Skip to content
Plinth
Funding

Michigan · Nonprofit

ARMED FORCES THANKSGIVING

ARMED FORCES THANKSGIVING (Michigan) receives grants from 7 organizations whose IRS filings report $49,300 to it, the largest being PETER AND ANNE EARDLEY FOUNDATION ($9,500). 6 of them have funded it in more than one year.

$160k
Revenue FY2024
7
Funders on record
$49k
Grants received
$22k
Net assets
6/7 repeat funderspeak grant-dependency 11%

Against its field

ARMED FORCES THANKSGIVING's funding base is broadening — from 1 funders to 3 as grant income climbed.

Operating margin3% · below the median
Revenue growth (annualized)2% · below the median

this organization peer median middle 50% of peers· 17,904 arts & culture nonprofits $100k–$1M, FY2024

Three funders worth looking at

Grantmakers with no record of funding this organization, ranked by how strongly the co-funder graph and the mission embeddings agree. The evidence is in section 03.

See all 12 prospects and why each one surfaced →
01The organization over time

The organization over time

Each line starts at 100 in 2017, so what you read is the shape rather than the size: 150 means half as much again as 2017, 50 means half. The number beside each label in the key is where it ended. The shaded band is where the middle 50% of its peers' revenue would sit, given their growth.

100 = 20172017 Revenue 100 ($141k) Expenses 100 ($130k) Net assets 100 ($21k)2018 Revenue 106 ($148k) Expenses 104 ($136k) Net assets 158 ($33k)2019 Revenue 103 ($145k) Expenses 100 ($130k) Net assets 229 ($48k)2020 Revenue 87 ($122k) Expenses 80 ($105k) Net assets 312 ($66k)2021 Revenue 65 ($92k) Expenses 102 ($133k) Net assets 116 ($24k)2022 Revenue 107 ($151k) Expenses 115 ($150k) Net assets 120 ($25k)2023 Revenue 127 ($179k) Expenses 143 ($187k) Net assets 83 ($17k)2024 Revenue 114 ($160k) Expenses 119 ($155k) Net assets 107 ($22k)
'17'18'19'20'21'22'23'24
Revenue (114)Expenses (119)Net assets (107)Peer revenue range

How it's funded, over time

Each bar is one year's revenue split into where it came from, and every bar is the same height — these are shares, not amounts, so a year that raised twice as much looks the same size. Hover a bar for the split.

2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
ContributionsProgram revenueInvestmentOther

100% of ARMED FORCES THANKSGIVING’s revenue is contributions — more reliant on donations than three-quarters of its peers (64% for the typical peer).

This organization
Typical peer · 19,459 orgs

Surplus & reserves

Operating surplus or deficit each year, and months of liquidity in hand. 2 of the last 8 reported years ran a deficit.

$10k
17
$12k
18
$15k
19
$17k
20
$41k
21
$882
22
$8k
23
$5k
24
02Who funds it

Who funds it, year by year

2018 → 2023: the base broadened from 1 funder to 3 funders, grant income rose $5k → $7k.

1 of 7 of your funders are donor-advised or pass-through sponsors (tagged DAF)13% of grant dollars received. That money is really individual donors directing a sponsor; the institutions to cultivate are the non-DAF funders.

From the IRS filings of ARMED FORCES THANKSGIVING’s funders (the co-funder graph). Association, not causation. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.

How concentrated its funding is

ARMED FORCES THANKSGIVING has a broad base — no single funder exceeds 19% of grant income, and it takes 3 funders to reach half.

the vertical line marks half of all grant income — 3 funders to its left

19%
largest funder
56%
top three
~6
effective funders

Largest funder’s share by year: 2018 100% · 2020 100% · 2021 20% · 2022 28% · 2023 36%diversifying over time.

“Effective funders” = inverse Herfindahl index (1 / Σ shareᵢ²) — the number of equal-sized funders that would give the same concentration. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.

Where its funders are

100% of ARMED FORCES THANKSGIVING's grant income comes from Michigan funders.

MI

In-state vs out-of-state, by year

18
20
21
22
23
Michigan out of state home

Funder states come from each funder’s own filing. $6k arriving through sponsors registered in 1 state is excluded from the map and the split above: a sponsor holds money on a donor’s behalf, so its registered address would place those dollars somewhere no donor need ever have been. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.

03Its place in the field

Funders to approach

Grantmakers that don’t fund you yet, surfaced two ways: they back organizations that share your funders, or their grantees resemble your mission. The ones both signals agree on come first. Your 7 funders put you under-funded among the 400 organizations that share them.

From the co-funder graph (funders backing at least two comparable organizations, shrunk for grantee count, donor-advised and mega-funds excluded) and the universe embeddings. A research starting point; overlap is association, not a guarantee of fit.

Organizations like ARMED FORCES THANKSGIVING

Nonprofits whose mission and program text most resemble this one, by semantic similarity over the universe of US filings — the closest peers, and often the clearest route to shared or prospective funders.

In Michigan

Nationally

04Profile & governance

Read directly from this organization’s own Form 990, as neutral context.

Public support

100%

Share of support from the public (Schedule A) — the basis for its public-charity status.

Footprint & structure

Files a return copy in 1 state

MI

Screen this organization

A dated, signed PDF of the compliance screen for ARMED FORCES THANKSGIVING: IRS status (Business Master File, Publication 78, auto-revocation), the OFAC sanctions lists, the Internal Revenue Bulletin, and California registration, with the Rev. Proc. 2018-32 §8.01 reliance elements stated element by element. Generated from the current files at the moment you download it.

A paid feature, included from the $75 plan up. Sign in to download.

Screens are triage, not determinations; a source that cannot be read reports not screened, never clear. How the screen works · on the API as GET /api/screening/{ein}?format=pdf

Questions and answers

Who funds ARMED FORCES THANKSGIVING?
ARMED FORCES THANKSGIVING (Michigan) receives grants from 7 organizations whose IRS filings report $49,300 to it, the largest being PETER AND ANNE EARDLEY FOUNDATION ($9,500). 6 of them have funded it in more than one year.
How many funders does ARMED FORCES THANKSGIVING have?
IRS filings report 7 organizations giving $49,300 in grants to ARMED FORCES THANKSGIVING, 6 of which have funded it in more than one year.
Who is the largest funder of ARMED FORCES THANKSGIVING?
PETER AND ANNE EARDLEY FOUNDATION is the largest funder on record, with $9,500 in grants. The full list of funders is on this page.
How can an organization like ARMED FORCES THANKSGIVING find more funders?
Start with the funders already giving here, then look at the foundations that back similar organizations in Michigan. The funding by cause and by state pages list the largest funders for a given area and how to approach them.

These figures are read directly from IRS Form 990 / 990-PF e-file XML: this organization’s own return for FY2024 (financials across 2017–2024), and the filings of 7funders that report grants to it. “On record” means captured in the filings we have parsed — a funder that does not e-file, or whose grant detail is not itemized, will not appear. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind. Trends on this page end at FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving; later years are shown and marked, and move no figure. Data on this page was exported August 27, 2026. What this page cannot tell you · view filing