton Museum of Art ↗
- Who funds NORTH CANTON PLAYHOUSE ↗
- Who funds FAMILY & COMMUNITY SERVICES INC ↗
- Who funds CHILD & ADOLESCENT BEHAVIORAL HEALTH ↗
- Who funds Hannah's House 119 ↗
- Who funds NATIONAL FIRE SAFETY COUNCIL INC ↗
- Who funds STEWART'S CARING PLACE INC AND SUBSIDIARY ↗
- Who funds CANTON PALACE THEATRE ASSOCIATION ↗
- Who funds SIFFRIN INC ↗
- Who funds PATHWAY CARING FOR CHILDREN ↗
- Who funds NAMI STARK COUNTY INC ↗
- Who funds COMMUNITY HOSPICE INC ↗
- Who funds MAKE A WAY INC ↗
- Who funds American National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches ↗
- Who funds THE VILLAGE NETWORK ↗
- Who funds CANTON BALLET ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Stark Community Foundation · Hoover Foundation Income Account · Sisters of Charity Foundation of Canton · Timken Foundation of Canton · Timken Co Charitable & Educational Fund · United Way of Greater Stark County · Christ Foundation · Austin-Bailey Health & Wellness Foundation · The Belden Brick Charitable Trust · Albert W & Edith V Flowers Charitable · The Paul and Carol David Foundation · The Johnson-Kazar Charitable Foundation Inc
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Diebold Employees Charitable Fd Ta funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.