Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

Pfk Family Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$169k
Granted FY2024still arriving
4
Grants FY2024still arriving
2
States reached
$100k
Largest
01What you fund
0197% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20202024.

Animals$660kFood & Nutrition$200kHuman Services$130kHealth$70kCivil Rights$50kReligion$50kPublic Safety & Disaster$40kInternational$40kOther$0
02FY2024 · 4 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k1 grant · $9k
  • $10k–50k1 grant · $10k
  • $50k–250k2 grants · $150k
$50,000
Median grant
2
States reached
$2.3M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
SHEDD AQUARIUM$100,000
PAWS CHICAGO$50,000
UNIV OF STO THOMAS MEDICAL ASSOC CHICAGO$10,000
FAR EASTERN UNIVERSITY$8,646
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY20–23, $80k) land where the poverty rate runs at 8%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 13% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Your grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%CRISIS AID INTERNATIONAL: $10k → 11%MORNINGSTAR MISSION: $30k → 7%MORNINGSTAR MISSION: $20k → 7%MORNINGSTAR MISSION: $10k → 7%MORNINGSTAR MISSION: $10k → 7%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

Which US states your grants reach

WA
MN
IL
NY
MA
NV
CA
MO
KY
MD
NM
KS
TN
DC

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

84%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$1.1M · 16 repeat orgs$214k to everyone else

16 repeat relationships — 2 still active in FY2024, 14 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

16
16

Total granted

$1.1M
$195k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+17%
+40%

Still filing today

75%
56%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 89% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $19k went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’21’22’23’24
AnimalsInternationalHuman ServicesFood & NutritionEducationCivil RightsOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • SA
    SHEDD AQUARIUM SOCIETY
    4× · 2020–2024 · $335k · revenue +111%
  • PC
    PAWS CHICAGO
    3× · 2022–2024 · $150k · revenue +82%
  • PI
    PAWS INC
    2× · 2020–2021 · $100k · revenue +259%

Funded once

  • PM
    PHILIPPINE MEDICAL ASSOC CHICAGO
    one grant, 2023 · $30k
  • U
    UPAAGC
    one grant, 2020 · $20k
  • IR
    International Rescue Committee INCgraduated
    one grant, 2020 · $20k · revenue +63%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Progressive Animal Welfare Society aka Paws

A champion for animals since 1967, PAWS is a nationally recognized leader - rehabilitating injured and orphaned wildlife, sheltering and adopting homeless cats and dogs, and educating people to make a better world for animals and people.

Animals
2
Korean K9 Rescue Inc

Korean k9 rescue inc is a non-profit no-kill 501c3 dog rescue organization that saves dogs from the mea trade puppy mills and high-kill shelters in south korea. due to the stigma associated with mixed breed and dog meat farm dogs most dogs…

Animals
3
Global Animal Partnership
Animals
4
Michigan Humane Society

To improve and save lives through compassionate care, community engagement and advocacy for animals.

Animals
5
Hope for China Dogs Rescue

At Hope for China Dogs, we are committed to combating the cruel and inhumane practice of the dog meat trade in China. We believe that every dog deserves to live a life free from pain and suffering, and we are dedicated to rescuing and…

Animals
6
Animal Outlook Inc

Animal outlook is a national animal protection organization working to end the abuse of farmed animals using a variety of strategies, including investigations, legal advocacy, corporate and food system reform, and vegan outreach.

Animals
7
Humane World for Animals International

HUMANE WORLD FOR ANIMALS INTERNATIONAL, FKA HUMANE SOCIETY INTERNATIONAL (HSI), works around the globe to promote the human-animal bond, rescue and protect dogs and cats, improve farm animal welfare, protect wildlife, promote animal-free…

Animals
8
Women's Humane Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals Inc

As america's first animal shelter, founded in 1869, women's humane society dba women's animal center (wac), assists people in the community, saves the lives of animals, and improves the health of pets through its shelter and adoptions…

Animals
9
Friends for Animals of Metro Detroit

The friends are dedicated to the rescue, protection, and adoption of companion animals in need while inspiring the human-animal bond. we meet our mission by:-saving 100% of healthy and treatable animals.-providing high-quality animal care…

Animals
10
World Vets

To improve the health & well-being of animals through veterinary aid, response, training, research & local capacity building worldwide. We provide services to companion animals, horses, street dogs, livestock and marine animals including…

Animals
11
A Life to Live Animal Shelter and Adoption Center

We have a no-kill mission to save the lives of homeless cats and dogs abandoned and/or placed in kill shelters, while also providing life-saving programs and services to keep pets and their people together. through outreach, education and…

12
Illinois Animal Welfare Networkers Association
Animals

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is National Domestic Workers Alliance Inc and the most unlike its peers is Big Guy Littles World Sanctuary Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.

← shrinkinggrowing →↓ leaning in → pulling backsteadyAnimal Rescue and AdoptionSenior Support ServicesAsian American Advocacy & H…Christian Missionary Organi…Community Arts OrganizationsFood Pantries & AssistanceVeteran Support Services
the sector your giving your giving is ahead of the sector the sector’s ahead of you· dot size = how much the theme matters to each side
Ordered by the change in your giving — leaning in on top, pulling back at the bottom. The bar between the two dots is how out of step you are with the sector. Hover any row for detail.

Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.

Your grantees are a median of 33 years old; the field is 20. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

THE FIELDby orgYOUR GRANTEESby number18%0%<5yr13%9%5–10yr18%22%10–20yr15%26%20–35yr14%9%35–55yr22%35%55yr+
THE FIELDby orgYOUR MONEYby value18%0%<5yr13%7%5–10yr18%12%10–20yr15%32%20–35yr14%6%35–55yr22%43%55yr+

The field is 18% startups (under 5 years old) — 0% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close 4% lost their exemption, against 12% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund
4%
1/25
the rest of the field
12%
8,891/72,334

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

04the grantee network

23 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 23 of the 34 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
4
Early backer (in before they grew)
21/23
Grantees still filing
16/23
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

SHEDD AQUARIUM SOCIETY — $335,000 · AnimalsSHEDD AQUARIUM SOCIETYPAWS CHICAGO — $150,000 · AnimalsPAWS CHICAGOPAWS INC — $100,000 · AnimalsPAWS INCBEST FRIENDS ANIMAL SOCIETY — $30,000 · Animals+2 more — $35,000 · Animals+2 moreTHE SALVATION ARMY — $50,000 · OtherTHE SALVATION ARMYCOVENANT HOUSE — $50,000 · OtherCOVENANT HOUSEST MICHAELS CATHOLIC CHURCH — $50,000 · OtherST MICHAELS CATHOLIC CHURCHDisabled American Veterans — $30,000 · OtherDisabled American VeteransPHILIPPINE MEDICAL ASSOC CHICAGO — $30,000 · OtherPHILIPPINE MEDICAL ASSOC CHICA…SMILE TRAIN INC — $20,000 · OtherSMILE TRAIN INCUPAAGC — $20,000 · OtherUPAAGCASIAN AMERICANS ADVANCING JUSTICE - CHICAGO — $20,000 · OtherASIAN AMERICANS ADVANCING JUST…+11 more — $88,646 · Other+11 moreGREATER CHICAGO FOOD DEPOSITORY — $70,000 · Food & NutritionGREATER CHI…MEALS ON WHEELS — $60,000 · Food & NutritionMEALS ON WH…MORNING STAR MISSION MINISTRIES INC — $70,000 · Human ServicesINTERNATIONAL CRISIS AID INC — $10,000 · Human ServicesWORLD CENTRAL KITCHEN INC — $40,000 · InternationalInternational Rescue Committee INC — $20,000 · InternationalHEART TO HEART INTERNATIONAL INC — $10,000 · InternationalNational Domestic Workers Alliance Inc — $20,000 · Civil RightsBOB BAKER MARIONETTE THEATER — $20,000 · Arts & Culture
Animals$650,000Other$358,646Food & Nutrition$130,000Human Services$80,000International$70,000Civil Rights$20,000Arts & Culture$20,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetSHEDD AQUARIUM SOCIETY — $335,000 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetPAWS CHICAGO — $150,000 over 3y, 0.2% of budgetPAWS INC — $100,000 over 2y, 22% of budgetMORNING STAR MISSION MINISTRIES INC — $70,000 over 4y, 0.4% of budgetGREATER CHICAGO FOOD DEPOSITORY — $70,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetMEALS ON WHEELS — $60,000 over 4y, 23% of budgetWORLD CENTRAL KITCHEN INC — $40,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetDisabled American Veterans — $30,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetBEST FRIENDS ANIMAL SOCIETY — $30,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetSMILE TRAIN INC — $20,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetNational Domestic Workers Alliance Inc — $20,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetInternational Rescue Committee INC — $20,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetNORTH SHORE ANIMAL LEAGUE AMERICA INC — $20,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetBOB BAKER MARIONETTE THEATER — $20,000 over 1y, 1.7% of budgetASIAN AMERICANS ADVANCING JUSTICE - CHICAGO — $20,000 over 2y, 0.4% of budgetPAWS AND STRIPES INC — $15,000 over 1y, 2.6% of budgetINTERNATIONAL CRISIS AID INC — $10,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetGIRLTREK INCORPORATED — $10,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetHEART TO HEART INTERNATIONAL INC — $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetPERKINS SCHOOL FOR THE BLIND — $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE LEADERSHIP CONFERENCE EDUCATION FUND INC — $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetNATIONAL VIETNAM VETERANS ART MUSEUM DBA NATIONAL VETERANS ART MUSEUM — $5,000 over 1y, 1.8% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

AbbVie FoundationIL11.8× affinity4 shared granteesties to 9 of 9Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: AbbVie Foundation · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · The Blackbaud Giving Fund · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · National Philanthropic Trust · Natl Christian Charitable Fdn Inc · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Pfk Family Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 00%2%6%14%25%your share of their income ↑0%15%30%45%60%share of the org’s income from governmentmedian 7%
  • Perkins School for the Blind7% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
0get no government money at all
6report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–60%
typical government reliance, FY2025

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 34 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

More from the funding graph