· Private foundation
Petri Family Foundation Inc
Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2024.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2024
- Under $10k25 grants · $29k
- $10k–50k3 grants · $42k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| SAINT PETER'S PREP | $21,000 |
| JUPITER HILLS COMMUNITY FOUNDATION | $10,500 |
| BOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF HARLEM COUNTY | $10,000 |
| FROM HOUSES TO HOMES | $4,500 |
| ST CHRISTOPHER ROMAN CATHOLIC CHURCH | $2,575 |
| VILLANOVA UNIVERSITY | $2,500 |
| HOPE RURAL SCHOOL | $2,500 |
| QUINNIPIAC UNIVERSITY | $2,500 |
| TUNNEL TO TOWERS FOUNDATION | $2,000 |
| CHURCH OF CHRIST THE KING | $1,875 |
| LOYOLA JESUIT CENTER | $1,500 |
| COOPERMAN BARNABAS MEDICAL CENTER | $1,500 |
| LABOR OF LOVE USA | $1,300 |
| CATHOLIC DIOCESE OF PALM BEACH | $1,250 |
| EVA'S VILLAGE | $1,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY17–24, $28k) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 61% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
45 repeat relationships — 14 still active in FY2024, 31 since wound down; 13 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 31% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $41k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- HRHOPE RURAL SCHOOL INC6× · 2017–2024 · $16k · revenue +65%
- TOTRUSTEES OF THE COLLEGE OF THE HOLY CROSS5× · 2017–2023 · $13k · revenue +44%
- FUFordham University4× · 2017–2021 · $13k · revenue +47%
Funded once
- FCFAMILY & CHILDREN'S AGENCY INCone grant, 2018 · $10k · revenue -4%
- JMJupiter Medical Center Incone grant, 2023 · $10k · revenue +7%
- GLGRAYBEARDS LTDgraduatedone grant, 2017 · $10k · revenue +62%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Research, education and general - princeton university is a private not-for-profit, non-sectarian institution of higher learning with approximately 5,700 undergraduate and 3,300 graduate students. 2,500 students graduated in the 2024-2025…
Provide clinical instruction to and supervision of medical school students, interns and residents and, incident thereto, rendering professional services.
Provide clinical instruction to and supervision of medical school students, interns and residents and, incident thereto, rendering professional services.
The University of New Haven is a student-centered comprehensive university with an emphasis on excellence in liberal arts and professional education. Our mission is to prepare our students to lead purposeful and fulfilling lives in a…
The mission of mit is to advance knowledge and educate students in science, technology, and other areas of scholarship that will best serve the nation and the world in the 21st century.
Northeast college of health sciences (the college) is committed to academic excellence, leadership, and professional best practices in the health sciences.
Provide clinical instruction to and supervision of medical school students, interns and residents and, incident thereto, rendering professional services.
The organization provides high quality medical care to the community that it serves and specifically provides cardiology & related professional medical services in conjunction with hmh hospitals corp.
To educate students to be ethical and socially responsible leaders in a global community.
Undergraduate, graduate, and professional education and research across a broad array of academic domains.
Provide clinical instruction to and supervision of medical school students, interns and residents and, incident thereto, rendering professional services.
To serve as the physician services component of a tax-exempt healthcare delivery network and to thereby promote, support & further the charitable purposes, programs & services of hmh hospitals corp.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Pancreatic Cancer Action Network Inc and the most unlike its peers is St Patricks Day Parade of Morris Countyinc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.
Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.
Your grantees are a median of 39 years old; the field is 16. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 22% startups (under 5 years old) — 0% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 13% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
46 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 46 of the 112 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds BOOMER ESIASON FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds HOPE RURAL SCHOOL INC ↗
- Who funds Jupiter Hills Community Foundation Inc ↗
- Who funds TRUSTEES OF THE COLLEGE OF THE HOLY CROSS ↗
- Who funds Fordham University ↗
- Who funds FAMILY & CHILDREN'S AGENCY INC ↗
- Who funds Jupiter Medical Center Inc ↗
- Who funds GRAYBEARDS LTD ↗
- Who funds Trustees of Dartmouth College ↗
- Who funds QUINNIPIAC UNIVERSITY ↗
- Who funds EVA'S VILLAGE INC ↗
- Who funds COVENANT HOUSE ↗
- Who funds FROM HOUSES TO HOMES - GUATEMALA INC ↗
- Who funds VILLANOVA UNIVERSITY ↗
- Who funds THE COMMUNITY FOUNDATION OF WESTERN NORTH CAROLINA INC ↗
- Who funds PARTNERSHIP FOR INNER CITY EDUCATION DBA PARTNERSHIP SCHOOLS ↗
- Who funds LINK EDUCATION PARTNERS INC ↗
- Who funds Dana-Farber Cancer Institute Inc ↗
- Who funds THE MCDAVID GROUP CHARITIES INC ↗
- Who funds ST PATRICKS DAY PARADE OF MORRIS COUNTYINC ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Community Foundation of New Jersey · The Goldman Sachs Charitable Gift Fund · Charities Aid Foundation America · Chubb Charitable Foundation · National Philanthropic Trust · Jpmorgan Chase Foundation · American Endowment Foundation · Verizon Foundation · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · The Blackbaud Giving Fund · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · The Pfizer Foundation Inc
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Petri Family Foundation Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal, a single department, or state — and drag the year to watch it move.
- Bonneville Environmental Foundation — 100% of income from government
- Christopher Reeve Foundation — 49% of income from government
- Family & Children's Agency Inc — 47% of income from government
- Eva's Village Inc — 19% of income from government
- Dana-Farber Cancer Institute Inc — 7% of income from government
- Hope Rural School Inc — 6% of income from government
- Florida Sheriffs Association Inc — 4% of income from government
- Lunch Break Inc — 4% of income from government
- Treasure Coast Food Bank Inc — 2% of income from government
- Jupiter Medical Center Inc — 2% of income from government
- Quinnipiac University — 0% of income from government
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.