· Private foundation
Peter & Maria Dubois Foundation Inc
Its FY2023 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.
What you funded, over time
By grantee IRS cause code (NTEE).
A cause breakdown isn’t shown here: 76% of PETER & MARIA DUBOIS FOUNDATION INC’s grantee dollars fall outside its nine largest cause areas, whether because the recipient carries no IRS cause code or because its cause sits in the long tail. A chart would be mostly one residual band and misrepresent the portfolio.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2023
- Under $10k4 grants · $18k
- $10k–50k4 grants · $68k
- $50k–250k1 grant · $50k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| FLICKINGER CENTER | $50,000 |
| LEGAL AID SOCIETY | $23,185 |
| JOHN MORTON MINISTRIES | $18,120 |
| Individual grant recipient | $16,000 |
| ST JOSEPH SOCIAL SERVICE CENTER | $11,000 |
| PLYMOUTH CHURCH OF SHAKER HEIGHTS | $6,500 |
| CLEVELAND HEIGHTS-UNIVERSITY HEIGHTS CITY SCHOOLS | $5,685 |
| MID-AMERICA BOSTON TERRIER RESCUE | $3,500 |
| FRIENDS OF CASCO BAY | $2,500 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY21–23, $16k) land where the poverty rate runs at 8%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 0% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Your grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +73% since the first grant, against +25% for the ones you funded once.
17 repeat relationships — 5 still active in FY2023, 12 since wound down; 4 grantees were first funded in FY2023 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2023, 41% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $81k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- TLTHE LEGAL AID SOCIETY3× · 2021–2023 · $32k · revenue +34%
- FOFRIENDS OF CASCO BAY7× · 2017–2023 · $19k · revenue +73%
The Brookwood Community Inc3× · 2020–2022 · $400 · revenue +96%
Funded once
- UOUniversity of Santa Monicaone grant, 2020 · $10k · revenue -22%
- MOMOVEMENT OF SPIRITUAL AWARENESSone grant, 2022 · $7k
- FCFLICKINGER CENTER FOR THE PERFORMING ARTSone grant, 2019 · $7k · revenue -18%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Life After Justice (LAJ) fights to free the wrongfully convicted and provides support in reclaiming their lives after justice. Created by exonerees, the majority exoneree-led Board of Directors' approach is rooted in the knowledge,…
A no kill animal sanctuary that saves and finds homes for animals facing imminent shelter euthanasia
Research and advocacy for veterans with post-traumatic stress and the prevention of veteran suicide.
We have a no-kill mission to save the lives of homeless cats and dogs abandoned and/or placed in kill shelters, while also providing life-saving programs and services to keep pets and their people together. through outreach, education and…
S.t.o.p. litigates and advocates for privacy, working to abolish local governments' systems of mass surveillance. our work highlights the discriminatory impact of surveillance on muslim americans, immigrants, the lgbtq+ community,…
Stop soldier suicide's mission is to reduce service member & veteran suicide using enhanced data insights, focused client acquisition, and suicide-specific intervention services.
Survivor Resources is a non-profit organization dedicated to providing immediate and long-term emotional support and practical help to the families and friends of those who have died by homicide, suicide, accident, or overdose.
Save a warrior saw is committed to ending the staggering suicide rate plaguing our veterans, active military and first responders. we conceive, originate and invent integrated intensive retreat iir experiences to transform the way our…
We're committed to reducing montana suicide rates and shifting the stigma around mental health, one conversation - and one life - at a time. we envision a future where all montanans can safely and comfortably ask for and access mental…
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is The Sentencing Project and the most unlike its peers is War Horses for Veterans Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
17 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 17 of the 38 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds THE LEGAL AID SOCIETY ↗
- Who funds FRIENDS OF CASCO BAY ↗
- Who funds ST JOSEPH SOCIAL SERVICE CENTER ↗
- Who funds University of Santa Monica ↗
- Who funds FLICKINGER CENTER FOR THE PERFORMING ARTS ↗
- Who funds SAMARITAN'S PURSE ↗
- Who funds THE SENTENCING PROJECT ↗
- Who funds WAR HORSES FOR VETERANS INC ↗
- Who funds THE LOVELAND FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds COPE FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds AMERICAN ASSOCIATION OF SUICIDOLOGY ↗
- Who funds MEMORIES LIVE FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds MIDAMERICA BOSTON TERRIER RESCUE ↗
- Who funds Keepers of the Wild ↗
- Who funds HIGHLANDER RESEARCH & EDUCATION CENTER INC ↗
- Who funds The Brookwood Community Inc ↗
- Who funds BROOKWOOD FLORIDA INC ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Jpmorgan Chase Foundation · The Pfizer Foundation Inc · Network for Good · Paypal Charitable Giving Fund · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Peter & Maria Dubois Foundation Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
- Brookwood Florida Inc — 7% of income from government
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.