How much did PETER J KING FAMILY FOUNDATION grant in FY2024?

Human Services$4.4MEducation$3.9MFood & Nutrition$1.8MInternational$463kPhilanthropy$101kReligion$28kHealth$10kHousing & Shelter$5kYouth Development$4kOther$7.1M

02beneath the categories

Past the labels — and the year it shifted

Beneath the NTEE codes, this is what the grant descriptions actually say.

…and in their own words, year by year

2020

paul

2021

—

2022

shoulder

2023

shoulder

Words distinctive to each year’s grant purposes (TF-IDF) · event-driven terms in cyan.

03FY2024 · 24 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2024

Under $10k9 grants · $35k
$10k–50k5 grants · $80k
$50k–250k3 grants · $403k
$250k+7 grants · $5.7M

$20,000

Median grant

States reached

$97M

Total assets

Largest grants

HOPE ACADEMY$1,308,000
EVERY MEAL$1,200,000
YMCA OF THE NORTH$1,115,000
BIG BROTHERS BIG SISTERS TWINS CITIES$640,000
BELWIN CONSERVANCY$535,490
PROJECT SUCCESS$520,000
SHOULDER TO SHOULDER$350,000
GENERAL ASSISTANCE INC$200,000
GLOBAL VOLUNTEERS$103,000
CONSTELLATION FUND$100,000
CRETIN DURHAM HALL HIGH SCHOOL$20,000
SHARING AND CARING HANDS$20,000
RIVERWORKS COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT$17,000
CHRISTIAN CROSS MINISTRIES$12,500
ST PAUL AREA SYNOD$10,000

02The need

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY20–24, $4.4M) land where the poverty rate runs at 10% — the area typically sits at 7%. 89% of those dollars reach neighborhoods with above-average need. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA, United Way ALICE — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge

repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

75%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.

$13M · 26 repeat orgs$4.5M to everyone else

26 repeat relationships — 18 still active in FY2024, 8 since wound down; 6 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

Total granted

$13M

$1.3M

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+14%

+68%

Still filing today

46%

30%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 49% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $3.2M went to new ones.

RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

Human ServicesEducationInternationalFood & NutritionPhilanthropyHousing & ShelterOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

PS
PROJECT SUCCESS
4× · 2021–2024 · $2.6M · revenue +171%
F
FRASER
2× · 2020–2021 · $763k · revenue +51%
ST
SHOULDER TO SHOULDER
3× · 2022–2024 · $457k · revenue +333% · 74% of their budget

Funded once

NS
NORTHERN STAR COUNCIL BSA
one grant, 2020 · $800k
BB
BIG BROTHRE BIG SISTERS TWIN CITIES
one grant, 2022 · $320k
YO
YMCA OF GREATER ST PAUL
one grant, 2020 · $50k

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

Minnesota Business Partnership

To maintain a high quality of life for all minnesotans.

—

Avivo

Increase well-being through recovery & career advancement while working to end homelessness.

Human Services

Family Pathways

Work alongside people and the community to enhance lives and champion positive social change.

Human Services

Women Winning

We are changing the face of power by activating pro-choice campaign operatives, candidates, and elected officials who are committed to reproductive health, rights and justice, and working to protect the safety, dignity and bodily autonomy…

Public Benefit

Lifeworks Services Inc

Lifeworks partners with people with disabilities to drive change by increasing opportunity and access in the community.

Human Services

Minnesota Family Council

Strengthening minnesota families by advancing biblical principles in the public arena.

—

Keystone Community Services

To strengthen the capacity of individuals and families to improve their quality of life.

—

Community Pathways of Steele County

To assist individuals and families meet their basic needs by providing resources in a healthy and caring environment. through these actions we build hope and support self-sufficiency.

—

Minnesota Medical Association

Be the leading voice of medicine to make minnesota the healthiest state & the best place to practice

—

Karen Organization of Minnesota

The mission of the karen organization of minnesota is to build on the strengths of refugee and immigrant communities and remove barriers to achieving economic, social, and cultural wellbeing.

Human Services

Connectability of Mn Inc

Connectability of mn, inc. empowers people with physical and invisible barries to achieve their potential.

—

Hope Haven Inc

Nurturing independence through services for children, adults, and families with unique challenges.

