Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

Philip E Fess Family Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$52k
Granted FY2024still arriving
9
Grants FY2024still arriving
4
States reached
$17k
Largest
01What you fund
0197% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20172024.

Food & Nutrition$160kHealth$154kHuman Services$39kArts & Culture$25kEducation$18kRecreation & Sports$11kAnimals$11kPublic Safety & Disaster$7kOther$0
02FY2024 · 9 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k8 grants · $35k
  • $10k–50k1 grant · $17k
$6,000
Median grant
4
States reached
$978k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
FEEDING SAN DIEGO$17,000
THE ROSS K MCNEILL FDN$8,000
AMERICAN BRAIN TUMOR ASSOCIATION$7,000
ST JUDE'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL$6,000
FENIX FAMILY HEALTH CENTER$6,000
LUCKY DUCK FOUNDATION$3,000
THE BISHOP'S SCHOOL$2,000
CABRILLO NATIONAL MONUMENT FOUNDATI$1,500
LEUKEMIA LYMPHOMA SOCIETY$1,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY18–21, $10k) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%BLACK MOUNTAIN HOME: $2k → 12%BLACK MOUNTAIN HOME: $2k → 12%BLACK MOUNTAIN HOME: $1k → 12%BLACK MOUNTAIN HOME: $1k → 12%CHALLENGED ATHLETES FOUNDATION: $4k → 11%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

Which US states your grants reach

WA
MT
IL
NY
IA
CA
VA
MD
TN
NC
DC
TX
FL

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

93%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$427k · 24 repeat orgs$31k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +42% since the first grant, against +12% for the ones you funded once.

24 repeat relationships — 8 still active in FY2024, 16 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

24
21

Total granted

$427k
$28k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+42%
+12%

Still filing today

71%
52%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 94% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $3k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
HealthFood & NutritionInternationalEducationPhilanthropyHuman ServicesOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • FS
    FEEDING SAN DIEGO
    5× · 2020–2024 · $63k · revenue +29%
  • FF
    Fenix Family Health Center
    8× · 2017–2024 · $56k · revenue +157%
  • JC
    JACOBS & CUSHMAN SAN DIEGO FOOD BANK
    5× · 2017–2021 · $50k · revenue +169%

Funded once

  • SD
    SAN DIEGUITO SURF SOCCER CLUB
    one grant, 2022 · $5k · revenue -99%
  • Best Buddies International Inc
    one grant, 2023 · $4k · revenue +18%
  • CA
    CHALLENGED ATHLETES INC
    one grant, 2019 · $4k · revenue +12%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Curebound

The organization's mission is to provide funding for the best cancer research ideas in san diego. all proceeds from curebound stay in san diego to fund innovative and collaborative cancer research.

Health
2
Ucsf Foundation Investment Company

The organization provides professional investment management services for endowed gifts and financial assets entrusted to the ucsf foundation.

Education
3
Balboa Park Conservancy

Balboa Park Conservancy (the Conservancy) was organized on November 3, 1923. The Conservancy is the City of San Diegos (the City) partner and advocated for the greater good of Balboa Park (the Park). The Conservancy collaborated with and…

4
St Francis Foundation of Santa Barbara

The mission of st. francis foundation of santa barbara is to promote and support health care.

Health
5
California Institute for BioMedical Research

Our mission is to build a unique institute that bridges basic research and drug discovery, and that attracts the best and brightest scientists, physicians and students to work together synergistically to find cures for neglected human…

6
San Diego Habitat Conservancy

Acquire, manage and protect land in perpetuity that supports sensitive habitats and species, and to educate and inspire people and communities as stewards and advocates of their natural environment.

Arts & Culture
7
City of Hope

City of Hope's mission is to make hope a reality for all touched by cancer and diabetes. PLEASE SEE SCHEDULE O FOR A CONTINUATION OF OUR MISSION

Health
8
Gastro Intestinal Research Foundation Inc

The GI Research Foundation works to treat, prevent, and cure digestive diseases. In collaboration with the physicians and scientists at the University of Chicago Digestive Diseases Center, we fund innovative clinical and laboratory…

Health
9
Community Foundation Santa Cruz County

To promote philanthropy to make santa cruz county a better place to live, now and in the future.we bring together people, ideas, and resources to inspire philanthropy and accomplish great things.

Philanthropy
10
Uc Santa Barbara Foundation

The uc santa barbara foundation actively works to further the goals of the university of california, santa barbara. the foundation seeks to maintain and nurture the university's quality and distinction. on behalf of the campus, the…

Education
11
California Dental Association Foundation

The foundation's mission is to improve the oral health of all californians by supporting the dental profession and its efforts to meet community needs.

Science & Tech
12
Pasadena Bio Collaborative Incubator

Pasadena bio collaborative incubator is a nonprofit organization focused on economic development and job creation in southern california. we encourage the growth of an innovative biotechnology industry by providing educational/training…

Science & Tech

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is The San Diego Foundation and the most unlike its peers is Evans School Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.

← shrinkinggrowing →↓ leaning in → pulling backsteadyWildlife Rehabilitation Cen…Land Conservation Organizat…Youth Sports Booster Organi…Community Health CentersChild and Family ServicesCancer Support OrganizationsFood Pantries & AssistancePublic University Foundatio…Animal Rescue and Adoption
the sector your giving your giving is ahead of the sector the sector’s ahead of you· dot size = how much the theme matters to each side
Ordered by the change in your giving — leaning in on top, pulling back at the bottom. The bar between the two dots is how out of step you are with the sector. Hover any row for detail.

Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.

Your grantees are a median of 34 years old; the field is 16. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

THE FIELDby orgYOUR GRANTEESby number22%0%<5yr14%0%5–10yr19%23%10–20yr16%29%20–35yr13%16%35–55yr16%32%55yr+
THE FIELDby orgYOUR MONEYby value22%0%<5yr14%0%5–10yr19%46%10–20yr16%18%20–35yr13%12%35–55yr16%24%55yr+

The field is 22% startups (under 5 years old) — 0% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close 0.0% lost their exemption, against 13% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund
0.0%0/32
the rest of the field
13%
240,396/1,819,533

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

04the grantee network

30 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 30 of the 47 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
5
Early backer (in before they grew)
30/30
Grantees still filing
19/30
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

FEEDING SAN DIEGO — $62,800 · Food & NutritionFEEDING SAN DIEGOJACOBS & CUSHMAN SAN DIEGO FOOD BANK — $50,000 · Food & NutritionJACOBS & CUSHMAN SAN DIEGO FOOD BANKTOP BOX FOODS — $47,000 · Food & NutritionTOP BOX FOODSAmerican Brain Tumor Association — $39,000 · OtherAmerican Brain Tumor AssociationYMCA OF MISSION VALLEY — $30,000 · OtherYMCA OF MISSION VALLEYTHE ROSS K MCNEILL FDN — $15,000 · OtherTHE ROSS K MCNEILL FDNBISHOP SCHOOL — $14,000 · OtherBISHOP SCHOOLTHE ROSS KJ MCNEILL FDN — $13,000 · OtherTHE ROSS KJ MCNEILL FDNKPBS — $8,000 · OtherKPBSSAN DIEGUITO SURF SOCCER CLUB — $5,200 · Other+19 more — $24,130 · Other+19 moreFenix Family Health Center — $56,000 · HealthFenix Family Health CenterST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC — $49,000 · HealthST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH …+6 more — $11,250 · Health+6 moreWORLD CENTRAL KITCHEN INC — $7,000 · InternationalBest Buddies International Inc — $4,000 · InternationalGLOBAL COMMUNITIES — $2,000 · InternationalBLACK MOUNTAIN HOME FOR CHILDREN YOUTH AND FAMILIES INC — $6,000 · Human ServicesCHALLENGED ATHLETES INC — $3,500 · Human ServicesThe Anti-Cruelty Society — $8,000 · AnimalsMontana Wild Wings Recovery Center — $1,000 · AnimalsTHE SAN DIEGO FOUNDATION — $2,000 · PhilanthropyMt Helix Park Foundation — $2,000 · PhilanthropyTHE OCTOBER SAVES GOALIE CHALLENGE — $500 · Philanthropy
Food & Nutrition$159,800Other$148,330Health$116,250International$13,000Human Services$9,500Animals$9,000Philanthropy$4,500

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetFEEDING SAN DIEGO — $62,800 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetFenix Family Health Center — $56,000 over 8y, 1.1% of budgetJACOBS & CUSHMAN SAN DIEGO FOOD BANK — $50,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC — $49,000 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetTOP BOX FOODS — $47,000 over 7y, 1.5% of budgetAmerican Brain Tumor Association — $39,000 over 7y, 0.1% of budgetThe Anti-Cruelty Society — $8,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetWORLD CENTRAL KITCHEN INC — $7,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetBLACK MOUNTAIN HOME FOR CHILDREN YOUTH AND FAMILIES INC — $6,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetSAN DIEGUITO SURF SOCCER CLUB — $5,200 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetBest Buddies International Inc — $4,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE UC DAVIS FOUNDATION — $4,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetCHALLENGED ATHLETES INC — $3,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetLUCKY DUCK FOUNDATION — $3,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetGirls on the Run of San Diego — $3,000 over 2y, 0.6% of budgetCabrillo National Monument Foundation — $2,500 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetThe Susan G Komen Breast Cancer Foundation Inc — $2,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetSCRIPPS HEALTH — $2,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetGLOBAL COMMUNITIES — $2,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE SAN DIEGO FOUNDATION — $2,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMt Helix Park Foundation — $2,000 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetEmilio Nares Foundation — $1,500 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetBLOOD CANCER UNITED INC — $1,500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetCROHN'S & COLITIS FOUNDATION INC — $1,250 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetALBION 12 FOUNDATION — $1,030 over 2y, 1.4% of budgetMontana Wild Wings Recovery Center — $1,000 over 1y, 1.4% of budgetTorrey Pines Association DBA Torrey Pines Conservancy — $1,000 over 1y, 0.7% of budgetTHE OCTOBER SAVES GOALIE CHALLENGE — $500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetSARAH'S CIRCLE — $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetEVANS SCHOOL FOUNDATION — $300 over 1y, 0.1% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The San Diego FoundationCA18.7× affinity7 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The San Diego Foundation · Sempra Foundation · Rancho Santa Fe Foundation · Jewish Community Foundation of San Diego · Charities Aid Foundation America · National Philanthropic Trust · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · American Endowment Foundation · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Philip E Fess Family Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%your share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from governmentmedian 44%
  • Global Communities44% of income from government
  • Best Buddies International Inc4% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
0get no government money at all
7report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY2025

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 47 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

More from the funding graph