· Public charity
Sisters of Charity Foundation of Canton
The Sisters of Charity Foundation of Canton (CAF) supports and furthers the mission and ministry of the Sisters of Charity of St.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2018–2024.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2024
- Under $10k6 grants · $38k
- $10k–50k23 grants · $468k
- $50k–250k15 grants · $2.1M
- $250k+2 grants · $661k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| Coleman Health Services | $375,000 |
| Stark Housing Network | $286,041 |
| ICAN Housing | $244,000 |
| YMCA of Central Stark County | $215,999 |
| CommQuest Services | $203,835 |
| Canton For All People | $200,000 |
| Beacon Charitable Pharmacy | $200,000 |
| Early Childhood Resource Center | $165,000 |
| Health Policy Institute of Ohio | $150,000 |
| Stark County Mental Health and Addiction Recovery | $148,000 |
| YWCA Canton | $126,000 |
| JRC | $97,500 |
| Access Health Stark County | $90,000 |
| Stark Economic Development Board | $60,500 |
| Alliance for Children and Families | $50,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY18–24, $6.5M) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 12%. 99% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +36% since the first grant, against +18% for the ones you funded once.
65 repeat relationships — 33 still active in FY2024, 32 since wound down; 12 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 93% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $225k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- ECEARLY CHILDHOOD RESOURCE CENTER7× · 2018–2024 · $2.1M · revenue +129%
- IIICAN INC7× · 2018–2024 · $1.7M · revenue +11%
- AHACCESS HEALTH STARK COUNTY INC6× · 2018–2024 · $865k · revenue +226% · 73% of their budget
Funded once
- MUMALONE UNIVERSITYone grant, 2023 · $375k · revenue +1%
- QRQUEST RECOVERY AND PREVENTION SERVICESone grant, 2018 · $93k
- THTiqvah Hands of Hopeone grant, 2021 · $53k · revenue -20%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Assist the homeless to rise out of poverty
To help people discover a lifestyle of meaning joy and fulfillment through treatment and training. emerge ministries inc. is devoted to serving our clients. this service encompasses a biblically based mental health center with…
Provide elderly services to allow persons to stay in their own homes
Helping individuals live with dignity through the final stage of life.
Provide high quality integrated healthcare services to consumers and agencies primarily in tuscarawas and carroll counties.
Serve the Youngstown area community with social, health, financial, strategic life advice, physical education and well-being services in addition to providing housing advice, food for the needy, program activities, and cultural activities.…
Community Mental Health, Drug Abuse and Alcoholism Services.
Empowering and strengthening ohio's people (esop) helps adults in all stages of life achieve and maintain financial wellness and housing stability.
To provide quality, culturally sensitive and accessible primary health care services focusing on the medically underserved, underinsured, and uninsured residing in northern hamilton county and surrounding areas.
To empower citizens with disabilities to be in charge of their lives and participate as members of their communities by advocating for the elimination of societal barriers and striving to achieve community accessibility and acceptance.
To promote the revitalization of neighborhoods in stark county by leading partnership-based, neighborhood-specific, revitalization efforts and developing programs that support community reinvestment.
Strategies to End Homelessness leads a coordinated community effort to end homelessness in Greater Cincinnati.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Access Health Stark County Inc and the most unlike its peers is Quest Recovery and Prevention Services. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
Your grantees are a median of 39 years old; the field is 18. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 22% startups (under 5 years old) — 2% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 13% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
88 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 88 of the 98 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds EARLY CHILDHOOD RESOURCE CENTER ↗
- Who funds ICAN INC ↗
- Who funds COMMQUEST SERVICES INC ↗
- Who funds CHILD & ADOLESCENT BEHAVIORAL HEALTH ↗
- Who funds STARK HOUSING NETWORK INC ↗
- Who funds ACCESS HEALTH STARK COUNTY INC ↗
- Who funds AKRON-CANTON REGIONAL FOODBANK ↗
- Who funds YMCA of Central Stark County ↗
- Who funds GOODWILL INDUSTRIES OF GREATER CLEVELAND AND EAST CENTRAL OHIO INC ↗
- Who funds J R COLEMAN FAMILY SERVICES CORP ↗
- Who funds Beacon Charitable Pharmacy Inc ↗
- Who funds DOMESTIC VIOLENCE PROJECT INC ↗
- Who funds HEALTH POLICY INSTITUTE OF OHIO ↗
- Who funds YOUNG WOMEN'S CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION OF CANTON OHIO ↗
- Who funds BOYS' & GIRLS' CLUB OF MASSILLON INC ↗
- Who funds COLEMAN PROFESSIONAL SERVICES INC ↗
- Who funds MALONE UNIVERSITY ↗
- Who funds CANTON FOR ALL PEOPLE INC ↗
- Who funds CLEVELAND CLINIC MERCY HOSPITAL ↗
- Who funds HABITAT FOR HUMANITY EAST CENTRAL OHIO ↗
- Who funds COMMUNITY LEGAL AID SERVICES ↗
- Who funds PEGASUS FARM ↗
- Who funds Hammer & Nails Inc ↗
- Who funds ARTS IN STARK ↗
- Who funds United Way of Greater Stark County ↗
- Who funds STARK ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT BOARD INC ↗
- Who funds THE GOLDEN KEY CENTER FOR EXCEPTIONAL CHILDREN INC ↗
- Who funds Early Childhood Education Alliance ↗
- Who funds REFUGE OF HOPE MINISTRIES ↗
- Who funds STARK COUNTY DISTRICT LIBRARY ↗
- Who funds ALLIANCE FOR CHILDREN AND FAMILIES ↗
- Who funds STARK EDUCATION PARTNERSHIP INC ↗
- Who funds VANTAGE AGING ↗
- Who funds GREATER STARK COUNTY URBAN LEAGUE INC ↗
- Who funds PATHWAY CARING FOR CHILDREN ↗
- Who funds CATHOLIC CHARITIES SERVING PORTAGE AND STARK COUNTIES ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Stark Community Foundation · United Way of Greater Stark County · Hoover Foundation Income Account · Austin-Bailey Health & Wellness Foundation · Timken Foundation of Canton · Health Foundation of Greater Massillon · Timken Co Charitable & Educational Fund · North Canton Medical Foundation · The Paul and Carol David Foundation · Christ Foundation · William & Minnette Goldsmith Foundation · Albert W & Edith V Flowers Charitable
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Sisters of Charity Foundation of Canton funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
- Third Sector New England Inc — 3% of income from government
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.