—

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Youthlink and the most unlike its peers is Project Success. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

Your grantees are a median of 31 years old; the field is 17. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

The field is 20% startups (under 5 years old) — 0% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 12% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund

0.0%0/25

the rest of the field

12%

1,865/15,515

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

05the grantee network

24 grantees, every filing reconciled, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue.

Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)

Early backer (in before they grew)

22/24

Grantees still filing

16/24

Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

Other$7,140,061Human Services$4,365,111Education$3,908,000Food & Nutrition$1,832,000International$463,421Philanthropy$101,000Religion$27,500

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Otto Bremer TrustMN25.4× affinity10 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Otto Bremer Trust · The Richard M Schulze Family Foundation · Saint Paul & Minnesota Foundation · Mightycause Charitable Foundation · The Minneapolis Foundation · The Walser Foundation · Greater Twin Cities United Way · Catholic Community Foundation · United Way Worldwide · The US Charitable Gift Trust · Ja Wedum Foundation · The Hubbard Broadcasting Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organisation PETER J KING FAMILY FOUNDATION funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2025

’20’21’22’23’24’25

no gov moneyreceives it· size = income

0get no government money at all

0rely on government for over half their income

⤢ axis zoomed · 0–20%

typical government reliance, FY20–25

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

05Through Plinth

Through Plinth

Your grantmaking, live and operational

This dossier was generated cold from public filings. In Plinth it’s a working system — every applicant assessed and every grant monitored. Here’s a taste, run on one of your grantees: SHOULDER TO SHOULDER.

Agentic due diligence · confidence × risk

Financial management

low risk

~8 months of operating runway; revenue grew over 5 filed years.

Track record & reputation

low risk

5 years of Form 990 filings, still active; revenue up 4.3× since.

Legal standing

low risk

US 501(c)(3); EIN 611490881 on file with current IRS Form 990 filings.

Governance

Live in Plinth

Board composition & governance documents — verified live in Plinth from the applicant.

Compliance & sanctions

Live in Plinth

OFAC / UN sanctions screening — run live in Plinth at assessment.

Program capacity

Live in Plinth

Staffing, M&E and activity alignment — assessed live in Plinth from submitted proposals.

Live · Plinth’s real DD engine

Run the actual assessment on SHOULDER TO SHOULDER, cold from public data.

Generated live from public IRS filings + open web sources by Plinth’s agentic engine. Shown as an illustration of the product, not a formal assessment.

Post-award monitoring · continuous checks

On trackFinancial stability— Roughly 8 months of cash on hand.
On trackSustained operations— Filing through 2024; revenue grew over the period.
WatchReliance on your funding— Your grants peaked at 74% of their budget — load-bearing; a dependency Plinth would track.
Awaiting reportEvidence of delivery— Plinth collects the grantee's own monitoring reports post-award.

What you see here is static and public. In Plinth it’s operational — the full six-pillar framework on every applicant (with their own documents + live registry and sanctions checks), monitoring dashboards on every award, custom board reports, and eligibility routing for intake.

Agentic due diligenceMonitoring dashboardsCustom board reportsEligibility routing

Preview generated from this grantee’s public IRS filings and independent reporting. Pillars marked “live in Plinth” require the applicant’s submitted documents. Shown as illustration, not a formal assessment.

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPro

How do I get to Peter J King Family Foundation?

Find your warmest path to Peter J King Family Foundation through people who sit on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the introduction across shared trustees and officers.

Every link is a documented governance overlap in public IRS 990 filings — not a personal network — and each hop carries its own confidence tier. Low-confidence or distant paths are held back rather than guessed.

PETER J KING FAMILY FOUNDATION

What you funded, over time

Past the labels — and the year it shifted

Where the money goes

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Who you back again

Backed again, and grew

Funded once

24 grantees, every filing reconciled, 2017–2025.

Government reliance of your grantees

Your grantmaking, live and operational

How do I get to Peter J King Family Foundation?

More from the funding graph

PETER J KING FAMILY FOUNDATION

What you funded, over time

Past the labels — and the year it shifted

Where the money goes

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Who you back again

Backed again, and grew

Funded once

24 grantees, every filing reconciled, 2017–2025.

Government reliance of your grantees

Your grantmaking, live and operational

How do I get to Peter J King Family Foundation?

More from the funding graph